Preprint
Article

MOF-Derived CoSe2@NiFeOOH Porous Arrays for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

29 August 2023

Posted:

31 August 2023

You are already at the latest version

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract
Water electrolysis is a compelling technology for the production of environmentally-friendly hydrogen, minimizing carbon emissions. The electrolysis process of water heavily relies on the effective and steady oxygen evolution reaction (OER) taking place at the anode. Herein, we in-troduce a highly promising catalyst for OER called CoSe2@NiFeOOH arrays, which are supported on a nickel foam. This catalyst, referred to as CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF, is fabricated through a two-step process involving the selenidation of a Co-based porous metal organic framework and subsequent electrochemical deposition on a nickel foam. The CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF catalyst demonstrates outstanding activity for the OER in an alkaline electrolyte. It exhibits a low over-potential (η) of 254 mV at 100 mA cm−2, a small Tafel slope of 73 mV dec−1, and excellent high stability. The high performance of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF can be attributed to the combination of the high conductivity of the inner layer and the synergistic effect between CoSe2 and NiFeOOH. This study offers an effective method for the fabrication of highly efficient catalysts for the OER.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The storage of renewable energy presents a significant challenge in constructing an environmentally-friendly energy system. [1,2,3,4,5,6] Water electrolysis has become a promising technology for storing electricity generated from renewable sources by converting it into clean energy carrier, H2. It involves two distinct half-reactions: the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) occurring at the cathode and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) taking place at the anode. [7,8,9,10] Relative to the HER, the OER suffers from a much more sluggish kinetic, which requires highly efficient electrocatalysts. Thus far, IrO2 and RuO2 represent the state-of-the-art OER electrocatalysts because of their high activity and stability. [11,12,13,14,15,16] However, the high cost and scarcity of these resources limit their extensive utilization. [12,17,18,19] Therefore, it is crucial to develop alternative, affordable electrocatalysts that are abundant in the Earth’s crust. Transition-metal chalcogenides (TMCs) with the formula MxCy (M = Fe, Co, Ni; C = S, Se) have gained significant interest for high performance in OER catalysis, as well as their low-cost and abundance in the Earth’s crust.[20] Yang Shao-Horn and colleagues conducted a catalytic analysis of perovskite oxide, where they elucidated a correlation between OER activity and the occupancy of 3d electrons with eg symmetry in transition metal cations on the surface. Their findings revealed that an optimized OER electrocatalyst possesses an eg occupancy of approximate one. [21] Liu et al. applied this principle to explain the high OER activity of CoSe2 which exhibits t2g6eg1 electronic configuration, approaching the optimal eg filling. [22,23] However, they overlooked the surface reconstruction or oxidation of CoSe2 under the OER catalysis. The surface oxidation of CoSe2 would theoretically lead to the generation of Co oxides or hydroxides on the CeSe2 surface. This indicates that the actual catalytic phase is the Co oxides/hydroxides rather than the CoSe2. Therefore, the inner CoSe2 serves as an electron-transfer conductor, and is also probably influence the electronic structure of the surface Co oxides/hydroxides.
Based on the above analysis, we incline to believe that the high OER catalytic performance of CoSe2 may results from the synergistic effect of the surface oxides and the inner CoSe2. Since NiFeOOH species have been recognized as very efficient OER electrocatalysts both from the theoretical calculations and experimental investigations, [24,25] we proposed to fabricate thin NiFeOOH onto CoSe2 surface, aiming to achieve an optimized OER performance through the synergistic effect of NiFeOOH and CoSe2. To increase the accessibility of CoSe2, we prepared it by selenidation of a Co-based metal-organic framework (MOF) array grown on Ni foam. [23,26] The deposition of NiFeOOH onto CoSe2 was achieved through electrochemical deposition. The CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF composite exhibited high performance in alkaline electrolytes for the OER, demonstrating an overpotential of 254 mV at a current density of 100 mA cm−2 and a Tafel slope of 73 mV dec−1. Furthermore, it showed excellent stability with negligible current density decay after 100 hours of operation. The high OER activity can be attributed to the increased exposure of active sites, and the synergistic effect of NiFeOOH out layer and CoSe2 inner layer.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the routes to CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the routes to CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
Preprints 83634 g001

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Co(NO3)2·6H2O, 2-methylimidazole (2-MeIM, 99%), Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, sodium borohydride (NaBH4), selenium powder (Se) and absolute ethanol were purchased from Aladdin. The Ni Form was obtained from J&K Chemical Technology and subsequently subjected to sonication with acetone, ethanol, and deionized water for 30 minutes each prior to use.

