Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Classical and modern prejudice toward Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: The role of Experienced Contact, Beliefs in a Just World, and Social Dominance Orientation

Version 1 : Received: 1 February 2024 / Approved: 2 February 2024 / Online: 2 February 2024 (09:28:07 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Servidio, R.; Cammarata, I.G.; Scaffidi Abbate, C.; Boca, S. Classical and Modern Prejudice toward Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: The role of Experienced Contact, Beliefs in a Just World and Social Dominance Orientation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 355. Servidio, R.; Cammarata, I.G.; Scaffidi Abbate, C.; Boca, S. Classical and Modern Prejudice toward Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: The role of Experienced Contact, Beliefs in a Just World and Social Dominance Orientation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 355.

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of experienced contact on prejudiced attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID), examining beliefs in a just world (BJW) and social dominance orientation (SDO) as potential serial mediators. Data were collected from 224 university students (M = 23.02, SD = 2.48). Path analysis modeling assessed the structural relationships between the study variables. The findings revealed that experienced contact was negatively and significantly associated with BJW and SDO. Additionally, BJW and SDO fully mediated the relationship between experienced contact and overt prejudice. These findings underscore the influence of individual differences on attitudes toward individuals with ID, establishing a crucial foundation for future research and the development of interventions aimed at reducing prejudice and discrimination.

Keywords

intellectual disabilities; classical prejudice; modern prejudice; social dominance orientation; be-liefs in a just world

Subject

Social Sciences, Psychology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.