Preprint
Article

Impact of Breastfeeding Duration on Adenoid Hypertrophy, Snoring and Acute Otitis Media. A Case-Control Study in Preschool Children

Altmetrics

Downloads

82

Views

39

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

03 November 2023

Posted:

05 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between breastfeeding duration and adenoid size, snoring and acute otitis media (AOM). Methods: We analyzed the medical history, reported symptoms, ear, nose and throat (ENT) examination, and flexible nasopharyngoscopy examination of 145 children aged 3-5 years. Results: Breastfeeding duration of 3 and 6 months or more had a significant effect on the reduction of snoring (p = 0.021; p = 0.039). However, it had no effect on the adenoid size, mucus coverage and sleeping with an open mouth. Snoring was correlated with open mouth sleeping (p < 0.001), adenoid size with a 75% A/C ratio or more (p < 0.001), and adenoid mucus coverage in the Mucus of Adenoid Scale by Nasopharyngoscopy Assessment - MASNA scale (p = 0.009). Children who were breastfed for less than 3 months had more than a 4-fold greater risk of snoring. There was a statistically significant correlation between AOM and gender (p = 0.033), breastfeeding duration in groups fed 1, 3 or 6 months or more (p = 0.018; p = 0.004; p = 0.004) and those fed with mother’s breast milk 3 or 6 months or more (p = 0.009; p = 0.010). Moreover, a correlation was found between adenoid size and mucus coverage, tympanogram, and open-mouth sleeping (p < 0.001). Independent factors of snoring in 3- to 5-year-old children were breastfeeding duration of less than 3 months (p = 0.032), adenoid size with an A/C ratio of 75% or more (p = 0.023) and open mouth sleeping (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Children breastfed for 3 and 6 months or more exhibited reduced rates of snoring. There was no effect of breastfeeding duration on adenoid size in children aged 3 to 5 years, suggesting that the link between breastfeeding duration and snoring is primarily associated with craniofacial development and muscle tone stimulation. A breastfeeding duration of 1 month or more plays a key role in reducing the rate of AOM. The mother’s milk plays a protective role against AOM. The presence of mucus might be responsible for snoring in preschool children. A medical history of breastfeeding should be taken into consideration when snoring children are suspected of adenoid hypertrophy.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Otolaryngology

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) strongly advocates breastfeeding for infants, recommending it from birth until at least six months due to its remarkable impact on bolstering the infant’s immune system and promoting optimal craniofacial development (1,2). Breast milk encompasses various bioactive components, with a pivotal role attributed to sIgA immunoglobulins. These immunoglobulins safeguard the infant’s intestinal barrier, reduce the risk of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, and mitigate inflammation (3). This immunoprotective effect is believed to be mediated through the passive transfer of maternal immune components during breastfeeding. Furthermore, breast milk is instrumental in shaping the upper respiratory tract microbiome and fostering greater alpha diversity (4).
Breastfeeding contributes significantly to the proper development of the oropharyngeal apparatus, including the peristaltic movement of the tongue during suckling, which in turn aids in the development and coordination of the oropharyngeal muscles engaged in swallowing (5). Additionally, it diminishes the risk of malocclusion disorders in children and supports the healthy formation of the palate (6-8). Importantly, scientific evidence has underscored a connection between the duration of breastfeeding and the subsequent occurrences of habitual snoring and apnea in preschool and early school-aged children. Habitual snoring is observed in 9% of preschool children, with adenoid hypertrophy being the predominant causative factor (9,10). This study seeks to elucidate the possible association between the duration of breastfeeding, snoring, adenoid size and acute otitis media (AOM). Specifically, it explores whether sustained exposure to immune components in breast milk has an influence on adenoid growth and mucus coverage or if the link between breastfeeding duration and snoring is primarily attributable to craniofacial development and muscle tone stimulation.

2. Materials and Methods

Study Population: The study encompassed 145 children (60 girls and 85 boys) aged 3-5 years, presenting with symptoms suggestive of adenoid hypertrophy, who were evaluated at an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) outpatient clinic in 2023. Detailed assessments included allergy history, symptoms linked to adenoid hypertrophy (e.g., snoring, mouth breathing), stated by parents’ hypoacusis, frequency of upper respiratory tract infections, and the presence and severity of a runny nose. Snoring was defined in accordance with criteria based on the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-3) (11). The children were categorized into six groups based on breastfeeding duration: up to 1 month, 3 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 18 months, 18 to 24 months, and over 24 months. Additionally, we analyzed children according to the same categorized periods of mother’s milk feeding, both from the breast and the bottle. The groups were analyzed according to adenoid size, mucus coverage and related symptoms, such as snoring and sleeping with an open mouth. Additionally, a history of AOM and the results of tympanometry examinations were recorded and compared with the breastfeeding period. Exclusion criteria included recent and prolonged treatment for adenoid hypertrophy with nasal steroid spray, craniofacial anomalies, genetic disorders (e.g., Down syndrome), nasal septal deviation, nasal polyps, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, and active upper respiratory infections. The patient characteristics and reported symptoms are presented in Table 1.
Endoscopy: Flexible endoscopic examinations of the nasopharynx were conducted on each child using a common nasal meatus. These examinations were carried out by a pediatric otorhinolaryngologist (AZ) using the Karl Storz Tele Pack endoscopic system, which was equipped with a flexible nasopharyngoscopy tool (2.8 mm outer diameter, 300 mm length). The assessment included choanal obstruction percentages (adenoid-to-choanae ratio - A/C ratio) and mucus coverage of the adenoids based on flexible nasopharyngoscopy. Choanal obstructions were assessed with up to 5% accuracy. To assess adenoid size in this study, we divided children into two groups: those with an adenoid size less than 75% in the A/C ratio and those with 75% or more in the A/C ratio in the flexible nasopharyngoscopy assessment. This categorization was derived from our intraoperative comparisons of adenoid size with preoperative endoscopic adenoid assessments, indicating that a 75% A/C ratio or more was equivalent to a surgically removed large adenoid (12), which was also confirmed in other clinicians’ opinions and studies (13,14). Videos of the nasopharynx were coded and analyzed blindly by the second ENT doctor (KM). Furthermore, the Mucus of Adenoid Scale by Nasopharyngoscopy Assessment (MASNA) was utilized to quantify adenoid mucus coverage, employing a four-point scale (0, no mucus; 1, residue of clear watery mucus; 2, some amount of dense mucus; 3, copious thick dense mucus) (15). In cases of assessment discrepancies, a third ENT doctor (PB) reassessed the score.
Tympanometry: The study involved otoscopic examinations and external auditory canal cleaning when required. Tympanometry was carried out using the GSI 39 AutoTymp TM by Grason-Stadler. Effusion in the middle ear was assessed through tympanometry measurements and tympanogram graphs. The results were classified using the Liden and Jerger classification system for tympanograms (16,17). Tympanograms were saved for each patient’s right and left ears, but to simplify the score, we divided them into three groups in accordance with the worst tympanogram in both ears. We adopted type-B tympanograms to consider the worst, type-C worse, and type-A indicative of normal function.
Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize variables within the study group. Quantitative variables were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical variables were summarized using frequency counts and percentages. Statistical significance was determined using the Chi-square method or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA for quantitative variables to assess differences between independent variables.
Variables significantly related to snoring in the univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression analysis to identify independent prognostic factors useful in assessing snoring. Prediction of snoring was assessed in two separate analyses: by using (1) breastfeeding <3 months and (2) breastfeeding <6 months for the logistic regression models. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were also calculated for considered clinical variables in regression models. For all these tests, two-tailed p-values were used, and differences at the level of p < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 28, Armonk, NY, USA) software.
Ethics: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ethics committee of Nicolaus Copernicus University (KB 141/2022).

3. Results

The study comprised 145 children with an average age of 3.9 years, a mean breastfeeding duration of 13 months, and an average adenoid size corresponding to a 65.3% A/C ratio (Table 1). The duration of breastfeeding 6 months or more had a significant effect on the reduction of snoring and incidence of AOM (p = 0.039 and p = 0.004, respectively). However, it had no effect on the adenoid size, mucus coverage, nasal blockage, sleeping with an open mouth, frequency of recurrent upper respiratory tract infection, rhinitis, cough, hypoacusis and tympanogram (Table 1).
Table 1. Characteristics of the study group divided into a 6-month breastfeeding period.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study group divided into a 6-month breastfeeding period.
Characteristic All Patients (N = 145) Breastfeeding Groups P value
≥ 6 months (n = 100) < 6 months (n = 45)
Age (years) mean ± SD 3.9 ± 0.8 3.9 ± 0.8 3.9 ± 0.8 0.981
Gender female 60 (41.4%) 41 (41.0%) 19 (42.2%) 0.890
male 85 (58.6%) 59 (59.0%) 26 (57.8%)
Breastfeeding (months) mean ± SD 13.0 ± 11.2
0-3 26 (17.9%) - - -
3-6 14 (9.7%)
6-12 31 (21.4%)
12-18 21 (14.5%)
18-24 16 (11.0%)
>24 37 (25.5%)
Adenoid size (A/C ratio, %) mean ± SD 65.3 ± 18.8 64.4 ± 19.0 67.3 ± 18.5
< 75 90 (62.1%) 66 (66.0%) 24 (53.3%) 0.146
≥ 75 55 (37.9%) 34 (34.0%) 21 (46.7%)
Adenoid mucus coverage (MASNA scale) 0 40 (27.6%) 27 (27.0%) 13 (28.9%) 0.615
1 36 (24.8%) 28 (28.0%) 8 (17.8%)
2 40 (27.6%) 26 (26.0%) 14 (31.1%)
3 29 (20.0%) 19 (19.0%) 10 (22.2%)
0 40 (27.6%) 27 (27.0%) 13 (28.9%) 0.814
1-3 105 (72.4%) 73 (73.0%) 32 (71.1%)
Tympanogram AA 65 (44.8%) 48 (48.0%) 17 (37.8%) 0.602
AB/BA 6 (4.1%) 5 (5.0%) 1 (2.2%)
AC/CA 15 (10.3%) 10 (10.0%) 5 (11.1%)
BB 34 (23.4%) 23 (23.0%) 11 (24.4%)
BC/CB 6 (4.1%) 4 (4.0%) 2 (4.4%)
CC 19 (13.1%) 10 (10.0%) 9 (20.0%)
A 65 (44.8%) 48 (48.0%) 17 (37.8%) 0.306
B 46 (31.7%) 32 (32.0%) 14 (31.1%)
C 34 (23.4%) 20 (20.0%) 14 (31.1%)
Allergy yes 24 (16.6%) 14 (14.0%) 10 (22.2%) 0.137
no 25 (17.2%) 21 (21.0%) 4 (8.9%)
not tested 96 (66.2%) 65 (65.0%) 31 (68.9%)
Snoring yes 106 (73.1%) 68 (68.0%) 38 (84.4%) 0.039
no 39 (26.9%) 32 (32.0%) 7 (15.6%)
Sleeping with an open mouth yes 72 (49.7%) 53 (53.0%) 19 (42.2%) 0.394
periodic 50 (34.5%) 31 (31.0%) 19 (42.2%)
no 23 (15.9%) 16 (16.0%) 7 (15.6%)
Hypoacusis (stated by parents) yes 35 (24.3%) 25 (25.3%) 10 (22.2%) 0.579
periodic 25 (17.4%) 15 (15.2%) 10 (22.2%)
no 84 (58.3%) 59 (59.6%) 25 (55.6%)
History of acute otitis media yes 84 (57.9) 50 (50.0%) 11 (24.4%) 0.004
no 61 (42.1%) 50 (50.0%) 34 (75.6%)
rURTIs yes 120 (82.8%) 83 (83.0%) 37 (82.2%) 0.909
no 25 (17.2%) 17 (17.0%) 8 (17.8%)
Rhinitis (weeks in a month) mean ± SD 1.8 ± 1.0 1.9 ± 1.0 1.6 ± 0.9 0.072
Cough yes 48 (33.1%) 37 (37.0%) 11 (24.4%) 0.237
no 97 (66.9%) 63 (63.0%) 34 (75.6%)
Blocked nose yes 11 (7.6%) 7 (7.0%) 4 (8.9%) 0.739
no 134 (92.4%) 93 (93.0%) 41 (91.1%)
A/C ratio: adenoid-to-choana ratio, rURTIs: recurrent upper respiratory tract infections.
To assess the factors that impact snoring within the study sample, a comparison was made between children who snored and those who did not (Table 2). There was no significant difference between age, gender, allergy history, hypoacusis, recurrent upper respiratory tract infections, rhinitis, cough, or nasal blockage. However, a statistically significant difference in snoring rates was observed based on breastfeeding duration. Children breastfed for 3 months, 6 months or more exhibited reduced rates of snoring (p = 0.021 and p = 0.039, respectively). Also, children fed with mother’s milk for 3 months or more snored less (p = 0.014). Snoring was also correlated with open mouth sleeping (p < 0.001), adenoid size with an A/C ratio of 75% or more (p < 0.001), and adenoid mucus coverage with the presence of any mucus (MASNA 1 to 3 degrees) (p = 0.009) (Table 2). Children with an adenoid size with an A/C ratio of 75% or more and mucus coverage on the adenoid snore more often. No relationship was observed between snoring and allergy, AOM, recurrent respiratory tract infections, rhinitis, nose blockage, cough, hypoacusis and tympanogram.
Table 2. The relationship of snoring and the occurrence of acute otitis media with clinical and demographic data in children aged 3-5 years with suspected adenoid hypertrophy.
Table 2. The relationship of snoring and the occurrence of acute otitis media with clinical and demographic data in children aged 3-5 years with suspected adenoid hypertrophy.
Characteristic History of acute otitis media P value Snoring P value
yes (n = 84) no (n = 61) yes (n = 106) no (n = 39)
Age (years) mean ± SD 4.0 ± 0.8 3.8 ± 0.9 0.345 4.0 ± 0.8 3.8 ± 0.8 0.211
Gender female 41 (48.8%) 19 (31.1%) 0.033 46 (43.4%) 14 (35.9%) 0.416
male 43 (51.2%) 42 (68.9%) 60 (56.6%) 25 (64.1%)
Breastfeeding (months) mean ± SD 11.8 ± 11.5 14.8 ± 10.5 0.107 12.5 ± 11.3 14.6 ± 10.7 0.318
≥ 1 66 (78.6%) 57 (93.4%) 0.018 87 (82.1%) 36 (92.3%) 0.128
< 1 18 (21.4%) 4 (6.6%) 19 (17.9%) 3 (7.7%)
≥ 3 59 (70.2%) 55 (90.2%) 0.004 78 (73.6%) 36 (92.3%) 0.021
< 3 25 (29.8%) 6 (9.8%) 28 (26.4%) 3 (7.7%)
≥ 6 50 (59.5%) 50 (82.0%) 0.004 68 (64.2%) 32 (82.1%) 0.039
< 6 34 (40.5%) 11 (18.0%) 38 (35.8%) 7 (17.9%)
≥ 12 38 (45.2%) 33 (54.1%) 0.292 49 (46.2%) 22 (56.4%) 0.277
< 12 46 (54.8%) 28 (45.9%) 57 (53.8%) 17 (43.6%)
≥ 24 18 (21.4%) 19 (31.1%) 0.185 26 (24.5%) 11 (28.2%) 0.652
< 24 66 (78.6%) 42 (68.9%) 80 (75.5%) 28 (71.8%)
Mother’s milk feeding mean ± SD 12.3 ± 11.2 15.0 ± 10.3 0.139 12.9 ± 11.0 14.9 ± 10.5 0.329
≥ 1 71 (84.5%) 58 (95.1%) 0.060 87 (82.1%) 36 (92.3%) 0.236
< 1 13 (15.5%) 3 (4.9%) 19 (17.9%) 3 (7.7%)
≥ 3 63 (75.0%) 56 (91.8%) 0.009 78 (73.6%) 36 (92.3%) 0.014
< 3 21 (25.0%) 5 (8.2%) 28 (26.4%) 3 (7.7%)
≥ 6 54 (64.3%) 51 (83.6%) 0.010 68 (64.2%) 32 (82.1%) 0.059
< 6 30 (35.7%) 10 (16.4%) 38 (35.8%) 7 (17.9%)
≥ 12 40 (47.6%) 34 (55.7%) 0.334 49 (46.2%) 22 (56.4%) 0.246
< 12 44 (52.4%) 27 (44.3%) 57 (53.8%) 17 (43.6%)
≥ 24 18 (21.4%) 19 (31.1%) 0.185 26 (24.5%) 11 (28.2%) 0.652
< 24 66 (78.6%) 42 (68.9%) 80 (75.5%) 28 (71.8%)
Adenoid size (A/C ratio, %) mean ± SD 66.6 ± 19.0 63.4 ± 18.6 0.320 68.2 ± 18.7 57.4 ± 17.2 0.002
< 75 47 (56.0%) 43 (70.5%) 0.075 56 (52.8%) 34 (87.2%) < 0.001
≥ 75 37 (44.0%) 18 (29.5%) 50 (47.2%) 5 (12.8%)
Adenoid mucus coverage (MASNA scale) 0 22 (26.2%) 18 (29.5%) 0.888 23 (21.7%) 17 (43.6%) 0.060
1 22 (26.2%) 14 (23.0%) 29 (27.4%) 7 (17.9%)
2 22 (26.2%) 18 (29.5%) 30 (28.3%) 10 (25.6%)
3 18 (21.4%) 11 (18.0%) 24 (22.6%) 5 (12.8%)
0 22 (26.2%) 18 (29.5%) 0.659 23 (21.7%) 17 (43.6%) 0.009
1-3 62 (73.8%) 43 (70.5%) 83 (78.3%) 22 (56.4%)
Tympanogram AA 29 (34.5%) 36 (59.0%) 0.054 50 (47.2%) 15 (38.5%) 0.486
AB/BA 3 (3.6%) 3 (4.9%) 3 (2.8%) 3 (7.7%)
AC/CA 9 (10.7%) 6 (9.8%) 11 (10.4%) 4 (10.3%)
BB 25 (29.8%) 9 (14.8%) 26 (24.5%) 8 (20.5%)
BC/CB 5 (6.0%) 1 (1.6%) 3 (2.8%) 3 (7.7%)
CC 13 (15.5%) 6 (9.8%) 13 (12.3%) 6 (15.4%)
A 29 (34.5%) 36 (59.0%) 0.011 50 (47.2%) 15 (38.5%) 0.643
B 33 (39.3%) 13 (21.3%) 32 (30.2%) 14 (35.9%)
C 22 (26.2%) 12 (19.7%) 24 (22.6%) 10 (25.6%)
Allergy yes 15 (17.9%) 9 (14.8%) 0.295 17 (16.0%) 7 (17.9%) 0.402
no 11 (13.1%) 14 (23.0%) 21 (19.8%) 4 (10.3%)
not tested 58 (69.0%) 38 (62.3%) 68 (64.2%) 28 (71.8%)
Sleeping with an open mouth yes 44 (52.4%) 28 (45.9%) 0.709 61 (57.5%) 11 (28.2%) < 0.001
periodic 28 (33.3%) 22 (36.1%) 37 (34.9%) 13 (33.3%)
no 12 (14.3%) 11 (18.0%) 8 (7.5%) 15 (38.5%)
Hypoacusis (stated by parents) yes 24 (28.9%) 11 (18.0%) 0.315 26 (24.8%) 9 (23.1%) 0.830
periodic 14 (16.9%) 11 (18.0%) 17 (16.2%) 8 (20.5%)
no 45 (54.2%) 39 (63.9%) 62 (59.0%) 22 (56.4%)
Snoring yes 65 (77.4%) 41 (67.2%) 0.173 - - -
no 19 (22.6%) 20 (32.8%) - -
History of acute otitis media yes - - - 41 (38.7%) 20 (51.3%) 0.173
no - - 65 (61.3%) 19 (48.7%)
rURTIs yes 72 (85.7%) 48 (78.7%) 0.269 91 (85.8%) 29 (74.4%) 0.104
no 12 (14.3%) 13 (21.3%) 15 (14.2%) 10 (25.6%)
Rhinitis (weeks in a month) mean ± SD 1.8 ± 0.9 1.8 ± 1.1 0.711 1.9 ± 0.9 1.6 ± 1.1 0.176
Cough yes 30 (35.7%) 18 (29.5%) 0.433 35 (33.0%) 13 (33.3%) 0.972
no 54 (64.3%) 43 (70.5%) 71 (67.0%) 26 (66.7%)
Blocked nose yes 7 (8.3%) 4 (6.6%) 0.761 9 (8.5%) 2 (5.1%) 0.498
no 77 (91.7%) 57 (93.4%) 97 (91.5%) 37 (94.9%)
Further relationships between the history of AOM and other factors were analyzed (Table 2). We found a statistically significant correlation between AOM and gender (p = 0.033). The girls got sick more often. Breastfeeding duration especially in groups fed 1, 3 or 6 months and more impact on recurrence of AOM (p = 0.018, p = 0.004 and p = 0.004, respectively). One month of breastfeeding was enough to reduce the amount of AOM. Also, in the groups of children fed with breast milk for 3 months, 6 months or more, a statistically significant difference in the incidence of AOM was shown (p = 0.009 and p = 0.010, respectively). A high correlation was also found depending on the depending on the type A tympanogram (p = 0.003). Tympanometry indicating any presence of fluid in the middle ear fostered the occurrence of AOM. There was no stated correlation between the history of AOM and adenoid size, adenoid mucus coverage, rhinitis, or upper respiratory tract infection, as observed by parents’ hypoacusis, cough, or snoring.
In the next step, correlations between the adenoid size and previously analyzed clinical data were analyzed. In addition to the previously presented correlations between adenoid size and snoring and the lack of correlation with breastfeeding duration, a statistically significant correlation was found between adenoid size and mucus coverage, tympanogram or open mouth sleeping (Table 3). In all of these correlation cases, the calculated p-value was < 0.001. Adenoid hypertrophy 75% and more was conducive to greater adenoid mucus coverage, C or B tympanogram, and sleeping with an open mouth. Additionally, a relationship was detected between adenoid size and mucus coverage on the MASNA scale, whereas larger adenoids more frequently displayed pathological mucus coverage. The presence of effusion in the middle ear was also linked to bigger adenoid size (Table 3). Moreover, it was determined that adenoid mucus coverage influenced snoring and tympanometry results.
Table 3. Relationship of adenoid size and demographic or clinical factors in children aged 3-5 years with suspected adenoid hypertrophy.
Table 3. Relationship of adenoid size and demographic or clinical factors in children aged 3-5 years with suspected adenoid hypertrophy.
Characteristic Adenoid size (A/C ratio) P value
n Mean ± SD
Gender female 60 67.5 ± 18.0 0.234
male 85 63.7 ± 19.4
Breastfeeding (months) 0-3 31 66.0 ± 21.1 0.753
3-6 14 70.4 ± 10.6
6-12 29 61.6 ± 20.0
12-18 18 63.1 ± 20.4
18-24 16 67.5 ± 17.3
>24 37 65.8 ± 18.8
Mother’s milk feeding 0-3 26 66.5 ± 19.4 0.742
3-6 14 70.4 ± 10.6
6-12 31 62.1 ± 19.6
12-18 21 62.4 ± 23.1
18-24 16 67.5 ± 17.3
>24 37 65.8 ± 18.8
Adenoid mucus coverage (MASNA scale) 0 40 53.5 ± 19.9 < 0.001
1 36 65.3 ± 19.6
2 40 70.1 ± 14.5
3 29 74.8 ± 13.3
0 40 53.5 ± 19.9 < 0.001
1-3 105 69.8 ± 16.4
Tympanogram AA 65 58.8 ± 20.6 0.010
AB/BA 6 75.8 ± 12.8
AC/CA 15 67.7 ± 13.7
BB 34 70.1 ± 18.7
BC/CB 6 72.5 ± 12.1
CC 19 71.1 ± 13.0
A 65 58.8 ± 20.6 < 0.001
B 46 71.2 ± 17.2
C 34 69.6 ± 13.2
Allergy yes 24 64.4 ± 19.3 0.904
no 25 64.2 ± 17.7
not tested 96 65.8 ± 19.2
Sleeping with an open mouth yes 72 71.9 ± 15.7 < 0.001
periodic 50 60.2 ± 19.8
no 23 55.4 ± 18.8
Hypoacusis (stated by parents) yes 35 69.1 ± 18.0 0.283
periodic 25 61.8 ± 22.8
no 84 64.3 ± 17.7
Snoring yes 106 68.2 ± 18.7 0.002
no 39 57.4 ± 17.2
History of acute otitis media yes 84 66.6 ± 19.0 0.320
no 61 63.4 ± 18.6
rURTIs yes 120 66.3 ± 18.1 0.156
no 25 60.4 ± 21.7
Cough yes 48 64.8 ± 17.1 0.829
no 97 65.5 ± 19.7
Blocked nose yes 11 72.7 ± 13.3 0.173
no 134 64.7 ± 19.1
Finally, we assessed the importance of breastfeeding in the prediction of snoring using logistic regression analysis. Regression analysis model using a 3-month breastfeeding cut-off point showed that a breastfeeding duration of less than 3 months (p = 0.032), adenoid size with an A/C ratio of 75% or more (p = 0.023) and open mouth sleeping (p = 0.001) were independent factors of snoring in children 3 to 5 years old (Table 4). The obtained estimates indicate that children who were breastfed for less than 3 months had more than a 4-fold greater risk of snoring than those who were breastfed for more than 3 months (OR = 4.33, 95% CI = 1.14-16.50). Analyzing the model with a 6-month breastfeeding cut-off point, sleeping with an open mouth (p < 0.001) and adenoid size of 75% or more (p = 0.030) were shown as significant factors of snoring.
Table 4. Logistic regression analysis for the prediction of snoring in children aged 3-5 years.
Table 4. Logistic regression analysis for the prediction of snoring in children aged 3-5 years.
Characteristic P value OR 95% CI
Model including breastfeeding with a 3-month cut-off point
  Sleeping with an open mouth, yes 0.001 2.57 1.46 - 4.51
  Adenoid mucus coverage (MASNA scale), 1-3 0.197 1.83 0.73 - 4.60
  Adenoid size, A/C ratio ≥ 75% 0.023 3.59 1.19 - 10.83
  Breastfeeding, < 3 months 0.032 4.33 1.14 - 16.50
Model including breastfeeding with a 6-month cut-off point
  Sleeping with an open mouth, yes < 0.001 2.71 1.52 - 4.84
  Adenoid mucus coverage (MASNA scale), 1-3 0.240 1.73 0.69 - 4.29
  Adenoid size, A/C ratio ≥ 75% 0.030 3.37 1.13 - 10.09
  Breastfeeding, < 6 months 0.055 2.66 0.98 - 7.24

4. Discussion

The study did not show an effect of breastfeeding duration on the adenoid size in children aged 3-5 years. No other studies in the available literature database have analyzed this relationship.
However, the study affirmed the beneficial effect of breastfeeding for 3 and 6 months or more in reducing snoring rates among children aged 3 to 5 years. This finding aligns with previous studies by Brew et al. indicating that breastfeeding for over one month is associated with a reduced risk of parent-reported habitual snoring (18). Moreover, breastfeeding for longer than 3 months was linked to a significant decrease in the risk of witnessed sleep apnea. Beebe et al. and Montgomery-Downs et al. also support this observation, suggesting that breastfeeding may confer protection against sleep-disordered breathing (9,19). One proposed hypothesis centers on the immunological protection of maternal milk, which reduces early childhood infections and inhibits lymphoid tissue proliferation. At ages 3 to 5, adenoids represent the most developed lymphoid tissue within Waldeyer’s ring (12). However, this study did not validate a correlation between breastfeeding duration and adenoid size as measured via flexible nasofiberscopy. Moreover, no such relationship emerged when considering the duration of breastfeeding. Multivariate analysis indicated that breastfeeding duration and adenoid size independently contributed to snoring. This raises questions regarding the second hypothesis postulated by Montgomery-Downs, suggesting that the link between breastfeeding duration and snoring might be primarily associated with craniofacial development and muscle tone stimulation (19, 20).
Our study has shown the beneficial effects of breastfeeding for more than one month on reducing the risk of AOM in preschool children. This was already reported in literature and meta-analysis performed by other authors (21-25). The population studies in Canada by Karunanayake et al. indicated that breastfeeding for more than 3 months protects against ear infection. We have also shown a beneficial effect of feeding the baby with breast milk for more than 3 months on reducing the incidence of AOM. This confirms the suggested effect of immune modulation, epigenetic changes, and colonization of beneficial microbiota supplemented with mother’s milk (24,26). Moreover, mothers’ milk has a bacteriostatic effect and contains lactoperoxidase which destroys pathogenic AOM bacteria (24). The positive effect of a short breastfeeding period (one month in our study) on the reduction of the incidence of AOM supports the protective role of mother’s milk against AOM rather than the breastfeeding process itself, influencing the development of muscle tone of the oropharyngeal apparatus and improving Eustachian tube function.
The incidence of AOM correlated with tympanometry results indicating effusion in the middle ear confirmed by a type C or B tympanogram. This clearly confirmed that effusion in the middle ear promotes the growth of pathogens and increases the risk of otitis media.
One noteworthy revelation in this study was the identification of a potential link between adenoid mucus coverage and snoring in preschool children. The presence of mucus is responsible for constriction of the nose and nasopharynx, increasing upper airway resistance and influencing snoring. Consequently, snoring in preschool children may be misinterpreted as a symptom of adenoid hypertrophy, even though it can be substantially caused by mucus covering the adenoid. Nonetheless, appropriate treatments such as anti-allergic medications, nasal steroids, and nasal lavage can potentially mitigate this effect. Research by Masna et al. emphasized that other factors, such as the thermal season, can also impact adenoid mucus (15). This observation was also stated by Wang et al., who showed seasonal dependence of snoring problems related to nasal blockage in the general population (27). Reduction of nasal resistance plays an important role in reducing snoring (28). This was corroborated by Värendh et al., who identified nasal symptoms as independent risk factors for snoring (29).
Our study did not show a relationship between the length of breastfeeding and open mouth sleeping. This is opposite to the results of a meta-analysis conducted by Savian et al., indicating a possible protective effect against the occurrence of mouth breathing (30). A study by Lopes et al. indicated that an increased duration of breastfeeding increases the likelihood of developing a normal breathing pattern in 2.5- to 4-year-old children (31). Similar positive results of breastfeeding for more than 3 months in similar groups of preschool children were shown by Travitzki (32). Similar to our findings, Ieto did not find that feeding correlated with predominant breathing patterns (33).
In addition, we confirmed the reports that other authors have already shown regarding the relationship between adenoid hypertrophy and the presence of effusion in the middle ear confirmed by tympanometry examination or adenoid size and sleeping with the mouth open (34-38). The high convergence of the obtained results and the resulting correlations with previous studies by other authors indicate that the studied group is representative. This increases the credibility of our results, particularly the lack of correlation between breastfeeding periods and adenoid hypertrophy.
Finally, it has been shown that the breastfeeding period and adenoid hypertrophy are independent factors influencing the snoring of preschool children. Therefore, a snoring child breastfed under 3 months may be misdiagnosed due to adenoid hypertrophy. A medical history of breastfeeding should be taken into consideration when snoring children are suspected of adenoid hypertrophy.

5. Conclusions

This study underscored the positive impact of breastfeeding for a minimum of 3 months in reducing snoring rates and preventing open month breathing among children aged 3 to 5 years. However, it did not establish any effect of breastfeeding duration on adenoid size. This reinforces the hypothesis that the favorable effect of breastfeeding on snoring is related to its influence on proper facial skeletal development, occlusion, and muscle tension in the mouth and throat. Moreover, it was found that breastfeeding duration of 3 months or more and adenoid hypertrophy with a 75% A/C ratio or more are independent factors of snoring in preschool children. Breastfeeding duration should be taken into account when, based on symptoms such as snoring, the doctor makes a diagnosis of suspected adenoid hypertrophy. The presence of mucus might be responsible for snoring in preschool children. Breastfeeding duration of 1 month or more plays a key role in reducing the rate of AOM. The nutrients of a mother’s milk play a protective role against AOM.

6. List of abbreviations:

  • FNE- flexible nasopharyngoscopy examination
  • A/C ratio - adenoid-to-choanae ratio
  • MASNA- mucus of adenoid scale by nasopharyngoscopy assessment
  • rURTI- recurrent upper respiratory tract infections
  • ICSD-3 -International Classification of Sleep Disorders
  • AOM -acute otitis media

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, A.Z. and K.D.; methodology, A.Z., K.D.; software, K.D.; validation, A.Z., K.D; formal analysis, A.Z, K.D..; investigation, A.Z, K.M..; resources, A.Z.; data curation, A.Z, K.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Z, K.D..; writing—review and editing, A.Z, PW.; visualization, A.Z.; supervision, P.B..; project administration, A.Z.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ethics committee of Nicolaus Copernicus University (KB 141/2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Additional data supporting reported results may be available for request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. World Health Organization. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
  2. Section on Breastfeeding Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129: e827–e841. [CrossRef]
  3. Aguiar H, Silva AI. Aleitamento materno: a importância de intervir [Breastfeeding: the importance of intervening]. Acta Med Port. 2011 Dec;24 Suppl 4:889-96. Portuguese. [CrossRef]
  4. Rosas-Salazar C, Shilts MH, Tang ZZ, Hong Q, Turi KN, Snyder BM, Wiggins DA, Lynch CE, Gebretsadik T, Peebles RS Jr, Anderson LJ, Das SR, Hartert TV. Exclusive breast-feeding, the early-life microbiome and immune response, and common childhood respiratory illnesses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Sep;150(3):612-621. [CrossRef]
  5. Woolridge M (1986) The ‘anatomy’ of infant sucking. Midwifery 2: 164–171. [CrossRef]
  6. Montaldo L, Montaldo P, Cuccaro P, Caramico N, Minervini G (2011) Effects of feeding on non-nutritive sucking habits and implications on occlusion in mixed dentition. Int J Paediatric Dent 21: 68 -73. [CrossRef]
  7. Vazquez-Nava F, Quezada-Castillo JA, Oviedo-Trevino S, Saldivar-Gonzalez AH, Sanchez-Nuncio HR, et al. (2006) Association between allergic rhinitis, bottle feeding, non-nutritive sucking habits, and malocclusion in the primary dentition. Arch Dis Child 91: 836–840. [CrossRef]
  8. Labbok M, Hendershot G (1987) Does breastfeeding protect against malocclusion? An analysis of the 1981 Child Health Supplement to the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Prev Med 3: 227–232. [CrossRef]
  9. Beebe DW, Rausch J, Byars KC, Lanphear B, Yolton K. Persistent snoring in preschool children: predictors and behavioral and developmental correlates. Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):382-9. [CrossRef]
  10. Zwierz A, Masna K, Domagalski K, Burduk P. 150th Anniversary of global adenoid investigations: unanswered questions and unsolved problems. Front Pediatr. 2023 Jul 14; 11:1179218. [CrossRef]
  11. Sateia, MJ. International classification of sleep disorders-third edition: highlights and modifications. Chest. 2014 Nov;146(5):1387-1394. [CrossRef]
  12. Zwierz A, Domagalski K, Masna K, Burduk P. Effectiveness of Evaluation of Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children by Flexible Nasopharyngoscopy Examination (FNE), Proposed Schema of Frequency of Examination: Cohort Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 17;12(7):1734. [CrossRef]
  13. Major MP, Saltaji H, El-Hakim H, Witmans M, Major P, Flores-Mir C. The accuracy of diagnostic tests for adenoid hypertrophy: a systematic review. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) 2014; 145 (3): 247-254. [CrossRef]
  14. Wang Y, Jiao H, Mi C, Yang G, Han T. Evaluation of Adenoid Hypertrophy with Ultrasonography. Indian journal of pediatrics 2020; 87 (11): 910- 915. [CrossRef]
  15. Masna K, Zwierz A, Domagalski K, Burduk P. The Impact of the Thermal Seasons on Adenoid Size, Its Mucus Coverage and Otitis Media with Effusion: A Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 28;10(23):5603. [CrossRef]
  16. Lidén, G. The scope and application of current audiometric tests. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1969;83:507–520. [CrossRef]
  17. Jerger, J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1970;92; 311–324. [CrossRef]
  18. Brew BK, Marks GB, Almqvist C, Cistulli PA, Webb K, Marshall NS. Breastfeeding and snoring: a birth cohort study. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 8;9(1):e84956. [CrossRef]
  19. Montgomery-Downs HE, Crabtree VM, Sans Capdevila O, Gozal D. Infant-feeding methods and childhood sleep-disordered breathing. Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):1030-5. 20. [CrossRef]
  20. Palmer B (2006) Snoring and sleep apnoea: how it can be prevented in childhood. Breastfeeding Rev 14: 11–14.
  21. Bowatte G, Tham R, Allen KJ, Tan DJ, Lau M, Dai X, Lodge CJ. Breastfeeding and childhood acute otitis media: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):85-95. [CrossRef]
  22. Abrahams SW, Labbok MH. Breastfeeding and otitis media: a review of recent evidence. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011 Dec;11(6):508-12. [CrossRef]
  23. Lodge CJ, Bowatte G, Matheson MC, Dharmage SC. The Role of Breastfeeding in Childhood Otitis Media. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016 Sep;16(9):68. [CrossRef]
  24. Kørvel-Hanquist A, Djurhuus BD, Homøe P. The Effect of Breastfeeding on Childhood Otitis Media. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Jul;17(7):45. [CrossRef]
  25. Karunanayake CP, Albritton W, Rennie DC, et al. Ear infection and its associated risk factors in first nations and rural school-aged Canadian children. Int J Pediatr. 2016;2016:1–10. [CrossRef]
  26. Claycombe KJ, Brissette CA, Ghribi O. Epigenetics of inflammation, maternal infection, and nutrition. J Nutr. 2015; 145:1109S– 15S. [CrossRef]
  27. Wang P, Chen C, Wang X, Zhang N, Lv D, Li W, Peng F, Wang X. Does seasonality affect snoring? A study based on international data from the past decade. Sleep Breath. 2023 Aug;27(4):1297-1307. [CrossRef]
  28. Georgalas, C. The role of the nose in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea: an update. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Sep;268(9):1365-73. [CrossRef]
  29. Värendh M, Janson C, Bengtsson C, Hellgren J, Holm M, Schlünssen V, Johannessen A, Franklin K, Storaas T, Jõgi R, Gislason T, Lindberg E. Nasal symptoms increase the risk of snoring and snoring increases the risk of nasal symptoms. A longitudinal population study. Sleep Breath. 2021 Dec;25(4):1851-1857. [CrossRef]
  30. Savian CM, Bolsson GB, Botton G, Antoniazzi RP, de Oliveira Rocha R, Zanatta FB, Santos BZ. Do breastfed children have a lower chance of developing mouth breathing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1641-1654. [CrossRef]
  31. Lopes TS, Moura LF, Lima MC. Association between breastfeeding and breathing pattern in children: a sectional study. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2014 Jul-Aug;90(4):396-402. [CrossRef]
  32. Trawitzki LV, Anselmo-Lima WT, Melchior MO, Grechi TH, Valera FC. Breast-feeding and deleterious oral habits in mouth and nose breathers. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Nov-Dec;71(6):747-51. [CrossRef]
  33. Ieto V, Rehder MIC, Bianchini EMG (2011) Possíveis associações entre o padrão respiratório predominante e o histórico alimentar infantil. Distúrb Comun 23(3):285–295.
  34. Galić MZ, Klančnik M. Adenoid size in children with otitis media with effusion. Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Feb;60(3):532-539. [CrossRef]
  35. Nwosu C, Uju Ibekwe M, Obukowho Onotai L. Tympanometric Findings among Children with Adenoid Hypertrophy in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Int J Otolaryngol. 2016; 2016:1276543. [CrossRef]
  36. Chen W, Yin G, Chen Y, Wang L, Wang Y, Zhao C, Wang W, Ye J. Analysis of factors that influence the occurrence of otitis media with effusion in pediatric patients with adenoid hypertrophy. Front Pediatr. 2023 Feb 22; 11:1098067. [CrossRef]
  37. Kim DK, Rhee CS, Yun PY, Kim JW. Adenotonsillar hypertrophy as a risk factor of dentofacial abnormality in Korean children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3311-6. [CrossRef]
  38. Bokov P, Dahan J, Boujemla I, Dudoignon B, André CV, Bennaceur S, Teissier N, Delclaux C. Prevalence of mouth breathing, with or without nasal obstruction, in children with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2022 Oct;98:98-105. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated