Submitted:
14 September 2023
Posted:
18 September 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Research Framework
2.1. Research Problem Definition
2.2. Research Gap Exploration
2.3. Research Goal and Research Questions
- What benefits resulting from the well-being of employees resulting from the implementation of the concept of sustainable production, described in the literature, should be included in the evaluation model in the analyzed sector?
- Do the survey results reflect the benefits identified as a result of the expert discussion (level of indications)?
- What benefits resulting from the well-being of employees are articulated by the surveyed enterprises (level of fulfillment)?
- What shortcomings in the category of benefits resulting from the well-being of employees are highlighted by the surveyed enterprises (low level of fulfillment)?
2.4. Research Thesis
- The research model developed as a result of the expert discussion reflects the values which are also significantly indicated by the surveyed enterprises.
- Expert assessment sheet reflecting selected values articulated in the literature on the subject.
- It is possible to diagnose the benefits that imply the legitimacy of implementing the concept of sustainable production.
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Literature Query
- multiplicity of ways of interpreting this term;
- the occurrence of synonymous terms, such as: stability or durability;
- defining sustainable production through metaphors (epistemological pluralism);
- considering sustainable generation through the prism of specific parameters;
- interdisciplinarity of sciences (different research trends influence them);
- transferring scientific achievements from other countries or sciences without clearly indicating the origin and meaning of the discussed terms.
- the activity of owners and managers of enterprises is increasing, which manifests itself in the pursuit of efficiency and rationality of management;
- the level of sustainability of the enterprise changes over time as a result of changes in the enterprise itself (self-acting and those resulting from intentional management activities) and market and macro-environment impacts independent of it;
- a sustainable enterprise is one that demonstrates long-term development ability and good economic, relational and environmental condition that persists despite changes in external conditions;
- a sustainable company is able to define the configuration direction of its resources in response to the impact of both internal and external factors in order to adjust to the market;
- the well-being of employees is a codified dimension in the area of sustainable production, oriented directly to increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the actions taken. In this sense, it is expressed through the ability of enterprises to meet the requirements of the market.
4.2. Competent Judges Method
4.3. Conclusive Research
4.4. Conclusive Research
5. Discussion and Conclusion
6. Summary
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Profiroiu, M.C.; Radulescu, C.V.; Burlacu, S.; Guţu, C. Changes and Trends in the Development of the World Economy. In Proceedings of the Competitivitatea Si Inovarea în Economia Cunoaşterii, Chisinau, Moldova, 25–26 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, J.; Vegelin, C. Sustainable Development Goals and Inclusive Development. Int. Environ. Agreem. Polit. Law Econ. 2016, 16, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felicioni, L.; Lupíšek, A.; Gaspari, J. Exploring the Common Ground of Sustainability and Resilience in the Building Sector: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of Building Rating Systems. Sustainability 2023, 15, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, S. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Singapore Medical Journal 2005, 46, 270–273. [Google Scholar]
- Anello, C.; Fleiss, J.L. Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: Should we distinguish between them? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995, 48, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lélé, S.M. Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development 1991, 19, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer-Kowalski, M.; Haberl, H. Sustainable development: Socioeconomic metabolism and colonization of nature. International Social Science Journal 1998, 50, 573–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakajima, N. A vision of industrial ecology: State-of-the-art practices for a circular and service-based economy. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 2000, 20, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meadows, D., Randers, J., Meadows, D. (2004) Limits to growth: The 30-year update. Earthscan, London.
