2. The effect of the pandemic on corporate financing policy
We know that it is crucial for companies to maintain financial balance by aligning the maturity of their liabilities with that of their assets. Additionally, capital structure is relevant for determining the value of a company and is analyzed through various theories, such as the trade-off theory and the pecking order theory.
Economic recovery and tourism in Portugal were heavily affected by a worsening of the pandemic activity. On January 13, 2021, a new state of emergency was declared along with the implementation of new restrictive measures. There was a severe increase in COVID-19 related mortality, which was mitigated through the implemented measures and the start of vaccination, resulting in a significant reduction in new cases, hospitalizations and deaths starting from February 8. In October 2021, when 85% of the population is vaccinated, restrictions that were in place are lifted [
4].
The economic crisis triggered by the onset of the pandemic hits Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) with greater intensity. As the Portuguese business landscape is predominantly composed of SMEs, Portugal is one of the countries most affected by the crisis [
5]. Additionally, export activities account for approximately 44% of Portugal's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), making the country particularly sensitive to the impact of the crisis. In 2020, the GDP experienced a significant year-on-year decline of 7,6% due to the pandemic [
6].
In order to mitigate the economic impact resulting from the epidemiological situation and the contingency measures imposed by the government in the short and medium term, a set of policies were adopted. These included the moratorium on interest and capital payments for loans, access to state-guaranteed credit lines and an extension of deadlines for tax and contribution obligations. Furthermore, in order to maintain employment and alleviate the business crisis, on March 15, extraordinary and temporary support measures were defined and regulated for workers and employers affected by the pandemic through simplified layoff arrangements [
7].
One of the most widely adopted measures by companies as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic was the moratorium on existing loans predating the onset of the disease. Due to the sharp decline in business turnover and disposable income of households, there is a high risk of default on loan obligations. Consequently, similar to other countries, the Portuguese government established a public moratorium regime through Decree-Law no. 10-J/2020. This moratorium entails the suspension of capital and interest payments due until the end of the moratorium. As a result, the loan term is extended by a period equal to the duration of the moratorium, without resulting in a contractual default.
Mutual Guarantee Societies (MGS) aim to provide financial guarantees to facilitate credit acquisition based on the conditions and activities of businesses. When companies secure credit using mutual guarantees, they obtain more favorable terms, meaning that the cost of this financing is lower compared to bank financing without the guarantee, given that limits on the spread to be applied are imposed. Despite the commission payable to the MGS the total cost for the company, which includes financing costs owed to the bank, is lower, considering that the bank offers a lower interest rate due to the capital savings resulting from the fact that the borrowed amount is guaranteed by the MGS [
8].
In order to access credit lines, companies must meet certain conditions. They should have a positive net equity position in the latest approved balance sheet. If this is not the case, they might still be eligible if they provide an interim balance sheet at the application date with a regularized situation. Additionally, they should have no defaults with banks or MGS, and their status must be in good standing with the Tax Authority and Social Security at the time of financing. Access to certain credit lines has been restricted to companies experiencing a revenue decline of 25% to 40%. Lastly, companies deemed in distress are not eligible and they must commit to maintaining the employment positions they had on February 1, 2020, until December 31, 2020 [
9]. This extraordinary measure to support job retention is intended for employers subject to the obligation to close their facilities and establishments, fully or partially, due to the COVID-19 outbreak [
10]. This support is financial and allocated exclusively to cover employee salaries. Workers covered by this scheme receive two-thirds of their salary, or the national minimum wage if higher. The employer pays 30% of this amount, while the remaining 70% is covered by the government.
This simplified and temporary version of the layoff scheme was one of the most significant measures during the initial phase of the pandemic, leading to high participation and budgetary impact. Two months after the pandemic's onset, almost 83 000 companies submitted around 100 000 applications, totaling payments of 284 million euros, covering approximately 681 000 workers.
In cases where there is neither partial nor complete closure of a company's facilities or establishments, nor a suspension of its activities, if there is a proven sharp and substantial decline of at least 40% in revenue, this provides a basis for a situation of business crisis. Consequently, the entity can join the simplified layoff scheme and benefit from the suspension of Social Security contributions.
On May 11, 2020, a survey was conducted among companies to gather credible and updated information. The renewal of the simplified layoff support measure is requested by one-third of the companies, demonstrating its continued necessity. Among the companies utilizing this measure, 25% place all employees under this scheme, while 75% do so only partially [
11].
The supports for the economy and employment in 2020 amount to around 22 billion euros, with non-repayable grants totaling 279 billion euros [
7]. Most of these supports are allocated to assist liquidity, achieved through tax and contribution relief, bank moratoriums, deferred tax payments and credit lines, accounting for about 19 billion euros. The remaining support is divided among job maintenance, including the simplified layoff scheme, support for gradual resumption, and incentive for normalization; investment, particularly through programs like Adaptar, COVID R&D and COVID Progressive Innovation and, finally, non-salary fixed cost support through the Apoiar program.
