1. Introduction
Speaking about of ancient Egyptian mathematics, it is impossible to pass by its famous riddle.
The matter of that the Egyptians considered a circle’s area (
S) to be equal to the area of the square, the side of which is 8/9 of circle’s diameter (
d), i.e. believed in modern designations,
Similar calculations are available in Moscow Mathematical Papyrus that dated to around 19th century BC [
1] and Rhind Mathematical Papyrus that dated roughly 17th century BC (but it is probably a copy of an older document) [
2].
This formula is characterized by amazing accuracy. If to consider that the ratio of a circle’s circumference (
L) to its diameter
the result is really very good: it exceeds the exact value (number π) 3.14159..., less than 0.02 (in other words, an error less than 1%) [
3]. But the answer to the question of how this result was obtained, has not yet been.
Various hypotheses have been proposed [
4,
5], but all of them are unconvincing.
The most reasonable is the assumption (put forward at the beginning of the 20th century) that the Egyptians divided the square into 9 parts, cut corners and get the right octagon the area of which is
d2 –
2/
9 d2, i.e. is 7/9 square area [
6], as can be seen in
Figure 1.
The area of the octagon close to the area of circle inscribed inside a square (
Figure 2) and is approximately equal to the area of square with the side 8/9 of the circle’s diameter, because 7/9 = 63/81 ≈ (8/9)
2. However, the researchers could not understand how the Egyptians came from the expression
d2 –
2/
9 d2 to the expression (
d –
1/
9 d )
2.
Here we reconstruct the ancient Egyptian method, in modern designations.
2. Method
At first, the Egyptian scientist have determined that an arbitrary square with side
d has the area (
Sq) is equal to:
where
P = 4
d is the perimeter of a square.
Then he drawed in the square the circle with a diameter equal to the side of the square (
Figure 2) and he found that the circle’s circumference is smaller than the perimeter of the square, and the circle area is smaller than the square area:
Substituting in formula (3)
L instead of
P, he obtained that the area of the circle
or
where
d ∙
d = 1 is the square’s area (in
Figure 2).
Hence, the ratio of the circumference to the diameter is equal to:
Thus, to calculate the area of a circle
it is necessary to know the ratio of the circumference length to the diameter (
L/
d). Using a strip of papyrus and a round flat object (such as a disc or wheel), the ancient researcher was able to determine
by direct measurement that this relationship lies approximately in the middle between the values 3 +
1/
4 and 3 +
l/
9:
Substituting in formula (7) the octagon’s area 7/9 instead of the circle’s area S, he obtained 4∙7/9 = 28/9 = 3 + 1/9 and made sure that the value of 7/9 for the area of the circle is not suitable.
Next, our scientist draws a square with an area equal to a given circle,
Sq =
S (
Figure 3). He sees that the square’s side (
а) is slightly smaller than the circle’s diameter (
a <
d), perhaps, it different from the diameter that is taken as
the unit of length (
d = 1), at 1/10, or 1/9, or 1/8:
Therefore, the square’s side is one of the following values from the circle’s diameter:
The areas of the circle and the square (in
Figure 3) the same,
S =
a ∙
a, so researcher receives from equation (7):
Sequentially substituting in the last formula instead of the square’s side
a its values (9/10, 8/9, 7/8), he calculates:
Thus, the unknown mathematician came to the conclusion that
the empirical condition (8)
is satisfied the value L/
d = 3 +
1/
6 , from where
a = (8/9)
d and the area of the circle is (
8/
9 d )
2 [
7].
3. Conclusion
Ancient Egyptians first proposed a mathematical method for calculating the circle’s area and the ratio of a circumference to diameter. This method is characterized by excellent accuracy, simplicity and elegance.
Footnote: This article is registered as an object of copyright in the Intellectual Property Office of Kyrgyzstan (Kyrgyzpatent) in November 2008 (Certificate № 1162).
References
- V.V. Struve and B.A. Turaev, Mathematischer Papyrus des Staatlichen Museums der Schönen Künste in Moskau. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, Abteilung A: Quellen, Vol. 1. (Heidelberg: J. Springer, 1930).
- T.E. Peet, The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus. British Museum10057 and 10058, London: The University Press of Liverpool limited and Hodder - Stoughton limited (1923).
- B.van der Waerden, Science awakening, Groningen: Wolters, 1954, p. 32.
- H. Engels, Quadrature of the circle in Ancient Egypt, Historia Mathematica, 4(2) 137–140 (1977). [CrossRef]
- P. Gerdes, Three alternate methods of obtaining the ancient Egyptian formula for the area of a circle, Historia Mathematica, 12(3) 261–268 (1985). [CrossRef]
- O. Neugebauer, Lectures on the history of ancient mathematical sciences, Moscow-Leningrad, 1937, pp. 140–141 [in Russian]. Available online: http://www.astro-cabinet.ru/library/Neigebauer/N_Lek_Ogl.htm.
- A.B. Abdukadyrov, Physics – unity in diversity, Bishkek, 2008, pp. 3–5 [in Russian].
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).