Submitted:
09 June 2023
Posted:
12 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
Background
-
The main principles of project-based learning include:
- Authenticity: Projects should be grounded in real-world problems or challenges that are relevant and meaningful to the students, fostering a sense of purpose and connection to their learning experience.
- Collaboration: Students work together in teams, developing essential communication, teamwork, and interpersonal skills as they share ideas, solve problems, and learn from one another.
- Inquiry: Students are encouraged to ask questions, explore various perspectives, and engage in research and investigation, promoting critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
- Student autonomy: Students take responsibility for their learning, making choices about the direction of their project, the resources they use, and the ways in which they demonstrate their understanding.
- Reflection: Throughout the project, students engage in ongoing reflection on their learning, the process, and the outcomes, fostering metacognitive awareness and continuous improvement.
- Integration: PBL encourages interdisciplinary learning by incorporating concepts and skills from multiple STREAM subjects, fostering a more holistic understanding of the problem at hand.
-
Some key benefits of project-based learning include:
- Enhanced student engagement and motivation.
- Improved critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
- Development of collaboration and communication skills.
- Application of knowledge to real-world situations.
- Greater student autonomy and ownership of learning.
- Opportunities for interdisciplinary learning and connections between subjects.
- Personalized learning systems: AI-powered adaptive learning platforms can analyze students' learning patterns, preferences, and progress, offering personalized recommendations and resources to support their unique needs and interests.
- Intelligent tutoring systems: AI-driven virtual tutors can provide real-time, individualized feedback, guidance, and support to students as they work on their projects, helping to address knowledge gaps and misconceptions.
- Research assistance tools: NLP-powered search engines and summarization tools can help students efficiently locate and process relevant information for their projects, streamlining the research and inquiry process.
- Collaborative AI tools: AI-enabled platforms can facilitate collaboration and communication among students, tracking contributions and progress, and providing insights into group dynamics and individual performance.
- Simulation and visualization tools: Advanced AI-driven simulation and visualization technologies can help students model complex systems, analyze data, and explore the implications of various solutions or approaches.
- Assessment and feedback tools: AI and NLP technologies can be used to assess student work, providing objective and personalized feedback on various aspects of their projects, such as the quality of their research, the clarity of their presentation, or the effectiveness of their problem-solving strategies.
Methodology.
- Project Selection: Begin by choosing an authentic, real-world problem or challenge relevant to the STREAM subjects being taught. The chosen problem should allow for interdisciplinary connections, promote inquiry and critical thinking, and be complex enough to engage students over an extended period of time. Ensure that the project aligns with learning objectives and curriculum requirements.
- AI-Powered Research Assistance: Introduce students to AI and NLP-powered research tools, such as advanced search engines, summarization tools, and citation management platforms. These tools can help students efficiently locate, process, and organize relevant information for their projects, streamlining the research and inquiry process.
- Personalized Project Pathways: Utilize AI-based personalized learning systems to create customized learning pathways for each student, taking into account their unique learning styles, interests, and abilities. These personalized pathways can help students develop the necessary knowledge and skills for their projects, while also fostering a sense of autonomy and ownership in their learning.
- Collaborative AI Tools: Incorporate collaborative AI platforms and tools that facilitate communication, teamwork, and project management among students. These tools can help track individual and group progress, provide insights into group dynamics, and support effective collaboration throughout the project.
- Real-Time Feedback: Implement AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems or virtual mentors to provide real-time, individualized feedback, guidance, and support to students as they work on their projects. This can help address knowledge gaps, misconceptions, and challenges as they arise, promoting continuous improvement and learning.
- Virtual Mentoring: Connect students with AI-powered virtual mentors or subject matter experts who can provide guidance, encouragement, and insights into real-world applications of the STREAM concepts being explored. This can enhance students' understanding of the relevance and potential impact of their projects, as well as provide valuable networking and career exploration opportunities.
- Advanced Simulation and Analysis: Integrate AI-based simulation and visualization tools that allow students to model complex systems, analyze data, and explore the implications of various solutions or approaches. These tools can help students gain a deeper understanding of the problem at hand, as well as develop critical skills in data analysis, modeling, and decision-making.