The number of companies benefiting from these measures increases over time, with the suspension of tax and contribution obligations being the most commonly used measure, followed by moratoriums on pre-pandemic existing loans.
In a statement from May 4th, 84% of the surveyed companies believe that the government-announced supports are insufficient to meet their needs [
12]. Among the companies using credit lines, only 3% have access to the funds within a month and a half from the start of the programs. Additionally, 46% of these companies state that they need additional financing to sustain their business crisis.
To ensure the competitiveness of companies, access to financing is crucial as their investment is constrained by their ability to secure credit. Moreover, the cost of financing is essential, as it impacts prices and the capacity to maintain competitive pricing.
As companies opt for credit lines with subsidized interest rates and state guarantees, the total debt of Non-Financial Corporations (NFC) as a percentage of GDP increases from 92,70% in 2019 to 100,90% in the second quarter of 2021. This percentage has decreased by 34 percentage points between 2013 and 2019. In 2020, Portuguese NFC increased their debt-to-equity ratio by 8,2 percentage points, surpassing the European average of 6,9 percentage points [
13].
According to the Financial Stability Report of December 2021 [
14], following the onset of the pandemic crisis, the ratio of cash and deposits to financial debt increased to 32,60% in June 2021, from a percentage of 27,30% in March 2020. This indicates an average increase in the liquidity of NFCs due to the pandemic-originated crisis. The highest increase in this financial debt-to-assets ratio occurs in companies that had lower debt ratios before the pandemic. Sectors most affected by the pandemic, such as accommodation and catering, experience a generalized increase in the financial debt ratio.
In 2021, in comparison to 2020, the increases in new bank loans to companies decreased. The amount of credit granted to NFC increased significantly due to credit lines with public guarantees [
14]. As these loans come with a long maturity and a capital grace period of up to 18 months, companies don't feel the need to seek short-term financing again. Additionally, the implementation of moratoriums on pre-existing loans was another measure to mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic. These moratoriums are more prominently granted to sectors most affected by the pandemic. Although it was a measure that helped companies in the face of the crisis, there were companies that closed their activities, proving that the government was unable to adopt sustainable measures that would guarantee their continuity.
Excessive reliance on external financing can become concerning, as it can lead to the default of a company's responsibilities and is one of the primary reasons behind many business closures. To prevent such a scenario, it's essential to analyze the debt-to-equity ratio, which indicates the proportion of debt compared to equity capital. This ratio essentially measures the level of dependence on external financing [
15].
Interest rates in the Eurozone had been decreasing since 2008 until the first half of 2022. The Euribor, the reference rate for various types of loans, transitioned from values exceeding 5% to negative values, reaching as low as -0,518%, and remained negative for the past six years (until early 2022). As a consequence of rising energy and food prices and disruptions in supply chains, associated with an imbalance between supply and demand, inflation increases. This imbalance initially stems from the pandemic but has been exacerbated by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The European Central Bank (ECB) maintained interest rates unchanged until July 2022, arguing that price changes are transitory. Over time, it becomes evident that these changes are not temporary but rather persistent and lasting. Consequently, on July 21, the ECB decides to raise the interest rates of main financing operations by 50 basis points, marking the first increase in over a decade. Since then, in anticipation of inflation persisting for some time, the ECB has continued to raise interest rates.
The average interest rate on new loans to businesses increases from 2,00% in December 2021 to 4,44% in December 2022. Given this abrupt rise in interest rates, it's expected that this upward trend will persist. The financing costs for companies are rapidly increasing, which will have an immediate impact on new borrowing and gradually affect existing loans, posing a risk to debt servicing capacity.
From the Eurozone crisis starting in 2009 to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, corporate indebtedness has decreased while capital has increased. These factors help mitigate defaults in a situation of rising interest rates, along with the fact that liquidity has been reinforced by deposit accumulation during the pandemic and the economic recovery following the pandemic shock.
According to the European Central Bank, its primary objective is to maintain price stability [
16]. When prices rise too quickly, leading to increased inflation, the way to address this situation is by raising interest rates, thereby reducing inflation back to the medium-term target of 2%. In this manner, the ECB increases its policy rates, making loans more expensive for banks, which subsequently results in higher interest rates for loans to businesses. This reduces demand and encourages saving. As a result, overall demand decreases and inflation is brought under control.
In the November 2022 Financial Stability Report [
17], an estimation model of financial statements per company is employed to analyze the impact on the Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR), measured as the ratio of EBITDA to interest expenses. Additionally, the number of vulnerable companies (those with ICR less than 2) is assessed, compared to the sovereign debt crisis, which is also influenced by rising interest rates. To mitigate the increased financing costs resulting from higher interest rates, companies can utilize liquidity surpluses to reduce debt, as well as decrease dividend distribution.
Companies classified as vulnerable exhibit lower levels of liquidity and capitalization compared to those that are not classified as such. The risk for companies rendered vulnerable by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is heightened by their struggle to generate results and maintain a low level of liquidity and capitalization, which are critical factors for determining their ability to service debt [
18].