Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Doxcycline post-exposure prophylaxis: are we using the correct method to assess for effect on antimicrobial resistance?

Version 1 : Received: 22 November 2023 / Approved: 3 January 2024 / Online: 3 January 2024 (10:56:36 CET)

How to cite: Vanbaelen, T.; Gestels, Z.; Abdellati, S.; De Baetselier, I.; Manoharan-Basil, S.; Kenyon, C. Doxcycline post-exposure prophylaxis: are we using the correct method to assess for effect on antimicrobial resistance?. Preprints 2024, 2024010148. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0148.v1 Vanbaelen, T.; Gestels, Z.; Abdellati, S.; De Baetselier, I.; Manoharan-Basil, S.; Kenyon, C. Doxcycline post-exposure prophylaxis: are we using the correct method to assess for effect on antimicrobial resistance?. Preprints 2024, 2024010148. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0148.v1

Abstract

Most recent studies of doxycycline PEP have assessed doxycycline's effect on antimicrobial resistance by measuring the proportion of colonies of the target species with AMR as the outcome measure. In this study, we show that this method is insufficiently sensitive to detect shifts in MIC distribution.

Keywords

AMR; MIC; proportion resistant; doxycycline PEP

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Clinical Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.