Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Implementing Pro-social Rule Bending in an Elder-care Robot Environment

Version 1 : Received: 12 October 2023 / Approved: 12 October 2023 / Online: 13 October 2023 (03:00:35 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 23 October 2023 / Approved: 23 October 2023 / Online: 23 October 2023 (10:04:14 CEST)

How to cite: Ramanayake, R.; Nallur, V. Implementing Pro-social Rule Bending in an Elder-care Robot Environment. Preprints 2023, 2023100788. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.0788.v2 Ramanayake, R.; Nallur, V. Implementing Pro-social Rule Bending in an Elder-care Robot Environment. Preprints 2023, 2023100788. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.0788.v2

Abstract

Many ethical issues arise when robots are introduced into elder-care settings. When ethically charged situations occur, robots ought to be able to handle them appropriately. Some experimental approaches use (top-down) moral generalist approaches, like Deontology and Utilitarianism, to implement ethical decision-making. Others have advocated the use of bottom-up approaches, such as learning algorithms, to learn ethical patterns from human behaviour. Both approaches have their shortcomings when it comes to real-world implementations. Human beings have been observed to use a hybrid form of ethical reasoning called Pro-Social Rule Bending, where top-down rules and constraints broadly apply, but in particular situations, certain rules are temporarily bent. This paper reports on implementing such a hybrid ethical reasoning approach in elder-care robots. We show through simulation studies that it leads to better upholding of human values such as autonomy, whilst not sacrificing beneficence.

Keywords

elder-care robots; machine ethics; ethical decision making; ethical governor; rule bending

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 23 October 2023
Commenter: Rajitha Ramanayake
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Added the funding information to the paper.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.