Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Structure, Properties and Recent Developments in Polysaccharides and Aliphatic Polyesters-Based Biopackaging – A Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

21 January 2024

Posted:

23 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract
Food packaging plays an imperative role in the food processing sector by safeguarding foods from their point of harvesting until the moment of consumption. In recent years, biopolymers have attracted the attention of the scientific community as an alternative to conventional packaging materials, reducing the negative environmental impact. Among the available biopolymer sources, a lot of focus has been directed toward polysaccharides due to their superior barrier qualities against gases, oil, and odour and their processing versatility. Moreover, there is a growing interest in aliphatic polyesters as a potential replacement for petrochemical-based synthetic plastics. Both polysaccharides and aliphatic polyesters have gained popularity in sustainable food packaging due to their unique characteristics, including low cost, readily available, biodegradability, gas and moisture barrier qualities, film-forming capabilities, excellent heat resistance, and ability to be processed into films, trays, and coatings. This review highlights the structural features, properties and recent advancements of several vital polysaccharides, namely starch, chitosan, cellulose, alginate, pectin, carrageenan, and aliphatic polyesters, including polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) for developing packaging materials and their applications in the food industry. Conventional packaging and future perspectives of biopolymer-based food packaging are also comprehensively covered in this review.
Keywords: 
Food Packaging
;  
Biopolymers
;  
Polysaccharides
;  
Aliphatic polyesters
;  
Biopackaging
Subject: 
Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Biomaterials

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are an estimated 600 million cases of foodborne diseases and 420,000 deaths yearly due to contaminated and unsafe food [1]. Therefore, it is crucial to intake safe and nutritious food to maintain a healthy and prolonged life. Food can be contaminated at various stages throughout the food production chain, from the farm to the consumption. Maintaining food safety is a top priority for public health and essential for attaining food security. Moreover, food safety and quality control systems are vital not only for protecting the health and well-being of consumers but also for supporting economic growth and boosting livelihoods by providing access to local and global markets.
Advanced food processing and packaging techniques are important to maintain a safe food supply worldwide. Food packaging is a key player in the food processing industry by safeguarding foods from their point of harvesting to the time of consumption. Food packaging protects its content from physical, biological, enzymatic, and biochemical damage. Beyond preservation, packaging also provides containment, utility, and communication [2]. Conventionally, a wide range of packaging materials is used in the food industry, including plastics, glass, metal, paper, paperboards, wood, or composites of these materials [3]. Even though these packaging materials fortify foods from various contaminations, other factors related to production costs and social and environmental aspects have raised many concerns over the past few decades.
Furthermore, most conventional food packaging materials are single-use and not environmentally benign. They are predominantly disposed of right after use, causing numerous environmental concerns. For instance, more than two-thirds of the total production of conventional packaging materials is used in the food sector alone. Due to the changes in food production, consumption habits, and the growing population, this number continues to rise [4]. Consequently, accumulating different types of packaging waste in large quantities has made it extremely difficult to handle solid waste sustainably. Surprisingly, around 30-35% of municipal solid waste comes from global packaging waste and food packaging accounts for approximately 60% of total solid municipal waste [5]. Hence, to address issues related to conventional food packaging, sustainable packaging materials with better thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties have shown significant importance in the food industry [6]. Interestingly, many investigations are underway to develop alternative food packaging materials due to increased consumer awareness about health, food quality, food safety, and environmental sustainability pertained to food packaging [7].
In this context, one of the emerging solutions for safer and sustainable food packaging is using biopolymer-based packages that alleviate health and environmental concerns over conventional packaging. Biopolymers-based packaging or biopackaging materials exhibit distinct freatures such as relative abundance, renewability, and biodegradabilty. Interestingly, the global market for biopacking materials is expected to grow rapidly in the coming years. It is forcasted that the production capacity of bio-based packaging is set to upsurge from 2.11 million tons in 2019 to around 2.43 million tons in 2024. Among many biopolymers, polysaccharides and aliphatic polyesters have been commonly considered for developing biopackaging materials in the food industry. Biopolymers can either be directly extracted from natural biomass or chemically synthesized from biomass-derived monomers or microorganisms [8]. For example, natural polysaccharides such as starch, cellulose, chitin; alginate, pectin, and carrageenan and synthetic aliphatic polyesters such as PLA and PHB have been widely investigated for food packaging applicaions [9].
Although numerous review articles have been published on the use of biopolymers in food packaging applications, there is scarce information available, explicitly emphasizing the structure, properties, and food packaging applications of polysaccharides and aliphatic polyesters. Therefore, this review focuses on structural arrangement, properties and recent advancements of polysaccharides and aliphatic polyesters in food packaging. The roles of polysaccharides, including starch, cellulose, chitosan, pectin, alginate, carrageenan, and synthetic aliphatic polyesters such as PLA and PHB in biopackaging have been discussed. The current state of conventional packaging and its advantages and disadvantages have also been evaluated. Recent trends and future outlooks of the biopackaging industry are also summarized in this review. Most importantly, we report the recent findings related to polysaccharides and aliphatic polyester-based food packaging to disseminate knowledge on further advancing biopackaging materials and enhancing their potential as sustainable alternatives to conventional packaging.

2. Conventional food packaging

Food packaging is a complex system that protects food until it arrives at its destination in perfect condition through transportation, distribution, and storage. Various packaging materials have been introduced to provide desirable functionality inside the packaging system for different food items. The selection of proper packaging material is essential for maintaining product quality until usage, as well as product requirements such as barrier properties and economic, environmental, and social factors [10]. Generally, conventional packaging can be divided into three categories based on their application: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary packaging directly contacts the food product and provides a protective barrier; secondary packaging stores several primary packagers, and tertiary packaging is employed for bulk storage and transportation [3]. Paper and paperboard, plastics, glass, and metal are the primary packaging materials utilized for most commercial food products, and a combination of more than two packaging materials is used to provide the best protection for food products, as shown in Figure 1. The following section discusses the conventional packaging materials and their pros and cons.

2.1. Paper and paperboards

Paper and paperboard represent over 30% of the worldwide packaging industry and are commonly applied in the food industry for product containment and preservation [11]. Paper and paperboard packages can be recognized as environmentally friendly due to their biodegradability, which promotes their usage in the food industry. Many paper and paperboard packages are available, from lightweight packages such as infusible tissues for tea bags to heavy tertiary packaging boxes. Paper and paperboard have been utilized for food packaging since the seventeenth century and usage increased in the late nineteenth century [12]. Of total paper production, more than 92% is made from wood pulp, and the remaining 8% is generated from agricultural by-products such as bagasse, straw, flax, and corn husks [13]. The quality of the paper depends on the type of raw materials used for paper development and their fiber and pulp properties [14]. Cellulose is responsible for fiber-forming ability with long and straight fibers, hemicellulose in wood pulp is responsible for bond development during the paper beating process, and lignin acts as a natural binding component for the paper development process [11]. After the pulping process, all unit operations, such as bleaching, beating, refining, and final treatments, are responsible for papers with different qualities and appearances [15]. Table 1 summarizes the various types of paper packaging used in the food industry.
Paper and paperboard packagings possess several advantages, including low production cost, biodegradability, lightweight, flexibility, printability, and recyclability [20]. However, they are also associated with environmental and health issues. For instance, chemicals added during pulping and coatings to enhance the properties of final packages may migrate into foods, resulting in adverse health effects. Organic and inorganic dyes, mineral oil phthalates, and polyfluorinated substances are some of those migrants, and high mineral oil migration has been reported with recycled papers [11]. Other than that, many researchers found that printing inks used for paper packages could cause cancers [21]. Moreover, the paper-making process requires a large volume of water and is energy-intensive, giving rise to vast amounts of wastewater and pollutants.

2.2. Plastics

Plastics are synthetic polymers with macromolecular structures obtained from repeating units of low molecular weight monomers [22]. During the last few years, plastics have grown into versatile and essential materials in the food industry. They are the second most used packaging material due to their flexibility, chemical resistance, low cost, lightweight, physical and optical properties. Plastics are commonly recognized as single-use packaging materials, affecting the environment and human health [23,24]. Globally, annual plastic production was estimated at 380 million tons in 2018, and single-use plastic accounts for nearly 40% of overall plastic usage [25]. Moreover, it was estimated that Asia accounted for the highest rate of plastic production in 2015, followed by Europe and North America [26]. In the packaging sector, 50% of the plastics for the food packaging industry are obtained from fossil fuels, and these fossil fuel-derived plastics take many years to degrade [4]. Thermoplastics are popular in food packaging applications. A thermoplastic is any polymer that becomes pliable or rubber-like above a specific temperature, known as glass transition temperature (Tg), and solidifies below Tg after cooling. The transition from the rubber-like state to the glass state is a key characteristic of polymer behavior, providing significant changes in the physical properties, including elasticity and hardness. Table 2 summarizes different types of plastics and their applications in food packaging.
From 1950 to 2018, 6.3 billion tons of plastics were produced; only 9-12% were recycled and incinerated, and the remaining 79% were accumulated in the environment [34]. Due to their recalcitrant nature, plastic packages remain in the environment for decades, causing soil, water, and air pollution. The leaching of many hazardous chemicals in plastic packaging materials into the soil, underground, and other water sources is an enormous consequence of landfilling after use [35]. Plastics also release significant amounts of greenhouse gases upon oxidation and incineration [36]. Different types of additives in plastics, such as bisphenol A, poly-fluorinated chemicals, phthalates, and brominated flame retardants, are toxic and potential carcinogens [25,37]. Also, synthetic packages are petroleum-based, contributing to the depletion of nonrenewable petroleum resources [4]. Furthermore, photodegradation causes these plastics to break into tiny fragments, eventually forming microplastics. Microplastics have long been known for their role in environmental implications and may enter the marine and human food chains, leading to health risks.

2.3. Glass

Glass is one of the oldest food packaging methods and dates back to 2500 BC. According to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), glass is an amorphous inorganic product of fusion that has been cooled to a rigid condition without crystallizing [38]. Glass is made of silica, which is naturally found in silica sand with different additives by fusion at high temperatures [39]. Recycled glasses can be used as a substitute for virgin materials, reducing energy usage during glass production [40]. Glass bottles and jars are employed primarily in the food industry and generally contain 68–73% of silica, 10–13% of limestone, 12–15% of soda ash and 1.5–2% of alumina [41].
Glass is applied in food packaging is because of its excellent barrier properties, heat resistance, transparency, moldability, rigidity, and strength [42]. However, production cost, high weight, light permeability, and fragility are main disadvantages of glass packages. hen comparing the interaction of food packaging material with packaged food, it was discovered that glass is the only packaging material that prevents toxic substances from being transferred from the package to the food and maintains the best quality of the food product [39]. However, the most notable setbacks of glass packaging include the extensive energy requirement and air pollution during glass production, which is three-fold higher than plastic production [39].

2.4. Metal

Metals are widely employed in the food industry for various applications, and amongst the usage of total packaging materials, 15% accounts for metal packaging [43]. Excellent barrier properties, physical protection, recyclability, formability, heat resistance, and decorative ability enhance the consumer preference for metal packaging [44]. Steel, tinplate, aluminum, and chromium are metals used for packaging dairy products, fruits, vegetables, beverages, meat-based products, bakery, and confectionary products [43]. Steels provide a barrier to gasses, odors, moisture, and light; coating improves the heat seal-ability due to ductility [45]. Steel coated with tin is one of the most used materials in food packaging and is utilized to produce cans and sheets for bulk products [46]. Aluminum can be formed into different forms, such as cans, foils, and laminated films, and they are lighter, weaker, and can be alloyed and shaped easily compared to tinplate [18].
The main food safety issue of metal packaging is the migration of materials, including metallic compounds and their interaction with food. Bisphenol A, lead, chromium, aluminum, cadmium, mercury, and nickel coatings are some migrants from metal packaging to food [43]. Metal packaging causes a minimal direct impact on the environment compared to plastic packaging other than landfilling. However, metal packagings contribute to drainage blockage and pollution of aquatic sources, require high energy during production and chronic metals and polyaromatic hydrocarbons co-exposure may lead to cancer [43].

3. Biopolymers for sustainable food packaging

Conventional petroleum-based packaging materials are currently associated with numerous concerns, including the accumulation of packaging waste, environmental pollution, climatic changes, and health effects. Therefore, packaging materials with enhanced environmental and sustainable attributes have received immense attraction in fulfilling food and environmental protection [47]. According to the definition of sustainable food packaging, it must have numerous features, including safety for people and society throughout its entire lifecycle, cost-effectiveness, utilization of renewable energy sources and recycled materials, production process feasibility, and cleaner technologies [48].
Currently, biopolymers are considered sustainable and innovative packaging materials due to their relative abundance, renewability, nontoxicity, biodegradability, easy functionalization, and environmental benignity [49]. They are polymers entirely biosynthesized by living organisms or chemically synthesized from natural sources [50] and can be easily degraded biologically [51]. Interestingly, these biopolymers have the capacity to substitute most conventional food packages [50,52].
These biopolymers contain different functional groups, such as hydroxyl, amide, amino, phosphate, and phenols, and there are three main types of natural biopolymers: polysaccharides, polypeptides, and polynucleotides [53]. Polysaccharides are made up of simple sugar units combined via glycoside bonds; amino acids are the monomers for polypeptides, and polynucleotides (DNA, RNA) are polymers of nucleotide monomers [54]. Moreover, biodegradable aliphatic polyesters, including polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) are chemically synthesized from bio-based monomers [51]. This review mainly focuses on the recent advances in polysaccharides and synthetic aliphatic polyester-based biopackaging materials in the food industry. Figure 2 synopsizes the biopolymers of the three categories and their key features related to sustainable packaging discussed in this review.

3.1. Polysaccharide-based biopackaging materials and applications in the food industry

Polysaccharides are the most abundant macromolecule in the biosphere and can be obtained from plants, animals, and microorganisms. Polysaccharides are a group of complex carbohydrates with different degrees of polymerization by α-1,4-, β-1,4-, or α-1,6-glycosidic bonds [7]. Wide varieties of polysaccharides have been used to develop biodegradable packaging materials, such as edible films and coatings, since they have excellent barrier properties against gases, oil, aroma, and processing adaptability [55]. Edible films and coatings are thin layers of edible materials used to wrap or coat a product to give protective and functional benefits, which can be ingested together with the product. Many films formed using polysaccharides-based biopolymers showed high tensile strength and percentage of elongation and are comparable with synthetic polymers [23]. The main disadvantage of polysaccharide-based films is poor barrier properties against water vapor due to their hydrophilic nature [56]. Several polysaccharides, including starch, cellulose, chitosan, pectin, alginate, and carrageenan, have been explored for their potential to form films and coatings. The properties, including mechanical properties, solubility, barrier and gelation, vary depending on the type of polysaccharide [57]. However, structural modifications can enhance these properties according to the final purpose, and different additives such as plasticizers, antioxidants, and antimicrobial agents can also be incorporated with polysaccharides. Moreover, combining two or more biopolymers often improves the properties of the blend films with excellent barrier properties [58]. The most widely explored polysaccharides in food packing include starch, cellulose, chitosan, pectin, alginate, and carrageenan.

