Barianaki, E.; Kyvelou, S.S.; Ierapetritis, D.G. How to Incorporate Cultural Values and Heritage in Maritime Spatial Planning: A Systematic Review. Heritage2024, 7, 380-411.
Barianaki, E.; Kyvelou, S.S.; Ierapetritis, D.G. How to Incorporate Cultural Values and Heritage in Maritime Spatial Planning: A Systematic Review. Heritage 2024, 7, 380-411.
Barianaki, E.; Kyvelou, S.S.; Ierapetritis, D.G. How to Incorporate Cultural Values and Heritage in Maritime Spatial Planning: A Systematic Review. Heritage2024, 7, 380-411.
Barianaki, E.; Kyvelou, S.S.; Ierapetritis, D.G. How to Incorporate Cultural Values and Heritage in Maritime Spatial Planning: A Systematic Review. Heritage 2024, 7, 380-411.
Abstract
Understanding aspects of maritime/underwater cultural heritage (MUCH) and the associated cultural values and integrating them into maritime spatial planning (MSP) endeavors, is a new global challenge, alongside the rapid increase of human activities at sea and climate change impacts on the seas and the oceans. The article highlights the significance of cultural values in shaping human interactions with the marine environments, and how MSP can address the cultural dimensions of marine resources management. To this end, a systematic literature review was carried out to address the research question on how maritime/underwater cultural heritage is incorporated into MSP and map relevant academic literature. Following, a methodology that entailed an academic database search and the application of exclusion criteria, 346 articles resulted from Scopus. These articles were classified using science mapping techniques (i.e the VOSviewer Software ) and several categories (clusters) were created. The research showed a diversity of literature addressing the relationship between MUCH and MSP with a strong focus on sustainability, the significance of cultural ecosystem services (CES) and cultural values, the role of indigenous and local communities, but also of local stakeholders, the transfer of traditional knowledge to MSP and the participatory approaches and tools. The article concludes that for MSPlans to be innovative and acceptable by local communities, the “missing layer”of socio-cultural values and data is indispensable. In the MSP process, MUCH should be understood within this broader framework of socio-cultural considerations and values.
Keywords
Maritime Spatial Planning; Coastal management; Socio-cultural values; Cultural Ecosystem Services; participatory approach; local communities
Subject
Social Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
