Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Effect of Roller Burnishing and Slide Roller Burnishing on Surface Integrity of AISI 316 Steel: Theoretical and Experimental Comparative Analysis

Version 1 : Received: 13 December 2023 / Approved: 13 December 2023 / Online: 13 December 2023 (12:21:06 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Maximov, J.; Duncheva, G.; Anchev, A.; Dunchev, V.; Anastasov, K.; Daskalova, P. Effect of Roller Burnishing and Slide Roller Burnishing on Surface Integrity of AISI 316 Steel: Theoretical and Experimental Comparative Analysis. Machines 2024, 12, 51. Maximov, J.; Duncheva, G.; Anchev, A.; Dunchev, V.; Anastasov, K.; Daskalova, P. Effect of Roller Burnishing and Slide Roller Burnishing on Surface Integrity of AISI 316 Steel: Theoretical and Experimental Comparative Analysis. Machines 2024, 12, 51.

Abstract

The article presents a new method called slide roller burnishing (SRB) for cold working of cylindrical surfaces on machine tools, implemented with a novel multi-functional device. The machined material was chromium–nickel austenitic stainless steel. The deforming element is a toroidal roller whose axis crosses that of the workpiece. As a result, a relative sliding velocity occurs in the contact zone between the roller and the machined surface. The sliding velocity vector is set using the burnishing device. The theoretical background of SRB is presented. When the two axes are parallel, the well-known roller burnishing (RB) method is implemented. Thus, RB is a special case of SRB. Both processes are realized using the multi-functional burnishing device. The RB process was studied experimentally and optimized according to three criteria, based on the relationship between the surface integrity and operating behavio of the respective component, to achieve three processes: smoothing, hardening and mixed burnishing. Using the optimal RB parameters obtained, the dependence of the results of SRB on the crossing angle was investigated and optimized. A comparative analysis was performed between the optimized RB and SRB processes (respectively for their three variants: smoothing, hardening and mixed) based on geometrical and physical–mechanical characteristics of the surface integrity. The main advantage of the SRB is that it provides smaller height roughness parameters and a higher surface microhardness than RB.

Keywords

austenitic stainless steel; surface integrity; roller burnishing; slide roller burnishing

Subject

Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.