2.2. Preparation of cobalt-based ZIF-L/NF

Initially, a solution of 2×10-3 mol Co (NO3)2 and another solution of 1.6×10-2 mol 2-MeIM were prepared by dissolving them individually in 40 mL of deionized water in a beaker. Then, the two solutions were combined by stirring. Subsequently, a nickel foam (NF) measuring 2×3 cm was immersed in the mixture and left at room temperature for 4 hours to generate ZIF-L/NF. To prepare it for future use, ZIF-L/NF was subjected to three rounds of rinsing with both ethanol and deionized water. Subsequently, it was dried overnight in an oven at 60 ºC.

2.3. Synthesis of CoSe2/NF

The ZIF-L/NF selenidation process was carried out using a hydrothermal method. Initially, 60 mg of NaBH4 was completely dissolved in 25 mL of deionized water. Subsequently, 20 mg of selenium powder was added to the solution. The mixture was continuously stirred for 40 minutes until a light-yellow solution was formed. The solution was then transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave, and a ZIF-L/NF sample with dimensions of 1 cm × 1.5 cm was immersed in the solution. The autoclave was kept at a temperature of 180°C for a duration of 8 hours. Afterward, the resulting CoSe2/NF product was rinsed with ethanol and water, and finally dried in an oven at a temperature of 60°C for 12 hours.

2.4. Synthesis of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF

The CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF composite was synthesized by electrochemically deposition with CoSe2/NF as the working electrode in a solution containing Ni(NO3)2 and Fe(NO3)3 (molar ratio of Ni2+/Fe3+= 4:1). The electrochemical deposition was conducted at a constant potential of -1.4 V vs. RHE for 8 seconds.

2.5. Characterization

X-ray power diffraction (XRD) data were recorded on Bruker D8 ADVANCE DAVINCI. The morphologies and nanostructures were probed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai F20, JEM-ARM200F). The surface chemical valences of the samples were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Axis SUPRA Kratos).

2.6. Electrocatalytic measurement

The electrochemical measurements were conducted on a CHI760E electrochemical workstation. The as-prepared samples served as the working electrode (geometric area: 1.0 cm2). The counter electrode was a Pt mesh with dimensions of 1 cm × 1 cm, and an Ag/AgCl electrode was used as the reference electrode. A 1.0 M KOH electrolyte was utilized. To convert the measured potentials to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale, the following equation was used: ERHE = EAg/AgCl + 0.059 pH+ 0.197 V. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves were measured at a scan rate of 5 mV s-1, while cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves were recorded at scan rates ranging from 10 to 50 mV s-1. Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were measured at 1.52 V vs.RHE. All polarization curves were IR-corrected. The double-layer capacitances were determined by analyzing the CV curves obtained at different scan rates, ranging from 10 to 50 mV s-1. The stability of the electrocatalyst was evaluated through chrono-amperometry performed at a constant potential. Faraday efficiency (FE) was determined using the bubbling method, following the formula: FE = 4 × F × V/(1000 × Vm × It), where V is the rising volume (mL) of the soap bubble over time t, I is the current density (It representing the total number of charges transferred under constant current), Vm is the molar volume (24.5 L mol-1 at 25 oC), and F is the Faraday constant (96485 C mol-1).