- Columb, M.O.; Lalkhen, A.G. Systematic reviews & meta-analyses. Current Anaesthesia & Critical Care 2005, 16, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
- Junior, R.M.; Best, P.J.; Cotter, J. Sustainability Reporting and Assurance: A Historical Analysis on a World-Wide Phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics 2014, 120, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugiawan, Y.; Kurniawan, R.; Managi, S. Assessing the United Nations sustainable development goals from the inclusive wealth perspective. Scientific Reports 2023, 13, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, R. Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour?: Wrong question? Right time? Accounting and Business Research 2006, 36, 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, R. Of messines, systems and sustainability: Towards a more social and environmental finance and accounting. British Accounting Review 2002, 34, 357–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Røpke, I. The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecological Economics 2004, 50, 293–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Røpke, I. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics 2005, 55, 262–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Z. An introduction to the circular economy; People’s Press: Beijing, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Levy, Y.; Ellis, T.J. A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal 2006, 9, 181–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, T.B.; Vacca, R.; Mantegazza, L.; Capua, I. Discovering new pathways toward integration between health and sustainable development goals with natural language processing and network science. Globalization and Health 2023, 19, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gimenez, C.; Tachizawa, E. Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2012, 17, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, W.R.; He, J. Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2005, 16, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Teng, Y.; Yang, S. Evaluation of the Sustainable Development of Macau, Based on the BP Neural Network. Sustainability 2023, 15, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berg, A.; Antikainen, R.; Hartikainen, E.; Kauppi, S.; Kautto, P.; Lazarevic, D.; Piesik, S.; Saikku, L. Circular economy for sustainable development. In Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute; Finnish Environment Institute: Helsinki, Finland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- McDonough, W. Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things; North Point Press: New York, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, A. Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 2015, 127, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luttropp, C.; Lagerstedt, J. Eco-Design and The Ten Golden Rules: Generic Advice for Merging Environmental Aspects into Product Development. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006, 14, 1396–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, J. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 2004, 48, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niewiadomski, P. Ecodesign as a sign of environmental maturity of manufacturing enterprises: The vivisection of the agricultural machinery industry. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences 2020, 41, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Angelis, M.; Giusino, D.; Nielsen, K.; Aboagye, E.; Christensen, M.; Innstrand, S.T.; Mazzetti, G.; van den Heuvel, M.; Sijbom, R.B.L.; Pelzer, V.; Chiesa, R.; Pietrantoni, L. H-WORK Project: Multilevel Interventions to Promote Mental Health in SMEs and Public Workplaces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17, 8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paterson, C.; Leduc, C.; Maxwell, M.; Aust, B.; Amann, B.L.; Cerga-Pashoja, A.; Coppens, E.; Couwenbergh, C.; O'Connor, C.; Arensman, E.; Greiner, B.A. Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: A systematic scoping review protocol. Systematic Review 2021, 10, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pitt, J. Beyond sustainability? (2011) Designing for a circular economy. http://www.ort.org/uploads/media/10th_Hatter_booklet.pdf.
- Soonhee, K. Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review 2002, 62, 231–241. [Google Scholar]
- Lok, P.; Crawford, J. The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Management Development 2004, 23, 321–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chumg, H.F.; Seaton, J.; Cooke, L.; Ding, W.Y. Factors affecting employees' knowledge-sharing behaviour in the virtual organisation from the perspectives of well-being and organisational behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior 2016, 64, 432–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.S.; Amin, M. A systematic review of human capital and employee well-being: Putting human capital back on the track. European Journal of Training and Development 2022, 46, 504–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKinnon, L.J.; Harrison, L.G.; Chow, W.C.; Wu, A. Organisational culture: Association with commitment, job satisfaction, propensity to remain and information sharing in Taiwan. International Journal of Business Studies 2023, 11, 25–44. [Google Scholar]
- Berner, B.; Hantz, K.; Chojnacki, J.; Grieger, A. Środki transportowe do przewozu płodów rolnych. Autobusy: Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe 2015, 5, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
- Skrobacki, A., Ekielski, A. (2006). Pojazdy i ciągniki rolnicze. Warszawa: Wieś Jutra.
- Bujaczek, R., Dulcet, E. (2014). Przyczepa sprzęgająca jako wielozadaniowa maszyna w transporcie rolniczym. Autobusy: Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe, 6, 81-84.
- Kuczewski, J., Majewski, Z. (1999). Eksploatacja maszyn rolniczych. Warszawa: WSiP.



