Submitted:
24 June 2023
Posted:
25 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Anthropometric measurements
2.3. Measurement of the bioelectrical impedance parameters
2.4. Definition of sarcopenia
2.5. Data processing and statistical analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations Secretariat, E.S.A. World population prospects: the 2017 revision Key Findings and Advance Tables (2017).
- Statistics Korea. Population Trends and Projections of the World and Korea. 2015.
- Sadighi Akha, AA. Aging and the immune system: An overview. J Immunol Methods. 2018;463:21-26. [CrossRef]
- Alfonso, J. Cruz-Jentoft, Francesco Landi, Stéphane M. Schneider, Clemente Zúñiga, Hidenori Arai, Yves Boirie, Liang-Kung Chen, Roger A. Fielding, Finbarr C. Martin, Jean-Pierre Michel, Cornel Sieber, Jeffrey R. Stout, Stephanie A. Studenski, Bruno Vellas, Jean Woo, Mauro Zamboni, Tommy Cederholm, Prevalence of and interventions for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the International Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS), Age and Ageing, Volume 43, Issue 6, November 2014, Pages 748–759. [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Zepeda, M.U. , Gutiérrez-Robledo, L.M. & Arango-Lopera, V.E. Sarcopenia prevalence. Osteoporos Int 24, 797 (2013). [CrossRef]
- von Haehling S, Morley JE, Anker SD. An overview of sarcopenia: facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010;1(2):129-133. [CrossRef]
- Janssen I, Shepard DS, Katzmarzyk PT, Roubenoff R. The healthcare costs of sarcopenia in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(1):80-85. [CrossRef]
- Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis [published correction appears in Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):601]. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31. [CrossRef]
- Amini B, Boyle SP, Boutin RD, Lenchik L. Approaches to Assessment of Muscle Mass and Myosteatosis on Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(10):1671-1678. [CrossRef]
- Loenneke JP, Dankel SJ, Bell ZW, Spitz RW, Abe T, Yasuda T. Ultrasound and MRI measured changes in muscle mass gives different estimates but similar conclusions: a Bayesian approach. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019;73(8):1203-1205. [CrossRef]
- Toombs RJ, Ducher G, Shepherd JA, De Souza MJ. The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(1):30-39. [CrossRef]
- Jeon KC, Kim SY, Jiang FL, et al. Prediction Equations of the Multifrequency Standing and Supine Bioimpedance for Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in Korean Older People. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5847. Published 2020 Aug 12. [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez MC, Barbosa-Silva TG, Bielemann RM, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB. Phase angle and its determinants in healthy subjects: influence of body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(3):712-716. [CrossRef]
- Lukaski HC, Kyle UG, Kondrup J. Assessment of adult malnutrition and prognosis with bioelectrical impedance analysis: phase angle and impedance ratio. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017;20(5):330-339. [CrossRef]
- Barbosa-Silva MC, Barros AJ. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: a new perspective on its use beyond body composition equations. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8(3):311-317. [CrossRef]
- Organ LW, Bradham GB, Gore DT, Lozier SL. Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis: theory and application of a new technique. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994;77(1):98-112. [CrossRef]
- Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement: National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(3 Suppl):524S-532S. [CrossRef]
- Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(6):1430-1453. [CrossRef]
- Marra M, Sammarco R, De Lorenzo A, et al. Assessment of Body Composition in Health and Disease Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): A Critical Overview. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2019;2019:3548284. Published 2019 May 29. [CrossRef]
