Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Machiavellianism in Mainstream Sustainability and Development: Re-imagining Alternative Futures through Empowerment

Version 1 : Received: 14 December 2023 / Approved: 15 December 2023 / Online: 15 December 2023 (08:23:30 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Adler, C.M. Re-Imagining Alternative Futures through Empowerment. Challenges 2024, 15, 8. Adler, C.M. Re-Imagining Alternative Futures through Empowerment. Challenges 2024, 15, 8.

Abstract

Despite concepts of human flourishing, a term connected to empowerment that acts as an archi-tectural structure within the development and sustainability discourse, tensions remain between exponential economic growth, planetary health and community empowerment. Scholars argue that the development agenda is maldevelopment due to the unrequested interventions delivered to communities, mainly in the Global South (Shiva, 1999). A current state of disorientation grips the modern world, and despite sophisticated global frameworks like the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), internal approaches are side-lined. This research article repositions empowerment and compassion at the centre of the sustainable development discourse by drawing on the Inner Development Framework, particularly goal one – Being – ‘Relationship to Self’ and goal three – Relating – ‘Caring for others and the World’ as a guiding theoretical underpinning. Accordingly, this research article presents a qualitative interpretative study that examines the lived experience of women and their journeys to empowerment. The key findings indicate an intricate relationship between wellbeing and empowerment and the realisation of inner development as a tool to re-imagine alternative futures. The Machiavellian tendency to the sustainability agenda is deeply embedded in the profiteering of the misery of affected communities.

Keywords

Inner development; empowerment; caring for others and the world; sustainability

Subject

Social Sciences, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.