| nr | Layer | number of parameters to be assessed |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | organization and management layer | 12 |
| 2 | technology and production layer | 9 |
| 3 | competences and hr layer | 7 |
| list of questions | 28 |
| Factors | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Avr. |
| % indications | ||||||
| Sense of job security | 1,6 (1) | 1,6 (1) | 9,5 (6) | 44,4 (28) | 42,9 (27) | 4,25 |
| Activation and openness to new ideas and improvements in the way of working | 3,2 (2) | - | 15,9 (10) | 36,5 (23) | 44,4 (28) | 4,19 |
| Increased employee responsibility | 1,6 (1) | 4,8 (3) | 12,7 (8) | 39,7 (25) | 41,3 (26) | 4,14 |
| Building trust and cooperation between employees; sense of community; employee self-control | 1,6 (1) | 3,2 (2) | 11,1 (7) | 49,2 (31) | 34,9 (22) | 4,13 |
| Improving communication | 3,2 (2) | 1,6 (1) | 15,9 (10) | 39,7 (25) | 39,7 (25) | 4,11 |
| Reduction of order fulfillment time | 1,6 (1) | 4,8 (3) | 12,7 (8) | 44,4 (28) | 36,5 (23) | 4,10 |
| Increased trust and cooperation with customers, increased customer satisfaction, increased sales | 3,2 (2) | 3,2 (2) | 15,9 (10) | 38,1 (24) | 39,7 (25) | 4,08 |
| Increased trust and cooperation with suppliers | 3,2 (2) | 3,2 (2) | 14,3 (9) | 42,9 (27) | 36,5 (23) | 4,06 |
| Improving the quality of products | 1,6 (1) | 6,3 (4) | 15,9 (10) | 41,3 (26) | 34,9 (22) | 4,02 |
| Increased timeliness of deliveries | 1,6 (1) | 7,9 (5) | 22,2 (14) | 38,1 (24) | 30,2 (19) | 3,87 |
| Efficiency of administrative activities | 3,2 (2) | 7,9 (5) | 23,8 (15) | 34,9 (22) | 30,2 (19) | 3,81 |
| Flattening the organizational structure; reduction of management levels | 6,3 (4) | 15,9 (10) | 23,8 (15) | 28,6 (18) | 25,4 (16) | 3,51 |
| Factor | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Av. |
| % indications | ||||||
| Technical culture implying minimization of losses in the entire production process (reduction of stocks, ensuring optimal level of energy consumption, minimization of waste production), | - | - | 14,3 (9) | 41,3 (26) | 44,4 (28) | 4,30 |
| Minimization of production costs and other operating costs; increase in production efficiency | 3,2 (2) | 4,8 (3) | 7,9 (5) | 41,3 (26) | 42,9 (27) | 4,16 |
| Minimizing the length of the production cycle; shortening the transition time from raw material to finished product | 1,6 (1) | 1,6 (1) | 20,6 (13) | 36,5 (23) | 39,7 (25) | 4,11 |
| Production based on current demand | 3,2 (2) | 4,8 (3) | 15,9 (10) | 33,3 (21) | 42,9 (27) | 4,08 |
| Faster response to emerging problems | 1,6 (1) | 1,6 (1) | 20,6 (13) | 41,3 (26) | 34,9 (22) | 4,06 |
| Reduction of machine changeover times | 1,6 (1) | 4,8 (3) | 14,3 (9) | 46,0 (29) | 33,3 (21) | 4,05 |
| Error prevention, self-control of production workers | 1,6 (1) | 4,8 (3) | 22,2 (14) | 31,7 (20) | 39,7 (25) | 4,03 |
| Proposed actions to improve workstations and manufacturing technologies | 3,2 (2) | 3,2 (2) | 15,9 (10) | 44,4 (28) | 33,3 (21) | 4,02 |
| Focus on the product flow process | 3,2 (2) | 3,2 (2) | 15,9 (10) | 46,0 (29) | 31,7 (20) | 4,00 |
| Factors | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Av |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % indications | ||||||
| Increased employees-initiated innovation | 1,6 (1) | - | 11,1 (7) | 44,4 (28) | 42,9 (27) | 4,27 |
| Increasing competences (including, among others, environmental competences through participation in training for employees) | - | 4,8 (3) | 11,1 (7) | 38,1 (24) | 46,0 (29) | 4,25 |
| Matching contractors to the level of tasks performed | - | - | 20,6 (13) | 39,7 (25) | 39,7 (25) | 4,19 |
| Raising job satisfaction | 1,6 (1) | 1,6 (1) | 11,1 (7) | 49,2 (31) | 36,5 (23) | 4,17 |
| Greater willingness to transfer knowledge to other employees | 1,6 (1) | 1,6 (1) | 14,3 (9) | 47,6 (30) | 34,9 (32) | 4,13 |
| Cooperation with technology parks and universities | 3,2 | 1,6 | 17,5 | 36,5 | 41,3 | 4,11 |
| The ability to implement your own ideas without fear of being disregarded | 3,2 (2) | 1,6 (1) | 20,6 (13) | 36,5 (23) | 38,1 (24) | 4,05 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
