Submitted:
13 July 2023
Posted:
13 July 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Experimental setup
3. Signal Acquisition and Preprocessing
3.1. Signal Acquisition
3.2. Signal Preprocessing
3.3. Relevance Analysis
4. Signal Feature Exaction
4.1. EEMD Based Signal Decomposition
4.2. HT based signal feature extraction
5. Result Analysis
5.1. Analysis of Generation and Propagation Process of Electromechanical Signal
5.2. OLTC Contact Fault Classification Based on SVM
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cai, Y.; Fang, R.; Peng, C.; Huang, W. On-load tap-changer mechanical fault diagnosis based on ANHGA-VMD and coupled hidden Markov model. High Voltage Technology. 2010, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Yu, S.; Chen, P.; Wang, F.; Ma, X.; Hu, X.; Qian, Y. Fault identification of energy storage spring of on-load tap-changer of transformer based on cluster analysis. High Voltage Apparatus 2020, 56, 159–165+172. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, L.; Lou, J. Mechanical fault diagnostics of on-load tap changer within power transformers based on hidden Markov model. IEEE Transactions on Power Deliver. 2012, 27, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Zeng, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Qian, Y. Mechanical fault diagnosis of on-load tap-changer based on Bayes estimation phase space fusion and CM-SVDD. Proceedings of the CSEE. 2020, 40, 58–368+402. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Fu, X.; Cui, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, D.; Wu, K. Ground-penetrating radar soil layer information recognition based on envelope detection and STFT spectrum analysis. Journal of Geo-Information Science. 2020, 22, 316–327. [Google Scholar]
- Li, K.; Li, X.; Su, L.; Su, W. Bearing fault diagnosis based on DTCWT and GA improved sparse decomposition. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition). 2021, 49, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Liu, S.; Lei, J. Empirical wavelet transform based on energy peak location and its application in weak bearing fault diagnosis. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University. 2021, 55, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, R.; Wang, F.; Zhou, L.; Yao, G. Detection of mechanical state of on load tap changer for converter transformer using narrowband noise assisted multiple empirical mode decomposition algorithm. Journal of Electrotechnics. 2017, 32, 182–189. [Google Scholar]
- Geng, C.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J. Modal parameters identification of power transformer winding based on improved Empirical Mode Decomposition method. Electric Power Systems Research. 2014, 108, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y.; Zhuang, Z.; Lin, J. Bearing fault diagnosis based on convolution sparse representation and isometric mapping. Vibration Test and Diagnosis. 2019, 39, 1081–1088+1138. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, C.; Zhang, D.; He, J. Protection scheme for VSC-MTDC based on low-frequency reactive power. Electric Power Systems Research. 2022, 204, 107703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamani, R.; Mohammad, E.; Hamedani, G.; Hassan, H. A novel synchronous DGs islanding detection method based on online dynamic features extraction. Electric Power Systems Research. 2021, 195, 107180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Wang, F.; Fu, J.; Lin, J.; Jin, Z. Mechanical condition monitoring of on load tap changer based on Chaos Theory and K-means clustering. Proceedings of the CSEE. 2015, 35, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar]
- Mehdi, B.; Ahmed, A. Clustering of transformer condition using frequency response analysis based on k-means and GOA. Electric Power Systems Research. 2022, 202, 107619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Chen, W.; Yan, Y. Fault diagnosis method for tram fuel cell system based on multi class correlation vector machine and fuzzy C-means clustering. Proceedings of the CSEE. 2018, 38, 6045–6052. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.; Wu, Z.; Mao, X. Risk early warning method for distribution system with sources-networks-loads-vehicles based on fuzzy C-mean clustering. Electric Power Systems Research. 2020, 180, 106059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y.; He, Y.; Li, B.; Cui, J. Inverter fault diagnosis based on wavelet packet and quantum neural network. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science). 2021, 35, 152–158. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, M. Research on mechanical fault diagnosis of on load tap changer based on vibration signal. Transformer. 2018, 55, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Yu, Y.; Bai, X.; Ke, Z.; Wang, J. Research on transformer fault detection system based on vibration signal analysis. Electrical Automation. 2020, 42, 80–82+86. [Google Scholar]