3.1.1. Starch

Starch is a natural polysaccharide derived from plants and composed of amylose, a linear polymer with α-1,4-linked d-glucose monomer units, and amylopectin, a branched polymer with α-1,4-linked d-glucose monomer units and 1,6 linkages. The chemical structures of amylose and amylopectin in starch are shown in Figure 3 [7]. Roots, tubers, and seeds are botanical sources of starch found in the form of granules. Starch is mainly isolated from wheat, corn, tapioca, cassava, potato, and rice [59]. Their granules are spherical, oval, or irregular in shape, with diameters ranging from 0.1 to 200 μm, and are insoluble in cold water [47]. Depending on the starch source, granule properties, amylose and amylopectin content, physiochemical and functional properties of starch can be varied. Most starches are semi-crystalline, with a crystallinity between 15% and 45%. The crystalline regions contain short-branched chains of amylopectin, and amorphous regions include amylose and branching points of amylopectin [60]. According to the x-ray scattering study of starch crystallites, there are two primary starches: type A and type B. Type A is mainly found in cereals, while type B is mainly in amylose-rich starches, including tubers and root crops. Moreover, mixed forms of type A and type B structures are called type C and are found in bean and pea starches [61].
Starch-based films exhibit low oxygen permeability but high hydrophilic properties. On the other hand, poor mechanical properties and retrogradation limit the use of starch-based films as food packaging material. However, incorporating plasticizers such as glycerol and sorbitol, grafting with more hydrophobic polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA), and blending with other polymers help overcome these drawbacks by improving chain mobility and flexibility [62,63]. Starch can be converted into thermoplastic starch by exposure to high temperatures and shear in the presence of water or plasticizers [64]. In the last few years, starch-based thermoplastics have been extensively used as bio-based compostable materials to develop bags, films, and food containers [7,65]. Two widely tested techniques for formulating starch-based films include solution casting or wet method and extrusion or dry method. The solution casting method is conducted by solubilizing starch in a solvent followed by drying. In contrast, the extrusion process is applied by plasticizing and heating starch above its Tg [66]. Regarding applications, different food products, including candies, bakery products, fruits and vegetables, dry products, and snacks, can be packed using starch-based films [67].
According to the literature, numerous studies have investigated the potential of starch-based materials for food packaging applications. For instance, Issa and coworkers studied the impact of sweet potato starch-based composite films with thyme essential oil and montmorillonite nano clay on fresh spinach leaves [68]. They showed that biodegradable packaging material effectively reduces microbial growth while also enhancing the sensory quality of baby spinach leaves during cold storage [68]. Baek et al. developed an antioxidant film with cowpea starch and maqui berry extract to enhance the storage life of salmon by delaying lipid oxidation [69]. Recently, Chen et al. tested potato starch-based film incorporated with tea polyphenols to extend the shelf-life of fresh-cut fruits. Figure 4 shows the effect of potato starch-based film incorporated with different concentrations of tea polyphenols on the color of fresh-cut bananas. They demonstrated strong free radical scavenging activity, water vapor and oxygen barrier effect with a high dose of tea polyphenols [70]. Garcia and coworkers suggested that the corn starch-based edible film with olive extract is an affordable and environmentally friendly food packaging material to prevent oxidation of packed foods [71]. Behera et al. developed a novel biodegradable film using yam starch and bentonite, making it an alternative to synthetic packaging materials [72]. Enhance the shelf-life of beef sauce by 4 – 6 days compared to control by delaying the rapid oxidation and microbial growth using antimicrobial composite film prepared with cassava starch, konjac glucomannan, chitosan, and Zanthoxylum armatum essential oil was done by Liu and coworkers [73]. Bangar and coworkers also prepared a pearl millet starch-based active food packaging material with cellulose nanocrystals and clove bud oil and investigated its potential for extending the shelf-life of red grapes [74]. Marichelvam et al. successfully synthesized a biodegradable film using starch extracted from the Prosopis juliflora plant and gelatin with similar properties to synthetic packaging materials [75]. The development of edible starch-based film using tef starch and agar with proper mechanical properties was conducted by Tafa and coworkers [76]. Ardjoum and coworkers evaluated the antimicrobial properties of a corn starch-based film by incorporating Thymus vulgaris essential oils and ethanolic propolis extract against E. coli and Listeria monocytogenes [77].

3.1.2. Cellulose

Cellulose is the most abundant biopolymer on the planet and the primary component in plant cell walls and natural fibers. Microorganisms, such as algae, fungi, bacteria, and tunicate family organisms also biosynthesize cellulose [78]. Wood pulp and cotton fibers are the most used commercial sources of cellulose, and recently, plant-based waste products such as sugar cane bagasse, peel, husk, and shells are also considered for extracting cellulose [7]. Cellulose is a linear polymer composed of D-glucopyranosyl units linked by β-(1→4) glycosidic bonds, which are covalently bonded between the equatorial –OH group of C4 and the C1 carbon atom through acetal functionalities [79]. This allows cellulose chains to be packed densely together, generating a strong inter-chain hydrogen bonding network. However, neat cellulose is not suitable for film development since it is highly crystalline, has a high molecular weight, and is insoluble in water due to strong intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonding between chains [80]. Therefore, cellulose is converted into various derivatives, such as hydroxyethyl cellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and carboxymethyl cellulose, by breaking the polymer chains before processing into bioplastic films to obtain unique chemical and physical properties [81]. Generally, the cellulose extracted from bacteria is much purer compared to plant-based cellulose with high strength, molding ability, and water-holding capacity [82]. Figure 5 represents the chemical structure of cellulose.
The films prepared from cellulose derivatives display intriguing characteristics, including transparency, tastelessness, odorless, flexibility, robustness, and excellent barrier properties [83]. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose is widely used to develop edible films with high water vapor barrier and mechanical properties [7]. Methylcellulose is the hydrophilic derivate of cellulose, and it produces films with excellent gas and lipid barrier properties with less water vapor resistance [61]. Different methods, such as solution casting, layer-by-layer assembly, extrusion, coating, and electrospinning, are applied for fabricating cellulose-based packaging materials [84]. Moreover, studies have shown that blending cellulose with different additives such as biopolymers, plasticizers, and active agents could enhance the mechanical properties and storage ability [85].
Cellulose-based materials have broadly been tested for food packaging applications. Atta et al. prepared bacterial cellulose (BC) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-based bioactive food packaging material with olive oil and ginger oil as antimicrobial agents [83]. The authors revealed that the developed coating extends the shelf-life of oranges and tomatoes by inhibiting the growth of three bacterial strains and two fungal strains under different storage conditions for up to 9 weeks [83]. An epichlorohydrin-crosslinked hydroxyethyl cellulose functional composite film was prepared with polyvinyl alcohol and ε-polylysine as reinforcing agents by Zhang et al. The authors tested antibacterial, barrier, and mechanical properties and the ability to act as a packaging material for grapefruit. They reported that the shelf-life of packaged grapes can be extended up to 6 days due to the excellent barrier properties and antimicrobial properties of the prepared film [84]. Yaradoddi and coworkers demonstrated the use of agricultural waste-derived carboxymethyl cellulose to develop cost-effective packaging materials with high mechanical and barrier properties [85]. Moreover, Romao et al. summarized previous research on cellulose-based films with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties for food applications [86]. Moradian and coworkers synthesized a bacterial cellulose-based active film with different herbal extracts, including pomegranate peel, green tea, and rosemary to pack button mushrooms [87]. The authors revealed that the fabricated film helped extend the shelf-life of mushrooms with its antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, as shown in Figure 6 [87]. Al-Moghazy et al. developed an active food packaging material with cellulose to enhance the storage life of cheese by delaying the growth of microorganisms [88]. Yordshahi and coworkers studied the impact of postbiotics-incorporated bacterial nanocellulose antimicrobial wrappers on ground meat [89]. They found that developed films effectively extend the shelf-life of ground meat by reducing mesophilic and psychrophile counts [89]. The development of active food packaging material using gallic acid-loaded hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanofibers and their potential as a packaging material for walnuts was investigated by Aydogdu et al. [90]. Further, Liu and coworkers discussed numerous studies on developing biodegradable films prepared from cellulose and derivatives in the food packaging industry [91].

3.1.3. Chitosan

Chitosan is the N-deacetylated derivative of chitin with at least 50% free amine, the second most abundant natural polysaccharide on earth after cellulose. Chitin is made up of N-acetylglucosamine (β-1,4 linked 2-acetamido-D-glucose) monomer and can be found in the exoskeleton of crustaceans and cell walls of fungi and insects [92]. Chitin is also discarded as a waste from the shrimp and crab processing industries. Chitosan polysaccharide polymerized with two monomers, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and D-glucosamine, randomly linked through β-(1-4) glycosidic bonds [93]. Chitosan can be deacetylated using concentrated alkali at elevated temperatures or by enzymatic hydrolysis process in the presence of chitin deacetylase [94]. Figure 7 shows the structure of chitosan.
Chitosan is insoluble in aqueous solutions due to the deprotonation at higher pH values (>6.5), thus limiting its usage in food and pharmaceutical industries [95]. However, chitosan dissolves in weakly acidic solutions with a pH<6.5 due to the protonation of the free glucosamine [54]. Chitosan also shows excellent antimicrobial properties against spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses, making it versatile in different industries [92]. Generally, chitosan-based films exhibit good mechanical properties, semi-permeability to gases, such as carbon dioxide and oxygen and low barrier properties [6,51].
The characteristics of chitosan-based films depend on numerous factors, including the degree of deacetylation, molecular weight, free amine regeneration mechanism and solvent evaporation process [96]. The solution casting technique is widely practiced to prepare chitosan-based films. In the solution casting method, chitosan and other additives, such as plasticizers, are dissolved in a slightly acidic solvent, poured into a flat surface, and allowed to dry. The extrusion process is not applied to chitosan-based films because chitosan is not a thermoplastic and degrades before the melting point, hindering commercial usage [60]. Hence, numerous methods have been proposed to overcome these drawbacks. Blending chitosan with different thermoplastic polymers enhances the thermal properties and sealability of the film. On the other hand, incorporating different hydrocolloids and biopolymers increases the water vapor transmission rate and other mechanical properties [93]. Moreover, recent studies have also focused on inculcating natural antimicrobial and antioxidant agents and nanomaterials with chitosan-based films to improve the shelf-life [97].
Biodegradable films and edible chitosan coatings have emerged as sustainable alternatives to compete with conventional non-biodegradable food packaging technologies. The development of chitosan-based films from edible cricket species and their application in the food industry was investigated by Malm and coworkers [98]. Zehra et al. prepared a chitosan-based film with thyme essential oil, zinc oxide (ZnO), polyethylene glycol (PEG), nanoclay (NC), and calcium chloride (CaCl2) as additives [102]. Then, the film was tested for preservation of collard greens under refrigerated conditions for 24 days. The authors reported that chitosan-based film effectively extended the shelf-life of collard greens [99]. A chitosan-based edible coating incorporated with tomato plant extract exhibited an enhanced shelf-life of pork loin by reducing microbial growth and maintaining the sensory attributes of pork during 21 days of storage [100]. Wang and coworkers developed a packaging film for bread using chitosan blending with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and grapefruit seed extract (GFSE) by extrusion and compression molding techniques [101]. They reported improved food safety and shelf-life of bread by inhibiting different foodborne pathogens [101]. Figure 8 shows the physical appearance of bread packed in developed chitosan-based film over other packaging mateerials [101]. Xu et al. prepared chitosan-based film with bacterial cellulose and curcumin, which exhibited good mechanical properties and antioxidant activity with the potential to be used for packaging foods with high-fat content [102]. Chitosan and whey protein hydrolysate composite films with improved physicochemical and mechanical properties was prepared by Al-Hilifi and coworkers [103]. Yao and coworkers successfully formulated chitosan and polyvinyl alcohol-based active films incorporated with curcumin for food packaging applications [104]. Recently, De Carli developed a biodegradable active film based on chitosan from crayfish shells enriched with bioactive propolis extract. The prepared film exhibited good antioxidant, antimicrobial, and mechanical properties with the potential to package oxidation-sensitive food products [105]. Chitosan film with zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles and sodium montmorillonite nanoclay was fabricated by Rodrigues et al. and demonstrated antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus with enhanced mechanical and physical properties [106]. Karkar et al. synthesized an active edible chitosan-based film enriched with Nigella sativa L. extract and investigated its potential to extend the shelf-life of grapes. They concluded that the developed film could prolong the shelf-life of grapes compared to the control, which was not covered [107]. Furthermore, applications of chitosan-based composites in the food industry were summarized by Kumar et al. [108].

