Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Polish version of the Neck Outcome Score

Version 1 : Received: 22 August 2023 / Approved: 22 August 2023 / Online: 22 August 2023 (11:33:55 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Dyrek, N.; Pulik, Ł.; Piwowarczyk, A.; Skała, W.; Grabowska-Mycko, N.; Łęgosz, P. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Polish Version of the Neck Outcome Score. Clinics and Practice 2023, 13, 1352–1359, doi:10.3390/clinpract13060121. Dyrek, N.; Pulik, Ł.; Piwowarczyk, A.; Skała, W.; Grabowska-Mycko, N.; Łęgosz, P. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Polish Version of the Neck Outcome Score. Clinics and Practice 2023, 13, 1352–1359, doi:10.3390/clinpract13060121.

Abstract

This study aimed to translate and psychometrically validate the Neck Outcome Score (NOOS) in the Polish population according to the recommendations of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) for the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Health Status Measures. Participants completed the NOOS, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment. The questionnaires were completed by 57 women and 32 men with cervical spine ailments. A retest was performed in all patients after 48 hours. The analysis confirmed the high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.95) of the Polish NOOS. No floor / ceiling effects were observed. The Polish NOOS showed a significant correlation with NDI (0.87; p<0.001) and VAS (0.79; p<0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the test-retest was found to be high (0.97). The Polish version of NOOS can be used for clinical and research purposes as an equivalent to the original English version. This study contributes to the area of patient-reported outcome measures available in the Polish language.

Keywords

Cervical Pain; Patient-Reported Outcome Measure; Validation Study; Poland

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.