Submitted:
12 June 2023
Posted:
13 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. High gravity in material extrusion
2.1. Applications of centrifugal acceleration and material extrusion
2.2. HG-MEX system
3. Experiment and numerical study of high gravity
3.1. HG-MEX system development
3.2. Polymer science and material extrusion conditions
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Behaviour of material extrusion
4.2. Filament fabrication by different gravity
5. Conclusion
Acknowledgments
References
- Rajan K, Samykano M, Kadirgama K, et al. Fused deposition modeling: Process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2022, 120, 1531–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleeman J, Bogut A, Mangrolia B, et al. Scalable, flexible and resilient parallelization of fused filament fabrication: Breaking endemic tradeoffs in material extrusion additive manufacturing[J]. Additive Manufacturing 2022, 56, 102926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang J, Xu X, Stringer J. Optimization of process planning for reducing material waste in extrusion based additive manufacturing[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2019, 59, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vyavahare S, Teraiya S, Panghal D, et al. Fused deposition modelling: a review[J]. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2020, 26, 176–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh G D, Yap Y L, Tan H K J, et al. Process–structure–properties in polymer additive manufacturing via material extrusion: A review[J]. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences 2020, 45, 113–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romanczuk-Ruszuk E, Sztorch B, Pakuła D, et al. 3D Printing Ceramics—Materials for Direct Extrusion Process[J]. Ceramics 2023, 6, 364–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serdeczny M P, Comminal R, Pedersen D B, et al. Numerical simulations of the mesostructure formation in material extrusion additive manufacturing[J]. Additive Manufacturing 2019, 28, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comminal R, Serdeczny M P, Pedersen D B, et al. Numerical modeling of the strand deposition flow in extrusion-based additive manufacturing[J]. Additive Manufacturing 2018, 20, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kattinger J, Ebinger T, Kurz R, et al. Numerical simulation of the complex flow during material extrusion in fused filament fabrication[J]. Additive Manufacturing 2022, 49, 102476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G. Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2016, 83, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nzebuka G C, Ufodike C O, Rahman A M, et al. Numerical modeling of the effect of nozzle diameter and heat flux on the polymer flow in fused filament fabrication[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 2022, 82, 585–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phan D D, Horner J S, Swain Z R, et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of the melting process in the fused filament fabrication additive manufacturing technique[J]. Additive Manufacturing 2020, 33, 101161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghtadernejad S, Lee C, Jadidi M. An introduction of droplet impact dynamics to engineering students[J]. Fluids 2020, 5, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sontti S G, Atta A. CFD analysis of microfluidic droplet formation in non–Newtonian liquid[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal 2017, 330, 245–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai Z, Song Y. Implementing Contact Angle Hysteresis in Moving Mesh-Based Two-Phase Flow Numerical Simulations[J]. ACS omega 2021, 6, 35711–35717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani M, Kazemzadeh Y, Daneshfar R. Positive coupling effect in gas condensate flow: Role of capillary number, Scheludko number and Weber number[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2021, 203, 108490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Placone J K, Engler A J. Recent advances in extrusion-based 3D printing for biomedical applications[J]. Advanced healthcare materials 2018, 7, 1701161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sontti S G, Atta A. Numerical insights on controlled droplet formation in a microfluidic flow-focusing device[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2019, 59, 3702–3716. [Google Scholar]
- Knoche S, Vella D, Aumaitre E, et al. Elastometry of deflated capsules: Elastic moduli from shape and wrinkle analysis[J]. Langmuir 2013, 29, 12463–12471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei M, Wei Q, Li M, et al. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study the Effects of Process Parameters on Filament Morphology and Mechanical Properties of FDM 3D Printed PLA/GNPs Nanocomposite[J]. Polymers 2022, 14, 3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keller J B, Miksis M J. Surface tension driven flows[J]. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 1983, 43, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu X, Jagota A, Peng S, et al. Gravity and surface tension effects on the shape change of soft materials[J]. Langmuir 2013, 29, 8665–8674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramshaw, C. The opportunities for exploiting centrifugal fields[J]. Heat recovery Systems and CHP 1993, 13, 493–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott R, F. Centrifuge model testing at Caltech[J]. International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1983, 2, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koike R, AlKhaled A, Kashimoto T. Basic study for lunar regolith powder bed fusion in high gravity[J]. CIRP Annals 2023.
- Hua J, Lou J. Numerical simulation of bubble rising in viscous liquid[J]. Journal of Computational Physics 2007, 222, 769–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharaf D M, Premlata A R, Tripathi M K, et al. Shapes and paths of an air bubble rising in quiescent liquids[J]. Physics of Fluids 2017, 29, 122104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, J. Critical Eotvos numbers for buoyancy-induced oil drop detachment based on shape analysis[J]. Advances in colloid and interface science 2002, 98, 265–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koike R, Sugiura Y. Metal powder bed fusion in high gravity[J]. CIRP Annals 2021, 70, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugiura Y, Koike R. High-gravitational effect on process stabilization for metal powder bed fusion[J]. Additive Manufacturing 2021, 46, 102153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lecacheux L, Sadoudi A, Duri A, et al. The role of Laplace pressure in the maximal weight of pendant drops[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2022, 606, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arashiro E Y, Demarquette N R. Use of the pendant drop method to measure interfacial tension between molten polymers[J]. Materials Research 1999, 2, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vafaei S, Wen D. Modification of the Young–Laplace equation and prediction of bubble interface in the presence of nanoparticles[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2015, 225, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mhatre S, Simon S, Sjöblom J. Methodology to calculate interfacial tension under electric field using pendent drop profile analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 2019, 475, 20180852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghassemi H, Panahi S, Kohnsal A R. Solving the Laplace’s equation by FDM and BEM using mixed boundary conditions[J]. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics 2016, 4, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
- Mo J, Sha J, Li D, et al. Fluid release pressure for nanochannels: the Young–Laplace equation using the effective contact angle[J]. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 8408–8415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]










| Parameter | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Diameter | 1.75 | mm |
| Melt Temperature | 190-230 | ℃ |
| Density | 1.24 | g/cm3 |
| Tensile Strength | 60 | N/mm3 |
| Tensile Modulus | 3600 | MPa |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.35 | |
| Specific heat | 2040 | J/kg·K |
| Coefficient of thermal conductivity | 0.231 | W/( m·K) |
| Coefficient of thermal expansion | 1.999×10-6 | |
| Thermal Diffusivity | 0.205 | mm2 /s |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).