3. Results and Discussion

ZIF-L was deposited onto NF prepared by facilely immersing NF into a solution of cobalt nitrate and 2-methylimidazole at room temperature. The morphology of the ZIF-L/NF sample was analyzed bySEM, which allows for detailed imaging of the sample surface at high magnification. The crystal structure of the synthesized catalyst was determined using powder XRD. Figure 2a, d, and g illustrate the triangular ZIF-L plates with smooth surfaces vertically aligned on the NF. The sharp diffraction peaks at 44.5°, 51.9°, and 76.2° are attributed to the Ni substrate, and the peak at 29.4° belongs to ZIF-L. This confirms the successful fabrication of ZIF-L on NF. After selenization, ZIF-L transformed into CoSe2 phase while maintaining its morphology, except that the surface became rougher (Figure 2b, e, and h). Subsequently, NiFeOOH was electrochemically deposited onto CoSe2, resulting in a morphological change where CoSe2 formed an array with increased surface roughness and additional folds. XRD analysis of the CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF sample showed no visible peaks except those of the Ni substrate, suggesting the amorphous structure in the NiFeOOH layer. [27] The absence of XRD signals for CoSe2 demonstrates that a relatively compact NiFeOOH layer is formed on the CoSe2 surface. The three-dimensional CoSe2@NiFeOOH can aid in the transportation of electrolytes and the diffusion of reactive gases, thereby accelerating the reaction process. [27]
The detailed morphology of CoSe2@NiFeOOH was further characterized by TEM. Figure 1a shows that CoSe2@NiFeOOH possesses a thin-leaf like morphology. The weak polycrystalline rings in the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure 2c) indicate the poor crystallization of these thin-leaf structures in the single derived CoSe2@NiFeOOH. (Figure 2c). The structure of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF was precisely characterized using high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). At the top surface of CoSe2@NiFeOOH, two fringes with lattice spacings of 0.259 and 0.223 nm are observed, corresponding to the (111) and (210) planes of CoSe2, respectively. Elemental mapping images demonstrate the homogeneous dispersion of Ni, Fe, Co, Se, and O elements throughout the entire CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed to analyze the elemental composition and chemical valence states of the as-prepared CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. As shown in Figure 3a, two peaks centered at 855.7 and 873.5 eV were identified as the main peaks corresponding to oxidized Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2, respectively. Another two peaks at 861.2 and 879.3 eV were attributed to the shakeup satellite peak. [28] Figure 3b displays the Co 2p1/2 and Co 2p3/2 peaks, which can be further divided into four peaks located at 796.8/780.8 eV (Co2+) and 783.8/802.2 eV (Co3+). This suggests that the Co atom in CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF is predominantly in the valence states of +2 and +3. [28] In the XPS spectra of Fe 2p (Figure 3c), two characteristic peaks at 712.9 and 726.1 eV correspond to Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2, respectively, indicating the presence of Fe3+. [29] The findings collectively indicate that Ni and Fe exist as Ni and Fe oxidation states in CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. Furthermore, the analysis of the Se 3d peak reveals that the peak at 54.5 eV corresponds to Se 3d in CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF, and the presence of a peak at 59.2 eV indicates bonding between Se and O, confirming the surface oxidation of Se species. [30,31,32,33]
The catalysts’ OER performance was assessed using an electrochemical three-electrode system in a 1 M KOH alkaline solution. As shown in Figure 5a, CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF exhibits an overpotential of 254 mV at 100 mA cm-2, which is significantly lower than that of CoSe2/NF, NiFe-LDH/NF, NF/Selenization, CoSe2@NiOOH/NF, and CoSe2@FeOOH/NF. The OER activity of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF is also among the best OER electrocatalysts reported. (Table S1). The Tafel slopes of the four samples, namely CoSe2@FeOOH/NF, CoSe2@NiOOH/NF, CoSe2/NF, and CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF, were calculated to analyze their kinetics. As shown in Figure 5c, CoSe2@NiFeOOH possesses the smallest Tafel slope of 73 mV dec-1, much smaller than those of CoSe2@FeOOH/NF (102 mV dec-1), CoSe2/NF (119 mV dec-1) and CoSe2@NiOOH/NF (126 mV dec-1), suggesting