3.1.4. Pectin

Pectin is a plant-based polysaccharide that makes up nearly two-thirds of the dry mass of the primary plant cell wall. This complex polysaccharide comprises up 10-30% plant primary walls and 2-5% secondary walls [109]. It is a high molecular weight, heterogeneous, amorphous, white, colloidal carbohydrate found in fruits and vegetables, mainly apple pomace and citrus peel [110]. The pectin backbone comprises D-galacturonic acid units linked with α (1→4) linkages [55]. Figure 9 depicts the chemical structure of pectin.
According to structural studies, pectin does not have a specific structure, comprising around 100–1000 saccharide units in a chain-like configuration. Therefore, it is a hetero-polysaccharide of three main domains, namely, homogalacturonan (HG), rhamnogalacturonan-I (RGI), and rhamnogalacturonan-II (RGII) [111]. Homogalacturonan is the major component of pectin polysaccharide, composed of (1-4) linked α-D-galacturonic acid and methyl esters. Rhamnogalacturonan I consists of (1-4)-linked α-D-galacturonic acid and (1-2)-linked α-L-rhamnose. Rhamnogalacturonan II is a complex structure of (1-4)-linked α-D-galacturonic acid backbone with side chains with sugars [112]. The plant source and development stage govern the chemical composition, quantity, and structural properties of pectin.
In the food industry, pectin is mainly used as a thickening agent, colloidal stabilizer, gelling agent, and emulsifier, depending on their degree of esterification [111]. Besides these applications, pectin and its derivatives are used to develop biodegradable and edible food packaging, primarily for fresh fruits and vegetables. Depending on the degree of esterification, there are two types of pectin: high methoxyl pectin or rapid set pectin and low methoxyl pectin or low set pectin. High methoxyl pectin is the best for producing good films and coatings [113]. The research on edible films developed from pectin and its derivatives, such as pectate and amidated, exhibited good barrier properties against gas, oil, and aroma with excellent mechanical properties. Still the major drawback is the lack of moisture barrier properties due to their hydrophilic nature [51]. The casting method and extrusion are effective approaches for producing pectin-based films [114]. The casting procedure entails spreading a prepared film-forming solution over a flat surface, followed by a drying process, while the extrusion process uses high pressure and temperature for film development [115,116]. However, the brittle nature, high water solubility, and poor moisture barrier qualities of pure pectin films limit the usage of pectin-based films. The brittle nature and poor elongations of these films can be overcome by incorporating plasticizers, which increases their flexibility [114]. Besides that, antimicrobial substances, emulsifiers and other biopolymers have been incorporated to obtain packaging materials with better barrier properties and antimicrobial activity [116]. Currently, pectin-based films are primarily used to pack fresh and minimally processed apples, berries, papaya, tomatoes, and carrots [117].
Pectin has gained focus as a promising biomaterial for manufacturing bio-based sustainable packaging films and coatings. For example, biodegradable films were prepared from pectin extracted from apple and pequi mesocarp, and its mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties were tested for application as food packaging materials [118,119]. Sadadekar and coworkers developed nano chitosan and pectin-based food packaging material incorporated with fennel essential oil and potato peel extracts to enhance antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [120]. Fabrication of biodegradable films from pomelo peel pectin, casein, and egg albumin was conducted by Sood and Saini [121]. The authors observed better mechanical, barrier, and thermal properties for their hybrid films compared to the pure films of casein and egg albumin [121]. In another study, an edible pectin-based biodegradable film enriched with mulberry leaf extract was tested on the performance of the shelf-life of capsicum fruit [122]. The authors confirmed that the edible pectin-based film is a promising material to extend the shelf-life of capsicum fruit up to 12 days [122]. Jiang and coworkers prepared an active and intelligent film using white-fleshed pitaya peel pectin, betacyanins, and montmorillonite [123]. Their films exhibited good mechanical and antioxidant activity and colorimetric response to pH and ammonia, showing their ability to monitor the freshness of shrimp [123]. A pectin-based film with sodium alginate and castor oil exhibited good moisture, barrier, and mechanical properties and extended the shelf-life of capsicum and chilli compared to uncoated samples [124]. Teleky et al. evaluated the physico-chemical and mechanical properties of pectin-based film enriched with phenolic extracts from apple pomace and stated their applicability in food packaging applications [125].
Han and Song prepared a mandarin peel pectin-based film with sage leaf extract [126]. They synthesized film could potentially prolong the shelf-life of food, preventing the degradation of the nutritional value of packaged food [126]. Nisar and coworkers successfully devised a citrus pectin-based film incorporated with clove bud essential oil and investigated its mechanical, thermal, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties for food packaging applications [127]. Moreover, different studies on pectin-based films from agro-waste residues and their potential to be used in the food packaging industry were discussed by Mellinas and others [116].

3.1.5. Alginate

Alginates are natural biopolymers derived from the marine brown algae of the family phaeophyceae and can also be synthesized by bacteria, such as Pseudomonas and Azotobacter [128]. Alginates are known for their biocompatibility, biodegradability, low cost, low toxicity, ability to react with polyvalent metal cations, resistance to acidic media, and solubility at basic pH [96]. They are linear, unbranched, and water-soluble polysaccharides made up of polyuronic acid with three block structures, namely poly-β-D-manopyranosyluronic acid (M) block, poly-α-L-gulopyranosyluronic acid (G) blocks, and M-G blocks linked by (1–4) linkages with varying characteristics and distributions throughout the chain [129]. Depending on the plant source and the stage of plant development, chemical composition and the order of M and G units may differ [130]. The physical properties of alginates are affected by the percentage of the three types of blocks, and the hardness of the three blocks diminishes in the sequence GG > MM > MG [131]. Figure 10 depicts the chemical structure of M and G monomer blocks, and the various combinations of M and G blocks could produce at least 200 distinct alginates [132].
Alginates are commonly utilized in the food industry as a thickener, gelling agent, and colloidal stabilizer [133]. Also, alginates are used to develop food coatings by reacting with divalent cations, especially calcium (Ca2+) ions, to generate water-insoluble polymers [134]. Alginate films can be fabricated via a two-step method: drying alginate solution and treatment with calcium salts to induce instantaneous crosslinking at the interface [79]. Alginates exhibit good film-forming characteristics, including uniform, transparent, and glossy appearance, flexible, tasteless, odorless, high tensile strength, tear resistant, low permeability to vapor and oxygen, and impermeable to fats and oils [132,134]. Furthermore, alginate-based films and coatings provide better barrier characteristics to bacteria and reduce the likelihood of microbial development on food products [135]. Alginate films were initially employed for fresh fruits and vegetables to reduce respiration rate since the Ca crosslinking was more effective in attaching the sliced fruit surface [134,136]. Apart from fruits and vegetables, alginate films are now applied to many other foods, including cheese, meat, and fish, resulting in the shelf-life extension of the products [132]. The properties of the alginate films could increase by incorporating different additives such as organic acids, essential oils, biopolymers, plant extract, and metallic nanoparticles [137].
Alginate-based edible coatings and films can efficiently maintain quality and lengthen the shelf-life of fruit, vegetables, meat, and cheese by controlling respiration, microbial growth and reducing dehydration [128]. Nair and coworkers studied the influence of alginate and chitosan-based coatings enriched with pomegranate peel extract to extend the shelf-life of guava. The coating was able to maintain the quality of guava at low temperatures for 20 days by improving the visual and nutritional properties while delaying senescence [138]. Dulta et al. also prepared an alginate-chitosan-based film supplemented with nano zinc oxide (ZnO) and investigated its impact on orange quality for 20 days at 4 °C [139]. The film extended the shelf-life of coated oranges by more than 1.5 times compared to uncoated samples by delaying fruit senescence [139]. The impact of alginate-based edible coating with resveratrol for prolonging the shelf-life of rainbow trout fillet at refrigerated temperature was examined by Bazargani-Gilani and revealed that the developed edible coating could extend the shelf-life of fish with more health benefits [140]. Mahcene and coworkers summarized the potential of sodium alginate-based film incorporated with essential oil to be utilized as food packaging material to extend the shelf-life of foods [141]. An alginate-based bio-composite material prepared with pure reduced graphene oxide or mixed ZnO exhibits high antioxidant and antimicrobial properties against E. coli and S. aureus, potentially extending food shelf-life [142]. Abdullah and coworkers prepared an alginate-based film incorporated with cinnamaldehyde for food packaging applications [143]. They stated high mechanical and antimicrobial properties against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, with a 98% reduction of microbial growth for their film [143]. Bata Gouda et al. evaluated the shelf-life of fresh-cut lotus root slices using sodium alginate mixed with L-cysteine and citric acid coating [144]. The authors reported that their coating prevented microbial growth, browning, and membrane damage and extended the shelf-life of lotus root slices for 14 days at 4 ֯C [144]. Montone and coworkers synthesized alginate-based films charged with quercetin glycoside compounds and hydroxyapatite to coat fresh-cut papaya [145]. The results demonstrated the preservation of fruits by reducing microbial growth, respiration rate, and persevering natural antioxidant compounds [145]. Packaging film based on alginate, carboxymethyl cellulose, and potato starch incorporating grapefruit seed extract was developed by Ramakrishnan et al. with excellent mechanical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties, which effectively extended the shelf-life of green chilli by 25 days [146]. Feng et al. successfully developed a novel cobalt-based metal-organic framework-loaded sodium alginate-based packaging films with antimicrobial and ammonia-sensitive functions for shrimp freshness monitoring [147].

3.1.6. Carrageenan

Carrageenan is a marine-origin polysaccharide and can be isolated from red algae, most often from Chondrus crispus, Kappaphycus alvarezii, and Eucheuma denticulatum species [134]. Carrageenan is a linear hydrophilic polymer made up of sulfated or non-sulfated galactose and 3, 6-dehydrated galactose linked together by α-(1→3) and β-(1→4) glycosidic linkages [55]. There are three carrageenan types, based on the position and quantity of sulfate groups on the disaccharide structures: kappa (κ), iota (ι), and lambda (λ) carrageenan [148]. In the food industry, kappa (κ) carrageenan is widely used, and the sulfate concentrations of the kappa (κ), iota (ι), and lambda (λ) carrageenan are 20, 33, and 41 percent (w/w), respectively [149]. The presence of sulfate ester groups in the structure influences the overall negative charge and water solubility of carrageenan [150]. Figure 11 shows the chemical structure of carrageenan.
Carrageenan is commonly used in the food industry as a stabilizer, gelling and thickening agent in dairy products, pet food, infant food formulas, and for preparing edible films [129]. Kappa (κ) carrageenan has been identified as the best type of carrageenan for edible food packages because kappa (κ) carrageenan produces robust, fragile, and firm gel, while iota (ι) carrageenan gels are weak, soft, and flexible [151]. Due to the higher gelling ability of carrageenan, random coils of polysaccharides change into double helices throughout the film-casting process by creating an extremely compact film with good mechanical and structural qualities [7]. Further, carrageenan-based coatings, edible films, and blends have been used in preserving freshly cut fruits due to the favorable properties of less moisture loss and gas exchange, preventing discoloration, and maintaining the texture of the fruit [51]. Also, carrageenan films exhibit strong oxygen barrier properties and protect against lipid oxidation [152]. However, water vapor permeability and high brittleness of carrageenan limit the usage of these polymer films in the food industry, and this can be overcome by blending them with natural or synthetic polymers [153]. Besides, carrageenan film can be developed with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties by adding different essential oils and antimicrobial agents [154].
Recently, carrageenan-based food packaging films have received more attention due to their biodegradability, excellent biocompatibility, and availability. For example, Cheng et al. reviewed information on carrageenan extraction methods, methods of preparing biodegradable films, and their properties and applications in different food products to extend shelf-life [155]. Martiny and coworkers prepared carrageenan-based biodegradable films activated with olive leaf extract [156]. They reported that the developed film reduces aerobic mesophile growth and extends the shelf-life of lamb meat by acting as an active food packaging material [156]. Avila et al. investigated the mechanical, light barrier, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties of carrageenan-based films incorporated with jaboticaba peel extract. They exhibited their potential as active food packaging material for food applications [157]. Duan and coworkers fabricated nanocomposite film from k-carrageenan, konjac glucomannan, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles and applied it to strawberry packing. They exhibited that the shelf-life of strawberries could extend with nanocomposite film compared to the conventional plastic package due to its excellent mechanical, thermal barrier, and antimicrobial properties [158]. Santos et al. evaluated barrier, mechanical, and bioactive properties of developed k-carrageenan-based films incorporated with Cymbopogon winterianus essential oil as a novel food packaging material. The developed film presented high antioxidant activity and inhibited the growth of most foodborne pathogens [159]. Panatarani and coworkers protected minced chicken with semi-refined kappa carrageenan-based film mixed with cassava starch, ZnO and SiO2 nanoparticles. The authors reported that the film exhibited improved water barrier and mechanical and optical properties while extending the shelf-life of minced chicken up to 6 days [160]. Kim et al. synthesized a biodegradable carrageenan-based functional nanocomposite film with silver nanoparticles, which was made using pine needle extract. The film exhibited intense antimicrobial activity, antioxidant activity, and UV protection, with the potential to be utilized for active food packaging applications [161]. Mahajan and colleagues developed a carrageenan-based edible film with Aloe vera that improved the microbiological and lipid oxidative stability of frozen dairy products during storage [162]. Color indicator film based on κ-carrageenan incorporating silver nanoparticles and red grape skin anthocyanin was developed by You et al. for fish freshness determination. The film displayed enhanced antioxidant activity, UV protection, antimicrobial activity against E.coli and S. aureus, and high mechanical strength with colorimetric response to pH and volatile ammonia variations [163].

3.2. Aliphatic polymer-based food packaging

A major category of biodegradable polymers is aliphatic polyesters, many exhibiting outstanding processability, biodegradability, and biocompatibility characteristics. Aliphatic polyesters are synthetic biopolymers obtained from the classical polymerization of renewable bio-derived monomers [57]. Polycondensation and ring-opening polymerization are the two main methods to synthesize aliphatic polyesters. Depending on the need and application, two different aliphatic polyesters are available: homopolymers and copolymers. Homopolymers are created when ester links combine the same monomer units, while copolymers are produced with two or more distinct types of blocks of monomer units [57].
The most researched aliphatic polyesters for a variety of applications are polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polyglycolic acid (PGA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), and their copolymers [63]. Among these, PLA and PHB are mainly used to develop biodegradable packaging materials with high melting points between 160 and 180 °C [51]. The excellent heat resistance, gas barrier qualities, and ability to be processed into films, trays, and coatings on bio-based materials allow these aliphatic polyesters to be used as food packaging agents [164].

3.2.1. Polylactic acid (PLA)

Polylactic acid (PLA) is one of the most widely used biodegradable polymers with numerous applications in the commercial packaging industry. PLA is an aliphatic polyester made from lactic acid or lactide monomers [165]. A thermoplastic biopolymer called polylactic acid (PLA) is produced when bacteria ferment the carbohydrates in corn, sugarcane, or cassava [166]. The synthesis of lactic acid is the first stage in the multistep process that results in the synthesis of PLA, followed by the generation of the lactide monomer and the actual polymerization procedure [9]. Poly (L-lactide) (PLLA), poly (D-lactide) (PDLA), and poly (DL-lactide) (PDLLA) are the three stereochemical forms of PLA, and depending on that crystallinity, melting temperature, tensile properties can differ. Figure 12 shows the chemical structure of PLA.
PLA is a good contender for several applications since it is an environmentally benign polymer with qualities like thermoplasticity, nontoxicity, and equivalent mechanical properties to other traditional polymers like PP, PE, and polystyrene (PS) [167]. PLA has been authorized as primary food packaging material because it is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Different film-forming methods, such as extrusion, injection molding, thermoforming, and film blowing, can be employed to cast PLA-based sheets, films, and molded packages [4].
Features such as high recyclability, biocompatibility, low manufacturing energy, easy processability into various shapes, good transparency, desirable mechanical properties, and barrier properties to oils and aromas have positively impacted the development of PLA-based packaging materials [168]. Studies have shown that PLA-based and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles possess similar tensile strength and elastic modulus [169]. PLA bottle manufacturing utilizes 36% less energy and produces 44% less CO2 than PET bottle manufacturing [4]. Also, PLA is superior to PP in terms of its tensile strength and O2 and CO2 barrier qualities. However, it has less toughness and impact strength than many non-biodegradable polymers [170].
Moreover, other drawbacks that limit PLA usage in the packaging industry include intrinsic brittleness, low-temperature resistance, and inadequate water-vapor barrier qualities [171]. Depending on the application, the properties of PLA-based packages can be modified by blending with other biopolymers, crosslinking, or adding various natural fillers [57].
Different juices, milk, water, cheese, and yogurt are packed using PLA-based packaging materials [9]. Food trays, films, bottles, sheets, and cups can be made of PLA, which is best for fresh products and those not needing to be protected from O2 [172]. For example, Mohamad et al. developed a PLA-based film incorporating three active ingredients, namely, thymol, kesum, and curry and investigated its impact on chicken meat [173]. They reported that the developed films extend the shelf-life of meat by 15 days while maintaining sensory properties and microbial growth [173]. PLA-based film activated with Cinnamomum verum essential oil was developed by Khanjari and coworkers, and its impact on sensory, microbial, and chemical properties of minced squab was assessed over 12 days at 4 °C. They revealed that the film reduces the growth of most bacteria, total volatile base nitrogen, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance and maintains the sensory properties of minced squab [174]. Ardjoum et al. investigated the mechanical, thermal, and antimicrobial properties of PLA-based film enriched with Thymus vulgaris essential oil and ethanolic extract of Mediterranean propolis and exhibited its potential as an active food packaging material [175]. PLA, poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate), and starch-based films with salicylic acid were prepared, and their potential to pack bananas was investigated by Ding et al. [176]. The authors reported that the shelf-life of bananas can be extended by 4 -5 days due to the excellent barrier and mechanical properties of the film [176]. Hernandez-Garcia et al. evaluated the effect of multilayer film of PLA on the shelf-life of fresh pork meat compared to commercial high-barrier multilayer packaging films. Figure 13 depicts that the meat samples packaged in the PLA films maintained a reddish color and freshness at the end of storage compared to other samples [177]. Zhang and coworkers developed and characterized the properties of PLA-based film enriched with cinnamaldehyde inclusions to preserve fruits [178]. The researchers found that the formed film exhibited enhanced barrier properties, tensile strength, morphology, crystallinity and antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes [178]. A film based on PLA, polybutylene-succinate-co-adipate and thymol demonstrated antifungal properties against Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp. and prolonged the shelf-life of bread to nine days [179]. Zhou and the research group reported that the developed sandwich-architectured films based on PLA and pea starch were effective in the shelf-life extension of strawberries [180]. Wongthanaroj et al. examined the effect of nanocomposite films based on polylactic acid and cellulose nanocrystals on the browning reaction of cut avocados. The film exhibited a reduction of browning reaction and extended the shelf-life of avocados by 1.3 days at 23 °C and 5.4 days at 4 °C with its O2 properties and antimicrobial effect [181]. Further, more research on PLA-based intelligent food packaging materials with different natural antibacterial and antioxidant agents on the shelf-life extension of perishables and their mechanical, physical and antimicrobial properties were reviewed by Nasution and co-authors [182].