- Stark, J A. Adaptive image contrast enhancement using generalizations of histogram equalization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2000, 9, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Huang, N. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis. 2008, 1, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Z.; Zheng, Q.; Liu, C. A feature extraction and ranking-based framework for electricity spot price forecasting using a hybrid deep neural network. Electric Power Systems Research. 2021, 200, 107453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozgonenel, O.; Yalcin, T.; Guney, I. A new classification for power quality events in distribution systems. Electric Power Systems Research. 2013, 95, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, N.; Long, S.; Zheng, S. A new view of nonlinear water waves: The Hilbert spectrum. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1999, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, A.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, W. Partial discharge pattern recognition of transformers based on marginal spectrum image and deep residual network. Power System Technology. 2021, 45, 2433–2442. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, J.; Ma, H.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, H. Transformer winding looseness diagnosis based on LMD marginal spectral energy entropy and FWA-SVM. Electrical Measurement and Instrumentation. 2021, 58, 74–80. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, M.; Zhao, W.; Wu, L.; Li, Y. Research on electric vehicle driving conditions based on K-means clustering and support vector machine. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition). 2021, 40, 129–139. [Google Scholar]
- Abdelhalim, M.; Boubakeur, Z.; Mohammed, B. Fixed least squares support vector machines for flashover modelling of outdoor insulators. Electric Power Systems Research. 2019, 173, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Zhang, W.; Chen, J.; Wang, L. PMU-based voltage stability prediction using least square support vector machine with online learning. Electric Power Systems Research. 2018, 160, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Qian, Y.; Huang, R.; Cui, Q. Pattern recognition of noisy partial discharge based on SURF. Journal of Electrotechnics. 2021, 10, 100–110. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, S.; Chen, S.; Li, G.; Jiang, J. Mechanical fault diagnosis of transformer on-load tap-changer based on variational modal decomposition and feature selection. Southern Power System Technology. 2019, 13, 39–47+59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| OLTC moving contact status | Related coefficient (r) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical vibration signal | High frequency current signal | |
| Normal condition | 1 | 1 |
| Loose state | 0.565 | 0.634 |
| Slight wear | 0.470 | 0.553 |
| Severe wear | 0.261 | 0.319 |
| IMF component | Normal condition | Moving contact loose | Moving contact slight wear | Moving contact severe wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMF1 | 2.9213 | 2.5627 | 2.3901 | 1.8172 |
| IMF2 | 2.276 | 2.0142 | 1.9283 | 1.5116 |
| IMF3 | 1.984 | 1.745 | 1.617 | 1.624 |
| IMF4 | 1.7998 | 1.5637 | 1.3869 | 1.964 |
| IMF5 | 1.507 | 1.3064 | 1.118 | 0.5927 |
| IMF6 | 1.8617 | 1.014 | 0.9081 | 0.5677 |
| IMF7 | 1.819 | 0.6592 | 0.4185 | 0.1278 |
| IMF8 | 1.717 | 0.4237 | 0.605 | 0.0779 |
| IMF component | Normal condition | Moving contact loose | Moving contact slight wear | Moving contact severe wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMF1 | 0.6691 | 0.4375 | 0.3017 | 0.1699 |
| IMF2 | 0.4206 | 0.4062 | 0.2856 | 0.1428 |
| IMF3 | 0.5013 | 0.3608 | 0.2601 | 0.1641 |
| IMF4 | 0.3918 | 0.4120 | 0.3015 | 0.1329 |
| IMF5 | 0.3216 | 0.3306 | 0.2590 | 0.0918 |
| IMF6 | 0.2961 | 0.3014 | 0.2310 | 0.0764 |
| IMF7 | 0.2654 | 0.2938 | 0.2045 | 0.1028 |
| IMF8 | 0.3013 | 0.2237 | 0.2407 | 0.0839 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).