a faster OER kinetics. To gain further insight into the kinetics of electron transfer, EIS measurements were performed. Figure 5b displays the Nyquist plots of all the samples. Notably, the CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF sample exhibits the smallest diameter of the semicircle in the high frequency region, which unequivocally confirms the presence of charge-transfer resistance (Rct). This resistance facilitates smooth charge transfer, ultimately resulting in excellent oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity. Additionally, to understand the intrinsic catalytic activity of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF for OER, the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) was estimated by measuring the double-layer capacitance (Cdl) in the potential range of 1.07-1.17 V at scan rates ranging from 10 to 50 mV s-1 (Figure S1). Interestingly, CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF exhibits the highest Cdl value of 29.0 mF cm-2 among all the samples, surpassing those of CoSe2@NiOOH/NF (23.1 mF cm-2) and CoSe2@FeOOH/NF (20.5 mF cm-2). Furthermore, the electrocatalytic stability of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF was evaluated. As depicted in Figure 5h, the current variation is negligible after a 100-hour continuous test at 1.54 V. The overpotential increase for every 50 mA cm-2 of current density is illustrated in Figure 5f. It is evident from the Figure 5a that CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF has a significantly lower overpotential than CoSe2@FeOOH/NF and CoSe2@NiOOH/NF, signifying higher catalytic activity of CoSe2@NiFeOOH. Figure 5e illustrates the chrono-potentiometric curve of CoSe2@NiFeOOH, showing multiple steps with the current density incrementing from 10 to 100 mA cm-2 in ten steps. In the initial step, the potential rapidly stabilizes at 1.44 V and remains nearly constant for a duration of 320 s. Similar phenomena are observed in the subsequent steps, indicating the exceptional mass transport and electronic conductivity characteristics of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. The faradaic efficiency for OER on the CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF electrodes was evaluated by measuring the O2 produced during a constant current test experiment. According to Figure 4g, the measured amount of O2 is in close agreement with the theoretical yield, resulting in a remarkable faradaic efficiency of 97.8% for the CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF electrode.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a three-dimensional CoSe2@NiFeOOH supported on nickel foam for efficient OER catalysis was fabricated. The excellent conductivity of CoSe2 and the synergistic effect between CoSe2 and NiFeOOH facilitate the OER catalysis on CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. The CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF catalyst demonstrated excellent performance in the alkaline electrolyte achieving an overpotential of 254 mV at 100 mA cm-2 and a Tafel slope of 73 mV dec-1. Furthermore, the catalyst demonstrated remarkable stability with minimal decay in current density, even after 100 hours. The findings of this study represent a prototype of a synergistic strategy for creating highly efficient electrocatalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded atthe website of this paper posted on Preprints.org. Figure S1. CV curves of a) CoSe2@FeOOH/NF. b) CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF and c) CoSe2@NiOOH/NF. Table S1. Comparison of the OER activity of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF with other non-noble metal electrocatalysts in alkaline solution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L., Y.W. and K.T.; methodology, Y.L., Y.T., Z.L. and J.L.; formal analysis, J.L., Y.T., Y.W. and Y.L.; investigation, Y.T. and J.L.; data curation, Y.T. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation Y.T. and J.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and Y.W.; supervision, Y.L., and K.T.; project administration, Y.L. Y.T. and J.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by R&D Program of Zhejiang (No. 2022C01029), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52271232), Bellwethers Project of Zhejiang Research and Development Plan (2022C01158), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LY21E020008), Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS (No. 2020300), Ningbo S&T Innovation 2025 Major Special Program (2022Z205), and Jiangbei Science and Technology planning project (202301A09).

