Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Novel Method for Ranking Generalized Fuzzy Numbers Based on Normalized Height Coefficient and Benefit and Cost Areas

Version 1 : Received: 15 September 2023 / Approved: 15 September 2023 / Online: 18 September 2023 (14:49:30 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Le, T.H.P.; Chu, T.-C. Novel Method for Ranking Generalized Fuzzy Numbers Based on Normalized Height Coefficient and Benefit and Cost Areas. Axioms 2023, 12, 1049. Le, T.H.P.; Chu, T.-C. Novel Method for Ranking Generalized Fuzzy Numbers Based on Normalized Height Coefficient and Benefit and Cost Areas. Axioms 2023, 12, 1049.

Abstract

To avoid loss of information and incorrect ranking, this paper proposes a method for ranking generalized fuzzy numbers, which guarantees both horizontal and vertical values are important parameters affecting the final ranking score. In this method, the normalized height coefficient is introduced to evaluate the influence of the height of fuzzy numbers on the final ranking score. The higher the normalized height coefficient of a fuzzy number is, the higher its ranking. The left area and the right area are presented to calculate the impact of vertical value on the final ranking score. The left area is considered the benefit area. The right area is considered the cost area. The fuzzy number is preferred if the benefit area is larger and the cost area is smaller. The proposed method can be employed to rank both normal and non-normal fuzzy numbers without normalization or height minimization. Numerical examples and comparison with other methods highlight the feasibility and robustness of the proposed method, which can overcome the shortcomings of some existing methods and can support decision-makers to select the best alternative.

Keywords

generalized fuzzy numbers; ranking; normalized height coefficient; left area; right area

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.