Enterococci in Ruminant Carcasses at a Slaughterhouse: Prevalence, Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance in Turkey

1. Introduction

Foodborne illnesses frequently occur after consuming contaminated food, particularly animal-derived products like meat [1]. Animal enterococci are easily found in animal-derived foods that are presumably frequently ingested by humans [2]. Enterococci are a component of the natural microbiota in the digestive systems of animals and humans, particularly E. faecalis and E. faecium, which have emerged as significant clinical concern. These nosocomial pathogens are recognized as the causative agents of various animal ailments, including mastitis, endocarditis, diarrhea, and septicemia in cattle, domesticated animals, swine, and poultry [3,4,5]. The species E. durans, E. hirae, E. gallinarum, E. cassseliflavus, E. faecium, and E. faecalis are frequently present in the gastrointestinal system of livestock [6].

Enterococci's pathogenesis is linked to a diverse range of virulence factors. Virulence factors contribute to the development of enterococcal infections by facilitating the attachment, colonization, and invasion of host tissues. They also affect the host's immune response and produce enzymes and toxins outside of cells, which worsen the severity of the illness. The key adhesion factors involved in biofilm development include Ebp (endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili), Asa (aggregation substance), EfaA (E. faecalis antigen A), Esp (extracellular surface protein), Ace (collagen-binding cell wall protein), cylA (hemolysin), efm (E. faecium-specific cell wall adhesin), cad1 (pheromone cAD1 precursor lipoprotein), sagA (secreted antigen), and cpd1 (pheromone cPD1 lipoprotein) [7,8,9].

The utilization of antimicrobials in animals is associated with the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, and mechanisms of antibiotic resistance can readily disseminate among microbial communities [10,11]. Both clinical and animal enterococci possess intrinsic resistance to several antimicrobial drugs, and they also have the ability to develop resistance to additional antimicrobial agents, such as glycopeptides, quinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, and streptogramins [1,12,13]. While food-producing animals may not always directly transmit enterococci to humans, they can nonetheless facilitate the transfer of resistance genes from these animals to human germs. Hence, the occurrence of resistant enterococci, particularly vancomycin-resistant enterococci, in animals used for food production has emerged as a significant issue [12].

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic bacteria poses a substantial risk to public health, mainly due to the heightened likelihood of treatment failures. Furthermore, the emergence of resistance, particularly through the acquisition of transmissible genetic components, might also impact other characteristics, such as the capacity to inhabit an animal host or endure in an agricultural or food processing setting [14,15]. The presence of antibiotic-resistant enterococci in meat, animal-related sources, and habitats linked to animals, food handling equipment, and healthy humans emphasizes the importance of evaluating enterococci in slaughterhouses as well. The main place where zoonotic pathogens come from is the gastrointestinal tract (GI tract) of healthy food animals. Most food-related diseases are spread by feces during the slaughtering process or by cross-contamination during processing [14,16]. The transfer of harmful microorganisms from one part of the animal's body to another during the slaughtering process poses a substantial risk to the safety of the meat. Carcass tissues primarily become contaminated with fecal particles during the evisceration and skinning processes [17,18,19]. This study aimed to assess and characterize the prevalence, types, virulence determinants, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of enterococci from healthy cattle, sheep, and goat carcasses to highlight their zoonotic importance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Between November 2019 and December 2020, we obtained carcass samples from a total of 20 cattle, 80 sheep, and 50 goats from a slaughterhouse located in Van, a city in the eastern region of Turkey. The animals that were sampled were chosen in a randomized way. A visit was made to the chosen slaughterhouse in order to collect 600 surface samples from 150 animals and carcasses during the pre-chilling stage of the slaughtering process. A total of 600 samples from different regions of beef, sheep, and goat carcasses were collected using swabs. The sampling region was meticulously surveyed for one minute using cotton swabs that were swiped in both vertical and horizontal positions. Four 100 cm2 areas, measuring 10 cm2 × 10 cm2, were swabbed on each beef, sheep, and goat carcass. These areas were situated in the brisket, flank, hind leg, and rectal regions of the carcass. Carcass swabs were collected pre-chilling using sterile cotton swabs soaked in 10 ml of buffered peptone water, following the protocols set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) [20]. The sampler was pressed firmly and evenly as it was inserted vertically onto the peripheral surfaces, repeating this process approximately 10 times. Then, the sampler was turned and used to swipe horizontally and diagonally, each motion being repeated roughly 10 times. The samples were promptly delivered to the laboratory of Espiye Vocational School, Giresun University, within 24-48 hours of being collected, using refrigerated containers [21].

