Submitted:
25 July 2023
Posted:
27 July 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature review and research hypothesis
3. Study Design
3.1. Model construction
3.2. Variable measures and descriptions
3.2.1. Explanatory variables
| Indicator Name | Proxy variables | Unit of measure | |
|
Input elements |
Capital | Capital stock (K) | Billion |
| Workforce | Employment in the three industries (L) | 10,000 people | |
| Energy | Energy consumption (E) | million tons of standard coal | |
| Output elements | Actual output | Real GDP (GDP) | Billion |
| Non-desired output elements | CE | CE (CO2) | million tons |
3.2.2. Core explanatory variables
| Evaluation Dimension | Indicator System | |
| The Level of DE | The construction of digital infrastructure | Internet usage percentage |
| Port accesses to the Internet | ||
| Ratio of people using cellphones | ||
| Total number of mobile phone users | ||
| The construction of digital technology application | Users of the internet | |
| Quantity of Domains | ||
| Quantity of websites | ||
| The construction of digital production services | Computer and software workers as a proportion of the urban population | |
| Overall telecom services per capita | ||
| Revenue from the software industry as a share of GDP | ||
| E-commerce purchases and sales as a percentage of GDP | ||
| Digital Finance Development Index |
3.2.3. Mediating variables
3.2.4. Control variables
3.3. Data sources and descriptive statistics
| Variable | Obs | Mean | Std.Dev | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEE | 270 | 0.433 | 0.265 | 0.005 | 1.217 |
| DE | 270 | 0.245 | 0.129 | 0.040 | 0.703 |
| mark | 270 | 6.721 | 1.956 | 2.067 | 11.639 |
| urb | 270 | 0.572 | 0.122 | 0.311 | 0.896 |
| open | 270 | 5.598 | 1.545 | -0.301 | 7.724 |
4. Empirical analysis
4.1. Baseline regression analysis
| CEE | (1) FE |
(2) FE |
(3) GMM |
(4) GMM |
| L.CEE | 0.508*** | 0.176*** | ||
| (0.006) | (0.028) | |||
| DE | 1.573*** | 0.942*** | 0.844*** | 0.853*** |
| (0.078) | ( 0.109) | (0.021) | (0.096) | |
| mark | 0.020** | 0.097*** | ||
| (0.008) | (0.010) | |||
| urb | 0.688*** | 0.535*** | ||
| ( 0.093) | (0.116) | |||
| open | -0.014* | -0.127*** | ||
| ( 0.008) | (0.007) | |||
| _cons | 0.048** | -0.245*** | 0.026*** | |
| 0.021 | ( 0.042) | (0.033) | ||
| AR(2) | 0.388 | 0.317 | ||
| Hansen | 0.633 | 0.851 | ||
| N | 270 | 270 | 240 | 240 |
| *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1,robust standard errors in parentheses | ||||
4.2. Regional heterogeneity analysis
| CEE | (1) East |
(2) Midwest |
(3) High economic development level |
(4) Low economic development level |
| DE | 1.160*** | -0.218 | 1.036*** | -0.420* |
| (7.18) | (-0.99) | (0.142) | (0.240) | |
| mark | 0.0380* | 0.0221** | 0.006 | 0.019** |
| (2.50) | (2.89) | (0.012) | (0.009) | |
| urb | 0.819*** | -0.027 | 0.860*** | -0.096 |
| (6.09) | (-0.22) | (0.136) | (0.121) | |
| open | -0.069** | 0.020* | -0.017 | 0.029*** |
| (-3.31) | (2.47) | (0.016) | (0.009) | |
| _cons | -0.210* | 0.163** | -0.329*** | 0.222** |
| (-2.09) | (2.69) | (0.091) | (0.060) | |
| N | 108 | 162 | 135 | 135 |
| Adj R-sq | 0.818 | 0.711 | 0.833 | 0.602 |
| *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1,robust standard errors in parentheses | ||||
4.3. Robustness tests based on the SDM
| year | Moran’s I of DE | year | Moran’s I of CEE |
| 2011 | 0.552*** | 2011 | 0.626*** |
| 2012 | 0.521*** | 2012 | 0.638*** |
| 2013 | 0.463*** | 2013 | 0.646*** |
| 2014 | 0.497*** | 2014 | 0.662*** |
| 2015 | 0.455*** | 2015 | 0.678*** |
| 2016 | 0.433*** | 2016 | 0.597*** |
| 2017 | 0.437*** | 2017 | 0.628*** |
| 2018 | 0.392*** | 2018 | -0.036 |
| 2019 | 0.365*** | 2019 | 0.615*** |
| *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 | |||
| Method tests | Statistical value | Method tests | Statistical value |
| LM-lag | 64.728*** | Wald-SAR | 85.21*** |
| LM-lag(robust) | 2.113 | Wald-SEM | 19.38*** |
| LM-error | 105.474*** | LR-SAR | 36.39*** |
| LM-error(robust) | 42.859*** | LR-SEM | 27.40*** |
| * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01 | |||
| CEE | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
| DE | 1.202*** | 1.089*** | 0.884*** | 0.918*** |
| (0.0691) | (0.0927) | (0.0984) | (0.009) | |
| mark | 0.0183*** | 0.0153*** | 0.022*** | |
| (0.00533) | (0.00530) | (0.007) | ||
| urb | 0.237** | 0.199* | ||
| (0.111) | (0.112) | |||
| lnopen | -0.012* | |||
| (0.007) | ||||
| W*DE | -0.253* | -0.0298 | -0.397* | -0.411** |
| (0.144) | (0.202) | (0.210) | (0.208) | |
| W*mark | -0.0381*** | -0.0533*** | -0.063*** | |
| (0.0131) | (0.0133) | (0.019) | ||
| W*urb | 0.713*** | 0.749*** | ||
| (0.212) | (0.217) | |||
| W*lnopen | 0.013 | |||
| (0.015) | ||||
| rho | 0.557*** | 0.614*** | 0.483*** | 0.494*** |
| sigma2_e | 0.0116*** | 0.0106*** | 0.0100*** | 0.010*** |
| N | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1,robust standard errors in parentheses. | ||||
4.4. Test of mediating effect
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
| CEE | Energy | CEE | Tec | CEE. | Ind | CEE | |
| Energy/Tec/Ind | -0.145*** | 3.40e-05** | 0.00319*** | ||||
| (0.0226) | (1.49e-05) | (0.000767) | |||||
| DE | 0.942*** | -0.721** | 0.895*** | 4,766*** | 0.780*** | 45.09*** | 0.798*** |
| (0.109) | (0.301) | (0.110) | (453.0) | (0.130) | (8.632) | (0.112) | |
| mark | 0.0198** | -0.229*** | -0.0156* | -78.14** | 0.0224*** | 0.346 | 0.0186** |
| (0.00821) | (0.0185) | (0.00846) | (33.99) | (0.00823) | (0.648) | (0.00797) | |
| urb | 0.688*** | 1.394*** | 0.890*** | 1,420*** | 0.640*** | 87.30*** | 0.410*** |
| (0.0927) | (0.237) | (0.0913) | (383.9) | (0.0944) | (7.315) | (0.112) | |
| lnopen | -0.0143* | 0.000137** | -2.75e-05 | -46.72 | -0.0127 | -1.698** | -0.00884 |
| (0.00834) | (6.14e-05) | (2.24e-05) | (34.52) | (0.00830) | (0.658) | (0.00819) | |
| _cons | -0.245*** | 1.663*** | -0.0564 | -833.9*** | -0.216*** | 184.4*** | -0.832*** |
| (0.0422) | (0.106) | (0.0536) | (174.6) | (0.0437) | (3.326) | (0.147) | |
| N | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| year | control | control | control | control | control | control | control |
| 0.799 | 0.629 | 0.835 | 0.545 | 0.803 | 0.697 | 0.811 |
5. Conclusion and Implications
References
- Alam MM, Murad MW (2020) The impacts of economic growth, trade openness and technological progress on renewable energy use in organization for economic co-operation and development countries. Renew Energy 145(Jan.):382–390.
- Ang, B. W. (1999). Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change?. Energy Policy, 27(15), 943-946. [CrossRef]
- Aydin E, Brounen D, Kok N (2018) Information provision and energy consumption: evidence from a field experiment. Energy Econ 71: 403–410. [CrossRef]
- Barata, A. (2019). Strengthening national economic growth and equitable income through sharia digital economy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(1), 145-168. [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya M, Rafiq S, Bhattacharya S (2015) The role of technology on the dynamics of coal consumption-economic growth: new evidence from China. Appl Energy 154:686–695. [CrossRef]
- Bukht, R., & Heeks, R. (2017). Defining, conceptualising and measuring the DE. Development Informatics working paper, (68).
- Chakpitak, N., Maneejuk, P., Chanaim, S., & Sriboonchitta, S. (2018, January). Thailand in the era of digital economy: How does digital technology promote economic growth?. In International Conference of the Thailand Econometrics Society (pp. 350-362). Springer, Cham. [CrossRef]
- Chen Y (2020) Improving market performance in the DE. China Econ Rev 62:101482.
- Dong, F., Hu, M., Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhu, J., & Pan, Y. (2022). How does digital economy affect carbon emissions? Evidence from global 60 countries. Science of The Total Environment, 852, 158401. [CrossRef]
- Ge, W., Xu, Y., Liu, G., Shen, B., Su, X., Liu, L.,... & Ran, Q. (2022). Exploring the impact of the DE on CEE under factor misallocation constraints: new insights from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 1116. [CrossRef]
- Ghasemaghaei, M., & Calic, G. (2019). Does big data enhance firm innovation competency? The mediating role of data-driven insights. Journal of Business Research, 104, 69-84. [CrossRef]
- Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3-43. [CrossRef]
- Gontareva, I., Chorna, M., Pawliszczy, D., Barna, M., Dorokhov, O., & Osinska, O. (2018). Features of the entrepreneurship development in DE. TEM Journal, 7(4), 813.
- Guan, H., Guo, B., & Zhang, J. (2022). Study on the Impact of the DE on the Upgrading of Industrial Structures—Empirical Analysis Based on Cities in China. Sustainability, 14(18), 11378. [CrossRef]
- Heiskanen E, Jalas M, Timonen P (2005) Reducing the natural resource intensity of private and organisational consumption: the potential of ICT and service innovations. Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal 2:453–474. [CrossRef]
- Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., & Stough, R. (Eds.). (2006). The emerging DE: entrepreneurship, clusters, and policy. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Kaya, Y., & Yokobori, K. (1997). 'Global environment, energy, and economic development'held at the United Nations University, Tokyo, 25-27 October 1993. 'Global environment, energy, and economic development'held at the United Nations University, Tokyo, 25-27 October 1993.
- LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
- LeSage J, Pace R K. Introduction to spatial econometrics[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2010(5): 1014-1015. [CrossRef]
- Li, S., & Ma, Y. (2014). Urbanization, economic development and environmental change. Sustainability, 6(8), 5143-5161. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y., Yang, X., Ran, Q., Wu, H., Irfan, M., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Energy structure, DE, and CE: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 64606-64629. [CrossRef]
- Li, Z., Li, N., & Wen, H. (2021b). DE and environmental quality: Evidence from 217 cities in China. Sustainability, 13(14), 8058. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Li, H., & Zhong, K. (2022). DE development, industrial structure upgrading and green total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from China’s cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2414.
- Liu, L, Yang, X., Meng, Y., Ran, Q., &Liu Z. (2021). Does the Construction of National Eco-Industrial Demonstration Parks Improve Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities in China. Sustainbility. [CrossRef]
- Lv, Y., Liu, J., Cheng, J., & Andreoni, V. (2021). The persistent and transient total factor CE performance and its economic determinants: evidence from China's province-level panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128198. [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q., Tariq, M., Mahmood, H., & Khan, Z. (2022). The nexus between DE and carbon dioxide emissions in China: The moderating role of investments in research and development. Technology in Society, 68, 101910. [CrossRef]
- Meng, F., Su, B., Thomson, E., Zhou, D., & Zhou, P. (2016). Measuring China’s regional energy and CEE with DEA models: A survey. Applied Energy, 183, 1-21. [CrossRef]
- Meng, Y., Liu, L., & Ran, Q. Does biased technological progress reduce air pollution emissions? Empirical analysis based on spatial Durbin model and threshold model. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 1811. [CrossRef]
- Mielnik, O., & Goldemberg, J. (1999). Communication The evolution of the “carbonization index” in developing countries. Energy Policy, 27(5), 307-308. [CrossRef]
- Miller P, Wilsdon J (2001) Digital futures—an agenda for a sustainable DE. Corp Environ Strateg 8(3):275–280.
