Preprint Case Report Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Controlled Case Report on the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Rectal Cancer: The Role of the Minimally Invasive Approach

Paolo Izzo
* ORCID logo ,
Luciano Izzo
ORCID logo ,
Maurizio Cardi
,
Andrea Polistena
ORCID logo ,
Daniele Crocetti
,
Simone Sibio
ORCID logo ,
Marcello Molle
,
Claudia De Intinis
ORCID logo ,
Sara Izzo
Version 1 : Received: 15 September 2023 / Approved: 18 September 2023 / Online: 19 September 2023 (07:37:03 CEST)

How to cite: Izzo, P.; Izzo, L.; Cardi, M.; Polistena, A.; Crocetti, D.; Sibio, S.; Molle, M.; De Intinis, C.; Izzo, S. Controlled Case Report on the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Rectal Cancer: The Role of the Minimally Invasive Approach. Preprints 2023, 2023091168. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.1168.v1 Izzo, P.; Izzo, L.; Cardi, M.; Polistena, A.; Crocetti, D.; Sibio, S.; Molle, M.; De Intinis, C.; Izzo, S. Controlled Case Report on the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Rectal Cancer: The Role of the Minimally Invasive Approach. Preprints 2023, 2023091168. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.1168.v1

Abstract

(1) Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic-therapeutic problem of pelvic recurrence of rectum cancer, highlighting current surgical standards and the possible role of the minimally invasive approach. This retrospective analysis of our surgical case study wishes to enter this debate while suggesting a possible line of action, based on the site of recurrence; (2) Methods: We examined, retrospectively, all the patients diagnosed, between 2008 and 2018, with cancer of the rectum at the "Pietro Valdoni" Department of Surgery and monitored their follow-up for 5 years. The sample consisted of 368 patients with rectal neoplasm, 136 females and 232 males, with an average age of 65.8 (ranging from 37 to 86); (3) Results: In 103 of the cases, the neoplasm was located in the upper rectum (28%), in 119 cases in the middle rectum (32.3%), in 102 cases in the lower rectum (27.7%), in 31 cases (8.4%) at the level of the right/sigma junction and in 13 cases it was not possible to define the site with certainty (3.5%); (4) Conclusions: The discussion re-mains open as to which approach is best at surgical level, whether laparoscopic, robotic or open-air. Our experience informs us that the most dangerous site remains on the anastomotic site.

Keywords

colorectal cancer; recurrent rectal cancer; laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery; openair surgery; controlled case report

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Surgery

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download PDF

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0
Get PDF Cite Share 0
Bookmark BibSonomy Mendeley Reddit Delicious
×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.