3.2.2. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB)

Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a well-known biodegradable poly-β-hydroxy alkanoate (PHA) synthesized by numerous bacteria as an internal carbon or energy reserve [172]. Nearly 75 different genera of bacteria can accumulate PHB, but Ralstonia eutropha has received the most attention because of its capacity to accumulate PHB in large quantities, and Haloferax mediterranei, Bacillus megaterium, and Halomonas boliviensis were also used for this purpose [183]. PHB is one of the several biodegradable polymers that have reached commercial production and has a wide range of applications, from manufacturing packages to more complex biomedical items [184]. This isotactic homopolyester has thermal and mechanical qualities similar to petrochemical polymers such as PP and PS and is biodegradable in various settings, including composting conditions and marine water. Due to the thermoplastic properties, the homopolymer, polyhydroxy butyrate (PHB), and poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3- hydroxy valerate (PHBV) copolymer, which is modified by copolymerization with hydroxy valerate used to develop packaging as alternatives to petroleum-based synthetic polymers [9]. Figure 14 shows the chemical strcutures of PHB and PHBV. Like other biopolymers, synthetic PHB also inherits biocompatibility, biodegradability, nontoxicity, thermoplasticity, and water barrier properties, making it widely available for packaging applications [172]. Figure 14 shows the chemical strcutures of PHB and PHBV.
As a pure homopolymer, PHB has a melting point of 180 °C, a glass transition temperature of nearly 55 °C, and a crystallinity above 50% [185]. High crystallinity with a high melting point makes it brittle and has lower mechanical strength compared to petroleum-based plastics, restricting the usage of PHB for packaging applications [186]. The high production cost of PHB compared to petrochemical-based plastics due to the expenses of the substrate, fermentation, and downstream processes is another critical barrier to mass manufacturing and commercialization. Solution casting and extrusion methods are widely used to fabricate PHB-based packaging materials [49]. The drawbacks of PHB-based packaging materials can be overcome by using thermal treatments, developing copolymers, blending with natural or synthetic polymers, and reinforcing with natural fibers and inorganic fillers [187].
Recently, numerous studies have explored the potential of PHB-based films and coatings for food packaging applications. For example, Rech et al. developed a PHB-based film by incorporating nanosilica and clove essential oil as an active food packaging material for brown bread [188]. The prepared film extended the shelf-life of bread up to 10 days compared to PE, with its high antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli, Aspergillus niger, and Staphylococcus aureus [188]. Kumari et al. prepared PHB-based films enriched with different essential oils, including grapeseed, ginger, and bergamot oil, and characterized their mechanical, thermal, barrier, and antimicrobial properties [189]. The impact of methylcellulose and chitosan-coated PLA-PHB film incorporated with olive leaf extract on the preservation of fresh pork burgers was examined by Fiorentini and coworkers [190]. The authors revealed that the shelf-life extension of pork burgers is due to the reduction of lipid oxidation and growth of Enterobacteriaceae [190]. Jiang et al. examined the mechanical and antioxidant properties of PLA-PHB-based film enriched with α-tocopherol to prolong shelf-life of peach [191]. The results revealed that the film exhibited improved barrier, mechanical, and antioxidant properties and extended peach storage life by reducing malondialdehyde content and protecting cell wall structure [191]. Iglesias-Montes and coworkers successfully developed a film based on PLA-PHB blend and chitin nanocomposite, suggesting its application in the food packaging industry [192]. Another study produced a PLA-PHB-based packaging film incorporating fennel oil and demonstrated its performance on the shelf-life of oysters [193]. The research confirmed that the developed film can prolong the shelf-life of oysters by 2–3 days due to its oxygen barrier properties, antioxidant and antibacterial ability [193]. Manikandan and the research group developed PHB-based nanocomposites using graphene nanoparticles and examined the shelf-life extension of oxygen-sensitive foods [184]. Table 3 summarizes several recent studies on composite biopackaging materials, their preparation methods, food type and properties.

4. Future perspectives of biopacking in the food industry

Consumer demand, advancements in industrial trends, environmental concerns, marketing methods, and customer lifestyles contribute to the growth of novel and inventive packaging strategies in the food sector [2]. Developing biodegradable packaging is an imperative step in the packaging industry toward reducing the environmental impact of conventional plastics and advancing sustainability objectives. The utilization of biodegradable and renewable materials is an excellent way to conserve the environment while adding economic value to neglected crops and industrial waste [210]. Currently, the improvement of primary biopackaging materials into active packaging materials incorporated with different active compounds such as antioxidant, antimicrobial agents, anti-browning agents, colorants, flavors, vitamins, and enzymes is an exciting and rapidly evolving area of the food packaging industry to extend the shelf-life of foods and to maintain their quality [211]. Furthermore, O2 scavengers, CO2 releasers, ethylene scavengers, moisture absorbers, UV barriers, and antimicrobial packaging systems are common active packaging systems tested in the food industry [212]. In addition, intelligent food packaging has recently emerged as a novel technique to improve the functionality of biopackaging. Intelligent food packaging, also known as smart packaging, is a novel solution that utilizes indicators and sensors incorporated in the packaging to monitor and report changes in food quality and safety. These indicators and sensors can detect various changes in the food system, including microbial activity, chemical and physical changes [213]. Some intelligent packages observe the real-time conditions of food, and some provide a source for releasing bioactive agents during food spoilage [214].
Further, nanotechnology-integrated biopolymer-based food packaging can be developed by addressing the issues with mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of biopolymers. The use of nanotechnology in biopackaging entails the production of bionanocomposites at the nanoscale or using nanoparticles to improve the properties of packaging material. Bionanocomposites are sophisticated materials composed of biodegradable polymers and nanoscale reinforcing elements with better mechanical, thermal, and barrier qualities than typical biodegradable polymers [215]. Future applications of bionanocomposites would rise with the development of smart and intelligent packaging as a new technology, incorporating novel programmable, artificial intelligence (AI)-based materials into bioplastics.

5. Conclusions

Economic, health and environmental concerns associated with conventional packages such as plastic, metal, paper, and glass have shifted consumers towards sustainable food packaging. One of the emerging solutions for sustainable food packaging is biopolymer-based packages that eliminate common waste and aid in minimizing the adverse effects of conventional packages on the environment. Biopackaging has been widely used in the food industry due to its degradability, renewability, nontoxicity, and edibility. The main biopolymers used to develop biodegradable food packaging are polysaccharides, which include starch, cellulose, chitosan, alginate, pectin, and carrageenan. Polysaccharides show excellent mechanical properties with superior barrier properties against O2, CO2, oil, and aromas while demonstrating poor moisture resistance. Moreover, synthetic aliphatic polyesters also exhibit desirable mechanical and barrier properties to oil and aroma. This review discussed the structure, properties and recent developments in food packaging applications of polysaccharides, including starch, cellulose, chitosan, alginate, pectin, and carrageenan and aliphatic polyester-based polylactic (PLA) and polyhydroxy-butyrate (PHB) biopackaging materials.
Although most of these biopolymers have poor mechanical and physical structures, numerous studies have demonstrated that polymer blends and composites would drastically strengthen their structures and other properties. Also, biopackaging plays a vital role in packaging perishable fruits, vegetables, meat, poultry and fish products, cereals, bakery, dairy products, and oil-fried products. Current trends in biopackaging include active packaging, intelligent packaging, edible coating and films and bionanocomposites and blends. Nevertheless, despite these innovations, shelf-life, financial, customer perception and socioeconomic impact upon directly replacing conventional packaging still hinder biopolymers from being broadly commercialized in food packaging.

