Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparison of Mental Nerve Block With Lingual Infiltration and Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Lingual Nerve Block for Extraction of Mandibular Anterior Teeth

Version 1 : Received: 8 January 2024 / Approved: 9 January 2024 / Online: 9 January 2024 (05:04:34 CET)

How to cite: S., M.P.; John, R.S. Comparison of Mental Nerve Block With Lingual Infiltration and Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Lingual Nerve Block for Extraction of Mandibular Anterior Teeth. Preprints 2024, 2024010693. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0693.v1 S., M.P.; John, R.S. Comparison of Mental Nerve Block With Lingual Infiltration and Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Lingual Nerve Block for Extraction of Mandibular Anterior Teeth. Preprints 2024, 2024010693. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0693.v1

Abstract

Aim: the main aim of this study is to compare the onset of effectiveness of mental nerve block with lingual infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block on patients visiting dental hospital for extraction of mandibular anterior teeth. Materials and methods: The study was set in a clinical setting. This was a randomized controlled double-blind cross study, where 25 subjects received two treatments at an interval of at least 1 week in a within a dental hospital.Inferior alveolar nerve block and lingual nerve block injection is given with 2mL lignocaine 2% with 1:2,00,000 epinephrine was administered for the right side. Mental nerve block along with lingual infiltration of the corresponding tooth was given with 2mL lignocaine 2% with 1:2,00,000 epinephrine was administered on the left side.Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used in this study, which consists of a scale with range of 0-10 pain severity on which 0 indicated absence of pain and 10 the worst pain possible. The patients were asked to give scores corresponding to his/her pain, after IANB, mental nerve block and lingual infiltration and these scores were recorde.Results: From the results we can see that patients gave scores between 3-4, stating that they had moderate pain during extraction after administration of IANB (54%) (graph 2) and VAS scores of 0-1 were given by patients, which is suggestive of no pain during extraction after administration of Mental nerve block and lingual nerve infiltration (62%)Conclusion: Within the limits of the study we can conclude that mental nerve block along with lingual infiltration is an effective way to completely and quickly anaesthetise the central incisor to the 1st premolar region.

Keywords

IANB; mental nerve block; local anaesthesia; VAS; mental nerve; lingual nerve block; innovative technique

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.