- Objective Assessment: Employ AI and NLP technologies to assess student work, providing objective and personalized feedback on various aspects of their projects. This can include evaluating the quality of research, clarity of presentation, effectiveness of problem-solving strategies, and alignment with learning objectives. The assessment should also take into account students' reflection and growth throughout the project, as well as their contributions to the collaborative process.
Practical Examples and Case Studies.
- Example 1: AI-Assisted Environmental Monitoring Project (Science)
- Example 2: Designing a Smart City (Technology and Engineering).
- Example 3: Stock Market Simulation (Mathematics).
- Example 4: AI-Powered Language Learning (Arts and Humanities).
- Example 5: Designing an Efficient Roller Coaster using Calculus and Physics.
- Example 6: Optimizing Drug Release using Calculus and Chemical Kinetics.
- Example 7: Optimizing Traffic Flow using Calculus and Graph Theory.
- Example 8: Designing a Solar Panel Array using Calculus and Polar Coordinates.
Implications for Educators, Institutions, and Students.
- Teacher Roles: Integrating AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning requires a shift in the role of the teacher. Traditionally, the teacher has been seen as the primary source of information and the authority figure in the classroom. However, with the integration of AI and NLP technologies, the teacher becomes a facilitator, guiding students through the project and providing support as needed. This shift requires teachers to be trained in new skills, including how to effectively use AI and NLP tools to support student learning, how to interpret and respond to real-time feedback, and how to design and assess project-based learning experiences that effectively integrate AI and NLP technologies.
- Support and Training: Successful integration of AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning requires the necessary support and training for both educators and students. Institutions must provide ongoing professional development opportunities for teachers to stay up-to-date with emerging technologies and best practices. This professional development should include not only training on the technical aspects of using AI and NLP tools, but also how to design and assess project-based learning experiences that effectively integrate these technologies. Additionally, students must receive training on how to effectively use AI and NLP tools to support their learning, as well as how to navigate ethical considerations such as data privacy and security. This training can be incorporated into the curriculum, providing students with the skills they need to succeed in the 21st century.
- Ethical Considerations: The integration of AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning raises important ethical considerations, particularly regarding data privacy and security. Institutions must develop policies and procedures to safeguard student data and ensure that AI and NLP tools are used in an ethical and responsible manner. This includes establishing clear guidelines for data collection, storage, and use, as well as implementing security measures to protect against cyberattacks and data breaches. Additionally, educators must be trained to teach students how to be responsible digital citizens, including how to navigate ethical considerations such as data privacy and security. By doing so, we can ensure that AI and NLP technologies are used in a way that benefits students without compromising their privacy or security.
- Equity and Inclusion: Integrating AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning presents opportunities for fostering a more equitable and inclusive educational experience for all learners. By providing personalized learning pathways and supporting diverse learning styles, AI and NLP tools can help to reduce achievement gaps and ensure that all students have access to high-quality educational opportunities. For example, AI and NLP tools can be used to provide real-time feedback to students, helping them to identify areas where they need additional support or challenge. Additionally, these tools can be used to create personalized learning pathways that take into account students' unique learning styles, interests, and abilities. By doing so, we can create a more dynamic and effective educational experience that meets the needs of all learners.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Integrating AI and NLP with Project-Based Learning.
- Advantages.
- Personalization: AI and NLP technologies enable personalized learning experiences tailored to individual students' learning styles, interests, and abilities, ensuring that projects are engaging and challenging for each learner.
- Enhanced Research Assistance: AI-powered research tools like ChatGPT can help students gather relevant information and resources more efficiently, allowing them to focus on problem-solving and application of concepts.
- Improved Collaboration: AI-driven collaborative tools facilitate group work and communication, allowing students to share ideas, compare strategies, and work together more effectively.
- Real-time Feedback: AI-powered assessment tools provide personalized, real-time feedback on students' understanding of concepts and problem-solving skills, helping them refine their project strategies and improve their learning outcomes.