Author Contributions

Writing, W.N.M., L.J. and R.S.D.; review & editing W.N.M., L.J., R.S.D., R.L., P.C.B., S.M.R, and CG. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Research Council, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka, grant number: ASP/01/RE/TEC/2022/66.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Estimating the burden of foodborne diseases. https://www.who.int/activities/estimating-the-burden-of-foodborne-diseases (archived on 22 August 2023).
  2. Han, J.; Ruiz-Garcia, L.; Qian, J.-P.; Yang, X.T. Food Packaging: A Comprehensive Review and Future Trends. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 1–18. [CrossRef]
  3. Goswami, B. The Role of Food Packaging. In Global Challenges and Innovation In Science and Management, 1st ed.; Rami, A., Jha, P., Shah, P., Eds.; Kaav publications: Delhi, India, 2019; pp. 157–167.
  4. Ncube, L. K.; Ude, A. U.; Ogunmuyiwa, E. N.; Zulkifli, R.; Beas, I. N. Environmental Impact of Food Packaging Materials: A Review of Contemporary Development from Conventional Plastics to Polylactic Acid Based Materials. Materials (Basel). 2020, 13, 1–24. [CrossRef]
  5. Nemat, B.; Razzaghi, M.; Bolton, K.; Rousta, K. The Potential of Food Packaging Attributes to Influence Consumers’ Decisions to Sort Waste. Sustain. 2020, 12, 2234. [CrossRef]
  6. Asgher, M.; Qamar, S. A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H. M. N. Bio-Based Active Food Packaging Materials: Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Petrochemical-Based Packaging Materials. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109625. [CrossRef]
  7. Nesic, A.; Cabrera-Barjas, G.; Dimitrijevic-Brankovic, S.; Davidovic, S.; Radovanovic, N.; Delattre, C. Prospect of Polysaccharide-Based Materials as Advanced Food Packaging. Molecules. 2020, 25, 1–35. [CrossRef]
  8. Shaikh, S.; Yaqoob, M.; Aggarwal, P. An Overview of Biodegradable Packaging in Food Industry. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2021, 4, 503–520. [CrossRef]
  9. Thulasisingh, A.; Kumar, K.; Yamunadevi, B.; Poojitha, N.; SuhailMadharHanif, S.; Kannaiyan, S. Biodegradable Packaging Materials. Polym. Bull. 2021, 79, 4467–4496. [CrossRef]
  10. Cruz, R. M. S.; Krauter, V.; Krauter, S.; Agriopoulou, S.; Weinrich, R.; Herbes, C.; Scholten, P. B. V; Uysal-Unalan, I.; Sogut, E.; Kopacic, S.; Lahti, J.; Rutkaite, R.; Varzakas, T. Bioplastics for Food Packaging: Environmental Impact, Trends and Regulatory Aspects. Food 2022, 11, 1–39. [CrossRef]
  11. Deshwal, G. K.; Panjagari, N. R.; Alam, T. An Overview of Paper and Paper Based Food Packaging Materials: Health Safety and Environmental Concerns. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 4391–4403. [CrossRef]
  12. Marsh, K.; Bugusu, B. Food Packaging - Roles, Materials, and Environmental Issues. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, 39–55. [CrossRef]
  13. Fahmy, Y.; Fahmy, T. y A.; Mobarak, F.; El-Sakhawy, M.; Fadl, M. Agricultural Residues (Wastes) for Manufacture of Paper, Board, and Miscellaneous Products: Background Overview and Future Prospects. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2017, 10, 424–448.
  14. Ferdous, T.; Ni, Y.; Quaiyyum, M. A.; Uddin, M. N.; Jahan, M. S. Non-Wood Fibers: Relationships of Fiber Properties with Pulp Properties. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 21613–21622. [CrossRef]
  15. Pydimalla, M.; Reddy, K. Effect of Pulping, Bleaching and Refining Process on Fibers for Paper Making - A Review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 310–316.
  16. Hubbe, M. A.; Pruszynski, P. Greaseproof Paper Products: A Review Emphasizing Ecofriendly Approaches. BioResources 2020, 15, 1978–2004. [CrossRef]
  17. Jasmani, L.; Ainun, Z. M. A.; Adnan, S.; Ibrahim, R.; Sapuan, S. M.; Ilyas, R. A. Sustainable Paper-Based Packaging. In Bio-BasedPackaging: Material, Environmental and Economic Aspects, 1st ed.; Sapuan, S.M., Ilyas, R.A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2021; 225–244. [CrossRef]
  18. Verma, M. K.; Shakya, S.; Kumar, P.; Madhavi, J.; Murugaiyan, J.; Rao, M. V. R. Trends in Packaging Material for Food Products: Historical Background, Current Scenario, and Future Prospects. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 4069–4082. [CrossRef]
  19. Fadiji, T.; Coetzee, C.; Pathare, P.; Opara, U. L. Susceptibility to Impact Damage of Apples inside Ventilated Corrugated Paperboard Packages: Effects of Package Design. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 111, 286–296. [CrossRef]
  20. Oloyede, O. O.; Lignou, S. Sustainable Paper-Based Packaging: A Consumer’s Perspective. foods 2021, 10, 1–18.
  21. Jadhav, S. V; Sonone, S. S.; Sankhla, M. S.; Kumar, R. Health Risks of Newspaper Ink When Used as Food Packaging Material. Lett. Appl. NanoBioScience 2021, 10, 2614–2623. [CrossRef]
  22. Tajeddin, B.; Arabkhedri, M. Polymers and Food Packaging. In Polymer Science and Innovative Applications; 2020; 525–543. [CrossRef]
  23. Silva, N.; Blumberga, D. Why Biopolymer Packaging Materials Are Better. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2019, 23, 366–384. [CrossRef]
  24. Sid, S.; Mor, R. S.; Kishore, A.; Sharanagat, V. S. Bio-Sourced Polymers as Alternatives to Conventional Food Packaging Materials: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 87–104. [CrossRef]
  25. Alabi, O. A.; Ologbonjaye, K. I.; Awosolu, O.; Alalade, O. E. Public and Environmental Health Effects of Plastic Wastes Disposal: A Review. J. Toxicol. risk Assess. 2019, 5, 1–13. [CrossRef]
  26. Worm, B.; Lotze, H. K.; Jubinville, I.; Wilcox, C.; Jambeck, J. Plastic as a Persistent Marine Pollutant. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2017, 42, 1–26. [CrossRef]
  27. Nistico, R. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) in the Packaging Industry. Polym. Test. 2020, 90, 106707. [CrossRef]
  28. Mendes, A. C.; Pedersen, G. A. Perspectives on Sustainable Food Packaging: – Is Bio-Based Plastics a Solution? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 839–846. [CrossRef]
  29. Cruz, R. M. S.; Rico, B. P. M.; Vieira, M. C. Food Packaging and Migration. In Food Quality and Shelf Life; Elsevier Inc., 2019; pp 281–301. [CrossRef]
  30. Lewandowski, K. A Brief Review of Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Recycling. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14, 1–14.
  31. Katsara, K.; Kenanakis, G.; Alissandrakis, E.; Papadakis, V. M. Low-Density Polyethylene Migration from Food Packaging on Cured Meat Products Detected by Micro-Raman Spectroscopy. Microplastics 2022, 1, 428–439. [CrossRef]
  32. Sadighara, P.; Akbari, N.; Mostashari, P.; Yazdanfar, N.; Shokri, S. The Amount and Detection Method of Styrene in Foods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Food Chem. X. 2022, 13, 100238. [CrossRef]
  33. Tajeddin, B.; Ahmadi, B.; Sohrab, F.; Chenarbon, H. A. Polymers for Modified Atmosphere Packaging Applications. In Food Packaging and Preservation; Elsevier Inc., 2018; pp 457–499. [CrossRef]
  34. Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J. R.; Law, K. L. Production, Use, and Fate of All Plastics Ever Made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700782.
  35. Kehinde, O.; Ramonu, O. J.; Babaremu, K. O.; Justin, L. D. Plastic Wastes: Environmental Hazard and Instrument for Wealth Creation in Nigeria. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05131. [CrossRef]
  36. Kumar, R.; Verma, A.; Shome, A.; Sinha, R.; Sinha, S.; Jha, P. K.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, P.; Shubham; Das, S.; Sharma, P.; Prasad, P. V. V. Impacts of Plastic Pollution on Ecosystem Services, Sustainable Development Goals, and Need to Focus on Circular Economy and Policy Interventions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1–40. [CrossRef]
  37. Proshad, R.; Kormoker, T.; Islam, M. S.; Haque, M. A.; Rahman, M. M.; Mithu, M. M. R. Toxic Effects of Plastic on Human Health and Environment: A Consequences of Health Risk Assessment in Bangladesh. Int. J. Heal. 2017, 6, 1. [CrossRef]
  38. Krammer, J. Exploring the Last Phases of Product Development;From Kitchen to Plant Production, LUND UNIVERSITY, 2017.
  39. Yaris, A.; Sezgin, A. C. Food Packaging : Glass and Plastic. In Researches On Science and Art in 21st Century Turkey; 2017; Vol. 8, pp 735–740.
  40. Testa, M.; Malandrino, O.; Sessa, M. R.; Supino, S.; Sica, D. Long-Term Sustainability from the Perspective of Cullet Recycling in the Container Glass Industry: Evidence from Italy. Sustain. 2017, 9. [CrossRef]
  41. Shin, J.; Selke, S. E. Food Packaging. In Food Processing: Principles and Applications, Second Edition; 2014; pp 249–273.
  42. Dunn, T. J. Food Packaging. Kirk-Othmer Encycl. Chem. Technol. 2017, 1–24. [CrossRef]
  43. Deshwal, G. K.; Panjagari, N. R. Review on Metal Packaging: Materials, Forms, Food Applications, Safety and Recyclability. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2377–2392. [CrossRef]
  44. Debeaufort, F. Metal Packaging. In Packaging Materials and Processing for Food, Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetics; 2021; Vol. 13, pp 75–104. [CrossRef]
  45. Sand, C. K. The Role of Metal in Food Packaging. Food Technol. 2021, July, 1–7.
  46. Pandey, S.; Mishra, K. K.; Ghosh, P.; Singh, A. K.; Jha, S. K. Characterization of Tin-Plated Steel. Front. Mater. 2023, January. [CrossRef]
  47. Cheng, H.; Chen, L.; McClements, D. J.; Yang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, F.; Miao, M.; Tian, Y.; Jin, Z. Starch-Based Biodegradable Packaging Materials: A Review of Their Preparation, Characterization and Diverse Applications in the Food Industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 114 (July 2020), 70–82. [CrossRef]
  48. Orzan, G.; Cruceru, A. F.; Teodora, C.; Chivu, R. Consumers’ Behavior Concerning Sustainable Packaging: An Exploratory Study on Romanian Consumers. sustainability 2018. [CrossRef]
  49. Udayakumar, G. P.; Muthusamy, S.; Selvaganesh, B.; Sivarajasekar, N.; Rambabu, K.; Banat, F.; Sivamani, S.; Sivakumar, N.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Show, P. L. Biopolymers and Composites: Properties, Characterization and Their Applications in Food, Medical and Pharmaceutical Industries. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105322. [CrossRef]
  50. Baranwal, J.; Barse, B.; Fais, A.; Delogu, L. G.; Kumar, A. Biopolymer: A Sustainable Material for Food and Medical Applications. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14, 1–22.
  51. Adeyeye, O. A.; Sadiku, E. R.; Babu Reddy, A.; Ndamase, A. S.; Makgatho, G.; Sellamuthu, P. S.; Perumal, A. B.; Nambiar, R. B.; Fasiku, V. O.; Ibrahim, I. D.; Agboola, O.; Kupolati, W. K.; Daramola, O. O.; Machane, M. J.; Jamiru, T. The Use of Biopolymers in Food Packaging. In Green Biopolymers and their Nanocomposites; Springer Singapore, 2019; pp 137–158. [CrossRef]
  52. Teixeira-Costa, B.; Andrade, C. Natural Polymers Used in Edible Food Packaging—History, Function and Application Trends as a Sustainable Alternative to Synthetic Plastic. Polysaccharides 2021, 3, 32–58. [CrossRef]
  53. Qureshi, D.; Nayak, S. K.; Anis, A.; Ray, S. S.; Kim, D.; Hanh Nguyen, T. T.; Pal, K. Introduction of Biopolymers: Food and Biomedical Applications. In Biopolymer-Based Formulations: Biomedical and Food Applications; Elsevier Inc., 2020; pp 1–45. [CrossRef]
  54. Dassanayake, R. S.; Acharya, S.; Abidi, N. Biopolymer-Based Materials from Polysaccharides: Properties, Processing, Characterization and Sorption Applications. In Advanced Sorption Process Applications; 2019; pp 1–24. [CrossRef]
  55. Zhao, Y.; Li, B.; Li, C.; Xu, Y.; Luo, Y.; Liang, D.; Huang, C. Comprehensive Review of Polysaccharide-Based Materials in Edible Packaging: A Sustainable Approach; 2021; Vol. 10. [CrossRef]
  56. Kong, I.; Degraeve, P.; Pui, L. P. Polysaccharide-Based Edible Films Incorporated with Essential Oil Nanoemulsions: Physico-Chemical, Mechanical Properties and Its Application in Food Preservation—A Review. Foods 2022, 11. [CrossRef]
  57. Katiyar, V.; Gupta, R.; Ghosh, T. Advances in Sustainable Polymers; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2019. [CrossRef]
  58. Pal, K.; Sarkar, P.; Anis, A.; Wiszumirska, K.; Jarzębski, M. Polysaccharide-based Nanocomposites for Food Packaging Applications. Materials (Basel). 2021, 14, 1–38. [CrossRef]
  59. Tadini, C. C. Bio-Based Materials from Traditional and Nonconventional Native and Modified Starches; Elsevier Inc., 2017. [CrossRef]
  60. Cazon, P.; Velazquez, G.; Ramirez, J. A.; Vázquez, M. Polysaccharide-Based Films and Coatings for Food Packaging: A Review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 68, 136–148. [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, J.; Hu, P.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wei, C. Progress in High-Amylose Cereal Crops through Inactivation of Starch Branching Enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1–10. [CrossRef]
  62. Jayarathna, S.; Andersson, M.; Andersson, R. Recent Advances in Starch-Based Blends and Composites for Bioplastics Applications. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14. [CrossRef]
  63. Gunawardene, O. H. P.; Gunathilake, C.; Amaraweera, S. M.; Fernando, N. M. L.; Wanninayaka, D. B.; Manamperi, A.; Kulatunga, A. K.; Rajapaksha, S. M.; Dassanayake, R. S.; Fernando, C. A. N.; Manipura, A. Compatibilization of Starch/Synthetic Biodegradable Polymer Blends for Packaging Applications: A Review. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 1–33. [CrossRef]
  64. Diyana, Z. N.; Jumaidin, R.; Selamat, M. Z.; Ghazali, I.; Julmohammad, N.; Huda, N.; Ilyas, R. A. Physical Properties of Thermoplastic Starch Derived from Natural Resources and Its Blends: A Review. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13, 5–20. [CrossRef]
  65. Lauer, M. K.; Smith, R. C. Recent Advances in Starch-Based Films toward Food Packaging Applications: Physicochemical, Mechanical, and Functional Properties. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 3031–3083. [CrossRef]
  66. Siqueira, L. do V.; Arias, C. I. L. F.; Maniglia, B. C.; Tadini, C. C. Starch-Based Biodegradable Plastics: Methods of Production, Challenges and Future Perspectives. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 38, 122–130. [CrossRef]
  67. Onyeaka, H.; Obileke, K.; Makaka, G.; Nwokolo, N. Current Research and Applications of Starch-Based Biodegradable Films for Food Packaging. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14, 83–102. [CrossRef]
  68. Issa, A.; Ibrahim, S. A.; Tahergorabi, R. Impact of Sweet Potato Starch-Based Nanocomposite Films Activated with Thyme Essential Oil on the Shelf-Life of Baby Spinach Leaves. Foods 2017, 6 (6), 1–13. [CrossRef]
  69. Baek, S. K.; Kim, S.; Song, K. Bin. Cowpea Starch Films Containing Maqui Berry Extract and Their Application in Salmon Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 22, 100394. [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, N.; Gao, H. X.; He, Q.; Zeng, W. C. Potato Starch-Based Film Incorporated with Tea Polyphenols and Its Application in Fruit Packaging. Polymers (Basel). 2023, 15, 1–13. [CrossRef]
  71. Garcia, A. V.; Alvarez-Perez, O. B.; Rojas, R.; Aguilar, C. N.; Garrigós, M. C. Impact of Olive Extract Addition on Corn Starch-Based Active Edible Films Properties for Food Packaging Applications. Foods 2020, 9, 1–20. [CrossRef]
  72. Behera, L.; Mohanta, M.; Thirugnanam, A. Environmental Technology & Innovation Intensification of Yam-Starch Based Biodegradable Bioplastic Film with Bentonite for Food Packaging Application. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 25, 102180. [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Hou, X.; Cui, Q.; Wu, H.; Shen, G.; Luo, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Li, M.; Zhou, M.; Zhu, X.; Chen, A.; Zhang, Z. Starch-Based Film Functionalized with Zanthoxylum Armatum Essential Oil Improved the Shelf Life of Beef Sauce. Lwt 2023, 183, 114930. [CrossRef]
  74. Bangar, S. P.; Whiteside, W. S.; Ozogul, F.; Dunno, K. D.; Cavender, G. A.; Dawson, P. Development of Starch-Based Films Reinforced with Cellulosic Nanocrystals and Essential Oil to Extend the Shelf Life of Red Grapes. Food Biosci. 2022, 47. [CrossRef]
  75. Marichelvam, M. K.; Manimaran, P.; Sanjay, M. R.; Siengchin, S.; Geetha, M.; Kandakodeeswaran, K.; Boonyasopon, P.; Gorbatyuk, S. Extraction and Development of Starch-Based Bioplastics from Prosopis Juliflora Plant: Eco-Friendly and Sustainability Aspects. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 5, 100296. [CrossRef]
  76. Tafa, K. D.; Satheesh, N.; Abera, W. Mechanical Properties of Tef Starch Based Edible Films: Development and Process Optimization. Heliyon 2023, 9. [CrossRef]
  77. Ardjoum, N.; Chibani, N.; Shankar, S.; Salmieri, S.; Djidjelli, H.; Lacroix, M. Incorporation of Thymus Vulgaris Essential Oil and Ethanolic Extract of Propolis Improved the Antibacterial, Barrier and Mechanical Properties of Corn Starch-Based Films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 224, 578–583. [CrossRef]
  78. Mishra, S.; Singh, P. K.; Pattnaik, R.; Kumar, S.; Ojha, S. K.; Srichandan, H.; Parhi, P. K.; Jyothi, R. K.; Sarangi, P. K. Biochemistry, Synthesis, and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose: A Review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1–12. [CrossRef]
  79. Janjarasskul, T.; Krochta, J. M. Edible Packaging Materials. Annu. Rev. ofFood Sci. Technol. 2016, 1, 415–448. [CrossRef]
  80. Torres-Giner, S.; Figueroa-Lopez, K. J.; Melendez-Rodriguez, B.; Prieto, C.; Pardo-Figuerez, M.; Lagaron, J. M. Emerging Trends in Biopolymers for Food Packaging. In Sustainable Food Packaging Technology; Athanassiou, A., Ed.; 2021; pp 1–33. [CrossRef]
  81. Yemenicioglu, A.; Farris, S.; Turkyilmaz, M.; Gulec, S. A Review of Current and Future Food Applications of Natural Hydrocolloids. Iternational J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 1, 1–18. [CrossRef]
  82. Zhong, C. Industrial-Scale Production and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 1–19. [CrossRef]
  83. Atta, O. M.; Manan, S.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ahmed, A. A. Q.; Ullah, M. W.; Yang, G. Development and Characterization of Plant Oil-Incorporated Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Bacterial Cellulose/Glycerol-Based Antimicrobial Edible Films for Food Packaging Applications. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5, 973–990. [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, X.; Guo, H.; Luo, W.; Chen, G.; Xiao, N.; Xiao, G.; Liu, C. Development of Functional Hydroxyethyl Cellulose-Based Composite Films for Food Packaging Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1–15. [CrossRef]
  85. Yaradoddi, J. S.; Banapurmath, N. R.; Ganachari, S. V.; Soudagar, M. E. M.; Mubarak, N. M.; Hallad, S.; Hugar, S.; Fayaz, H. Biodegradable Carboxymethyl Cellulose Based Material for Sustainable Packaging Application. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–13. [CrossRef]
  86. Romao, S.; Bettencourt, A.; Ribeiro, I. A. C. Novel Features of Cellulose-Based Films as Sustainable Alternatives for Food Packaging. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14, 1–27.
  87. Moradian, S.; Almasi, H.; Moini, S. Development of Bacterial Cellulose-Based Active Membranes Containing Herbal Extracts for Shelf-Life Extension of Button Mushrooms (Agaricus Bisporus). J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42. [CrossRef]
  88. Al-Moghazy, M.; Mahmoud, M.; Nada, A. A. Fabrication of Cellulose-Based Adhesive Composite as an Active Packaging Material to Extend the Shelf Life of Cheese. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 264–275. [CrossRef]
  89. Yordshahi, A. S.; Moradi, M.; Tajik, H.; Molaei, R. Design and Preparation of Antimicrobial Meat Wrapping Nanopaper with Bacterial Cellulose and Postbiotics of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 321, 108561. [CrossRef]
  90. Aydogdu, A.; Sumnu, G.; Sahin, S. Fabrication of Gallic Acid Loaded Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Nanofibers by Electrospinning Technique as Active Packaging Material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 208, 241–250. [CrossRef]
  91. Liu, Y.; Ahmed, S.; Sameen, D. E.; Wang, Y.; Lu, R.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W. A Review of Cellulose and Its Derivatives in Biopolymer-Based for Food Packaging Application. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 532–546. [CrossRef]
  92. Florez, M.; Guerra-Rodríguez, E.; Cazon, P.; Vazquez, M. Chitosan for Food Packaging: Recent Advances in Active and Intelligent Films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124. [CrossRef]
  93. Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J. W. Chitosan-Based Biodegradable Functional Films for Food Packaging Applications. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 62, 102346. [CrossRef]
  94. Kaczmarek, M. B.; Struszczyk-Swita, K.; Li, X.; Szczęsna-Antczak, M.; Daroch, M. Enzymatic Modifications of Chitin, Chitosan, and Chitooligosaccharides. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7. [CrossRef]
  95. Duan, C.; Meng, X.; Meng, J.; Khan, M. I. H.; Dai, L.; Khan, A.; An, X.; Zhang, J.; Huq, T.; Ni, Y. Chitosan as A Preservative for Fruits and Vegetables: A Review on Chemistry and Antimicrobial Properties. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2019, 4, 11–21. [CrossRef]
  96. Luangapai, F.; Peanparkdee, M.; Iwamoto, S. Biopolymer Films for Food Industries: Properties, Applications, and Future Aspects Based on Chitosan. Rev. Agric. Sci. 2019, 7, 59–67. [CrossRef]
  97. Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Dutta, J. Chitosan Based Nanocomposite Films and Coatings: Emerging Antimicrobial Food Packaging Alternatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 196–209. [CrossRef]
  98. Malm, M.; Liceaga, A. M.; Martin-gonzalez, F. S.; Jones, O. G.; Garcia-bravo, J. M.; Kaplan, I. Development of Chitosan Films from Edible Crickets and Their Performance as a Bio-Based Food Packaging Material. polysaccharides 2021, 744–758.
  99. Zehra, A.; Wani, S. M.; Jan, N.; Bhat, T. A.; Rather, S. A.; Malik, A. R.; Hussain, S. Z. Development of Chitosan - Based Biodegradable Films Enriched with Thyme Essential Oil and Additives for Potential Applications in Packaging of Fresh Collard Greens. Sci. Rep. 2022, 1–13. [CrossRef]
  100. Ruiz-cruz, S.; Enrique, M.; Jes, D.; Del-toro-s, C. L.; Gassos-ortega, L. E. Effect of Chitosan–Tomato Plant Extract Edible Coating on the Quality, Shelf Life, and Antioxidant Capacity of Pork during Refrigerated Storage. Coatings 2019, 9, 1–16.
  101. Wang, K.; Lim, P. N.; Tong, S. Y.; Thian, E. S. Development of Grapefruit Seed Extract-Loaded Poly ( ε -Caprolactone )/ Chitosan Films for Antimicrobial Food Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 22, 100396. [CrossRef]
  102. Xu, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, Q.; Yu, D.; Xu, Y.; Wang, B.; Xia, W. Development and Properties of Bacterial Cellulose, Curcumin, and Chitosan Composite Biodegradable Films for Active Packaging Materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 260, 117778. [CrossRef]
  103. Al-Hilifi, S. A.; Al-Ibresam, O. T.; Al-Hatim, R. R.; Al-Ali, R. M.; Maslekar, N.; Yao, Y.; Agarwal, V. Development of Chitosan/Whey Protein Hydrolysate Composite Films for Food Packaging Application. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7. [CrossRef]
  104. Yao, J.; Mao, L.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y. Development of Chitosan/Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Active Films Reinforced with Curcumin Functionalized Layered Clay towards Food Packaging. Prog. Org. Coatings 2023, 182, 9–10. [CrossRef]
  105. De Carli, C.; Aylanc, V.; Mouffok, K. M.; Santamaria-Echart, A.; Barreiro, F.; Tomás, A.; Pereira, C.; Rodrigues, P.; Vilas-Boas, M.; Falcão, S. I. Production of Chitosan-Based Biodegradable Active Films Using Bio-Waste Enriched with Polyphenol Propolis Extract Envisaging Food Packaging Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 213, 486–497. [CrossRef]
  106. Rodrigues, C.; de Mello, J. M. M.; Dalcanton, F.; Macuvele, D. L. P.; Padoin, N.; Fiori, M. A.; Soares, C.; Riella, H. G. Mechanical, Thermal and Antimicrobial Properties of Chitosan-Based-Nanocomposite with Potential Applications for Food Packaging. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 28, 1216–1236. [CrossRef]
  107. Karkar, B.; Patır, İ.; Eyüboğlu, S.; Şahin, S. Development of an Edible Active Chitosan Film Loaded with Nigella Sativa L. Extract to Extend the Shelf Life of Grapes. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 50. [CrossRef]
  108. Kumar, A.; Yadav, S.; Pramanik, J.; Sivamaruthi, B. S.; Jayeoye, T. J.; Prajapati, B. G.; Chaiyasut, C. Chitosan-Based Composites: Development and Perspective in Food Preservation and Biomedical Applications. Polymers (Basel). 2023, 15. [CrossRef]
  109. Anderson, C. T. Pectic Polysaccharides in Plants: Structure, Biosynthesis, Functions, and Applications. In Extracellular Sugar-Based Biopolymers Matrices; Springer Nature, 2019; pp 487–514. [CrossRef]
  110. Aguirre-Joya, J. A.; De Leon-Zapata, M. A.; Alvarez-Perez, O. B.; Torres-León, C.; Nieto-Oropeza, D. E.; Ventura-Sobrevilla, J. M.; Aguilar, M. A.; Ruelas-Chacón, X.; Rojas, R.; Ramos-Aguiñaga, M. E.; Aguilar, C. N. Basic and Applied Concepts of Edible Packaging for Foods; Elsevier Inc., 2018. [CrossRef]
  111. Vanitha, T.; Khan, M. Role of Pectin in Food Processing and Food Packaging. In Pectins - Extraction, Purification, Characterization and Applications; Masuelli, M., Ed.; 2020; pp 1-. [CrossRef]
  112. Lara-Espinoza, C.; Carvajal-Millan, E.; Balandran-Quintana, R.; Lopez-Franco, Y.; Rascon-Chu, A. Pectin and Pectin-Based Composite Materials: Beyond Food Texture. Molecules 2018, 23, 1–35. [CrossRef]
  113. Raghav, P. K.; Agarwal, N.; Saini, M. Edible Coating of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Mod. Educ. 2016, 1, 188–204.
  114. Gouveia, T. I. A.; Biernacki, K.; Castro, M. C. R.; Gonçalves, M. P.; Souza, H. K. S. A New Approach to Develop Biodegradable Films Based on Thermoplastic Pectin. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 97, 105175. [CrossRef]
  115. Oliveira, A. C. S. de; Ferreira, L. F.; Begali, D. de O.; Ugucioni, J. C.; Neto, A. R. de S.; Yoshida, M. I.; Borges, S. V. Thermoplasticized Pectin by Extrusion/Thermo-Compression for Film Industrial Application. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 2546–2556. [CrossRef]
  116. Mellinas, C.; Ramos, M.; Jiménez, A.; Garrigós, M. C. Recent Trends in the Use of Pectin from Agro-Waste Residues as a Natural-Based Biopolymer for Food Packaging Applications. Materials (Basel). 2020, 13. [CrossRef]
  117. Valdes, A.; Burgos, N.; Jimenez, A.; Garrigos, M. C. Natural Pectin Polysaccharides as Edible Coatings. Coatings 2015, 5, 865–886. [CrossRef]
  118. Siqueira, R. A.; Veras, J. M. L.; Sousa, T. L. de; Farias, P. M. de; Filho, J. G. de O.; Bertolo, M. R. V.; Egea, M. B.; Placido, G. R. Pequi Mesocarp: A New Source of Pectin to Produce Biodegradable Film for Application as Food PackagingAnunciação Veras, July Maendra Lopes de SOUSA, Tainara Leal de FARIAS, Patrícia Marques de OLIVEIRA FILHO, Josemar Gonçalves Bertolo, Mirella Romanelli V. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 42. [CrossRef]
  119. Pereira, D. G. M.; Vieira, J. M.; Vicente, A. A.; Cruz, R. M. S. Development and Characterization of Pectin Films with Salicornia Ramosissima: Biodegradation in Soil and Seawater. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13. [CrossRef]
  120. Sadadekar, A. S.; Shruthy, R.; Preetha, R.; Kumar, N.; Pande, K. R.; Nagamaniammai, G. Enhanced Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Nano Chitosan and Pectin Based Biodegradable Active Packaging Films Incorporated with Fennel (Foeniculum Vulgare) Essential Oil and Potato (Solanum Tuberosum) Peel Extracts. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 938–946. [CrossRef]
  121. Sood, A.; Saini, C. S. Utilization of Peel of White Pomelo for the Development of Pectin Based Biodegradable Composite Films Blended with Casein and Egg Albumen. Food Chem. Adv. 2022, 1, 100054. [CrossRef]
  122. Shivangi, S.; Dorairaj, D.; Negi, P. S.; Shetty, N. P. Development and Characterisation of a Pectin-Based Edible Film That Contains Mulberry Leaf Extract and Its Bio-Active Components. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 121, 107046. [CrossRef]
  123. Jiang, H.; Zhang, W.; Pu, Y.; Chen, L.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. Development and Characterization of a Novel Active and Intelligent Film Based on Pectin and Betacyanins from Peel Waste of Pitaya (Hylocereus Undatus). Food Chem. 2023, 404. [CrossRef]
  124. Kannan, A.; Dheeptha, M.; Sistla, Y. S. Development of Pectin and Sodium Alginate Composite Films with Improved Barrier and Mechanical Properties for Food-Packaging Applications. Eng. Proc. 2023, 37. [CrossRef]
  125. Teleky, B.-E.; Mitrea, L.; Plamada, D.; Nemes, S. A.; Lavinia-florina, C.; Pascuta, M. S.; Varvara, R.; Szabo, K. Development of Pectin and Poly (Vinyl Alcohol ) -Based Active Packaging Enriched with Itaconic Acid and Apple Pomace-Derived Antioxidants. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1–21.
  126. Han, H. S.; Song, K. Bin. Antioxidant Activities of Mandarin (Citrus Unshiu) Peel Pectin Films Containing Sage (Salvia Officinalis) Leaf Extract. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 3173–3181. [CrossRef]
  127. Nisar, T.; Wang, Z. C.; Yang, X.; Tian, Y.; Iqbal, M.; Guo, Y. Characterization of Citrus Pectin Films Integrated with Clove Bud Essential Oil: Physical, Thermal, Barrier, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 670–680. [CrossRef]
  128. Parreidt, T. S.; Müller, K.; Schmid, M. Alginate-Based Edible Films and Coatings for Food Packaging Applications. Foods 2018, 7, 1–38. [CrossRef]
  129. Ferreira, A. R. V.; Alves, V. D.; Coelhoso, I. M. Polysaccharide-Based Membranes in Food Packaging Applications. Membranes (Basel). 2016, 6, 1–17. [CrossRef]
  130. Castro-Yobal, M. .; Contreras-Oliva, A.; Saucedo-Rivalcoba, V.; Rivera-Armenta, J. L.; Hernández-Ramírez, G.; Salinas-Ruiz, J.; Herrera-Corredor, A. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of Film-Based Alginate for Food Packing Applications. E-Polymers 2021, 21, 82–95. [CrossRef]
  131. Kruk, K.; Winnicka, K. Alginates Combined with Natural Polymers as Valuable Drug Delivery Platforms. Mar. Drugs 2022, 21, 1–33. [CrossRef]
  132. Kontominas, M. G. Use of Alginates as Food Packaging Materials. Foods 2020, 9. [CrossRef]
  133. Reddy, S. G. Alginates –A Seaweed Product: Its Properties and Applications. In Properties and Applications of Alginates; 2021; pp 225–240.
  134. Kocira, A.; Kozłowicz, K.; Panasiewicz, K.; Staniak, M.; Szpunar-Krok, E.; Hortyńska, P. Polysaccharides as Edible Films and Coatings: Characteristics and Influence on Fruit and Vegetable Quality—a Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1–38. [CrossRef]
  135. Anis, A.; Pal, K. Essential Oil-Containing Polysaccharide-Based Edible Films and Coatings for Food Security Applications. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13, 575. [CrossRef]
  136. Parreidt, T. S.; Lindner, M.; Rothkopf, I.; Schmid, M.; Müller, K. The Development of a Uniform Alginate-Based Coating for Cantaloupe and Strawberries and the Characterization of Water Barrier Properties. Foods 2019, 8. [CrossRef]
  137. Puscaselu, R.; Gutt, G.; Amariei, S. The Use of Edible Films Based on Sodium Alginate in Meat Product Packaging: An Eco-Friendly Alternative to Conventional Plastic Materials. Coatings 2020, 10. [CrossRef]
  138. Nair, M. S.; Saxena, A.; Kaur, C. Effect of Chitosan and Alginate Based Coatings Enriched with Pomegranate Peel Extract to Extend the Postharvest Quality of Guava (Psidium Guajava L.). Food Chem. 2018, 240, 245–252. [CrossRef]
  139. Dulta, K.; Koşarsoy Agçeli, G.; Thakur, A.; Singh, S.; Chauhan, P.; Chauhan, P. K. Development of Alginate-Chitosan Based Coating Enriched with ZnO Nanoparticles for Increasing the Shelf Life of Orange Fruits (Citrus Sinensis L.). J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 3293–3306. [CrossRef]
  140. Bazargani-Gilani, B. Activating Sodium Alginate-Based Edible Coating Using a Dietary Supplement for Increasing the Shelf Life of Rainbow Trout Fillet during Refrigerated Storage (4 ± 1 °C). J. Food Saf. 2018, 38, 1–9. [CrossRef]
  141. Mahcene, Z.; Khelil, A.; Hasni, S.; Akman, P. K.; Bozkurt, F.; Birech, K.; Goudjil, M. B.; Tornuk, F. Development and Characterization of Sodium Alginate Based Active Edible Films Incorporated with Essential Oils of Some Medicinal Plants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 124–132. [CrossRef]
  142. Alves, Z.; Ferreira, N. M.; Mendo, S.; Ferreira, P.; Nunes, C. Design of Alginate-based Bionanocomposites with Electrical Conductivity for Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22. [CrossRef]
  143. Abdullah, S. Z.; Tong, W. Y.; Leong, C. R.; Rashid, S. A.; Rozman, N. A. S.; Hamid, N. H. M.; Karim, S.; Tumin, N. D.; Muda, S. A.; Yacob, L. S. Development of Cinnamaldehyde Loaded-Alginate Based Film for Food Packaging. Asia-Pacific J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 2021, 29, 18–25. [CrossRef]
  144. Bata Gouda, M. H.; Zhang, C.; Peng, S.; Kong, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Luo, H.; Yu, L. Combination of Sodium Alginate-Based Coating with L-Cysteine and Citric Acid Extends the Shelf-Life of Fresh-Cut Lotus Root Slices by Inhibiting Browning and Microbial Growth. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 175, 111502. [CrossRef]
  145. Montone, A. M. I.; Malvano, F.; Pham, P. L.; Cinquanta, L. C.; Capparelli, R.; Capuano, F.; Albanese, D. Alginate-based Coatings Charged with Hydroxyapatite and Quercetin for Fresh-cut Papaya Shelf Life. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 5307–5318.
  146. Ramakrishnan, R.; Kulandhaivelu, S. V.; Roy, S. Alginate/Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Starch- Based Active Coating with Grapefruit Seed Extract to Extend the Shelf Life of Green Chilli. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 199, 99.
  147. Feng, S.; Tang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Huang, K.; Li, H.; Zou, Z. Development of Novel Co-MOF Loaded Sodium Alginate Based Packaging Films with Antimicrobial and Ammonia-Sensitive Functions for Shrimp Freshness Monitoring. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 135. [CrossRef]
  148. Jeevahan, J.; Studies, A.; Govindaraj, M. A Brief Review on Edible Food Packaging Materials. J. Glob. Eng. Probl. Solut. 2017, 1, 9–19.
  149. Karbowiak, T.; Debeaufort, F.; Champion, D.; Voilley, A. Wetting Properties at the Surface of Iota-Carrageenan-Based Edible Films. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 294, 400–410. [CrossRef]
  150. Janjarasskul, T.; Krochta, J. M. Edible Packaging Materials. 2016, No. April 2010. [CrossRef]
  151. Bhat, K. M.; R, J.; Sharma, A.; Rao, N. N. Carrageenan-Based Edible Biodegradable Food Packaging: A Review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 5, 69–75.
  152. Li, F.; Liu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhe, T.; Guo, Z.; Sun, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, L. Copper Sulfide Nanoparticle-Carrageenan Films for Packaging Application. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 109, 106094. [CrossRef]
  153. Sedayu, B. B.; Cran, M. J.; Bigger, S. W. A Review of Property Enhancement Techniques for Carrageenan-Based Films and Coatings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 216, 287–302. [CrossRef]
  154. Simona, J.; Dani, D.; Petr, S.; Marcela, N.; Jakub, T.; Bohuslava, T. Edible Films from Carrageenan/Orange Essential Oil/Trehalose—Structure, Optical Properties, and Antimicrobial Activity. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13, 1–19. [CrossRef]
  155. Cheng, C.; Chen, S.; Su, J.; Zhu, M.; Zhou, M.; Chen, T.; Han, Y. Recent Advances in Carrageenan-Based Films for Food Packaging Applications. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9. [CrossRef]
  156. Martiny, T. R.; Raghavan, V.; de Moraes, C. C.; da Rosa, G. S.; Dotto, G. L. Bio-Based Active Packaging: Carrageenan Film with Olive Leaf Extract for Lamb Meat Preservation. Foods 2020, 9 , 1–14. [CrossRef]
  157. Avila, L. B.; Barreto, E. R. C.; de Souza, P. K.; Silva, B. D. Z.; Martiny, T. R.; Moraes, C. C.; Morais, M. M.; Raghavan, V.; da Rosa, G. S. Carrageenan-Based Films Incorporated with Jaboticaba Peel Extract: An Innovative Material for Active Food Packaging. Molecules 2020, 25. [CrossRef]
  158. Duan, N.; Li, Q.; Meng, X.; Wang, Z.; Wu, S. Preparation and Characterization of K-Carrageenan/Konjac Glucomannan/TiO2 Nanocomposite Film with Efficient Anti-Fungal Activity and Its Application in Strawberry Preservation. Food Chem. 2021, 364, 130441. [CrossRef]
  159. Santos, C.; Ramos, A.; Luís, Â.; Amaral, M. E. Production and Characterization of K-Carrageenan Films Incorporating Cymbopogon Winterianus Essential Oil as New Food Packaging Materials. Foods 2023, 12. [CrossRef]
  160. Panatarani, C.; Praseptiangga, D.; Widjanarko, P. I.; Azhary, S. Y.; Nurlilasari, P.; Rochima, E.; Joni, I. M. Synthesis, Characterization, and Performance of Semi-Refined Kappa Carrageenan-Based Film Incorporating Cassava Starch. Membranes (Basel). 2023, 13. [CrossRef]
  161. Kim, Y. H.; Bang, Y. J.; Yoon, K. S.; Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J. W. Pine Needle (Pinus Densiflora) Extract-Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and the Preparation of Carrageenan-Based Antimicrobial Packaging Films. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022. [CrossRef]
  162. Mahajan, K.; Kumar, S.; Bhat, Z. F.; Naqvi, Z.; Mungure, T. E.; Bekhit, A. E. D. A. Functionalization of Carrageenan Based Edible Film Using Aloe Vera for Improved Lipid Oxidative and Microbial Stability of Frozen Dairy Products. Food Biosci. 2021, 43, 101336. [CrossRef]
  163. You, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Wei, M.; Wang, X. Development of Highly Stable Color Indicator Films Based on κ-Carrageenan, Silver Nanoparticle and Red Grape Skin Anthocyanin for Marine Fish Freshness Assessment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 216, 655–669. [CrossRef]
  164. Pinto, L.; Bonifacio, M. A.; De Giglio, E.; Santovito, E.; Cometa, S.; Bevilacqua, A.; Baruzzi, F. Biopolymer Hybrid Materials: Development, Characterization, and Food Packaging Applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 28, 100676. [CrossRef]
  165. Khodaei, D.; Álvarez, C.; Mullen, A. M. Biodegradable Packaging Materials from Animal Processing Co-Products and Wastes: An Overview. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13. [CrossRef]
  166. Galgano, F.; Condelli, N.; Favati, F.; Di Bianco, V.; Perretti, G.; Caruso, M. C. Biodegradable Packaging and Edible Coating for Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2015, 27, 1–20. [CrossRef]
  167. Maurizzi, E.; Bigi, F.; Quartieri, A.; De Leo, R.; Volpelli, L. A.; Pulvirenti, A. The Green Era of Food Packaging: General Considerations and New Trends. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14. [CrossRef]
  168. Naser, A. Z.; Deiab, I.; Darras, B. M. Poly (Lactic Acid) (PLA) and Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), Green Alternatives to Petroleum-Based Plastics: A Review. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 17151–17196. [CrossRef]
  169. Farah, S.; Anderson, D. G.; Langer, R. Physical and Mechanical Properties of PLA, and Their Functions in Widespread Applications — A Comprehensive Review. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 107, 367–392. [CrossRef]
  170. Sharma, S. Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Its Composites: An Eco-friendly Solution for Packaging. In Sustainable Food Packaging Technology; 2021; pp 107–132. [CrossRef]
  171. Marano, S.; Laudadio, E.; Minnelli, C.; Stipa, P. Tailoring the Barrier Properties of PLA: A State-of-the-Art Review for Food Packaging Applications. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14. [CrossRef]
  172. Torres-giner, S.; Figueroa-lopez, K. J.; Melendez-rodriguez, B.; Prieto, C.; Pardo-figuerez, M.; Lagaron, J. M. Emerging Trends in Biopolymers for Food Packaging. In Sustainable Food PackagingTechnology; 2021; pp 1–32.
  173. Mohamad, N.; Mazlan, M. M.; Tawakkal, I. S. M. A.; Talib, R. A.; Kian, L. K.; Fouad, H.; Jawaid, M. Development of Active Agents Filled Polylactic Acid Films for Food Packaging Application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 1451–1457. [CrossRef]
  174. Khanjari, A.; Esmaeili, H.; Hamedi, M. Shelf-Life Extension of Minced Squab Using Poly-Lactic Acid Films Containing Cinnamomum Verum Essential Oil. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2023, 385, 109982. [CrossRef]
  175. Ardjoum, N.; Chibani, N.; Shankar, S.; Fadhel, Y. Ben; Djidjelli, H.; Lacroix, M. Development of Antimicrobial Films Based on Poly(Lactic Acid) Incorporated with Thymus Vulgaris Essential Oil and Ethanolic Extract of Mediterranean Propolis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 185, 535–542. [CrossRef]
  176. Ding, J.; Hao, Y.; Liu, B.; Chen, Y.; Li, L. Development and Application of Poly (Lactic Acid)/Poly (Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate)/Thermoplastic Starch Film Containing Salicylic Acid for Banana Preservation. Foods 2023, 12, 3397. [CrossRef]
  177. Hernández-García, E.; Vargas, M.; Torres-Giner, S. Quality and Shelf-Life Stability of Pork Meat Fillets Packaged in Multilayer Polylactide Films. Foods 2022, 11. [CrossRef]
  178. Zhang, L.; Huang, C.; Xu, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhao, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Antibacterial Polylactic Acid Film Incorporated with Cinnamaldehyde Inclusions for Fruit Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4547–4555. [CrossRef]
  179. Suwanamornlert, P.; Kerddonfag, N.; Sane, A.; Chinsirikul, W.; Zhou, W.; Chonhenchob, V. Poly (Lactic Acid)/Poly (Butylene-Succinate-Co-Adipate) (PLA/PBSA) Blend Films Containing Thymol as Alternative to Synthetic Preservatives for Active Packaging of Bread. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 25, 100515. [CrossRef]
  180. Zhou, X.; Cheng, R.; Wang, B.; Zeng, J.; Xu, J.; Li, J.; Kang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Gao, W.; Chen, K. Biodegradable Sandwich-Architectured Films Derived from Pea Starch and Polylactic Acid with Enhanced Shelf-Life for Fruit Preservation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117117. [CrossRef]
  181. Wongthanaroj, D.; Jessmore, L. A.; Lin, Y.; Bergholz, T. M.; Stark, N. M.; Sabo, R. C.; Matuana, L. M. Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Poly (Lactic Acid)/Cellulose Nanocrystal Nanocomposite Films for the Preservation of Oxygen-Sensitive Food. Appl. Food Res. 2022, 2, 100222. [CrossRef]
  182. Nasution, H.; Harahap, H.; Julianti, E.; Safitri, A.; Jaafar, M. Smart Packaging Based on Polylactic Acid: The Effects of Antibacterial and Antioxidant Agents from Natural Extracts on Physical – Mechanical Properties, Colony Reduction , Perishable Food Shelf Life , and Future Prospective. Polymers (Basel). 2023, 15. [CrossRef]
  183. Gabor, D.; Tita, O. Biopolymers Used in Food Packaging: A Review. Acta Univ. Cibiniensis Ser. E Food Technol. 2012, XVI (2), 3–19.
  184. Manikandan, N. A.; Pakshirajan, K.; Pugazhenthi, G. Preparation and Characterization of Environmentally Safe and Highly Biodegradable Microbial Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Based Graphene Nanocomposites for Potential Food Packaging Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 866–877. [CrossRef]
  185. Pawar, P. A; Purwar, A. H. Bioderadable Polymers in Food Packaging. Am. J. Eng. Res. 2013, No. 05, 151–164.
  186. Garcia-Garcia, D.; Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Balart, R.; Torres-Giner, S.; Arrieta, M. P. Innovative Solutions and Challenges to Increase the Use of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) in Food Packaging and Disposables. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 178. [CrossRef]
  187. Yeo, J. C. C.; Muiruri, J. K.; Thitsartarn, W.; Li, Z.; He, C. Recent Advances in the Development of Biodegradable PHB-Based Toughening Materials: Approaches, Advantages and Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 92, 1092–1116. [CrossRef]
  188. Rech, C. R.; Brabes, K. C. S.; Silva, B. E. B.; Martines, M. A. U.; Silveira, T. F. S.; Alberton, J.; Amadeu, C. A. A.; Caon, T.; Arruda, E. J.; Martelli, S. M. Antimicrobial and Physical–Mechanical Properties of Polyhydroxybutyrate Edible Films Containing Essential Oil Mixtures. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 1202–1211. [CrossRef]
  189. Kumari, S. V. G.; Pakshirajan, K.; Pugazhenthi, G. Facile Fabrication and Characterization of Novel Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate)/Essential Oil Composites for Potential Use in Active Food Packaging Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 252, 98. [CrossRef]
  190. Fiorentini, C.; Bassani, A.; Zaccone, M.; Luana, M.; Díaz, E.; Apodaca, D.; Spigno, G. Active Coated PLA-PHB Film with Formulations Containing a Commercial Olive Leaf Extract to Improve Quality Preservation of Fresh Pork Burgers. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2023, 102, 85–90. [CrossRef]
  191. Jiang, J.; Dong, Q.; Gao, H.; Han, Y.; Li, L. Enhanced Mechanical and Antioxidant Properties of Biodegradable Poly (Lactic) Acid-Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-4-Hydroxybutyrate) Film Utilizing α-Tocopherol for Peach Storage. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2021, 34, 187–199. [CrossRef]
  192. Iglesias-Montes, M. L.; Soccio, M.; Siracusa, V.; Gazzano, M.; Lotti, N.; Cyras, V. P.; Manfredi, L. B. Chitin Nanocomposite Based on Plasticized Poly (Lactic Acid)/Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) (PLA/PHB) Blends as Fully Biodegradable Packaging Materials. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14. [CrossRef]
  193. Miao, L.; Walton, W. C.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Wang, Y. Characterization of Polylactic Acids-Polyhydroxybutyrate Based Packaging Film with Fennel Oil, and Its Application on Oysters. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 22. [CrossRef]
