Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Assessing Last Decimal Digits in Retracted Research Articles: Accounting for Missing Zeroes

Version 1 : Received: 7 June 2023 / Approved: 8 June 2023 / Online: 8 June 2023 (07:42:55 CEST)

How to cite: Schumm, W.R. Assessing Last Decimal Digits in Retracted Research Articles: Accounting for Missing Zeroes. Preprints 2023, 2023060603. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.0603.v1 Schumm, W.R. Assessing Last Decimal Digits in Retracted Research Articles: Accounting for Missing Zeroes. Preprints 2023, 2023060603. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.0603.v1

Abstract

The cumulative nature of knowledge in science in general and for social science in particular depends on research being conducted with integrity, with fraudulent research being one of the most harmful of questionable research practices. It has been observed that, in fabricated research, there is often a deficit of zeroes in the last digits of regression results. In research, authored by Dr. Eric A. Stewart, that has been retracted, there appears to have been a paucity of zeroes as last digits in his regression results. Eight hypotheses were tested to re-examine the relative lack of zeroes and possible increases in ones or nines as last digits. Some support was found for all hypotheses. It appears that in Stewart’s retracted research, ones and nines were substituted for zeroes as last digits. Furthermore, the increased proportions of ones and nines was found to be highly correlated with other anomalies in the same retracted articles, possibly indicative of fabrication of the results in the retracted articles. Further research in this area might use symbolic interaction theory or justification theory to guide our developing knowledge about this type of questionable research practice.

Keywords

Scientific misconduct; fraud; regression digits; zeroes; Eric Stewart; fabrication of results

Subject

Social Sciences, Sociology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.