Preprint Article Version 3 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Rethinking Human and Machine Intelligence through Kant’s Incongruent Counterparts

Version 1 : Received: 13 October 2023 / Approved: 13 October 2023 / Online: 13 October 2023 (11:37:25 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 26 October 2023 / Approved: 26 October 2023 / Online: 26 October 2023 (11:30:49 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 5 December 2023 / Approved: 6 December 2023 / Online: 6 December 2023 (09:20:28 CET)

How to cite: Lee, J.J. Rethinking Human and Machine Intelligence through Kant’s Incongruent Counterparts. Preprints 2023, 2023100876. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.0876.v3 Lee, J.J. Rethinking Human and Machine Intelligence through Kant’s Incongruent Counterparts. Preprints 2023, 2023100876. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.0876.v3

Abstract

This paper proposes a metaphysical framework for distinguishing between human and machine intelligence. By drawing an analogy from Kant’s incongruent counterparts, it posits two identical deterministic worlds -- one comprising a human agent and the other comprising a machine agent. These agents exhibit different types of information processing mechanisms despite their apparent sameness in a causal sense. By postulating the distinctiveness of human over machine intelligence, this paper resolves what it refers to as “the vantage point problem” – namely, how to legitimize a determinist’s assertion of determinism by placing the determinist within the universe.

Keywords

determinism; incongruent counterparts; simulation; state description; counterfactuals

Subject

Arts and Humanities, Philosophy

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 6 December 2023
Commenter: Jae Lee
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: The 'vantage point problem' stated in the abstract and introduction has been further clarified. Additionally, I excluded the application of Gödel's proof strategy for his incompleteness theorem from the paper. Accordingly, I had to change the title as well. The existing term 'metaphysically open deterministic world' has been changed to 'deterministic world' for simplicity. Furthermore, I have cited two new thinkers, Piccinini and Zizek, to support my arguments. 
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.