Submitted:
28 July 2023
Posted:
01 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Eligibility criteria and anti-VEGF treatment
2.2. Clinical measurements
2.3. Statistical analyses
3. Results
3.1. General patient information
3.2. Variation and correlation of imaging parameters
3.3. Comparison of the incidence of imaging parameters at baseline
4. Discussion
4.1. Factors that influence the prognosis of BCVA
4.2. Variation and correlation of imaging parameters
4.3. Comparison of the incidence of different imaging parameters
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PCV | polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy |
| nAMD | neovascular age-related macular degeneration |
| BVN | branching vascular network |
| ICGA | indocyanine green angiography |
| OCT | optical coherence tomography |
| OCTA | optical coherence tomography angiography |
| VEGF | vascular endothelial growth factor |
| FA | fluorescein angiography |
| PRN | pro re nata |
| PED | pigment epithelium detachment |
| SRF | subretinal fluid |
| BCVA | best-corrected visual acuity |
| LGH | late geographic hyperfluorescence |
| SFCT | subfoveal choroidal thickness |
| DLS | double-layer sign |
| CFT | central foveal thickness |
| PLs | polypoidal lesions |
| CNV | choroidal neovascularization |
References
- Fenner, B.J.; Cheung, C.M.G.; Sim, S.S.; Lee, W.K.; Staurenghi, G.; Lai, T.Y.Y.; Ruamviboonsuk, P.; Kokame, G.; Yanagi, Y.; Teo, K.Y.C. Evolving treatment paradigms for PCV. Eye 2021, 36, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dansingani KK, Gal-Or O, Sadda SR, Yannuzzi LA, Freund KB. Understanding aneurysmal type 1 neovascularization (polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy): a lesson in the taxonomy of 'expanded spectra' - a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;46(2):189-200.
- Cheung CMG, Lee WK, Koizumi H, Dansingani K, Lai TYY, Freund KB. Pachychoroid disease. Eye (Lond). 2019 Jan;33(1):14-33.
- Lee, W.K.; Baek, J.; Dansingani, K.K.; Lee, J.H.; Freund, K.B. CHOROIDAL MORPHOLOGY IN EYES WITH POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY AND NORMAL OR SUBNORMAL SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL THICKNESS. Retina 2016, 36, S73–S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tan, C.S.; Ngo, W.K.; Chen, J.P.; Tan, N.W.; Lim, T.H. EVEREST study report 2: imaging and grading protocol, and baseline characteristics of a randomised controlled trial of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 99, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vyas, C.H.; Cheung, C.M.G.; Tan, C.; Chee, C.; Wong, K.; Jordan-Yu, J.M.N.; Wong, T.Y.; Tan, A.; Fenner, B.; Sim, S.; et al. Multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy versus aflibercept combined with reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT) for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e050252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koizumi, H.; Yamagishi, T.; Yamazaki, T.; Kinoshita, S. Relationship Between Clinical Characteristics of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy and Choroidal Vascular Hyperpermeability. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 155, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Augsburger, M.; Sarra, G.-M.; Imesch, P. Treat and extend versus pro re nata regimens of ranibizumab and aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comparative study. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2019, 257, 1889–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.-Y.M.; Luo, M.-Y.M.; Meng, L.-H.M.; Zhang, W.-F.M.; Li, B.M.; Wang, E.-Q.M.; Liu, S.-Z.; Yu, W.-H.M.; Chen, Y.-X.M. THE INCIDENCE, CHARACTERISTICS, MANAGEMENT, PROGNOSIS, AND CLASSIFICATION OF BREAKTHROUGH VITREOUS HEMORRHAGE SECONDARY TO POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY. Retina 2020, 41, 1675–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yu, W.; Chen, Y. Additional file 1 of Activation of quiescent polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy after membrane peeling vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane: a case report. [CrossRef]
- Iwasaki, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Aoki, S.; Miyamoto, H.; Imaizumi, H. Comparative analysis of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with and without hemorrhage treated by anti-VEGF monotherapy. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schworm, B.; Luft, N.; Keidel, L.F.; Herold, T.R.; Wolf, A.; Priglinger, S.G.; Siedlecki, J. Ranibizumab non-response in pachychoroid neovasculopathy: Effects of switching to aflibercept. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung CMG, Lai TYY, Teo K, Ruamviboonsuk P, Chen SJ, Kim JE, et al. Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Consensus Nomenclature and Non-Indocyanine Green Angiograph Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia-Pacific Ocular Imaging Society PCV Workgroup. Ophthalmology. 2021 Mar;128(3):443-52.
