Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Cervical Pessary in Preterm Birth Prevention among Singleton Pregnant Women with a Short Cervix and Obtuse Uterocervical Angle: A Quasi-experimental Study

Version 1 : Received: 1 August 2023 / Approved: 7 August 2023 / Online: 8 August 2023 (11:21:49 CEST)

How to cite: Nguyen, T.H.T.; Vu, V.T.; Nguyen, V.Q.H. Cervical Pessary in Preterm Birth Prevention among Singleton Pregnant Women with a Short Cervix and Obtuse Uterocervical Angle: A Quasi-experimental Study. Preprints 2023, 2023080661. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.0661.v1 Nguyen, T.H.T.; Vu, V.T.; Nguyen, V.Q.H. Cervical Pessary in Preterm Birth Prevention among Singleton Pregnant Women with a Short Cervix and Obtuse Uterocervical Angle: A Quasi-experimental Study. Preprints 2023, 2023080661. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.0661.v1

Abstract

(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate the role of cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnant women with a cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm and a uterocervical angle (UCA) ≥95o and ≥105o. (2) Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 225 singleton pregnant women with a gestational age of 16+o-23+6 weeks and transvaginal ultrasound CL measurements ≤25 mm, whose pregnancy was man-aged at the Haiphong Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vietnam, from September 2020 to September 2022. Participants were allocated into two groups: prophylactic treatment with progesterone (123 pregnant women) and combined with a cervical pessary (102 pregnant women). The UCAs measured via transvaginal ultrasound by a single sonographer were divided into groups with UCA measurements ≥95o and ≥105o. The gestational age at birth was classified into full-term and preterm <37 weeks and <34 weeks. A binary regression model assessed the association between CL, UCA, and pre-term birth outcomes. The difference was statistically significant, with p<0.05. (3) Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of preterm birth <37 weeks and <34 weeks between the two groups (16.3% vs. 11.8% and 6.5% vs. 4.9%, p>0.05). The probability of preterm birth <37 weeks in the group of pregnant women with a UCA ≥95o treated via cervical pessary plus progesterone decreased by 60.6%, OR (95% CI) of 0.394 (0.165-0.941), p<0.05. In the group of pregnant women with a UCA ≥105o, there was a significant association in the group of progesterone treatment combined with a cervical pessary, with the lower rate of PTB <37 weeks and <34 weeks, with OR (95% CI) of 0.028 (0.005-0.146), p<0.001, and 0.141 (0.030-0.664), p<0.05, respectively. (4) Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that cervical pessary is beneficial to the prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnant women with an obtuse uterocervical angle. Further randomized studies among pregnant women with obtuse uterocervical angles will be needed to clarify the role of a cervical pessary in preventing preterm birth.

Keywords

uterocervical angle; cervical pessary; preterm birth; singleton pregnancy

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.