- Sheean P, Gonzalez MC, Prado CM, McKeever L, Hall AM, Braunschweig CA. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Clinical Guidelines: The Validity of Body Composition Assessment in Clinical Populations. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44(1):12-43. [CrossRef]
- Roche S, Lara-Pompa NE, Macdonald S, et al. Bioelectric impedance vector analysis (BIVA) in hospitalised children; predictors and associations with clinical outcomes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019;73(10):1431-1440. [CrossRef]
- Piccoli A, Nigrelli S, Caberlotto A, et al. Bivariate normal values of the bioelectrical impedance vector in adult and elderly populations. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;61(2):269-270. [CrossRef]
- Zhang G, Huo X, Wu C, Zhang C, Duan Z. A bioelectrical impedance phase angle measuring system for assessment of nutritional status. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):3657-3664. [CrossRef]
- Stobäus N, Pirlich M, Valentini L, Schulzke JD, Norman K. Determinants of bioelectrical phase angle in disease. Br J Nutr. 2012;107(8):1217-1220. [CrossRef]
- Norman K, Wirth R, Neubauer M, Eckardt R, Stobäus N. The bioimpedance phase angle predicts low muscle strength, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality in old patients with cancer. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(2):173.e17-173.e1.73E22. [CrossRef]
- Piccoli, A. , Rossi, B., Pillon, L., & Bucciante, G. (1994). A new method for monitoring body fluid variation by bioimpedance analysis: the RXc graph. Kidney international, 46(2), 534–539. [CrossRef]
- Norman, K. , Stobäus, N., Pirlich, M., & Bosy-Westphal, A. (2012). Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis--clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 31(6), 854–861. [CrossRef]
- Jiang, F., Tang, S., Eom, J. J., Song, K. H., Kim, H., Chung, S., & Kim, C. H. (2022). Accuracy of Estimated Bioimpedance Parameters with Octapolar Segmental Bioimpedance Analysis. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 22(7), 2681. [CrossRef]
- Legrand, D. , Vaes, B., Matheï, C., Adriaensen, W., Van Pottelbergh, G., & Degryse, J. M. (2014). Muscle strength and physical performance as predictors of mortality, hospitalization, and disability in the oldest old. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(6), 1030–1038. [CrossRef]
- Cesari, M. , Kritchevsky, S. B., Newman, A. B., Simonsick, E. M., Harris, T. B., Penninx, B. W., Brach, J. S., Tylavsky, F. A., Satterfield, S., Bauer, D. C., Rubin, S. M., Visser, M., Pahor, M., & Health, Aging and Body Composition Study (2009). Added value of physical performance measures in predicting adverse health-related events: results from the Health, Aging And Body Composition Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(2), 251–259. [CrossRef]
- Chen, L. K. , Woo, J., Assantachai, P., Auyeung, T. W., Chou, M. Y., Iijima, K., Jang, H. C., Kang, L., Kim, M., Kim, S., Kojima, T., Kuzuya, M., Lee, J., Lee, S. Y., Lee, W. J., Lee, Y., Liang, C. K., Lim, J. Y., Lim, W. S., Peng, L. N., … Arai, H. (2020). Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21(3), 300–307.e2. [CrossRef]
- Piccoli, A., Nigrelli, S., Caberlotto, A., Bottazzo, S., Rossi, B., Pillon, L., & Maggiore, Q. (1995). Bivariate normal values of the bioelectrical impedance vector in adult and elderly populations. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 61(2), 269–270. [CrossRef]
- Chertow GM, Lowrie EG, Wilmore DW, et al. Nutritional assessment with bioelectrical impedance analysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6:75–81.
- Castillo-Martínez L, Colín-Ramírez E, Orea-Tejeda A, et al. Cachexia assessed by bioimpedance vector analysis as a prognostic indicator in chronic stable heart failure patients. Nutrition. 2012;28(9):886–891.
- Norman K, Pirlich M, Sorensen J, et al. Bioimpedance vector analysis as a measure of muscle function. Clin Nutr. 2009;28(1):78–82.
- Marini, E. , Buffa, R., Saragat, B., Coin, A., Toffanello, E. D., Berton, L., Manzato, E., & Sergi, G. (2012). The potential of classic and specific bioelectrical impedance vector analysis for the assessment of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity. Clinical interventions in aging, 7, 585–591. [CrossRef]
- Piccoli, A. , Rossi, B., Pillon, L., & Bucciante, G. (1994). A new method for monitoring body fluid variation by bioimpedance analysis: the RXc graph. Kidney international, 46(2), 534–539. [CrossRef]
- Piccoli, A. , Brunani, A., Savia, G., Pillon, L., Favaro, E., Berselli, M. E., & Cavagnini, F. (1998). Discriminating between body fat and fluid changes in the obese adult using bioimpedance vector analysis. International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 22(2), 97–104. [CrossRef]
- Bosy-Westphal, A. , Danielzik, S., Dörhöfer, R. P., Later, W., Wiese, S., & Müller, M. J. (2006). Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index. JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 30(4), 309–316. [CrossRef]
- Brunani, A., Perna, S., Soranna, D., Rondanelli, M., Zambon, A., Bertoli, S., Vinci, C., Capodaglio, P., Lukaski, H., & Cancello, R. (2021). Body composition assessment using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in a wide cohort of patients affected with mild to severe obesity. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 40(6), 3973–3981. 6. [CrossRef]
- Basile, C., Della-Morte, D., Cacciatore, F., Gargiulo, G., Galizia, G., Roselli, M., Curcio, F., Bonaduce, D., & Abete, P. (2014). Phase angle as bioelectrical marker to identify elderly patients at risk of sarcopenia. Experimental gerontology, 58, 43–46. [CrossRef]
- Yamada, Y. , Buehring, B., Krueger, D., Anderson, R. M., Schoeller, D. A., & Binkley, N. (2017). Electrical Properties Assessed by Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy as Biomarkers of Age-related Loss of Skeletal Muscle Quantity and Quality. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 72(9), 1180–1186. [CrossRef]
- Tomeleri, C. M. , Cavalcante, E. F., Antunes, M., Nabuco, H., de Souza, M. F., Teixeira, D. C., Gobbo, L. A., Silva, A. M., & Cyrino, E. S. (2019). Phase Angle Is Moderately Associated With Muscle Quality and Functional Capacity, Independent of Age and Body Composition in Older Women. Journal of geriatric physical therapy (2001), 42(4), 281–286. [CrossRef]
- Mullie, L. , Obrand, A., Bendayan, M., Trnkus, A., Ouimet, M. C., Moss, E., Chen-Tournoux, A., Rudski, L. G., & Afilalo, J. (2018). Phase Angle as a Biomarker for Frailty and Postoperative Mortality: The BICS Study. Journal of the American Heart Association, 7(17), e008721. [CrossRef]
- Yamada, M. , Kimura, Y., Ishiyama, D., Nishio, N., Otobe, Y., Tanaka, T., Ohji, S., Koyama, S., Sato, A., Suzuki, M., Ogawa, H., Ichikawa, T., Ito, D., & Arai, H. (2019). Phase Angle Is a Useful indicator for Muscle Function in Older Adults. The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 23(3), 251–255. [CrossRef]
- Piccoli, A., Codognotto, M., Piasentin, P., & Naso, A. (2014). Combined evaluation of nutrition and hydration in dialysis patients with bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA). Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 33(4), 673–677. [CrossRef]
- Akamatsu, Y., Kusakabe, T., Arai, H., Yamamoto, Y., Nakao, K., Ikeue, K., Ishihara, Y., Tagami, T., Yasoda, A., Ishii, K., & Satoh-Asahara, N. (2022). Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis is a useful indicator of muscle quality. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 13(1), 180–189. [CrossRef]
- McGregor, R. A., Cameron-Smith, D., & Poppitt, S. D. (2014). It is not just muscle mass: a review of muscle quality, composition and metabolism during ageing as determinants of muscle function and mobility in later life. Longevity & healthspan, 3(1), 9. [CrossRef]




| Males (n=75) | Females (n=59) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 76.6±4.2 | 75.3±4.1 | 0.059 |
| Height (cm) | 166.5±4.8 | 152.0±5.1 | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 65.4±7.2 | 54.1±6.1 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.6±2.3 | 23.4±2.2 | 0.320 |
| WB_R (Ω) | 454.0±42.4 | 532.9±49.4 | <0.001 |
| WB_Xc (Ω) | 47.1±5.9 | 48.1±5.8 | 0.176 |
| R/H (Ω/m) | 272.9±27.5 | 354.4±34.5 | <0.001 |
| Xc/H (Ω/m) | 28.3±3.8 | 31.9±3.7 | <0.001 |
| N | R | Xc | PhA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | Non-sarcopenia | 65 | 444.9±35.9 | 47.0±5.4 | 6.0±0.6 |
| Sarcopenia | 10 | 513.7±31.9 | 47.9±8.9 | 5.2±0.5** | |
| F | Non-sarcopenia | 57 | 536.7±44.7 | 48.5±5.4 | 5.3±0.8 |
| Sarcopenia | 2 | 595.9±21.0 | 45.5±0.5 | 4.4±0.1* |
| N | R/H | Xc/H | r | H | PhA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | Non-sarcopenia | 65 | 266.9±22.4 | 28.2±3.4 | 0.63 | 1.67±0.05 | 6.0±0.6 |
| Sarcopenia | 10 | 312.1±25.8 | 29.1±5.8 | 0.71 | 1.65±0.04 | 5.2±0.5** | |
| F | Non-sarcopenia | 57 | 353.0±34.2 | 31.9±3.7 | 0.54 | 1.52±0.05 | 5.3±0.8 |
| Sarcopenia | 2 | 395.2±3.0 | 30.2±0.5 | - | 1.51±0.04 | 4.4±0.1* |
| Males (n=75) | Females (n=59) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 76.6±4.2 | 75.±4.1 | 0.059 |
| Height (cm) | 166.5±4.8 | 152.0±5.1 | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 65.4±7.2 | 54.1±6.1 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.6±2.33 | 23.4±2.2 | 0.320 |
| ASM (kg) | 20.7±2.3 | 14.3±1.5 | <0.001 |
| ASM/H2 (kg/m2) | 7.4±0.7 | 6.1±0.5 | <0.001 |
| HGS (kg) | 31.6±5.2 | 22.1±2.9 | <0.001 |
| Physical performance (m/s) | 1.0±0.2 | 1.0±0.2 | 0.421 |
| Muscle quality (kg/kg) | 1.64±0.18 | 1.55±0.17 | 0.006 |
| WB_R (Ω) | 454.0±42.4 | 532.9±49.4 | <0.001 |
| WB_Xc (Ω) | 47.1±5.9 | 48.1±5.8 | 0.176 |
| WB_PhA (°) | 5.9±0.7 | 5.2±0.6 | <0.001 |
| Non-sarcopenia | N | Sarcopenia | N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 6.0±0..6° | 65 | 5.2±0.5°** | 10 |
| Female | 5.3±0.8° | 57 | 4.4±0.1°* | 2 |
| Male (n=75) | Pearson's r | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Age | -0.275* | 0.017 |
| ASM | 0.229* | 0.048 |
| ASM/H2 | 0.352** | 0.002 |
| HGS | 0.350** | 0.002 |
| Physical performance | 0.493*** | <0.001 |
| Muscle quality | 0.272* | 0.018 |
| Females (n=59) | Pearson's r | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Age | -0.389** | 0.002 |
| ASM | 0.271* | 0.038 |
| ASM/H2 | 0.235 | 0.073 |
| HGS | 0.640*** | <0.001 |
| Physical performance | 0.074 | 0.578 |
| Muscle quality | 0.524*** | <0.001 |
| Dependent variable | R2 | β | P value | 95% CI | Partial correlation coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Muscle strength | 0.12 | 2.8 | <0.001 | 1.060-4.579 | 0.35 |
| Muscle quality | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.037 | 0.013-0.139 | 0.27 | |
| Physical performance | 0.24 | 0.15 | <0.001 | 0.088-0.211 | 0.49 | |
| Female | Muscle strength | 0.41 | 3.31 | <0.001 | 2.282-4.496 | 0.64 |
| Muscle quality | 0.27 | 0.16 | <0.001 | 0.090-0.227 | 0.52 | |
| Physical performance | 0.005 | 0.02 | 0.543 | -0.062-0.109 | 0.07 | |
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | |||||||||||||||
| Males | Lower | Upper | β |
P value |
Lower | Upper | β |
P value |
Lower | Upper | β |
P value |
|||||
| Physical performance | 0.953 | 2.289 | 1.62 | <0.001 | 0.767 | 2.094 | 1.43 | <0.001 | 0.693 | 1.996 | 1.34 | <0.001 | |||||
| ASM/H2 | — | — | — | — | 0.050 | 0.455 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 0.053 | 0.448 | 0.25 | 0.01 | |||||
| Muscle quality |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.069 | 1.452 | 0.76 | 0.03 | |||||
| Females | |||||||||||||||||
| Muscle quality |
0.985 | 2.481 | 1.73 | <0.001 | 1.375 | 2.741 | 2.06 | <0.001 | — | — | — | — | |||||
| ASM | — | — | — | — | 0.078 | 0.231 | 0.16 | <0.001 | — | — | — | — | |||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).