Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Performance of Harvesting Residue Treatment Methods in South African Pine Plantation

Version 1 : Received: 18 July 2023 / Approved: 18 July 2023 / Online: 19 July 2023 (03:37:09 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Zitha, H.M.; Ramantswana, M.M.; Spinelli, R. Performance of Harvesting Residue Treatment Methods in South African Pine Plantations. Forests 2023, 14, 1661. Zitha, H.M.; Ramantswana, M.M.; Spinelli, R. Performance of Harvesting Residue Treatment Methods in South African Pine Plantations. Forests 2023, 14, 1661.

Abstract

Forest harvesting generates variable amounts of residue that represent a fire hazard and a hindrance to regeneration and must be managed accordingly. In South Africa, burning is the most common residue management method, but there is an interest in introducing safer and more effective techniques, such as mulching. For that reason, a productivity study was conducted in the Eastern Cape province to gather information on the productivity, cost, and work quality of the three main alternatives: manual broadcasting, manual broadcasting followed by mulching with an adapted farm tractor and mulching with a purpose-built mulcher. Manual broadcasting required 16 h/ha, mulching with a farm tractor 3.6 h/ha, and mulching with a purpose-built mulcher 0.9 h/ha (one pass). Manual broadcasting was the cheapest option, at a cost of 400 ZAR/ha. Mulching with a farm tractor and a purpose-built mulcher incurred a cost of 3 267 ZAR/ha and 4 083 ZAR/ha, respectively. Manual broadcasting achieved a minimal reduction of residue size, with 50% of the slash (branches and stem wood) having a mean length above 40 cm. When mulching with a farm tractor was applied, 49% of the slash (branches and stem wood) length reduced to about 30 cm. When a purpose-built mulcher was used, only 10% of the slash elements exceeded 40 cm length.

Keywords

Mastication; Mulching; Broadcasting Productivity; Cost; Work quality

Subject

Engineering, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.