Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Surface Quality Evaluation in the Milling Process Using a Ball Nose End Mill

Version 1 : Received: 21 July 2023 / Approved: 24 July 2023 / Online: 25 July 2023 (05:26:57 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Varga, J.; Ižol, P.; Vrabeľ, M.; Kaščák, Ľ.; Drbúl, M.; Brindza, J. Surface Quality Evaluation in the Milling Process Using a Ball Nose End Mill. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10328. Varga, J.; Ižol, P.; Vrabeľ, M.; Kaščák, Ľ.; Drbúl, M.; Brindza, J. Surface Quality Evaluation in the Milling Process Using a Ball Nose End Mill. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10328.

Abstract

Shaped surfaces are increasingly used in the field of mould making for casting or injection moulding, where future products include shapes with different curvatures. These are surfaces that form convex curves, concave curves, or a combination thereof. Given these machined surfaces, it is important to know the impact of the finishing strategies on these surfaces. This paper deals with the comparison of finishing milling strategies in the production of shaped surfaces and the analysis of different methods for the evaluation of surface topography, surface roughness and the evaluation of deviations. The material used for the experiments was AlCu4Mg aluminium alloy, and Constant Z, Spiral and Spiral circle strategies were chosen for the finishing strategies. The evaluation of surface topography and surface roughness was carried out at three different sample heights with respect to the tool contact with the machined surface. The results showed changes in the toolpaths due to the variation of the effective diameter of the tool cutter to the machined surface as well as the choice of strategy. To produce specimens with corresponding shapes in terms of topography, the Constant Z strategy was the most suitable, in which uniform toolpaths were obtained over the whole height of the sample.

Keywords

roughness; surface topography; geometric deviations

Subject

Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.