Version 1
: Received: 13 October 2023 / Approved: 16 October 2023 / Online: 17 October 2023 (12:15:12 CEST)
How to cite:
AlJasser, R. Comparison of Self-Perceived Oral and Facial Esthetics in Patients after Lip Repositioning Surgery with Modified and Conventional Technique. Preprints2023, 2023101093. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.1093.v1
AlJasser, R. Comparison of Self-Perceived Oral and Facial Esthetics in Patients after Lip Repositioning Surgery with Modified and Conventional Technique. Preprints 2023, 2023101093. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.1093.v1
AlJasser, R. Comparison of Self-Perceived Oral and Facial Esthetics in Patients after Lip Repositioning Surgery with Modified and Conventional Technique. Preprints2023, 2023101093. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.1093.v1
APA Style
AlJasser, R. (2023). Comparison of Self-Perceived Oral and Facial Esthetics in Patients after Lip Repositioning Surgery with Modified and Conventional Technique. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.1093.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
AlJasser, R. 2023 "Comparison of Self-Perceived Oral and Facial Esthetics in Patients after Lip Repositioning Surgery with Modified and Conventional Technique" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.1093.v1
Abstract
Patients with excessive gingival display (EGD) are treated with lip repositioning surgeries (LRS). This study used a questionnaire to analyze and evaluate how patients who received LRS with modified and traditional techniques perceived their own oral and facial aesthetics at various timelines after their surgeries. An orofacial esthetic questionnaire (OEQ) was used in this cross-sectional study. The participants were patients who underwent LRS for treatment of their EGD were divided into control (n=100) and test (n=100) groups. For control group, LRS were performed using traditional/conventional technique and for test group, LRS were performed by modified approach. OEQ was used to record responses. The scale comprised of eight questions targeted to capture participating patient’s perceptions about their own oral and facial aesthetics at four timelines (Baseline; 1 Month; 6 Months & 1 Year). Patients responded to each question on a 10 point Likert scale (Range: 0=very dissatisfied to 10= very satisfied). Data was analyzed by independent samples T-tests, using SPSS software. 7 (3.5%) out of the total (200) patients were unable to take part in the study's OEQ. At a one-year follow-up, the mean and standard deviation for the test group's GD were 2.48+0.86mm and 3.77+1.76mm, respectively, and comparisons revealed that the test group's GD was significantly lower (p=0.000) than the control group. Results from the participant responses to OEQ using the Likert scale at the 1-year follow-up revealed significant differences between control and test groups for all questions, except Q5 (P=0.06) as shape of the teeth will not be affected by LRS. Test group patients who underwent the LRS with modified approach were having high level of satisfaction (satisfaction-score>9). Patients in control group scored their satisfaction less favorably, with certain questions (Q3) receiving scores as low as 0.31. The test group's perception of oral and facial esthetics, was significantly higher for test group at different time points. At the 1-year follow-up, the mean difference was 4.46, which was the greatest (P=0.000). The EGD improved significantly at one year with the modified lip repositioning technique. The satisfaction level of the patients with outcomes of modified lip repositioning was significantly higher as compared to conventional technique.
Medicine and Pharmacology, Dentistry and Oral Surgery
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