Data Availability Statement

We would like to share our data upon request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dresp, S.; Ngo Thanh, T.; Klingenhof, M.; Brückner, S.; Hauke, P.; Strasser, P. Efficient direct seawater electrolysers using selective alkaline NiFe-LDH as OER catalyst in asymmetric electrolyte feeds. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 1725–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.; Tao, S.; Lin, H.; Wang, G.; Zhao, K.; Cai, R.; Tao, K.; Zhang, C.; Sun, M.; Hu, J.; Huang, B.; Yang, S. Atomically targeting NiFe LDH to create multivacancies for OER catalysis with a small organic anchor. Nano Energy. 2021, 81, 105606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, H.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.-G.; Li, Z.; Ao, X.; Xue, K.-H.; Ostrikov, K. K.; Tang, J.; Wang, C. Rh-engineered ultrathin NiFe-LDH nanosheets enable highly-efficient overall water splitting and urea electrolysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 284, 119740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alobaid, A.; Wang, C.; Adomaitis, R. A. Mechanism and kinetics of HER and OER on NiFe LDH films in an alkaline electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, J3395–J3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hunter, B. M.; Hieringer, W.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B.; Müller, A. M. Effect of interlayer anions on NiFe-LDH nanosheet water oxidation activity. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1734–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Y.; Yan, D.; El Hankari, S.; Zou, Y.; Wang, S. Recent progress on layered double hydroxides and their derivatives for electrocatalytic water splitting. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Dong, L.; Wu, H. B.; Yu, X.-Y. Activating the hydrogen evolution and overall water splitting performance of NiFe LDH by cation doping and plasma reduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 266, 118627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, L.; Zeng, X.; Wei, X.; Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; Gu, W.; Shi, L.; Zhu, C. Interface engineering for enhancing electrocatalytic oxygen evolution of NiFe LDH/NiTe heterostructures. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 273, 119014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nayak, S.; Parida, K. Superactive NiFe-LDH/graphene nanocomposites as competent catalysts for water splitting reactions. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 3805–3836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, J.; Yu, F.; Yuen, M.-F.; Wang, C. Two-dimensional layered double hydroxides as a platform for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 9389–9430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, S.; Huang, H.; Jiang, P.; Yang, K.; Diao, J.; Gong, S.; Liu, S.; Huang, M.; Wang, H.; Chen, Q. Mn-doped RuO2 nanocrystals as highly active electrocatalysts for enhanced oxygen evolution in acidic media. ACS Catal. 2019, 10, 1152–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hubert, M. A.; Patel, A. M.; Gallo, A.; Liu, Y.; Valle, E.; Ben-Naim, M.; Sanchez, J.; Sokaras, D.; Sinclair, R.; Nørskov, J. K.; King, L. A.; Bajdich, M.; Jaramillo, T. F. Acidic oxygen evolution reaction activity–stability relationships in Ru-based pyrochlores. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 12182–12196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Su, J.; Ge, R.; Jiang, K.; Dong, Y.; Hao, F.; Tian, Z.; Chen, G.; Chen, L. Assembling ultrasmall Copper-doped ruthenium oxide nanocrystals into hollow porous polyhedra: highly robust electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution in acidic media. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jin, H.; Choi, S.; Bang, G. J.; Kwon, T.; Kim, H. S.; Lee, S. J.; Hong, Y.; Lee, D. W.; Park, H. S.; Baik, H.; Jung, Y.; Yoo, S. J.; Lee, K. Safeguarding the RuO2 phase against lattice oxygen oxidation during acidic water electrooxidation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 1119–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, Y.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, L.; Ma, J.; Jiang, Z.; Deibert, B. J.; Ge, R.; Chen, L. Chromium-ruthenium oxide solid solution electrocatalyst for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Retuerto, M.; Pascual, L.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Ferrer, P.; Gianolio, D.; Pereira, A. G.; Garcia, A.; Torrero, J.; Fernandez-Diaz, M. T.; Bencok, P.; Pena, M. A.; Fierro, J. L. G.; Rojas, S. Na-doped ruthenium perovskite electrocatalysts with improved oxygen evolution activity and durability in acidic media. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2041–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. An, L.; Wei, C.; Lu, M.; Liu, H.; Chen, Y.; Scherer, G. G.; Fisher, A. C.; Xi, P.; Xu, Z. J.; Yan, C. H. Recent development of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts in acidic environment. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2006328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.; Wang, P.; Shao, Q.; Huang, X. Recent progress in advanced electrocatalyst design for acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2004243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Spori, C.; Kwan, J. T. H.; Bonakdarpour, A.; Wilkinson, D. P.; Strasser, P. The stability challenges of oxygen evolving catalysts: towards a common fundamental understanding and mitigation of catalyst degradation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 5994–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, T.; Hang, L.; Sun, Y.; Men, D.; Li, X.; Wen, L.; Lyu, X.; Li, Y. Hierarchical hetero-Ni3Se4@NiFe LDH micro/nanosheets as efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts with superior stability for overall water splitting. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019, 4, 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suntivich, J.; May, K. J.