Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Charting the Chronology of Research on Added Sugars: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map

Version 1 : Received: 24 October 2023 / Approved: 24 October 2023 / Online: 24 October 2023 (10:54:25 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Fleming, S.A.; Peregoy, J.A.; Paul, T.L.; Scott, M.O.; Gaine, P.C. Charting the Chronology of Research on Added Sugars: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4974. Fleming, S.A.; Peregoy, J.A.; Paul, T.L.; Scott, M.O.; Gaine, P.C. Charting the Chronology of Research on Added Sugars: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4974.

Abstract

The objective was to conduct a scoping review and produce a publicly available database characterizing the design and reporting elements of the literature on dietary added sugars and select health outcomes. Relevant studies published from 1990 – 2021 were identified to create a database containing information on study and population characteristics, reported added sugars source and concentrations, diet energy balance, total energy intake, and outcome measures related to body composition, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus. There were 245 publications identified, 22% of which describe interventions and 78% describe observational studies. Publications pertaining to added sugars have risen dramatically since 2010, led by studies primarily assessing body composition (36%) or cardiovascular health (32%), including adults (65%), measuring liquid-only sources of added sugars (56%). Over 65% of studies reported total energy intake, 61% controlled for total energy intake in the design and analysis, and fewer than 5% of studies reported the energy balance of subjects. There has been a significant increase in research on added sugars since 2010, with substantial heterogeneity across all facets of methodology – study designs, exposures and outcomes of interest, terminology, and reporting of dietary intake data – thus limiting the ability to synthesize evidence in this scope of literature. This evidence map highlights gaps and important areas for improvement to strengthen the state of research to better inform future policies and dietary recommendations on added sugars.

Keywords

added sugar; sugar-sweetened beverages; dietary intake

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.