Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A novel approach of evaluating crosstalk for near-infrared spectrometers

Version 1 : Received: 23 December 2023 / Approved: 25 December 2023 / Online: 26 December 2023 (08:58:15 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Chen, Z.; Cao, X.; Li, X.; Pan, B.; Wang, P.; Li, T. A Novel Approach to Evaluating Crosstalk for Near-Infrared Spectrometers. Sensors 2024, 24, 990. Chen, Z.; Cao, X.; Li, X.; Pan, B.; Wang, P.; Li, T. A Novel Approach to Evaluating Crosstalk for Near-Infrared Spectrometers. Sensors 2024, 24, 990.

Abstract

Multi-channel and multi-parameter near-infrared spectrometers (NIRS) have gradually become a new research direction and hot spot due to their ability to provide real-time, continuous, comprehensive indicators of multiple parameters. However, multi-channel and multi-parameter detection may lead to crosstalk between signals. There is still a lack of benchmarks on the evaluation of reliability, sensitivity, stability and response consistency of the NIRS instrument. In this study, a set of test methods (the ink drop test, multi-channel crosstalk test and multi-parameter crosstalk test) for analysis crosstalk and verifying the reliability of NIRS were conducted to test experimental verification on a multi-channel (8-channel), multi-parameter (4-parameter) NIRS instrument independently developed by our team. Results show that these tests can be used to analyze the signal crosstalk and verify the reliability, sensitivity, stability and response consistency in the NIRS instrument. This study contributes to the establishment of benchmarks for the NIRS instrument crosstalk and reliability testing. These novel tests have the potential to become the benchmark for the NIRS instrument reliability testing.

Keywords

near-infrared spectroscopy; crosstalk analysis; multi-channel; multi-parameter; multi-wavelength

Subject

Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.