2.2. Enterococus Species Isolation

Isolation was conducted as described previously. Swab samples were homogenized in a blender (Waring, New Hartford, Conn.) with 90 ml of buffered peptone water (BPW) (Lab M, Lancashire, UK). After inoculation at 37 °C for 24 h, 0.1 ml was streaked onto Slanetz and Bartley Agar (Lab M, Lancashire, UK) and incubated for 24 ± 2 h at 37 ± 1 °C under the same condition (Na et al., 2019). After incubating, we observed pink or dark red colonies with a narrow, whitish border. After the incubation period, five colonies that were believed to be Enterococcus spp. were selected from each petri dish and transferred to Tryptone Soya Agar (Lab M, Lancashire, UK) agar for purification. The agar plates were then incubated at a temperature of 37 ± 1 °C for 24 ± 2 hours. The suspected isolates were biochemically identified using Gram staining and catalase activity. All strains were kept in skim milk powder stocks at −80 °C for further testing [22]. The Enterococcus species were identified through MALDI-TOF MS (BioMérieux Inc., Marcy l’Etoile, France) performed only on gram-positive and catalase-negative cocci [23].

2.3. DNA Isolation Protocols

The QIAsymphony, a magnetic particle-based automated extraction system, was used to extract genomic DNA. The extraction was carried out using the QIAamp DNA micro kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The isolated DNA was utilized as a template for PCR using the specified methods.

2.4. Screening for Confirmation and Virulence Genes

Using PCR with the primers listed in Table 1, all Enterococcus isolates were screened for the confirmation genes and presence of virulence genes. These were 16S rDNA, E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. hirae, E. casseliflavus, E. gallinarum identification genes [24] and virulence genes; asa1 (aggregation substance), ace (collagen-binding protein), cylA (cytolysin activator), efaA (endocarditis antigen), esp (enterococcal surface protein), gelE (gelatinase), hyl (hyaluronidase) [25]. The methods by Billström et al. (25] were modified and used for genotyping the Enterococcus isolates.

2.5. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The susceptibility of Enterococcus isolates to antibiotics was assessed using the disc diffusion method, following the protocols outlined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [26]. To determine antibiotic resistance in the isolates, 10 µg ampicillin (AM), 5 µg ciprofloxacin (CIP), 30 μg chloramphenicol (C), 15 µg erythromycin (E), 200 μg fosfomycin (FF), 300 μg high-level streptomycin-resistant (HLSR), 120 μg high-level gentamicin-resistant (HLGR), 10 μg imipenem (IPM), 5 µg levofloxacin (LEV), 30 μg linezolid (LNZ), 300 µg nitrofurantoin (F), 10 units penicillin (P), 15 μg quinupristin-dalfopristin (QD), 5 µg rifampin (RA), 30 µg vancomycin (VA), 30 µg teicoplanin (TEC), 30 µg tetracycline (TE), 15 μg tigecycline (TIG) and 5 μg vancomycin (VA) antibiotic discs were used (all purchased from Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). After incubation, the resulting diameters of the inhibition zones that formed around the discs of AM, P, VA-30 µg, TEC, E, TE, CIP, LEV, F, RA, FF, C, QD, LNZ, HLSR, and HLGR were classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant according to the diameters and breakpoints available in CLSI documents [26]. For the remaining antimicrobial agents (TIG, VA-5 μg, and IPM), the critical values were evaluated according to the zone table described by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) document [27]. For quality control purposes, S. aureus ATCC 25923 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 were utilized as control strains.

Figure 1. High-level streptomycin-resistant Enterococcus casseliflavus isolate.

Figure 1. High-level streptomycin-resistant Enterococcus casseliflavus isolate.

2.6. PCR Detection of Genes for Antimicrobial Resistance

In the present study, various PCR assays were used for the detection of antibiotic resistance genes (AGRs) of Enterococcus isolates. All isolates were tested for the presence of aminoglycoside modifying enzyme (AME) genes [aac(6')-Ie–aph(2'')- Ia, aph(2'')-Ib, aph(2'')-Ic, aph(2'')-Id, ant(3'')-Ia, and ant(6)-Ia], phenicols resistance genes (cfr, fexA, and optrA), tetracyclines resistance genes [tet(L), tet(M), and tet(O)], macrolides resistance genes [ermA, ermB and mef], and efflux pump genes [efr(A), emeA, and lsa] by PCR using specific primers as described by a previous study [28], with some modifications (Table 2).

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Enterococci

The overall prevalence of enterococci in sheep, goat, and cattle animals from a slaughterhouse in Van, Turkey, was 60% (90/150). The species distribution is shown in Table 3. The predominant species evaluated were E. hirae (n = 34, 37.7%) and E. casseliflavus (n = 30, 33.3%). A smaller number of E. faecium (n = 14, 15.5%), E. faecalis (n = 11, 12.2%), and E. gallinarum (n = 1, 1.1%) were also evaluated. The number of Enterococcus species in the brisket, flank, hind leg, and rectal sides of carcasses is shown in Table 3. E. casseliflavus and E. faecium were isolated from 10 and 6 out of 150 carcass surface samples from the brisket and hind leg, respectively, whereas E. hirae, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum were isolated from 13, 5, and 1 out of 150 carcass surface samples from rectal swabs, respectively.

3.2. Virulence of Enterococci

The distribution of virulence genes among Enterococcus species is presented in Table 4. The different species of Enterococcus showed variability in their virulence gene profiles. The hyaluronidase virulence factor hyl, enterococcal surface protein esp, and cytolysin activator gene cylA were absent in all 90 of the Enterococcus isolates. Among the E. faecalis isolates, 6 (54.5%) isolates were tested positive for the efaA gene. The aggregation substance gene, asaI, was tested positive for 2 (18.8%) E. faecalis isolates. The collagen-binding protein gene, ace, and the gelatinase gene, gelE, were possessed by 1 (9.9%) and 1 (9.9%) E. faecalis isolates, respectively. Two, two, and one of five E. hirae isolates were tested positive for gelE, efaA, and asaI genes, respectively, whereas none of them possessed the ace, esp, cylA, or hyl genes. For E. faecium and E. casseliflavus isolates, 3/14 (21.4%) and 1/30 (3.3%) harbored efaA and ace genes, respectively.

3.3. Phenotyping of Antibiotic Resistance

The resistance patterns of Enterococci towards the tested antimicrobial agents are presented in Table 5. Resistance to QD was the most common (28.8%), followed by TE (21.1%), AM (18%), and RA (15.5%). High rates of resistance to QD were found in E. hirae (21.1%) and E. faecium (7.7%). Tetracycline resistance was common in E. faecalis (6.6%), E. casseliflavus (6.6%), E. hirae (4.4%), and E. faecium (3.3%). Ampicillin and rifampin resistance were frequent in E. faecium (8.8%, 4.4%). Resistance to VA (7.7%), CIP (6.6%), F (4.4%), FF (4.4%), C (4.4%), P (2.2%), LEV (1.1%), and TIG (1.1%) was relatively low. Few isolates displayed HSLR (5.5%), which were in E. faecalis, E. faecium, and E. casseliflavus. except for E. gallinarum, 90 isolates of 4 species were found resistant to at least one antibiotic (64.4%, 58/90), with 17 isolates (18.8%, 17/90) of 90 Enterococcus species displaying multidrug resistance (Table 7).

3.4. Genotyping of Antibiotic Resistance

The distribution of antibiotic-resistant elements amongst Enterococcus species is presented in Table 6 and Figure 2. Of the 3 isolates showing resistance to E, 1 (1.1%) carried the ermA gene, and 2 (2.2%) carried the ermB gene. Five isolates of the E. faecalis isolates were carried tet(M), and one isolate was carried aac(6’)Ie-aph(2")-la. The genes efr(A), emeA, and lsa, conferring efflux pump, were observed in 31 Enterococcus isolates. Glycopeptide genes like VanC1 and VanC2 were present in 1.1% and 1.1% of E. faecium and E. hirae isolates in goat and sheep carcasses, respectively.

Table 6. Characteristics of multidrug-resistant 17 enterococci.

EFM, Enterococcus faecium; EH, Enterococcus hirae; EFS, Enterococcus faecalis; EC, Enterococcus casseliflavus; ampicillin, AM; penicillin, P; erythromycin, E; tetracycline, TE; ciprofloxacin, CIP; levofloxacin, LEV; nitrofurantoin, F; rifampin, RA; fosfomycin, FF; chloramphenicol, C; quinupristin-dalfopristin, QD; high-level streptomycin-resistant, HLSR.

Table 6. Characteristics of multidrug-resistant 17 enterococci.

EFM, Enterococcus faecium; EH, Enterococcus hirae; EFS, Enterococcus faecalis; EC, Enterococcus casseliflavus; ampicillin, AM; penicillin, P; erythromycin, E; tetracycline, TE; ciprofloxacin, CIP; levofloxacin, LEV; nitrofurantoin, F; rifampin, RA; fosfomycin, FF; chloramphenicol, C; quinupristin-dalfopristin, QD; high-level streptomycin-resistant, HLSR.

Table 7. The presence of antibiotic resistance genes profiles among Enterococci.

*; Intrinsic resistance, n; number

Table 7. The presence of antibiotic resistance genes profiles among Enterococci.

*; Intrinsic resistance, n; number

4. Discussion

Enterococci, being a component of the normal microorganisms found in the gastrointestinal tract of animals, can be present in meat during the slaughtering process. The prevalent species include E. hirae, E. faecium, E. faecalis, E. casseliflavus, E. mundtii, E. durans, and E. gilvus [29]. Other people, the environment, and foods contaminated with livestock intestinal microflora are just a few of the ways that enterococci can spread to humans. These are only a few of these potential vectors [30]. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of Enterococcus species, analyze their patterns of antibiotic resistance, and identify the presence of resistance and virulence genes in the Enterococcus species collected from Van, Turkey. This research is particularly relevant due to the high consumption of meat by a significant portion of the local population. In this study, E. hirae was the predominantly isolated species, which accounted for 37.7% of total Enterococcus isolates, and the remaining 33.3%, 15.5%, 12.2%, and 1.1% of the isolates were identified as E. casseliflavus, E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, respectively (Table 3). Wide variation (0–90.6%) in the prevalence of Enterococci in food-producing animals has been reported in different countries [1,4,5,12,16,31,32,33]. In the present study, the speciation of the isolates confirmed that E. hirae was the most prevalent species identified from sheep and goat carcass samples. Other studies reported the prevalence of Enterococcus spp. on cattle at a slaugterhouse with a recovery rate of E. hirae, ranging from 8 to 92% [13,34]. Enterococci, especially E. faecalis and E. faecium, are known to be nosocomial pathogens and have become a major clinical concern [34]. Although E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates identified in this study are low-level documented by Ramos et al. [1] and Holman et al. [32], both species were isolated from slaughtered animals (12.2% and 15.5%, respectively). E. casselifalavus and E. gallinarum were also isolated from sheep carcasses and cattle carcasses, supporting similar findings reported by Ramos et al. [1] and Smoglica et al. [5]. The data regarding the occurrence of enterococci in cattle, sheep, and goat carcasses exhibits a wide range of variation. Differences in the occurrence rates of enterococci in cattle, sheep, and goat carcasses may be attributed to variances in geographical regions, hygiene conditions, livestock management practices, agro-climatic factors, detection sample methods, animal breeds, and age. Potential factors influencing the variability in results encompass the level of quality of the farms supplying the animals and the health and sickness conditions of the killed animals.

Given that enterococci are naturally found in the intestinal tract of animals, it is frequent for meat to get contaminated during the slaughtering process. Various enterococcal virulence genes associated with the initiation or worsening of illness symptoms in humans have been documented. Screening for certain genetic features in enterococci is necessary to identify their potential for causing disease and to confirm their ability to be transmitted between animals and humans, which is a significant health concern. The genetic transmission mechanisms are closely interconnected with the virulence traits of particular enterococci [36,37,38]. The identification of virulence factors is crucial in assessing bacterial pathogenicity, as these factors enable microorganisms to invade and harm the host. In this study, virulence typing was conducted by targeting seven specific genes. Of all the 90 isolates, 11 (12.2%) showed the presence of efaA genes. The other three gelE, asaI, and ace genes were present in 3 (3.3%), 3 (3.3%), and 2 (2.2%) isolates, respectively (Table 4). The high prevalence (12.2%) of endocarditis antigen efaA in E. faecalis, E. hirae, and E. faecium was consistent with findings from previous reports, whereas the moderate presence of ace, gelE, and asaI was lower than that previously reported by Beukers et al. [10], Zhang et al. [39], and Mohanty et al. [40]. Other authors have observed different values. Klibi et al. [12] in Tunisia detected gelE, especially in 11.5% and 10% of Enterococcus isolates in fecal samples from animals, respectively. Smoglica et al. [5] in Italy, in which the gelE, asaI, efaA, ace, and esp genes were observed in 35.41%, 25%, 22.91%, 0.08%, and 0.04% of Enterococcus isolates, respectively. In another study, Song et al. [8] reported that E. faecalis isolates were positive for gelE (88%), asa1 (44%), cylA (16%), and esp (4%) virulence factor genes. Diversity in enterococci virulence genes reported from other studies might be attributable to various sampling techniques, sample types, isolation processes, environmental conditions, or geographic regions.

Enterococci are environmental organisms that have the ability to adapt to and spread antimicrobial-resistant traits [41]. Antimicrobial-resistant enterococci in animals are thought to serve as a reservoir for transmitting resistance genes to enterococci in humans. This transmission can occur through various means, such as human ingestion of animal-derived food, direct contact between animals and humans, or environmental factors. The visible limited preference of enterococci for certain hosts does not exclude the potential spread of antimicrobial resistance from animals to humans by enterococci [2]. In this investigation, Enterococcus isolates exhibited resistance to one or more antimicrobial agents, with a prevalence of 64.4%. The antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus isolates was assessed for 18 antimicrobial agents using the disk diffusion method. Among the 90 Enterococcus isolates examined, the most prevalent observation was resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin (28.8%), followed by resistance to tetracycline (21.1%), ampicillin (20%), and rifampin (15.5%). None of the isolates were resistant to teicoplanin, linezolid, imipenem, or high-level gentamicin. The Enterococcus isolates were least resistant to vancomycin (7.7%), ciprofloxacin (6.6%), high-level streptomycin-resistant (5.5%), chloramphenicol (4.4%), fosfomycin (4.4%), nitrofurantoin (4.4%), erythromycin (3.3%), penicillin (2.2%), levofloxacin (1.1%), and tigecycline (1.1%) (Table 5). In this study, the high prevalence of tetracycline resistance, which was detected in enterococci other than antibiotics that belong to the natural resistance group, may be linked to the use of tetracyclines in the treatment of cattle, sheep, and goats. Oxytetracycline (OTC) is a tetracycline antibiotic primarily used to treat infections caused by a broad range of bacteria. However, it is important to note that resistance to OTC is frequently observed among gram-negative bacilli of enteric origin and staphylococci [42,43]. One prevalent application is in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in cattle, which is caused by Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Histophilus somni (formerly known as Haemophilus somnus). Doxycycline is the preferred treatment for Rickettsiae and Ehrlichiae in small animals, as opposed to oxytetracycline [42,44]. Resistance to tetracyline in Enterococcus isolates was consistent with current results, which revealed a high resistant rate [1,4,45], but a higher prevalence of tetracycline-resistant E. faecalis was obtained in the present study [46,47,48]. A study conducted in Tunisia between September 2011 and December 2011 showed that E. hirae species isolated from animal stools were resistant to tetracyclines, in accordance with this study [12]. The E. faecium isolates were more resistant to ampicillin antimicrobial agents (20%). This result was in accordance with other study in Saudi Arabia that revealed similar result [9]. Resistance to rifampin in E. casseliflavus was consistent with the current result, which revealed a low resistance rate [16]. Compared with other antimicrobial agents, the resistance rates to ciprofloxacin were relatively low in E. faecium and E. faecalis (1.1%, 2.2%, respectively). These findings produced parallel results to those of other studies conducted in the USA and Korea [8,32]. The prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Enterococcus strains in slaughtering and production can be explained by the extensive utilization of antibiotics for growth promotion, disease prevention, and infection treatment.

Multidrug resistance in enterococci can arise from either intrinsic attributes of the species or from acquired resistance mechanisms. The resistance to aminoglycosides can be attributed to both intrinsic and acquired factors. Resistance to high concentrations of gentamicin and streptomycin is usually acquired through the transfer of resistant genes, while resistance to low concentrations of amikacin, tobramycin, and kanamycin is frequently caused by intrinsic causes [49,50]. In this study, we have observed about 5.5% of HSLR Enterococcus isolates, whereas other findings have reported higher rates, including Li et al. (74.4%) [51]. Ngbede et al. [45] noted that 53.1% of 167 resistant isolates exhibited the highest multidrug resistance to antibiotics. Research conducted on cattle in South Australia [16] revealed that 26.9% of the isolates were resistant to at least two different classes of antibiotics. The values recorded by these authors were higher than the values noted in this study (18.8%).

Enterococci can gain resistance to clinically relevant medications through chromosomal mutations and horizontal gene transfer. Enterococci are naturally resistant to a wide range of antibiotic classes [15]. Enterococci present a major challenge to illness treatment because of their limited susceptibility to antibiotics, which is caused by both intrinsic and acquired resistances. These resistances enable them to obtain supplementary resistances on mobile genetic elements, resulting in heightened interaction with other antibiotic-resistant microorganisms [52]. Overall, 22 target antibiotic-resistant and efflux pump genes were detected at a variable frequency in tested isolates of Enterococcus, where tet(M), efr(A), Isa, and eme(A) were commonly detected compared to the ermA, ermB, vanC1, vanC2, and aac(6’)Ie-aph(2")-la genes which were detected with less frequency (Table 7). E. faecalis harbored a greater number of tet(M) gene (5 isolates) than the other Enterococcus isolates, in agreement with a previous study [9]. Holman et al. [32] reported that the tet(M) antimicrobial resistance-encoding gene was detected in 31.9% (15 isolates) of E. faecalis bacteria. They also found that the tet(M) gene was detected in 37.5% (3 isolates) of E. faecium. You et al. [48] completed a report that was similar. They showed that the distribution of tet(M) and aac(6’)Ie-aph(2")-la resistance genes in E. faecalis strains isolated from poultry in China was 91.80% and 67.21%, respectively. In another study, a Tunisian survey [12] reported that E. faecalis isolated from food-producing animals carried aac(6’)Ie-aph(2") antimicrobial resistance-encoding genes. Thirty-one of the 85 E. casseliflavus isolates harbored the tetM gene. This result is similar to that reported in E. casseliflavus isolates from swine farms [53]. Out of the three genes, ermA, ermB, and mef, ermB was the most frequently detected in this investigation. It was found in 5.8% of E. hirae isolates (n = 2/34), which is consistent with findings from other studies [1,10,12,36]. VanC1 and VanC2 were identified in E. faecium and E. hirae isolates, respectively. These results are consistent with a previous study that identified VanC1/VanC2 resistance genes in E. faecium isolates from aquaculture and slaughterhouse facilities [36]. Efflux pumps play a significant role in both natural and acquired resistance to antimicrobial medicines that are currently employed for the treatment of infectious illnesses [54]. Our finding that over 34.4% of enterococcal isolates carried efflux pump genes is consistent with previous reports from bovine feces, retail chicken meat, broiler chickens, and traditional fermented foods [10,28,55,56]. The changes in antibiotic use are likely to differ between nations due to variations in their usage patterns. Efflux pumps and the acquisition of genetic elements such as plasmids and transposons can result in increased tolerance or resistance to antimicrobials in enterococci.

5. Conclusions

This study revealed information about the similarity of virulence-related genes and antibiotic resistance of enterococci isolated from animals to human enterococci. The presence of the same mobile DNA elements in these strains of both human and animal origin may indicate horizontal transfer of this resistance gene. The isolation of virulence potential and multidrug-resistant enterococci isolates from slaughtered cattle, sheep, and goat carcasses emphasized the importance of slaughter hygiene in the transmission of pathogenic enterococci. The presence of enterococci in different parts of carcasses and during the pre-chilling stage poses a risk of cross-contamination in the examined facility. Carcasses can be contaminated with fecal bacteria, the majority of which results from contamination during the slaughter process, such as damage to intestinal tissue during evisceration and fecal leakage, which can increase cross-contamination of carcasses. According to the data determined in this study, enterococci may pose a potential risk to public health, considering their virulence potential and antibiotic resistance (mainly against quinupristin-dalfopristin, tetracycline, and ampicillin). Therefore, considering the slaughterhouse in Van Province included in this study, larger studies from different geographical regions are needed to fully understand the genetic diversity of enterococci in farm animals.