- Coscas GJ, Lupidi M, Coscas F, Cagini C, Souied EH. OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY VERSUS TRADITIONAL MULTIMODAL IMAGING IN ASSESSING THE ACTIVITY OF EXUDATIVE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A New Diagnostic Challenge. Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2219-28.
- Karacorlu, M.; Muslubas, I.S.; Arf, S.; Hocaoglu, M.; Ersoz, M.G. Membrane patterns in eyes with choroidal neovascularization on optical coherence tomography angiography. Eye 2019, 33, 1280–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Ding, Q.M.; Yan, M.; Lian, H.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Song, Y. SHORT-TERM EFFICACY OF CONBERCEPT AND RANIBIZUMAB FOR POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY. Retina 2019, 39, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koh A, Lai TYY, Wei WB, Mori R, Wakiyama H, Park KH, et al. REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY: Twelve-Month Results From the LUMINOUS Study. Retina. 2020 Aug;40(8):1529-39.
- Gupta, P.; Ting, D.S.W.; Thakku, S.G.; Wong, T.-Y.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Wong, E.; Mathur, R.; Wong, D.; Yeo, I.; Cheung, C.M.G. DETAILED CHARACTERIZATION OF CHOROIDAL MORPHOLOGIC AND VASCULAR FEATURES IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION AND POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY. Retina 2017, 37, 2269–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt-Erfurth, U.; Waldstein, S.M.; Deak, G.-G.; Kundi, M.; Simader, C. Pigment Epithelial Detachment Followed by Retinal Cystoid Degeneration Leads to Vision Loss in Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yamamoto M, Tsujikawa A, Mizukami S, Miyoshi N, Yoshimura N. Cystoid macular edema in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy viewed by a scanning laser ophthalmoscope: CME in PCV viewed by SLO. Int Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;29(6):503-6.
- Cheung CMG, Tan CS, Patalauskaite R, Margaron P, Lai TYY. RANIBIZUMAB WITH OR WITHOUT VERTEPORFIN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY FOR POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY: Predictors of Visual and Anatomical Response in the EVEREST II Study. Retina. 2021 Feb 1;41(2):387-92.
- Hua, R.; Duan, J.; Zhang, M. Pachychoroid Spectrum Disease: Underlying Pathology, Classification, and Phenotypes. Curr. Eye Res. 2021, 46, 1437–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaffe GJ, Martin DF, Toth CA, Daniel E, Maguire MG, Ying GS, et al. Macular morphology and visual acuity in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1860-70.
- Li, X.; Qu, J.; Su, G.; Yu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Sadda, S.V. ; STAR Study Group The comparison of two different strategies of intravitreal conbercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Chinese patients results from a 48-week randomized phase 4 study: STAR study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022, 101, e327–e337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.; Lee, S.C.; Kwon, K.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Koh, H.J.; Byeon, S.H.; Kim, S.S.; Kim, M.; Lee, C.S. Subfoveal choroidal thickness as a predictor of treatment response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015, 254, 1497–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, D.; Hua, R.; Li, J.Q. Different imaging characteristics between unilateral and bilateral polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2019, 26, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagai, N.; Suzuki, M.; Minami, S.; Kurihara, T.; Kamoshita, M.; Sonobe, H.; Watanabe, K.; Uchida, A.; Shinoda, H.; Tsubota, K.; et al. Dynamic changes in choroidal conditions during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Lai, T.Y.Y.; Chiang, S.W.Y.; Chan, V.C.K.; Young, A.L.; Tam, P.O.S.; Pang, C.P.; Chen, L.J. Gender specific association of a complement component 3 polymorphism with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7018–7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.-J.; Huang, Y.-M.; Hsieh, M.-H.; Li, A.-F.; Chen, S.-J. Flow signal change in polyps after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. PLOS ONE 2020, 15, e0241230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spaide, R.F.; Ledesma-Gil, G.; Cheung, C.M.G. INTERVORTEX VENOUS ANASTOMOSIS IN Pachychoroid-RELATED DISORDERS. Retina 2020, 41, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.T.; Kang, S.W.; Chung, S.E.; Kong, M.G.; Kim, J.H. Development of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in unaffected fellow eyes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 96, 1217–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siedlecki, J.; Schworm, B.; Priglinger, S.G. The Pachychoroid Disease Spectrum—and the Need for a Uniform Classification System. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2019, 3, 1013–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takayama, K.; Ito, Y.; Kaneko, H.; Kataoka, K.; Sugita, T.; Maruko, R.; Hattori, K.; Ra, E.; Haga, F.; Terasaki, H. Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and optical coherence tomographic angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Eye 2016, 31, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, C.M.G.; Yanagi, Y.; Mohla, A.; Lee, S.Y.; Mathur, R.; Chan, C.M.; Yeo, I.; Wong, T.Y. CHARACTERIZATION AND DIFFERENTIATION OF POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY USING SWEPT SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY. Retina 2017, 37, 1464–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hua R, Wang H. Dark Signals in the Choroidal Vasculature on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: An Artefact or Not? J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:5498125.
