Submitted:
18 June 2023
Posted:
19 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Study area, data and methods
2.1. Study area
2.2. Data sources and processing
2.3. Methodology
2.3.1 Extraction of rural settlements
2.3.2 Change in rural settlement area and its annual change index
2.3.3 Rural settlement gravity center migration model
3. Results
3.1. The spatiotemporal distribution pattern of rural settlements
3.2. Area evolution characteristics of rural settlements
3.3. Density evolution characteristics of rural settlements
3.4. Evolution characteristics of rural settlements’ gravity center
3.5. Factors influencing the evolution of spatial pattern of rural settlements
3.5.1. Natural factors
3.5.2. Socio-economic factors
3.5.3. Locational factor
4. Discussion
4.1. Development model of rural settlements in the Shiyang River Basin
4.2. Main driving factors of rural settlement dynamics in an arid region
4.3. Optimization of spatial layout
4.4. Limitation and prospects
5. Conclusions
Funding
Acknowledgments
References
- Doyle C J, Morag M, Kairsty T. 2000. Effectiveness of farm policies on social and economic development in rural areas. European Review of Agricultural Economics, (3-4): 530-546.
- Li G Y, Jiang C H, Du J, et al. 2020a. Spatial differentiation characteristics of internal ecological land structure in rural settlements and its response to natural and socio-economic conditions in the central plains, China. The Science of the Total Environment, 709: 13593.
- Zhou Y, J. 2018. Measures and policy suggestions for improving rural settlements in Guangdong[J]. Journal of Landscape Research, 10(3): 43-49.
- Dong G L, Zhang W X, Xu X L, et al. 2021. Multi-Dimensional Feature Recognition and Policy Implications of Rural Human–Land Relationships in China. Land, 10(10): 1086.
- Oostrum M, V. 2021. Access, density and mix of informal settlement: comparing urban villages in China and India. Cities, 117: 103334.
- Sun D L, Hong B T, et al. 2022. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of the rural settlements in the mountain-plain transitional zone. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 15(2): 149-155.
- Dasgupta, S. 1983. Analysis of the processes of evolution of rural settlements in the moribund Ganges delta 1921 to 71. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.
- Sevenant M, Antropl M. 2007. Settlement modes, land use and versatility in rural landscapes: Two case studies in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(4): 362-374.
- Long H L, Liu Y S, Wu X Q, et al. 2009. Spatio-temporal dynamic patterns of farmland and rural settlements in Su–Xi–Chang region: Implications for building a new countryside in coastal China. Land Use Policy, 26(2): 322-333.
- Dahms F, A. 2010. The evolving spatial organization of small settlements in the countryside–an Ontario example. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 71(5): 295-306.
- Shinde N N, Gajhans D S. 2015. Distribution pattern of rural settlement of Jalgoan district. Indian Streams Research Journal, 4(12): 1-4.
- Zhou J, Hou Q. 2021. Resilience assessment and planning of suburban rural settlements based on complex network. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28: 1645-1662.
- Tian G, Qiao Z, Zhang Y. 2012. The investigation of relationship between rural settlement density, size, spatial distribution and its geophysical parameters of China using Landsat TM images. Ecological Modelling, 231: 25-36.
- Conrad C, Rudloff M, Abdullaev I, et al. 2015. Measuring rural settlement expansion in Uzbekistan using remote sensing to support spatial planning. Applied Geography. 62(7): 29–43.
- Xing H, T. 2021. The spatial pattern planning method of rural landscape based on remote sensing technology. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 24: 93-106.
- Asimakopoulos A, Mogios E, Xenikos D G. 2016. Geographic location, network patterns and population distribution of rural settlements in Greece. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 30(15): 1541009.
- Montis A D, Caschili S, Mulas M, et al. 2016. Fichera urban-rural ecological networks for landscape planning. Land Use policy, 50: 312-327.
- Sun P L, Xu Y Q, Liu Q G, et al. 2017. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of changes in rural settlements in the poverty belt around Beijing and Tianjin: a case study of Zhangjiakou city, Hebei Province. Journal of Mountain Science, 14(5): 980-997.
- Huo X L, Xu X W, Tang Y, et al. 2021. An analysis of the spatial evolution and influencing factors of rural settlements along the Shandong section of the Grand Canal of China. River Research and Applications, 9: 3874.
- Tian Y S, Kong X S, Liu Y L. Combining weighted daily life circles and land suitability for rural settlement reconstruction. Habitat International, 2018, 76: 1-9.
- Li J T, Gong Y L. 2022. Spatial location differentiation and development decision optimization of characteristic villages and towns in China. Geography and Sustainability, 3(1): 21-31.
- Ma W Q, Jiang G H, Wang D Q, et al. 2018. Rural settlements transition (RST) in a suburban area of metropolis: Internal structure perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 615: 672-680.
- Zhao Z J, Fan B L, Zhou Q B, et al. 2022. Simulating the coupling of rural settlement expansion and population growth in Deqing, Zhejiang Province, based on MCCA modeling. Land, 11(11): 1975.
- Roy S S, Jana N C. 2015. Impact of geomorphic attributes on rural settlement distribution: A case study of Baghmundi Block in Purulia District, West Bengal. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 4(8): 121-132.
- Dong X M, Xu S N. 2020. Spatial evolution characteristics of urban and rural settlements in Inner Mongolia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13: 1214.
- Bański J, Wesołowska M. 2010. Transformations in housing construction in rural areas of Poland’s Lublin region influence on the spatial settlement structure and landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning. 94(2): 116–126.
- Dong W, Yang Y, Zhou Y. 2011. Land use changes and evaluation of land use efficiency in an arid oasis city, A case of Urumuqi, China. Arid Land Geography. 34 (4): 679–686.
- Du Q, Xu H, Zhao X, et al. 2014. Changing characteristics of land use/cover and landscape pattern from 1990 to 2010 in the Kaxgar River basin, Xinjiang. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 36 (6): 1548–1555.
- Chen P, Wang S, Liu Y X, et al. 2022. Spatio-temporal patterns of oasis dynamics in China's drylands between 1987 and 2017. Environmental Research Letters, 17(6): 064044.
- Yi F, Yang Q K, Wang Z J, et al. 2023. Changes in land use and ecosystem service values of Dunhuang Oasis from 1990 to 2030. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(3), 564.
- Fang C L, Cui X G, Li G D.; et al. 2019. Modeling regional sustainable development scenarios using the urbanization and eco-environment coupler: Case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China. Science of the Total Environment, 689: 820–831.
- Heng J, Wang H, Fan Y, et al. 2021. Simulation and optimization of urban–Rural settlement development from the perspective of production–life–ecology space: A case study for Aksu City. Sustainability, 13(13): 7452.
- Liu S C, Ma L B, Yao Y, et al. 2022. Man-land relationship based on the spatial coupling of population and residential land-A case study of Yuzhong County in Longzhong Loess Hilly Region, China. Land Use Policy, 116: 106059.
- Shang H, Fan J, Fan B, et al. 2022. Economic Effects of Ecological Compensation Policy in Shiyang River Basin: Empirical Research Based on DID and RDD Models. Sustainability, 14: 2999.
- Li K, Chen R, Liu G. 2021. Cryosphere water resources simulation and service function evaluation in the Shiyang River Basin of Northwest China. Water, 13(2): 114.
- Li C H, Wang Y T, Wu X D, et al. 2020b. Reducing human activity promotes environmental restoration in arid and semi-arid regions: A case study in Northwest China. Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 768: 144525.
- Xu Y, Pu L J, Zhang L F. 2014. Spatial pattern and the process of settlement expansion in Jiangsu Province from 1980 to 2010, Eastern China. Sustainability, 6(11): 8180–8194.
- Shi M J, Xie Y W, Cao Q, et al. 2016. Spatiotemporal changes in rural settlement land and rural population in the middle basin of the Heihe River, China. Sustainability, 8(7): 614.
- Shan Z Y, Feng C C. 2018. The redundancy of residential land in Rural China: The evolution process, current status and policy implications. Land Use Policy, 74: 179-186.
- Chen Y H, Ge Y. 2015. Spatial point pattern analysis on the villages in China's poverty-stricken areas. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 27: 98-105.
- Wu H, Y. 2014. Evolvement and comparative analysis of population gravity center and economic gravity center in Qinhuangdao City based on GIS. Advanced Materials Research, 955-959: 3819-3823.
- Li Z, Jiang W G, Wang W J, et al. 2019. Exploring spatial-temporal change and gravity center movement of construction land in the Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomeration. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(8): 1363-1380.
- Pawar D, H. 2011. Spatial growth pattern of rural settlement: a case study of Panhala Tahsil of Kolhapur District of Maharashtra, 1: 59-67.
- Song W, Li H H. 2020. Spatial pattern evolution of rural settlements from 1961 to 2030 in Tongzhou District, China. Land Use Policy, 99: 105044.
- Wei W, Zhang X Y, Liu C F, et al. 2021. Spatial interaction of urban-rural system and influence pattern in the arid inland river basin-a case study in Shiyang River Basin in Northwest China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30(4): 3307-3316.













| Region | Increased Area/km2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2011 | 2019 | 2000-2011 | 2011-2019 | 2000-2019 | |
| Gulang | 4.25 | 4.33 | 4.44 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.19 |
| Jinchuan | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Liangzhou | 10.32 | 10.41 | 10.71 | 0.09 | 0.30 | 0.39 |
| Minqin | 7.61 | 8.48 | 8.62 | 0.87 | 0.14 | 1.01 |
| Yongchang | 3.67 | 3.69 | 3.76 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Total | 26.44 | 27.51 | 28.19 | 1.07 | 0.68 | 1.75 |
| Region | 2000 | 2011 | 2019 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X (m) | Y (m) | X (m) | Y (m) | X (m) | Y (m) | |
| Liangzhou | 818780.40 | 4202954.74 | 819337.81 | 4202812.45 | 819717.85 | 4202745.22 |
| Jinchuan | 789199.48 | 4269550.63 | 788945.43 | 4269448.90 | 788473.99 | 4269343.13 |
| Minqin | 878549.00 | 4301874.09 | 876054.53 | 4298522.33 | 870622.77 | 4291855.16 |
| Gulang | 880655.51 | 4154497.60 | 875948.48 | 4158946.55 | 876583.38 | 4158549.94 |
| Yongchang | 768804.37 | 4237775.52 | 768434.02 | 4238573.62 | 768961.17 | 4237577.37 |
| Total | 845513.25 | 4225374.97 | 844573.88 | 4226507.26 | 844429.09 | 4226321.74 |
| Region | 2000-2011 | 2011-2019 | 2000-2019 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radian | (m) | Radian | (m) | Radian | (m) | |
| Liangzhou | -0.250 | 575.29 | -0.175 | 385.94 | -0.220 | 960.58 |
| Jinchuan | 2.761 | 273.67 | 2.921 | 483.16 | 2.863 | 754.58 |
| Minqin | 2.211 | 4178.11 | 2.254 | 8599.72 | 2.240 | 12775.13 |
| Gulang | 3.899 | 6476.83 | -0.558 | 748.61 | 3.925 | 5744.88 |
| Yongchang | 4.278 | 879.85 | -1.084 | 1127.13 | -0.901 | 252.69 |
| Total | 4.020 | 1471.22 | 0.908 | 235.34 | -0.718 | 1439.37 |
| Year | < 1000 (m) | 1000–2500 (m) | 2500–4000 (m) | > 4000 (m) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| 2000 | 2475 | 38.88 | 2038 | 32.01 | 1387 | 21.79 | 466 | 7.32 |
| 2011 | 2839 | 40.23 | 2235 | 31.67 | 1451 | 20.56 | 532 | 7.54 |
| 2019 | 2885 | 39.83 | 2265 | 31.27 | 1471 | 20.31 | 622 | 8.59 |
| Year | GDP/102 million RMB | Proportion of industrial structure /% | Urbanization rate /% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First industry | Second industry | Tertiary industry | |||
| 2000 | 98.70 | 27.9 | 43.3 | 28.8 | 21.94 |
| 2011 | 461.45 | 15.7 | 59.3 | 25.0 | 35.84 |
| 2019 | 828.76 | 20.3 | 35.7 | 44.0 | 48.86 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
