Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Multi-Fidelity Successive Response Surface Method for Crashworthiness Optimization Problems

Version 1 : Received: 7 September 2023 / Approved: 11 September 2023 / Online: 11 September 2023 (10:54:16 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Lualdi, P.; Sturm, R.; Siefkes, T. A Multi-Fidelity Successive Response Surface Method for Crashworthiness Optimization Problems. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11452. Lualdi, P.; Sturm, R.; Siefkes, T. A Multi-Fidelity Successive Response Surface Method for Crashworthiness Optimization Problems. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11452.

Abstract

Due to the high computational burden and the high nonlinearity of the responses, crashworthiness optimizations are notoriously hard-to-solve challenges. Among various approaches, methods like the Successive Response Surface Method (SRSM) have stood out for their efficiency in enhancing baseline designs within a few iterations. However, these methods have limitations that restrict their application. Their minimum iterative resampling required is often computationally prohibitive. Furthermore, surrogate models are conventionally constructed using Polynomial Response Surface (PRS), a method that is poorly versatile, prone to overfitting, and incapable of quantifying uncertainty. Furthermore, the lack of continuity between successive response surfaces results in suboptimal predictions. This paper introduces the Multi-Fidelity Successive Response Surface (MF-SRS), a Gaussian process-based method, which leverages a nonlinear multi-fidelity approach for more accurate and efficient predictions compared to SRSM. After initial testing on synthetic problems, this method is applied to a real-world crashworthiness task: optimizing a bumper crossmember and crash box system. Results, benchmarked against SRSM and the Gaussian Process Successive Response Surface (GP-SRS) – a single-fidelity Gaussian process-driven extension of SRSM, show that MF-SRS offers distinct advantages. Specifically, it improves upon the specific energy absorbed optimum value achieved by SRSM by 14.1 %, revealing its potential for future applications.

Keywords

crashworthiness optimization; MF-SRS; SRSM; multi-fidelity; design optimization; Gaussian Process; NARGP

Subject

Engineering, Automotive Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.