- Chong Teo KY, Sadda SR, Gemmy Cheung CM, Chakravarthy U, Staurenghi G, Invernizzi A, et al. Non-ICGA treatment criteria for Suboptimal Anti-VEGF Response for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: APOIS PCV Workgroup Report 2. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Oct;5(10):945-53.


| Variable | Baseline | Last follow-up | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| LogMAR BCVA | 0.70 (interquartile range: 0.40-1.00) | 0.60 (interquartile range: 0.40-1.00) | z=3.093, p=0.002* |
| Macular edema (OCT) | 12/51 | 12/51 | z=0.000, p=1.000 |
| BVN(OCTA) | Ill-defined type 15 eyes | Ill-defined type 14 eyes | |
| Mulberry type 23 eyes | Mulberry type 20 eyes | z=0.855, p=0.393 | |
| Medusa or sea-fan shape type 12 eyes | Medusa or sea-fan shape type 14 eyes | ||
| Dead tree type 1 eye | Dead tree type 3 eyes |
| Variable | Ill-defined group (n=15) | Well-defined group (n=35) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 66.00 [interquartile range:62.00 to 73.00] | 64.00 [interquartile range:61.00 to 70.00] | 0.379 |
| Gender, male/female | Male=6/9 | Male=21/14 | 0.193 |
| The number of injections (n) | 5 [interquartile range:4 to 7] | 5 [interquartile range:4 to9] | 0.522 |
| Baseline BCVA, logMAR) | 0.70 [interquartile range: 0.30 to 1.22] | 0.70 [interquartile range: 0.52 to 1.00] | 0.907 |
| Baseline SFCT, μm Baseline CFT, μm Baseline SRF, μm |
356.00[interquartile range:187.00 to 389.00] 446.00[interquartile range:376.00 to 722.00] 128.00[interquartile range:0.00 to 297.00] |
259.00[interquartile range:191.00 to 360.00] 424.00[interquartile range:307.00 to 598.00] 145.00[interquartile range:0.00 to 257.00] |
0.244 0.295 0.923 |
| Baseline PED height, μm | 41.00[interquartile range:0.00 to 114.00] | 63.00[interquartile range:0.00 to 252.00] | 0.418 |
| BCVA improvement, logMAR | -0.18 [interquartile range: -0.40 to 0.00] | 0.00 [interquartile range: -0.15 to 0.00] | 0.032* |
| SFCT improvement, μm CFT improvement, μm SRF improvement, μm PED height improvement, μm |
21.00[interquartile range: -26.00 to 80.00] 211.00[interquartile range:73.00 to 305.00] 84.00[interquartile range:0.00 to 259.00] 0.00[interquartile range:0.00 to 108.00] |
4.00[interquartile range: -34.00 to 38.00] 68.00[interquartile range: -14.00 to 189.00] 0.00[interquartile range:0.00 to 110.00] 0.00[interquartile range:0.00 to 32.00] |
0.295 0.018* 0.087 0.500 |
| B | OR | 95%CI | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.050 | 1.051 | 0.962-1.148 | 0.274 |
| Gender | 2.577 | 13.153 | 2.187-79.100 | 0.005* |
| PLs on OCTA at baseline | 2.364 | 10.637 | 1.840-61.485 | 0.008* |
| The number of injections | -0.412 | 0.663 | 0.454-0.967 | 0.033* |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).