- Virtual Mentoring: AI and NLP technologies can serve as virtual math and science mentors, answering students' questions, providing feedback, and offering suggestions for improving their optimization strategies, even outside of class hours.
- Advanced Simulation and Analysis: AI-driven simulation tools enable students to test their designs and analyze performance under various conditions more effectively, leading to better project outcomes and a deeper understanding of the underlying concepts.
- Objective Assessment: AI-enhanced grading tools can provide more objective and consistent assessment of student work, reducing potential bias and ensuring fair evaluation.
- ii.
- Disadvantages.
- Technology Dependence: Integrating AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning may create an over-reliance on technology, potentially reducing students' ability to work independently and think critically without technological assistance.
- Cost and Accessibility: Implementing AI and NLP technologies in education can be expensive, and not all schools may have the resources to adopt these tools, creating disparities in educational opportunities and outcomes.
- Data Privacy and Security: The use of AI and NLP technologies in education raises concerns about student data privacy and security, as personal information and learning data may be collected and stored by these systems.
- Technical Challenges: Teachers and students may face technical challenges in using AI and NLP technologies, which could hinder the learning process if they are not adequately trained and supported.
- Limited AI Understanding: AI and NLP technologies are not perfect and may not always provide accurate information or appropriate feedback, which could lead to confusion or misconceptions if not carefully monitored by educators.
- iii.
- Comparison with Traditional Project-Based Learning:
| Metric | Project-Based Learning without AI and NLP | Project-Based Learning with AI and NLP |
|---|---|---|
| Student engagement | Moderate | High |
| Learning outcomes | Moderate | High |
| Project success rate | Moderate | High |
| Real-time feedback | Limited or absent | AI-powered tools provide personalized, real-time feedback |
| Advanced simulation and analysis | Limited or absent | AI-driven simulation tools enable advanced analysis and testing |
| Collaboration | Limited to in-person or email communication | AI-driven collaborative tools facilitate group work and communication |
| Access to information | Time-consuming and limited research resources | AI-powered research tools provide efficient access to information |
| Objective assessment | Subjective and potentially biased evaluation | AI-enhanced grading tools provide more objective and consistent assessment |
| Source of evidence | (Niemitz et al., 2019) | (Samarakoon & Fadde, 2019); (Yuan & Kim, 2020); (Lee et al., 2021) |
Assessing the Integration of AI and NLP with Project-Based Learning:
- Assessment Method.
- Set clear learning objectives: Define specific learning objectives that align with the project and curriculum requirements, as well as the targeted skills and knowledge students should acquire through the project.
- Design a rubric: Create a detailed rubric that outlines the criteria for evaluating student performance in various aspects of the project, such as creativity, optimization, effective use of mathematical concepts, collaboration, presentation skills, and the application of AI and NLP technologies.
- Monitor student progress: Regularly assess students' understanding of concepts, problem-solving skills, and progress towards project goals using AI-powered assessment tools. Provide personalized, real-time feedback to help students refine their project strategies and improve their learning outcomes.
- Evaluate group collaboration: Assess students' teamwork, communication, and collaboration skills using AI-driven collaborative tools that track and analyze student interactions, contributions, and discussions throughout the project.
- Assess project outcomes: Evaluate the quality of students' final projects based on the established rubric, considering factors such as creativity, optimization, effective use of mathematical concepts, and clarity of presentation.
- Review AI and NLP technology usage: Assess students' ability to effectively utilize AI and NLP technologies during the project, including their proficiency in using research assistance tools, virtual mentoring, and simulation tools.
- Assess presentation skills: Evaluate students' ability to effectively present their project outcomes, design decisions, and insights gained during the project using AI-powered presentation tools.
- Reflective assessment: Encourage students to engage in self-assessment and reflection on their learning, discussing challenges faced, insights gained, and areas for improvement throughout the project. This can be done through journaling, group discussions, or individual meetings with the teacher.
- Peer assessment: Involve students in the assessment process by having them evaluate their peers' projects, providing feedback based on the established rubric, and discussing their observations with the class.