  194. Singh, P.; Chatli, A. S.; Mehndiratta, H. K. Development of Starch Based Edible Films. Int. J. Dev. Res. 2018, 8, 23501–23506.
  195. Yang, S.-Y.; Cao, L.; Kim, H.; Beak, S. E.; Song, K. Bin. Utilization of Foxtail Millet Starch Film Incorporated with Clove Leaf Oil for the Packaging of Queso Blanco Cheese as a Model Food. Starch/Staerke 2018, 70. [CrossRef]
  196. Aghazadeh, M.; Karim, R.; Sultan, M. T.; Paykary, M.; Johnson, S. K.; Shekarforoush, E. Comparison of Starch Films and Effect of Different Rice Starch-Based Coating Formulations on Physical Properties of Walnut during Storage Time at Accelerated Temperature. J. Food Process Eng. 2018, 41. [CrossRef]
  197. Cheng, J.; Wang, H.; Kang, S.; Xia, L.; Jiang, S.; Chen, M.; Jiang, S. An Active Packaging Film Based on Yam Starch with Eugenol and Its Application for Pork Preservation. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 96, 546–554. [CrossRef]
  198. (198) Pavinatto, A.; Mattos, A. V. de A.; Malpass, A. C. G.; Okura, M. H.; Balogh, D. T.; Sanfelice, R. C. Coating with Chitosan-Based Edible Films for Mechanical/ Biological Protection of Strawberries. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 1004–1011. [CrossRef]
  199. Priyadarshi, R.; Sauraj; Kumar, B.; Deeba, F.; Kulshreshtha, A.; Negi, Y. S. Chitosan Films Incorporated with Apricot (Prunus Armeniaca) Kernel Essential Oil as Active Food Packaging Material. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 85, 158–166. [CrossRef]
  200. Kumar, N.; Pratibha; Petkoska, A. T.; Khojah, E.; Sami, R.; A. M., A.; Al-Mushhin. Chitosan Edible Films Enhanced with Pomegranate Peel Extract: Study on Physical, Biological, Thermal, and Barrier Properties. Materials (Basel). 2021, 14, 1–18.
  201. Salama, H. E.; Abdel Aziz, M. S. Development of Active Edible Coating of Alginate and Aloe Vera Enriched with Frankincense Oil for Retarding the Senescence of Green Capsicums. Lwt 2021, 145, 111341. [CrossRef]
  202. Chen, J.; Wu, A.; Yang, M.; Ge, Y.; Pristijono, P.; Li, J.; Xu, B.; Mi, H. Characterization of Sodium Alginate-Based Films Incorporated with Thymol for Fresh-Cut Apple Packaging. Food Control 2021, 126, 108063. [CrossRef]
  203. Sarengaowa; Hu, W.; Jiang, A.; Xiu, Z.; Feng, K. Effect of Thyme Oil–Alginate-Based Coating on Quality and Microbial Safety of Fresh-Cut Apples. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 2302–2311. [CrossRef]
  204. Ravishankar, S.; Jaroni, D.; Zhu, L.; Olsen, C.; McHugh, T.; Friedman, M. Inactivation of Listeria Monocytogenes on Ham and Bologna Using Pectin-Based Apple, Carrot, and Hibiscus Edible Films Containing Carvacrol and Cinnamaldehyde. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, 1–6. [CrossRef]
  205. Romero, J.; Cruz, R. M. S.; Díez-Méndez, A.; Albertos, I. Valorization of Berries’ Agro-Industrial Waste in the Development of Biodegradable Pectin-Based Films for Fresh Salmon (Salmo Salar) Shelf-Life Monitoring. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23. [CrossRef]
  206. Farhan, A.; Hani, N. M. Active Edible Films Based on Semi-Refined κ-Carrageenan: Antioxidant and Color Properties and Application in Chicken Breast Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100476. [CrossRef]
  207. Meindrawan, B.; Suyatma, N. E.; Wardana, A. A.; Pamela, V. Y. Nanocomposite Coating Based on Carrageenan and ZnO Nanoparticles to Maintain the Storage Quality of Mango. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 18, 140–146. [CrossRef]
  208. Ma, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y. Development of PLA-PHB-Based Biodegradable Active Packaging and Its Application to Salmon. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2018, 31, 739–746. [CrossRef]
  209. Fiore, A.; Park, S.; Volpe, S.; Torrieri, E.; Masi, P. Active Packaging Based on PLA and Chitosan-Caseinate Enriched Rosemary Essential Oil Coating for Fresh Minced Chicken Breast Application. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100708. [CrossRef]
  210. Salgado, P. R.; Di Giorgio, L.; Musso, Y. S.; Mauri, A. N. Recent Developments in Smart Food Packaging Focused on Biobased and Biodegradable Polymers. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 1–30. [CrossRef]
  211. Peramune, D. L.; Ranaweera, S.; Marasinghe, W. N.; Manatunga, D. C.; Jayathunge, K. G. L. R.; Dassanayake, R. S. Polysaccharides-Based Food Packaging Films: An Overview. In Food Packaging-Safety, Management and Quality; Lai, W.-F., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, 2022; pp 3–40. [CrossRef]
  212. Tan, C.; Han, F.; Zhang, S.; Li, P.; Shang, N. Novel Bio-Based Materials and Applications in Antimicrobial Food Packaging: Recent Advances and Future Trends. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22. [CrossRef]
  213. Chaudhary, V.; Bangar, S. P.; Thaku, N.; Trif, M. Recent Advancements in Smart Biogenic Packaging: Reshaping the Future of the Food Packaging Industry. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14. [CrossRef]
  214. Chausali, N.; Saxena, J.; Prasad, R. Recent Trends in Nanotechnology Applications of Bio-Based Packaging. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 7, 100257. [CrossRef]
  215. Chawla, R.; Sivakumar, S.; Kaur, H. Antimicrobial Edible Films in Food Packaging: Current Scenario and Recent Nanotechnological Advancements- a Review. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100024. [CrossRef]
Preprints 96963 g001
Figure 1. Main types of conventional food packaging materials.
Figure 1. Main types of conventional food packaging materials.
Preprints 96963 g001
Preprints 96963 g002
Figure 2. A summary of biopolymers and their key elements related to sustainable food packaging discussed in this review.
Figure 2. A summary of biopolymers and their key elements related to sustainable food packaging discussed in this review.
Preprints 96963 g002
Preprints 96963 g003
Figure 3. Chemical structures of amylose (left) and amylopectin (right) in starch.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of amylose (left) and amylopectin (right) in starch.
Preprints 96963 g003
Preprints 96963 g004
Figure 4. The effect of potato starch-based film incorporated with different concentrations of tea polyphenols on the color of fresh-cut bananas (Reprinted with permission from [70]).
Figure 4. The effect of potato starch-based film incorporated with different concentrations of tea polyphenols on the color of fresh-cut bananas (Reprinted with permission from [70]).
Preprints 96963 g004
Preprints 96963 g005
Figure 5. Chemical structure of cellulose.
Figure 5. Chemical structure of cellulose.
Preprints 96963 g005
Preprints 96963 g006
Figure 6. The physical appearance of fresh mushrooms, and those packed with pure bacterial cellulose-based membranes (a) and active membranes containing pomegranate peel extract (b), green tea extract (c), and rosemary extract (d) after 5 days (1) and 15 days (2) of storage at 4 °C (Reprinted with permission from [87]. Copyright (2024) with permission from John Wiley and Sons).
Figure 6. The physical appearance of fresh mushrooms, and those packed with pure bacterial cellulose-based membranes (a) and active membranes containing pomegranate peel extract (b), green tea extract (c), and rosemary extract (d) after 5 days (1) and 15 days (2) of storage at 4 °C (Reprinted with permission from [87]. Copyright (2024) with permission from John Wiley and Sons).
Preprints 96963 g006
Preprints 96963 g007
Figure 7. Chemical structure of chitosan.
Figure 7. Chemical structure of chitosan.
Preprints 96963 g007
Preprints 96963 g008
Figure 8. The physical appearance of bread packaged by (a) polyethylene (PE) (b) PCL/chitosan (c) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 0.5ml/g (d) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 1.0 ml/g (e) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 1.5 ml/g (f) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 2.0 ml/g and (g) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 2.5 ml/g films at 24 °C, 70% RH for 7 days (Reprinted from [101]. Copyright (2024) with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 8. The physical appearance of bread packaged by (a) polyethylene (PE) (b) PCL/chitosan (c) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 0.5ml/g (d) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 1.0 ml/g (e) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 1.5 ml/g (f) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 2.0 ml/g and (g) PCL/chitosan/GFSE 2.5 ml/g films at 24 °C, 70% RH for 7 days (Reprinted from [101]. Copyright (2024) with permission from Elsevier).
Preprints 96963 g008
Preprints 96963 g009
Figure 9. Chemical structure of pectin.
Figure 9. Chemical structure of pectin.
Preprints 96963 g009
Preprints 96963 g010
Figure 10. Chemical structure of M and G monomer blocks of alginate.
Figure 10. Chemical structure of M and G monomer blocks of alginate.
Preprints 96963 g010
Preprints 96963 g011
Figure 11. Chemical structure of carrageenan.
Figure 11. Chemical structure of carrageenan.
Preprints 96963 g011
Preprints 96963 g012
Figure 12. Chemical structure of PLA.
Figure 12. Chemical structure of PLA.
Preprints 96963 g012
Preprints 96963 g013
Figure 13. Visual aspect of pork meat fillets packaged in the M1 (PA6/EVOH32/PA6/LDPE), M2 (EVOH48/EVA/EVOH48/EVA/coPP) multilayer films, PLA film (polylactide) and control (PVC cling film) during storage (Reprinted with permission from [177]).
Figure 13. Visual aspect of pork meat fillets packaged in the M1 (PA6/EVOH32/PA6/LDPE), M2 (EVOH48/EVA/EVOH48/EVA/coPP) multilayer films, PLA film (polylactide) and control (PVC cling film) during storage (Reprinted with permission from [177]).
Preprints 96963 g013
Preprints 96963 g014
Figure 14. Chemical structures of PHB and PHBV.
Figure 14. Chemical structures of PHB and PHBV.
Preprints 96963 g014
Table 1. Major types of papers used in food packaging.
Table 1. Major types of papers used in food packaging.
Paper type Properties Application Ref.
Kraft paper Type of coarse paper, high strength, economical, porous, tear-resistant, rough surface, can be coated or laminated Beverage carriers, boxes, sacks, cartons, package flour, dried fruits, sugar [11]
Greaseproof paper Translucent, machine-finished, resistant to oils Wrap cookies, confectionaries, snack foods, high oily foods [16]
Parchment paper Made from acid-treated pulp, not heat sealable, poor air and moisture barrier properties, high wet strength, greaseproof Layer between pastry or meat slices, labels for fatty foods, cheese wrapping [11]
Glassine paper Glassy smooth surface, transparent sheet, good grease and oil resistance, high density Liner for baked goods,
biscuits, cookies, and cooking fats		 [17]
Bleached paper Soft and white, weaker compared to unbleached paper, expensive Food labels, flour, sugar, and fruits and vegetables [18]
Paperboards Thicker than paper, rigid, foldable, and different types are available: whiteboard, liner board, food board, carton board, chipboard, and corrugated board Rigid boxes, beverage cartons, boxes for fruits and vegetables [18,19]
Table 2. Major types of plastics used in food packaging.
Table 2. Major types of plastics used in food packaging.
Plastic Properties Application Ref.
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) Good barrier to gases
and moisture, resistant to heat, mineral oils, solvents, and acids, transparent, tough		 Beverage and mineral water bottles, jars, tubes, trays [27,28]
High-density polyethylene (HDPE) Good barrier to solvents
and moisture, high tensile strength, opaque, high-temperature capability		 Beverage and milk bottles, shopping bags, ice cream containers [25,29]
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) High resistance to chemicals, high strength, high oil barrier properties, good heat sealability Bottles, food wraps [30]
Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) Good heat sealing, resistant to acid, oils, and bases, rigid, flexible, transparent Bakery, frozen, fresh produce, meat packing, soft squeeze bottles [31]
Polypropylene (PP) High water vapor barrier, resistant to gases and odor, high strength and puncture resistance Containers for ice cream, margarine, yogurt, snack packs, biscuit packs [29]
Polystyrene (PS) Brittle, rigid, poor barrier to moisture and gases, good insulation properties Cutlery, food insulation boxes, meat trays, egg containers [32,33]
Table 3. Applications of composite biopackaging materials in food packaging.
Table 3. Applications of composite biopackaging materials in food packaging.
Packaging material Additives Preparation method Food sample Properties Ref.
Potato starch-based film Sodium alginate Glycerol
Essential oil		 Casting method Perishable food products Shelf-life extension and inhibit the spoilage organisms [194]
Foxtail millet starch-based film Clove leaf oil
Sorbitol 		Casting method Cheese Reduces the lipid oxidation and microbial growth compared to LDPE [195]
Rice starch-based coating Chitosan Coating method Walnut Shelf-life extension due to reduced effect of oxygen, moisture, and temperature [196]
Chinese yam starch-based film Sorbitol
Glycerol
Eugenol		 Casting method Pork Due to its superior barrier and antibacterial qualities increases the shelf-life of pork beyond 50%. [197]
Chitosan-based coating Glycerol Coating method Strawberry Excellent antibacterial and antifungal activity for one week and maintain the appearance of strawberries [198]
Chitosan-based film Apricot kernel essential oil Casting method Sliced bread Enhance the shelf-life of bread with antioxidant and antimicrobial activity against E. coli, B. subtilis, and fungal growth. [199]
Chitosan-based films Pomegranate peel extract
Glycerol		 Casting method Fruits and vegetables Extend storage life and improve the quality [200]
Alginate based films Glycerol
Aloe vera Frankincense oil		 Casting method Green capsicum Senescence retardation and resistance to the mass loss of green capsicums [201]
Alginate based films Glycerol
Thymol		 Two-stage cross-
linking method		 Fresh cut apple Inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli and maintain apple weight, color, and appearance. [202]
Alginate based coating Glycerol
Thyme oil		 Dipped method Fresh cut apple preventing bacteria growth, respiration, weight loss, and browning reaction while preserving the firmness [203]
Pectin based film Carvacrol Cinnamaldehyde Casting method Ham and Bologna Improve microbial food safety [204]
Pectin based film Glycerol
Berry extract		 Casting method Salmon Fillets Improve the shelf-life due to the antioxidant properties and barrier properties. [205]
Carrageenan based film Water extract of germinated fenugreek seeds
Sorbitol		 Casting method chicken breast Improve the shelf-life of meat by controlling the growth of microorganisms on the surface of chicken breast. [206]
Carrageenan based film ZnO nanoparticles
Glycerol		 Dipping method Mango Maintain firmness and delay the discoloration and decay of mango [207]
PLA-PHB based films Glycerol
Cinnamaldehyde		 Casting method Salmon Reduce the total bacterial count on the sampler [208]
PLA and chitosan-caseinate based film Rosemary essential oil Casting method Fresh minced chicken breast Provide antioxidant effects and improve the shelf-life of fresh meat products [209]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

207

Views

131

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated