Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Effects of Different Temperature and Density on Quality and Microbial Population of Alfalfa Silage

Version 1 : Received: 8 January 2024 / Approved: 8 January 2024 / Online: 9 January 2024 (02:51:31 CET)

How to cite: Liu, J.; Hao, J.; Zhao, M.; Yan, X.; Ge, G. Effects of Different Temperature and Density on Quality and Microbial Population of Alfalfa Silage. Preprints 2024, 2024010634. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0634.v1 Liu, J.; Hao, J.; Zhao, M.; Yan, X.; Ge, G. Effects of Different Temperature and Density on Quality and Microbial Population of Alfalfa Silage. Preprints 2024, 2024010634. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0634.v1

Abstract

In this study, alfalfa silage with different packing densities (500 kg/m3, 600 kg/m3 and 700 kg/m3) were set up under outdoor high temperature and indoor normal temperature. The chemical composition, fermentation quality and microbial community of alfalfa silage were analyzed. The results showed that DM and WAC content decreased with the increase of density. When the density is 600kg/m3, CP content reaches the maximum and ADF content is the lowest. Temperature has a certain effect on alfalfa silage. The content of Lactobacillus plantarum fermented at high temperature is lower than that fermented at normal temperature. At the same time, the content of Lactobacillus plantarum decreased with the increase of packing density. However, the content of Lactobacillus plantarum was the lowest when the packing density was 600 kg/m3 at high temperature. In summary, this study explained the effects of different temperature and density on alfalfa fermentation quality and microbial community, and clarified that the density should be reasonably controlled within 600 kg/m3 during alfalfa silage, providing theoretical support for production practice.

Keywords

High temperature ensiling; Density; Microbial community; Fermentation quality

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Agricultural Science and Agronomy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.