Preprint Short Note Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Priori Justification in Engineering Innovations: Using Computer Simulation Results without Validation to Accelerate Engineering Innovations and Discovery

Version 1 : Received: 22 June 2023 / Approved: 23 June 2023 / Online: 23 June 2023 (10:44:26 CEST)

How to cite: Hosseinzadeh, H. Priori Justification in Engineering Innovations: Using Computer Simulation Results without Validation to Accelerate Engineering Innovations and Discovery. Preprints 2023, 2023061656. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.1656.v1 Hosseinzadeh, H. Priori Justification in Engineering Innovations: Using Computer Simulation Results without Validation to Accelerate Engineering Innovations and Discovery. Preprints 2023, 2023061656. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.1656.v1

Abstract

Computer simulation relies on well-defined experimental supported theories, models, and numerical methods. Computer simulation is an alternative to fill the gaps where the experiment is pricy or limited in engineering. Computer simulation is a high-fidelity computational technique that can work as an engineering innovation tool to try imaginative ideas beyond the available technologies. The accuracy of current computer simulation results is reliable enough to accelerate innovation for new materials and mechanical technologies without experimental validation. So, we may need to urge relying on computer simulation results without any experimental validation to accelerate engineering innovations. In addition, using high-fidelity computer simulation for engineering innovation acceleration without validation will be promoted if it is credited as a new classification. This subject and a related justification's classification in engineering have been discussed.

Keywords

engineering innovation; computer simulation; computational engineering; priori justification

Subject

Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.