- Collect and analyze feedback data: Use AI and NLP tools to gather and analyze feedback from students, teachers, and stakeholders on the project-based learning experience. Identify areas for improvement and make adjustments to the approach for future students.
- 2
- Suggested Rubric.
| Criteria | Level 1: Below Expectations | Level 2: Approaching Expectations | Level 3: Meeting Expectations | Level 4: Exceeding Expectations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creativity | Demonstrates limited originality and innovation in project design and problem-solving strategies. | Demonstrates some originality and innovation in project design and problem-solving strategies but lacks consistency or depth. | Demonstrates strong originality and innovation in project design and problem-solving strategies, applying novel and effective approaches. | Demonstrates exceptional originality and innovation in project design and problem-solving strategies, applying highly creative and ground-breaking approaches. |
| Optimization | Demonstrates limited proficiency in applying mathematical concepts and formulas to optimize project outcomes. | Applies some mathematical concepts and formulas to optimize project outcomes, but with limited success or understanding. | Applies mathematical concepts and formulas proficiently to optimize project outcomes, with a clear understanding of their relevance and application. | Applies mathematical concepts and formulas expertly to optimize project outcomes, demonstrating exceptional understanding and mastery. |
| Effective Use of AI and NLP Technologies | Demonstrates limited proficiency in using AI and NLP tools to gather and analyze information and resources, or applies them inappropriately. | Demonstrates some proficiency in using AI and NLP tools to gather and analyze information and resources, but with some errors or limitations. | Demonstrates strong proficiency in using AI and NLP tools to gather and analyze information and resources, with few errors or limitations. | Demonstrates exceptional proficiency in using AI and NLP tools to gather and analyze information and resources, with advanced knowledge and skills. |
| Collaboration | Contributes minimally to group work and communication, or displays unproductive or disruptive behavior. | Contributes somewhat effectively to group work and communication, but with some misunderstandings or conflicts. | Contributes strongly and effectively to group work and communication, building consensus and promoting productivity. | Contributes exceptionally to group work and communication, demonstrating strong leadership and collaboration skills. |
| Presentation Skills | Presents project outcomes, design decisions, and insights gained during the project unclearly or with errors or omissions. | Presents project outcomes, design decisions, and insights gained during the project somewhat effectively and clearly, but with some flaws or weaknesses. | Presents project outcomes, design decisions, and insights gained during the project strongly and clearly, with effective use of visual aids and language. | Presents project outcomes, design decisions, and insights gained during the project exceptionally and persuasively, with exceptional use of visual aids and language. |
Recommendations for Future Research and Development:
- Rigorous Empirical Studies: While there have been numerous case studies and anecdotal evidence demonstrating the potential of integrating AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning, there is a need for more rigorous empirical studies that can provide a better understanding of the impact of this approach on student learning outcomes. Specifically, future research should explore the effectiveness of AI and NLP technologies in supporting student learning across various STREAM subjects and educational levels, as well as the impact of these technologies on student motivation, engagement, and overall academic achievement.
- Development of Best Practices and Guidelines: The integration of AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning is a complex process that requires careful planning and implementation. To ensure the success of this approach, there is a need for the development of best practices and guidelines for educators. These guidelines should cover topics such as project design, implementation, assessment, and ethical considerations, providing educators with a framework for effectively integrating AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning.
- Refinement of AI and NLP Technologies: AI and NLP technologies are rapidly evolving, and there is a need for ongoing refinement of these technologies to better serve the diverse needs of learners in STREAM education. This includes the development of AI and NLP tools that can support a range of learning styles, abilities, and cultural backgrounds. Additionally, these technologies should be designed with accessibility and inclusivity in mind, ensuring that they are usable by all learners regardless of their physical or cognitive abilities.
- Exploration of New Applications: The integration of AI and NLP technologies with project-based learning is a relatively new area of research and development, and there are likely many applications that have yet to be explored. Future research should focus on exploring new applications of these technologies in STREAM education, such as the use of AI and NLP tools to support collaborative learning, assessment, and feedback.
Conclusion
References
- Almohammadi, K.; Hagras, H.; Alghazzawi, D.; Aldabbagh, G. A Survey of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges, Applications, and Emerging Trends. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2019, 35, 1688–1707. [Google Scholar]
- Andrade, H.G. Using Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning. Educ. Leadersh. 2000, 57, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
- Baker, R.S.; Inventado, P.S. Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. In Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice; Larusson, J.A., White, B., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 61–75. [Google Scholar]
- Bell, S. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. Clear. House A J. Educ. Strateg. Issues Ideas 2010, 83, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belpaeme, T.; Kennedy, J.; Ramachandran, A.; Scassellati, B.; Tanaka, F. Social Robots for Education: A Review. Sci. Robot. 2018, 3, eaat5954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blikstein, P. Computationally Enhanced Toolkits for Children: Historical Review and a Framework for Future Design. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2015, 9, 1–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bostrom, N.; Yudkowsky, E. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence; Frankish, K., Ramsey, W.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 316–334. [Google Scholar]
- Boud, D.; Falchikov, N. Aligning Assessment with Long-Term Learning. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2006, 31, 399–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brookhart, S.M. How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. ASCD. 2013.
- Bulger, M. Personalized Learning: The Conversations We're Not Having. Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from link. 2016.
- Cai, Z.; Graesser, A.C.; Forsyth, C.; Burkett, C.; Millis, K.; Wallace, P.; Halpern, D.F.; Butler, H. Trialog in ARIES: User Input Assessment in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In Artificial Intelligence in Education; Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 422–429. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary, N.; Mishra, S. Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing in Education: A Systematic Review. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2020, 49, 232–255. [Google Scholar]
- Conradty, C.; Bogner, F.X. From STEM to STREAM: Integrating the Arts in STEM Education. Creat. Res. J. 2018, 30, 278–290. [Google Scholar]
- Dillenbourg, P. What Do You Mean by Collaborative Learning. In Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches; Dillenbourg, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- D'Mello, S.; Graesser, A. Dynamics of Affective States during Complex Learning. Learn. Instr. 2012, 22, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fidalgo-Blanco, Á.; Sein-Echaluce, M.L.; García-Peñalvo, F.J.; Conde M, Á. Using Learning Analytics to Improve Teamwork Assessment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 47, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graesser, A.C.; McNamara, D.S. Self-Regulated Learning in Learning Environments with Pedagogical Agents that Interact in Natural Language. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 45, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hattie, J.; Timperley, H. The Power of Feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 2007, 77, 81–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinojo-Lucena, F.J.; Aznar-Díaz, I.; Cáceres-Reche, M.P.; Romero-Rodríguez, J.M. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Study on Its Impact in the Scientific Literature. Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmes, W.; Bialik, M.; Fadel, C. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. Retrieved from link. 2019.
- Honey, M.; Pearson, G.; Schweingruber, H. (Eds.) STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, T.C.; Chang, S.C.; Hung, Y.T. How to Learn and How to Teach Computational Thinking: Suggestions Based on a Review of the Literature. Comput. Educ. 2018, 126, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaya, T.; Karakirik, E. Gamification in the Context of Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ. 2019, 12, 75–88. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.; Ke, F. Effects of Game-Based Learning in an OpenSim-Supported Virtual Environment on Mathematical Performance. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2017, 25, 543–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirschner, P.A.; Sweller, J.; Clark, R.E. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educ. Psychol. 2006, 41, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krajcik, J.S.; Blumenfeld, P.C. Project-Based Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences; Sawyer, R.K., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 317–334. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, F.Q.; Viering, M. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education: A Review of Selected Literature. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2019, 57, 1269–1302. [Google Scholar]
- Larmer, J.; Mergendoller, J.R.; Boss, S. Setting the Standard for Project-Based Learning: A Proven Approach to Rigorous Classroom Instruction. ASCD. 2015.
- Lee, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, M. Enhancing Project-Based Learning through the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Tools. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2021, 49, 349–364. [Google Scholar]
- Luckin, R.; Holmes, W.; Griffiths, M.; Forcier, L.B. Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson. Retrieved from link. 2016.