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Goodenough, J. B.; Shao-Horn, Y. , A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science. 2011, 334, 1383–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y.; Cheng, H.; Lyu, M.; Fan, S.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhi, Y.; Wang, C.; Xiao, C.; Wei, S.; Ye, B.; Xie, Y. Low overpotential in vacancy-rich ultrathin CoSe2 nanosheets for water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15670–15675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, J. G.; Sun, H.; Lv, L.; Li, Z.; Ao, X.; Xu, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, C. Metal-organic framework-derived hierarchical (Co,Ni)Se2@NiFe LDH hollow nanocages for enhanced oxygen evolution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 8106–8114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bai, L.; Lee, S.; Hu, X. , Spectroscopic and electrokinetic evidence for a bifunctional mechanism of the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 3095–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gao, Z. W.; Liu, J. Y.; Chen, X. M.; Zheng, X. L.; Mao, J.; Liu, H.; Ma, T.; Li, L.; Wang, W. C.; Du, X. W. , Engineering NiO/NiFe LDH intersection to bypass scaling relationship for oxygen evolution reaction via dynamic tridimensional adsorption of intermediates. Adv Mater 2019, 31, e1804769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dong, Q.; Wang, Q.; Dai, Z.; Qiu, H.; Dong, X. MOF-derived Zn-doped CoSe2 as an efficient and stable free-standing catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 26902–26907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. He, K.; Tadesse Tsega, T.; Liu, X.; Zai, J.; Li, X. H.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; Ali, N.; Qian, X. Utilizing the space-charge region of the FeNi-LDH/CoP p-n junction to promote performance in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 11903–11909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, R.; Zhou, Y.; Xing, Y.; Li, D.; Jiang, D.; Chen, M.; Shi, W.; Yuan, S. Synergistic coupling of CoFe-LDH arrays with NiFe-LDH nanosheet for highly efficient overall water splitting in alkaline media. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 253, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Ruan, Y.; Lv, L.; Ji, X.; Xu, K.; Miao, L.; Jiang, J. Hierarchical NiCo2S4@NiFe LDH heterostructures supported on nickel foam for enhanced overall-water-splitting activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 15364–15372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, F. S.; Wang, J. W.; Luo, J.; Liu, R. R.; Zhang, Z. M.; He, C. T.; Lu, T. B. Extraction of nickel from NiFe-LDH into Ni2P@NiFe hydroxide as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for efficient overall water splitting. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 1375–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jia, B.; Xue, Z.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Q.; Liu, K.; Liu, M.; Chan, T.-S.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Su, C.-Y.; Li, G. Hierarchical nanotubes constructed from CoSe2 nanorods with an oxygen-rich surface for an efficient oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 15073–15078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kwak, I. H.; Im, H. S.; Jang, D. M.; Kim, Y. W.; Park, K.; Lim, Y. R.; Cha, E. H.; Park, J. CoSe2 and NiSe2 nanocrystals as superior bifunctional catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 5327–5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhao, S.; Jin, R.; Abroshan, H.; Zeng, C.; Zhang, H.; House, S. D.; Gottlieb, E.; Kim, H. J.; Yang, J. C.; Jin, R. , Gold nanoclusters promote electrocatalytic water oxidation at the nanocluster/CoSe2 interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1077–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. SEM images of (a, d) ZIF-L, (b, e) CoSe2 and (c, f) CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. XRD pattern of (g) ZIF-L/NF, (h) CoSe2/NF, (i) CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a, d) ZIF-L, (b, e) CoSe2 and (c, f) CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. XRD pattern of (g) ZIF-L/NF, (h) CoSe2/NF, (i) CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
Preprints 83634 g002
Figure 3. (a) TEM, (b) HRTEM, (c) SAED pattern, and (d) STEM images and the corresponding elemental mapping images of Co, O, Fe, Ni and Se of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
Figure 3. (a) TEM, (b) HRTEM, (c) SAED pattern, and (d) STEM images and the corresponding elemental mapping images of Co, O, Fe, Ni and Se of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
Preprints 83634 g003
Figure 4. High-resolution XPS spectra of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
Figure 4. High-resolution XPS spectra of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF.
Preprints 83634 g004
Figure 5. (a) LSV curves for CoSe2/NF, CoSe2@FeOOH/NF, CoSe2@NiOOH/NF, NiFe-LDH/NF, NF/Selenization and CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. (b) EIS curves, (c) Tafel plots, (d) Cdl plots. (e) Rate capability evaluation of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. (f) Catalyst overpotentials at dif-ferent current densities. (g) Faraday efficiency. (h) i–t curve for CoSe2@NiFeOOH at the η=0.31 V for 100 h.
Figure 5. (a) LSV curves for CoSe2/NF, CoSe2@FeOOH/NF, CoSe2@NiOOH/NF, NiFe-LDH/NF, NF/Selenization and CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. (b) EIS curves, (c) Tafel plots, (d) Cdl plots. (e) Rate capability evaluation of CoSe2@NiFeOOH/NF. (f) Catalyst overpotentials at dif-ferent current densities. (g) Faraday efficiency. (h) i–t curve for CoSe2@NiFeOOH at the η=0.31 V for 100 h.
Preprints 83634 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

120

Views

58

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated