Submitted:
05 June 2023
Posted:
05 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Measurements
2.2.1. Outcome Variables
2.2.2. Explanatory Variables
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
Triple Burden of Malnutrition among under Five Children in India
Spatial Heterogeneity in the Triple Burden of Malnutrition
Description of the Study Population
Multi-Level Regression Analysis
4. Discussion
Possible Mechanism of the Findings
Policy Implications of the Findings
Strengths and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Isanaka S, Barnhart DA, McDonald CM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of community-based screening and treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in Mali. BMJ Glob Health 2019, 4, 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Davis JN, Engle-stone R. The Double Burden of Malnutrition : A Systematic Review of Operational Definitions. 1–14.
- Ranjani H, Mehreen TS, Pradeepa R, et al. Epidemiology of childhood overweight & obesity in India : A systematic review. 2016, 160–174. [CrossRef]
- Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA. Changes in child survival are strongly associated with changes in malnutrition in developing countries. Journal of Nutrition 2003, 133, 107–119. [CrossRef]
- Blankenship JL, Rudert C, Aguayo VM. Triple trouble: Understanding the burden of child undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, and overweight in East Asia and the Pacific. Matern Child Nutr 2020, 16, 1–7. [CrossRef]
- Global Nutrition Report. Global Nutrition Report. Available online: https://www.segeplan.gob.gt/2.0/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=472&Itemid=472 (2020).
- Global Nutrition Report. Global Nutrition Report. 2020.
- de Onis M, Blössner M. The World Health Organization Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition: Methodology and applications. Int J Epidemiol 2003, 32, 518–526. [CrossRef]
- Biesalski HK. The 1,000-day window and cognitive development. World Rev Nutr Diet 2016, 115, 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Mkhize M, Sibanda M. A review of selected studies on the factors associated with the nutrition status of children under the age of five years in South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020, 17, 1–26. [CrossRef]
- Akombi BJ, Agho KE, Merom D, et al. Child malnutrition in sub-Saharan Africa : A meta-analysis of demographic and health surveys ( 2006-2016 ). 2017, 1–11.
- Gödecke T, Stein AJ, Qaim M. The global burden of chronic and hidden hunger: Trends and determinants. Glob Food Sec 2018, 17, 21–29. [CrossRef]
- Miglioli TC, Fonseca VM, Gomes Junior SC, et al. Factors associated with the nutritional status of children less than 5 years of age. Rev Saude Publica; 49. Epub ahead of print 2015. [CrossRef]
- Mittal A, Singh J, Ahluwalia SK. Effect of maternal factors on nutritional status of 1-5-year-old children in urban slum population. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2007, 32, 264. [CrossRef]
- Dey I, Chaudhuri RN. Gender inequality in nutritional status among under five children in a village in Hooghly district, West Bengal. Indian J Public Health 2008, 52, 218–220.
- Jayant D D, Purushottam A G, Deepak B P, et al. Socio-cultural practices in relation to breastfeeding, weaning and child rearing among Indian mothers and assessment of nutritional status of children under five in rural India. Australasian Medical Journal 2010, 3, 618–624.
- Nguyen PH, Scott S, Headey D, et al. The double burden of malnutrition in India: Trends and inequalities (2006-2016). PLoS One 2021, 16, 1–14. [CrossRef]
- Pomati M, Mendoza-Quispe D, Anza-Ramirez C, et al. Trends and patterns of the double burden of malnutrition (DBM) in Peru: a pooled analysis of 129,159 mother–child dyads. Int J Obes 2021, 45, 609–618. [CrossRef]
- Doak CM, Adair LS, Bentley M, et al. The dual burden household and the nutrition transition paradox. Int J Obes 2005, 29, 129–136. [CrossRef]
- Popkin BM, Corvalan C, Grummer-Strawn LM. Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet 2020, 395, 65–74. [CrossRef]
- Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) INDIA REPORT NATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR HEALTH CARE OF ELDERLY & INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR POPULATION SCIENCES MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.
- Alderman H, Headey DD. How Important is Parental Education for Child Nutrition? World Dev 2017, 94, 448–464.