- Lynch, K.; Hill, H.C.; Gonzalez, K.E. Using Natural Language Processing Tools to Facilitate Analysis of Observation Data in Mathematics Classrooms. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Educ. 2018, 4, 366–389. [Google Scholar]
- Murray, T.; Arroyo, I. Toward an Operational Definition of Scaffolding for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Case Study in Geometry. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems; Cerri, S.A., Gouardères, G., Paraguaçu, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 820–831. [Google Scholar]
- Nicol, D.J.; Macfarlane-Dick, D. Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Stud. High. Educ. 2006, 31, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niemitz, M.; Hummel, H.; Brandhofer, G. Project-Based Learning in the Age of Digitalization: Comparing Learning Outcomes in Traditional and Technology-Enhanced Project-Based Learning Environments. In Tomorrow's Learning: Involving Everyone. Learning with and about Technologies and Computing; Tatnall, A., Webb, M., Eds.; Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 337–346. [Google Scholar]
- Nye, B.D. Intelligent Tutoring Systems by and for the Developing World: A Review of Trends and Approaches for Educational Technology in a Global Context. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 2015, 25, 177–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panadero, E.; Romero, M. To Rubric or Not to Rubric? The Effects of Self-Assessment on Self-Regulation, Performance and Self-Efficacy. Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract. 2014, 21, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Burford, S. Integrating Artificial Intelligence into K-12 Teaching and Learning: A Review of Literature, Policy, and Practice. TechTrends 2018, 62, 566–571. [Google Scholar]
- Penstein Rosé, C.; Ferschke, O. Technology Support for Discussion-Based Teaching. In Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016; Looi, C.K., Polman, J.L., Cress, U., Reimann, P., Eds.; International Society of the Learning Sciences: 2016; Volume 1, pp. 182–189.
- Reeves, T.D.; Crippen, K.J. Design-Based Research (DBR) in Educational Settings: A Primer for the Busy Educator. Curr. Issues Educ. 2012, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Sadler, D.R. Transforming Holistic Assessment and Grading into a Vehicle for Complex Learning. In Assessment, Learning, and Judgement in Higher Education; Joughin, G., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 45–63. [Google Scholar]
- Samarakoon, P.; Fadde, P.J. Enhancing Project-Based Learning with Natural Language Processing Tools. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 2019, 11, 65–77. [Google Scholar]
- Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How to Respond. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from link. 2016.
- Selwyn, N. Should Robots Replace Teachers?: AI and the Future of Education. Polity. 2019.
- Serdyukov, P. Innovation in Education: What Works, What Doesn't, and What to Do About It? J. Res. Innov. Teach. Learn. 2017, 10, 4–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stiggins, R.J. Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning. Phi Delta Kappan 2002, 83, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, J.W. A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. Autodesk Foundation. Retrieved from link. 2000.
- Tong, X.; Peng, L. Using Artificial Intelligence to Support Language Learning: A Literature Review. Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education; Bastiaens, J.T., Moore, M.G., Eds.; Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2020; pp. 64–72. [Google Scholar]
- Topping, K.J. Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities. Rev. Educ. Res. 1998, 68, 249–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, C.W.; Shen, P.D.; Lu, Y.J. The Effects of Problem-Based Learning with Flipped Classroom on Elementary Students' Computing Skills: A Switched Replicated Study. Comput. Educ. 2015, 89, 226–239. [Google Scholar]
- VanLehn, K. The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educ. Psychol. 2011, 46, 197–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Chignell, M. Creating a MOO-Based Virtual Learning Environment for High School Students Studying Climate Change. Comput. Educ. 2011, 57, 1802–1812. [Google Scholar]
- Weller, K. The Internet of Toys: A Posthuman and Multimodal Analysis of Connected Play. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2018, 120, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
- Williamson, B.; Eynon, R. The Datafication of Education. Learn. Media Technol. 2016, 41, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, S.; Kim, C. Using AI in Project-Based Learning to Enhance Student Outcomes. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2020, 58, 25–46. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