- Niyazbekova, S. U., Moldashbayeva, L. P., Zhumatayeva, B. A., Mezentseva, T. M., & Shirshova, L.V. (2021). DE development as an important factor for the country’s economic growth. In Socio-economic Systems: Paradigms for the Future (pp. 361-366). Springer, Cham.
- Prokopenko, O., Shmorgun, L., Kushniruk, V., Prokopenko, M., Slatvinska, M., & Huliaieva, L. (2020). Business process efficiency in a DE. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(3).
- Rademaeker ED, Suter G, Pasman HJ, Fabiano B (2014) A review of the past, present and future of the European loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries. Process Saf Environ Prot 92(4): 280–291. [CrossRef]
- Soares JB, Tolmasquim MT (2000) Energy efficiency and reduction of CO2 emissions through 2015: the Brazilian cement industry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 5(3):297–318. [CrossRef]
- Sun, W., & Huang, C. (2020). How does urbanization affect CEE? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122828. [CrossRef]
- Wang, J., Dong, K., Dong, X., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Assessing the DE and its carbon-mitigation effects: The case of China. Energy Economics, 113, 106198.
- Wang, J., Wang, W., Ran, Q., Irfan, M., Ren, S., Yang, X.,... & Ahmad, M. (2022). Analysis of the mechanism of the impact of internet development on green economic growth: evidence from 269 prefecture cities in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(7), 9990-10004. [CrossRef]
- Wang, S., Sun, X., & Song, M. (2021). Environmental regulation, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(3), 410-429. [CrossRef]
- Wu, J., Zhu, Q., & Liang, L. (2016). CO2 emissions and energy intensity reduction allocation over provincial industrial sectors in China. Applied Energy, 166, 282-291. [CrossRef]
- Xi, B., & Zhai, P. (2022). Economic growth, industrial structure upgrading and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Kybernetes, (ahead-of-print). [CrossRef]
- Xie, Z., Wu, R., & Wang, S. (2021). How technological progress affects the CEE? Evidence from national panel quantile regression. Journal of Cleaner Production, 307, 127133. [CrossRef]
- Xu, S., Yang, C., Huang, Z., & Failler, P. (2022). Interaction between Digital Economy and Environmental Pollution: New Evidence from a Spatial Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5074. [CrossRef]
- Yang, X., Zhang, J., Ren, S., & Ran, Q. (2021). Can the new energy demonstration city policy reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125015. [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2021). Low-carbon city pilot and CEE: Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Economics, 96, 105125. [CrossRef]
- Yuan S, Musibau HO, Genç SY, Shaheen R, Ameen A, Tan Z (2021) Digitalization of economy is the key factor behind fourth industrial revolution: how G7 countries are overcoming with the financing issues? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 165:120533. [CrossRef]
- Zeng, W., Li, L., & Huang, Y. (2021). Industrial collaborative agglomeration, marketization, and green innovation: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123598. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W., Liu, X., Wang, D., & Zhou, J. (2022). DE and CE performance: Evidence at China's city level. Energy Policy, 165, 112927. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J., Jiang, Q., Dong, X., Dong, K., & Jiang, H. (2022). How does industrial structure adjustment reduce CO2 emissions? Spatial and mediation effects analysis for China. Energy Economics, 105, 105704. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J., Lan, H., Zhao, C., & Zhou, J. (2021). Haze Pollution Levels, Spatial Spillover Influence, and Impacts of the Digital Economy: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(16), 9076. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).