Submitted:
11 December 2023
Posted:
12 December 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. POH and PHB
3.2. Age, Hearing loss, facial paresis and pain
3.3. Pain-related mental interference, pain coping and personality traits
3.4. Pain-related mental interference, coping mechanisms and perceived health benefits
3.5. Personality and perceived health benefits
3.6. Predictors for perceived health benefits
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sandooram D, Grunfeld EA, McKinney C, Gleeson MJ. Quality of life following microsurgery, radiosurgery and conservative management for unilateral vestibular schwannoma. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(6):621–7. [CrossRef]
- Presutti L, Magnaguagno F, Pavesi G, Cunsolo E, Pinna G, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, et al. Combined endoscopic-microscopic approach for vestibular schwannoma removal: outcomes in a cohort of 81 patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(6):427.
- Bender M, Tatagiba M, Gharabaghi A. Quality of Life After Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: A Question of Perspective. Front Oncol. 2022;11:5950. [CrossRef]
- Turel MK, Thakar S, Rajshekhar V. Quality of life following surgery for large and giant vestibular schwannomas: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(2):303–11. [CrossRef]
- Lucidi D, Fabbris C, Cerullo R, Di Gioia S, Calvaruso F, Monzani D, et al. Quality of life in vestibular schwannoma: A comparison of three surgical techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(4):1795–803. [CrossRef]
- Santa Maria C, Santa Maria PL, Bulsara V, Jayawardena J, Caldow JD, Png LH, et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma managed with microsurgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2019;133(11):953–9. [CrossRef]
- Breivik CN, Varughese JK, Wentzel-Larsen T, Vassbotn F, Lund-Johansen M. Conservative management of vestibular schwannoma—a prospective cohort study: treatment, symptoms, and quality of life. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(5):1072–80. [CrossRef]
- Carlson ML, Tveiten ØV, Driscoll CL, Goplen FK, Neff BA, Pollock BE, et al. What drives quality of life in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma? The Laryngoscope. 2015;125(7):1697–702. [CrossRef]
- Pruijn IM, Kievit W, Hentschel MA, Mulder JJ, Kunst HP. What determines quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma? Clin Otolaryngol. 2021;46(2):412–20. [CrossRef]
- Miller LE, Brant JA, Naples JG, Bigelow DC, Lee JY, Ruckenstein MJ. Quality of life in vestibular schwannoma patients: a longitudinal study. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(2):e256–61. [CrossRef]
- Lassaletta L, Alfonso C, Del Rio L, Roda JM, Gavilan J. Impact of Facial Dysfunction on Quality of Life after Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006 Sep;115(9):694–8. [CrossRef]
- Sabab A, Sandhu J, Bacchi S, Jukes A, Zacest A. Postoperative headache following treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;52:26–31. [CrossRef]
- Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E14. [CrossRef]
- Charalampakis S, Koutsimpelas D, Gouveris H, Mann W. Post-operative complications after removal of sporadic vestibular schwannoma via retrosigmoid-suboccipital approach: current diagnosis and management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268:653–60. [CrossRef]
- Ribeyre L, Parietti-Winkler C, Lassalle B, Hoffmann C, Spitz E. Vestibular schwannoma surgery: personality facets, illness perceptions and coping strategies influencing long term postural recovery. Eur Health Psychol. 2017;622–622.
- Garramone F, Baiano C, Russo A, D’Iorio A, Tedeschi G, Trojano L, et al. Personality profile and depression in migraine: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2020;41:543–54. [CrossRef]
- Özdemir O, Aykan F, Özdemir PG. Coping Strategies and personality traits in women patients with migraine and tension type headache. Psychiatry Behav Sci. 1970;4(2):59–59.
- Aaseth K, Grande RB, Leiknes KA, Benth J, Lundqvist C, Russell MB. Personality traits and psychological distress in persons with chronic tension-type headache. The Akershus study of chronic headache. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;124(6):375–82. [CrossRef]
- Bigal ME, Sheftell FD, Rapoport AM, Tepper SJ, Weeks R, Baskin SM. MMPI personality profiles in patients with primary chronic daily headache: a case-control study. Neurol Sci. 2003;24:103–10. [CrossRef]
- Rausa M, Cevoli S, Sancisi E, Grimaldi D, Pollutri G, Casoria M, et al. Personality traits in chronic daily headache patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity: an observational study in a tertiary care headache center. J Headache Pain. 2013;14:1–7. [CrossRef]
- Yang F, Dos Santos IAM, Gomez RS, Kummer A, Barbosa IG, Teixeira AL. Personality disorders are associated with more severe forms of migraine. Acta Neurol Belg. 2019;119:201–5. [CrossRef]
- Koos WT, Day JD, Matula C, Levy DI. Neurotopographic considerations in the microsurgical treatment of small acoustic neurinomas. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(3):506–12. [CrossRef]
- Müller B, Baum A, Holzhausen M, Grittner U, Hilgendorf I, Martus P, et al. Der Rostocker Kopfschmerzfragen-Komplex („Rokoko “)–Validierung einer schnellen diagnostischen Hilfe bei der Einordnung primärer Kopfschmerzen. Fortschritte Neurol Psychiatr. 2014;82(03):145–8. [CrossRef]
- Thomas M, Rampp S, Scheer M, Strauss C, Prell J, Schönfeld R, et al. Premorbid Psychological Factors Associated with Long-Term Postoperative Headache after Microsurgery in Vestibular Schwannoma—A Retrospective Pilot Study. Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 7;13(8):1171. [CrossRef]
- Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105(6):415–22. [CrossRef]
- Geissner E. Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Schmerzverarbeitung. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2001.
- McCrae RR, Costa PT. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(1):81. [CrossRef]
- Muck PM, Hell B, Gosling SD. Ten-Item Personality Inventory--German Version. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2011.
- Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. The Revised Neo Personality Inventory (neo-pi-r). Sage Publications, Inc; 2008.
- IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2021.
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300. [CrossRef]
- Hemmerich W. StatistikGuru: Rechner zur Adjustierung des α-Niveaus. 2016 [cited 2023 Jun 21]. Available from: https://statistikguru.de/rechner/adjustierung-des-alphaniveaus.html.
- Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1992;1(3):98–101. [CrossRef]
- Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Cognitive coping and goal adjustment are associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety in people with acquired hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(7):545–50. [CrossRef]
- Hickson L, Scarinci N. Older adults with acquired hearing impairment: applying the ICF in rehabilitation. In: Seminars in speech and language. © Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007. p. 283–90. [CrossRef]
- Magyar M, Gonda X, Pap D, Edes A, Galambos A, Baksa D, et al. Decreased openness to experience is associated with migraine-type headaches in subjects with lifetime depression. Front Neurol. 2017;8:270. [CrossRef]
- Chan JK, Consedine NS. Negative affectivity, emotion regulation, and coping in migraine and probable migraine: A new zealand case–control study. Int J Behav Med. 2014;21:851–60. [CrossRef]
- Ramírez-Maestre C, Martínez AEL, Zarazaga RE. Personality Characteristics as Differential Variables of the Pain Experience. J Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):147–65. [CrossRef]
- Bevers K, Watts L, Kishino ND, Gatchel RJ. The biopsychosocial model of the assessment, prevention, and treatment of chronic pain. US Neurol. 2016;12(2):98–104. [CrossRef]
- Meints SM, Edwards RR. Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;87:168–82. [CrossRef]
- Scheidegger A, Jäger J, Blättler LT, Aybek S, Bischoff N, Grosse Holtforth M. Identification and Characterization of Pain Processing Patterns Among Patients With Chronic Primary Pain: A Replication. Clin J Pain. 2023 Aug 1;39(8):414–25. [CrossRef]
- Grolimund J, Studer M, Stewart JA, Egloff N, Grosse Holtforth M. Typen der Schmerzverarbeitung bei Patienten mit chronischen Schmerzen. Schmerz. 2018 Feb;32(1):39–47. [CrossRef]
- Scheidegger A, Gómez Penedo JM, Blättler LT, Aybek S, Bischoff N, Grosse Holtforth M. Improvements in pain coping predict treatment success among patients with chronic primary pain. J Psychosom Res. 2023 May;168:111208. [CrossRef]
- Hackshaw A. Small studies: strengths and limitations. Vol. 32, European Respiratory Journal. Eur Respiratory Soc; 2008. [CrossRef]
- Ball HL. Conducting online surveys. J Hum Lact. 2019;35(3):413–7. [CrossRef]
| variables/ questionnaire scales |
mininum | maximum | M (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| age age at onset time since treatment in years pain (NAS) TIPI-G |
30 28 1 2 |
75 69 36 10 |
53.94 (12.68) 45.92 (10.04) 8.02 (9.36) 6.65 (2.13) |
| extraversion | 2 | 14 | 8.04 (3.20) |
| agreeableness | 6 | 14 | 10.50 (2.23) |
| conscientiousness | 8 | 14 | 12.37 (1.58) |
| emotional stability | 2 | 14 | 9.6 (3.34) |
| openness | 5 | 14 | 10.58 (2.48) |
| FESV | |||
| HD | 5 | 30 | 15.40 (7.71) |
| ANX | 4 | 24 | 10.77 (6.12) |
| ANG | 5 | 26 | 11.15 (6.29) |
| APC | 4 | 24 | 15.55 (5.33) |
| CR | 4 | 24 | 14.70 (5.56) |
| EC | 4 | 24 | 16.08 (5.56) |
| MD | 4 | 18 | 7.94 (4.01) |
| CA | 3 | 20 | 8.34 (4.30) |
| RR | 4 | 24 | 11.49 (5.58) |
| GBI | |||
| global | -100.00 | 75.00 | -23.19 (34.93) |
| social support | -83.33 | 66.67 | 0.31 (27.44) |
| physical health | -83.33 | 33.33 | -21.96 (31.86) |
| overall | -80.56 | 63.69 | -20.09 (25.68) |
| questionnaire scales | POH (n = 50) |
non POH (n = 42) |
p |
FDR-corrected p |
Cohen`s d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBI | |||||
| general | -23.4 (34.6) | -10.9 (27.5) | .16 | .21 | - |
| social support | -0.9 (29.5) | 1.1 (20.6) | .56 | .56 | - |
| physical health | -23.2 (32.0) | -9.1 (21.5) | .049 | .098 | - |
| total | -20.7 (25.3) | -8.6 (19.9) | .01 | .04 | 0.52 |
| FESV | HADS-D | GBI | |||||||||||||||||
| HD | ANX | ANG | APC | CR | EC | MD | CA | RR | depression | anxiety | total | hearing loss | facial paresis | pain (NAS) | general | social support | physical health | total | |
| gender age |
-.08 -.27 |
-.04 -.32* |
-.15 -.32* |
-.13 .08 |
.17 .27 |
.17 .30* |
.01 .18 |
-.24 -.23 |
.23 .22 |
-.28 -.18 |
-.05 -.26 |
-.16 -.23 |
-.05 -.31* |
.23 .05 |
.03 -.20 |
.12 -.02 |
-.06 .30 |
.26 .25 |
.24 .20 |
| hearing loss | .16 | .29* | .37** | -.13 | -.33* | -.19 | -.17 | .11 | .01 | .37** | .04 | .20 | - | - | - | .01 | -.16 | -.06 | -.12 |
| facial paresis | -.03 | .01 | -.23 | .14 | .06 | .02 | -.11 | -.13 | -.16 | -.13 | .09 | -.02 | - | - | - | .17 | -.07 | -.07 | .18 |
| pain (NAS) | .24 | .21 | .19 | .11 | .01 | -.10 | -.23 | -.17 | .15 | .25 | .02 | .09 | - | - | - | -.23 | -.08 | .18 | -.28 |
|
TIPI-G |
|||||||||||||||||||
| extraversion | -.21 | -.32* | -.39* | .09 | .23 | .30* | -.01 | .12 | -.06 | -.49** | -.23 | -.34* | -.29* | -.03 | -.39** | .07 | .14 | .33* | .20 |
| agreeableness | -.02 | -.03 | -.13 | .25 | -.02 | .19 | .05 | -.24 | .18 | -.07 | -.12 | -.10 | -.01 | .17 | -.003 | .19 | .14 | .21 | .23 |
| conscientiousness | .10 | -.03 | .04 | -.07 | .16 | .15 | .17 | .14 | .27 | -.06 | -.31* | -.24 | -.11 | -.01 | .06 | -.14 | -.00 | -.20 | .21 |
| emotional stability | -.42** | -.58** | -.59** | .13 | .20 | .48** | .01 | .02 | .09 | -.35* | -.63** | -.56** | -.15 | -.17 | -.31* | .02 | .07 | .20 | -.14 |
| openness | -.46** | -.50** | -.42** | .24 | .15 | .23 | -.12 | .12 | .05 | -.47** | -.29 | -.35* | -.17 | -.13 | -.32* | .11 | -.12 | .17 | .14 |
|
GBI |
|||||||||||||||||||
| general | -.40** | -.35* | -.25 | .39** | .40** | .39** | .03 | .18 | .08 | -.25 | -.24 | -.29 | .01 | .17 | -.23 | - | - | - | - |
| social support | .05 | -.06 | -.02 | .04 | .02 | .07 | -.11 | -.14 | .06 | -.01 | .09 | .04 | -.16 | -.07 | -.08 | - | - | - | - |
| physical health | -.45** | -.30* | -.25 | .18 | .33* | .46** | .09 | .10 | .14 | -.40* | -.33* | -.37* | -.06 | -.07 | -.10 | - | - | - | - |
| total | -.44** | -.37* | -.32* | .31* | .49** | .50** | .13 | .20 | .10 | -.39* | -.27 | -.38** | -.12 | .15 | -.28 | - | - | - | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).