- Khan J, Mohanty SK. Spatial heterogeneity and correlates of child malnutrition in districts of India. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Puri P, Khan J, Shil A, et al. A cross-sectional study on selected child health outcomes in India : Quantifying the spatial variations and identification of the parental risk factors. Sci Rep 2020, 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Dhingra S, Pingali PL. Effects of short birth spacing on birth-order differences in child stunting: Evidence from India. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021, 118, 1–8. [CrossRef]
- Rahman MS, Howlader T, Masud MS. Association of Low-Birth Weight with Malnutrition in Children under Five Years in Bangladesh : Do Mother ’ s Education , Socio- Economic Status , and Birth Interval Matter ? 2016, 23, 1–16.
- Sk R, Banerjee A, Rana MJ. Nutritional status and concomitant factors of stunting among pre-school children in Malda, India: A micro-level study using a multilevel approach. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Sserwanja Q, Kamara K, Mutisya LM, et al. Rural and Urban Correlates of Stunting Among Under-Five Children in Sierra Leone: A 2019 Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey. Nutr Metab Insights; 14. Epub ahead of print 2021. [CrossRef]
- Onyeneho NG, Ozumba BC, Subramanian S V. Determinants of Childhood Anemia in India. Sci Rep 2019, 9, 1–7. [CrossRef]
- Alderman H, Headey DD. How Important is Parental Education for Child Nutrition? World Dev 2017, 94, 448–464.
- Nguyen PH, Kachwaha S, Tran LM, et al. Maternal diets in india: Gaps, barriers, and opportunities. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1–28. [CrossRef]
- Singh SK, Taillie LS, Gupta A, et al. Front-of-Package Labels on Unhealthy Packaged Foods in India: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1–26. [CrossRef]
- Choudhury S, Shankar B, Aleksandrowicz L, et al. Caste-Based Inequality in Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in India. Food Nutr Bull 2021, 42, 451–459. [CrossRef]
- India NP of. National Nutrition Mission [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.india.gov.in/national-nutrition-mission.
- Champagne B, Arora M, ElSayed A, Løgstrup S, Naidoo P, Shilton T, et al. Front of pack Labelling- Unhealthy Chnages in the Global Food System. 2020,17.



| Background Characteristics | Weighted Percentage (N=198,335) | Stunting | Overweight | Anaemia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child Characteristics | ||||
| Age of children (months) | ||||
| 6-23® | 32.89 | 33.96 | 4.36 | 79.05 |
| 24-35 | 22.08 | 38.16 | 2.50 | 71.81 |
| 36-59 | 45.02 | 37.25 | 2.56 | 58.71 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Sex of child | 51.92 | |||
| Male® | 48.08 | 37.03 | 3.26 | 68.14 |
| Female | 35.68 | 3.02 | 68.16 | |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value=0.010 | Chi-square p-value=0.304 | ||
| Birth Order | ||||
| 1® | 39.07 | 31.93 | 3.65 | 66.35 |
| 2 to 3 | 33.94 | 35.52 | 3.08 | 68.06 |
| 4+ | 27.00 | 43.82 | 2.49 | 70.81 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Birth Size and Weight Composite Index | 35.98 | |||
| Low ® | 64.02 | 41.45 | 2.59 | 69.95 |
| Normal or Above Average | 33.39 | 3.47 | 67.11 | |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Household Characteristics | ||||
| Place of residence | ||||
| Urban® | 27.18 | 30.63 | 4.09 | 64.93 |
| Rural | 72.82 | 38.44 | 2.80 | 69.29 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Religion | ||||
| Hindu® | 79.33 | 36.36 | 3.06 | 68.74 |
| Muslim | 16.32 | 37.88 | 3.39 | 67.74 |
| Christian | 2.08 | 32.12 | 3.5 | 53.78 |
| Others | 2.27 | 30.45 | 3.95 | 71.48 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Caste | ||||
| Scheduled Caste/Tribes ® | 33.00 | 40.83 | 2.78 | 71.59 |
| Other Backward Classes | 43.40 | 35.97 | 2.96 | 66.31 |
| Others | 23.60 | 30.80 | 3.99 | 66.61 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Wealth | ||||
| Poorest® | 24.17 | 47.87 | 2.38 | 72.66 |
| Poorer | 21.55 | 40.90 | 2.56 | 69.92 |
| Middle | 19.52 | 35.08 | 3.12 | 67.77 |
| Richer | 18.54 | 28.60 | 3.53 | 64.87 |
| Richest | 16.21 | 23.00 | 4.74 | 62.84 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Mother's Characteristics | ||||
| Mother's Age at Birth (in years) | ||||
| Below 19® | 34.32 | 40.92 | 2.68 | 72.32 |
| 20-24 | 49.35 | 35.76 | 3.13 | 66.62 |
| 25-49 | 16.33 | 28.51 | 4.19 | 63.82 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Mother's education | ||||
| No education ® | 21.23 | 47.75 | 2.57 | 72.83 |
| Primary | 12.28 | 42.88 | 2.61 | 70.5 |
| Secondary | 50.72 | 34.09 | 3.08 | 67.53 |
| Higher | 15.77 | 22.97 | 4.58 | 61.71 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Mother's Body Mass Index (BMI) | ||||
| Underweight® | 19.78 | 44.36 | 2.12 | 72.91 |
| Normal | 60.96 | 36.5 | 3.14 | 68.51 |
| Overweight or Obese | 19.26 | 27.71 | 4.17 | 62.02 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Mass Media Exposure | ||||
| No exposure | 28.39 | 45.57 | 2.52 | 72.11 |
| Any Media Exposure | 71.61 | 32.72 | 3.39 | 66.57 |
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | Chi-square p-value<0.000 | ||
| Mother's Anaemia | ||||
| No Anaemia | 40.37 | 60.94 | ||
| Anaemia | 59.63 | 72.99 | ||
| Chi-square p-value<0.000 |
| Background Characteristics | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Childhood Stunting | Childhood Overweight | Childhood Anaemia | |||||||
| Model-1 | Model-2 | Model-3 | Model-1 | Model-2 | Model-3 | Model-1 | Model-2 | Model-3 | |
| Age of children (months) | |||||||||
| 6-23® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 24-35 | 1.27***(1.22, 1.31) | 1.27***(1.22, 1.31) | 0.45***(0.41, 0.49) | 0.44***(0.,41, 0.49) | 0.60*** (0.58, 0.62) | 0.60*** (0.58, 0.63) | |||
| 36-59 | 1.19*** (1.16, 1.23) | 1.19***(1.17, 1.23) | 0.49***(0.46, 0.53) | 0.49***(0.46, 0.53) | 0.30***(0.29, 0.31) | 0.30*** (0.29, 0.31) | |||
| Sex of child | |||||||||
| Male® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Female | 0.86*** (0.84, 0.89) | 0.86***(0.84, 0.89) | 0.92**(0.87, 0.98) | 0.92*(0.86, 0.98) | 0.98 (0.95, 1.00) | 0.98 (0.95, 1.00) | |||
| Birth Order | |||||||||
| 1® | 1.00 | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 2 to 3 | 1.16*** (1.13, 1.19) | 1.16***(1.13, 1.19) | 0.85***(0.79, 0.90) | 0.84***(0.78, 0.89) | 1.06***(1.03, 1.09) | 1.06***(1.04, 1.09) | |||
| 4+ | 1.28*** (1.23, 1.34) | 1.25***(1.20, 1.31) | 0.83***(0.74, 0.93) | 0.83***(0.74, 0.93) | 1.09***(1.04, 1.14) | 1.08***(1.03, 1.13) | |||
| Birth Size/Weight | |||||||||
| Low ® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Normal or Above Average | 0.68***(0.67, 0.71) | 0.69***(0.68, 0.71) | 1.29***(1.20, 1.37) | 1.27***(1.19, 1.37) | 0.94***(0.91, 0.96) | 0.94***(0.92, 0.97) | |||
| Place of residence | |||||||||
| Urban® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Rural | 1.94**(1.90, 1.99) | 0.87***(0.79, 0.95) | 1.04*(1.01, 1.08) | ||||||
| Religion | |||||||||
| Hindu® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Muslim | 1.13***(1.07, 1.18) | 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) | 1.07**(1.02, 1.13) | ||||||
| Christian | 0.83***(0.77, 0.89) | 1.29***(1.08, 1.53) | 0.74***(0.68, 0.80) | ||||||
| Others | 0.86***(0.79, 0.94) | 1.56*** (1.31, 1.86) | 0.99 (0.92, 1.08) | ||||||
| Caste | |||||||||
| Scheduled Caste/Tribes ® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Other Backward Classes | 0.89***(0.86, 0.92) | 0.88*** (0.81, 0.96) | 0.84***(0.82, 0.87) | ||||||
| Others | 0.75***(0.71, 0.78) | 1.04 (0.94, 1.16) | 0.99 (0.92, 1.08) | ||||||
| Wealth | |||||||||
| Poorest® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Poorer | 0.82***(0.79, 0.86) | 1.07 (0.96, 1.19) | 0.90***(0.86, 0.94) | ||||||
| Middle | 0.71***(0.68, 0.74) | 1.16*(1.03, 1.30) | 0.88***(0.84, 0.92) | ||||||
| Richer | 0.55***(0.53, 0.58) | 1.18*(1.04, 1.34) | 0.83***(0.79, 0.88) | ||||||
| Richest | 0.45***(0.42, 0.48) | 1.48***(1.27, 1.72) | 0.79***(0.74, 0.84) | ||||||
| Mother's Age at Birth (in years) | |||||||||
| 15-24® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 25-34 | 0.92*** (0.89, 0.95) | 0.94***(0.94, 1.03) | 1.05 (0.97, 1.13) | 1.04 (0.97, 1.12) | 0.97 (0.95, 1.00) | 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) | |||
| 35-49 | 0.82*** (0.78, 0.85) | 0.86***(0.83, 0.89) | 1.12*(1.02, 1.23) | 1.07 (0.97, 1.18) | 0.97(0.93, 1.00) | 0.99 (0.94, 1.03) | |||
| Mother's education | |||||||||
| No education ® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Primary | 0.96* (0.91, 0.99) | 0.98(0.94, 1.03) | 0.97(0.85, 1.01) | 0.95(0.84, 1.07) | 0.94**(0.89, 0.98) | 0.95*(0.91, 0.99) | |||
| Secondary | 0.71*** (0.69, 0.75) | 0.82***(0.79, 0.86) | 0.93(0.84, 1.03) | 0.88*(0.80, 0.98) | 0.84***(0.81, 0.88) | 0.89***(0.86, 0.92) | |||
| Higher | 0.49*** (0.47, 0.52) | 0.67***(0.63, 0.71) | 1.16*(1.03, 1.32) | 1.01(0.88, 1.15) | 0.73***(0.69, 0.77) | 0.81***(0.77, 0.86) | |||
| Mother's Body Mass Index | |||||||||
| Underweight® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Normal | 0.75*** (0.73, 0.78) | 0.78***(0.75, 0.81) | 1.50***(1.37, 1.65) | 1.47*** (1.34, 1.62) | 0.91*** (0.88, 0.94) | 0.92***(0.88, 0.95) | |||
| Overweight or Obese | 0.57*** (0.54, 0.59) | 0.63*** (0.59, 0.66) | 2.02*** (1.81, 2.27) | 1.92*** (1.71, 2.15) | 0.83*** (0.79, 0.87) | 0.86***(0.82, 0.89) | |||
| Mass Media Exposure | |||||||||
| No exposure | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Any Media Exposure | 0.81*** (0.78, 0.84) | 0.91*** (0.88, 0.95) | 1.06 (0.98, 1.15) | 1.00 (0.92, 1.09) | 0.91*** (0.88, 0.94) | 0.95** (0.92, 0.98) | |||
| Mother's Anaemia | |||||||||
| No Anaemia | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Anaemia | 1.67*** (1.63, 1.72) | 1.66*** (1.62, 1.71) | |||||||
| Constant | 0.42*** (0.401-0.435) |
1.06* (0.996-1.132) |
1.31*** (1.217-1.422) |
0.01*** (0.008, 0.012) |
0.01*** (0.006, 0.102) |
0.01*** (0.008, 0.0115) |
2.25*** (2.146, 2.361) |
4.97*** (4.600, 5.370) |
5.45*** (4.987, 5.957) |
| Random intercept parameter | |||||||||
| Var(district) | 0.417 (0.401-0.434) |
0.129 (0.112-0.149) |
0.113 (0.098-0.132) |
0.642 (0.549, 0.749) |
0.607 (0.517, 0.713) |
0.555 (0.469, 0.655) |
0.37 (0.325, 0.412) |
0.34 (0.301, 0.385) |
0.32 (0.28, 0.36) |
| Var (PSU) | 0.462 (0.432-0.493) |
0.403 (0.375-0.434) |
0.397 (0.369-0.428) |
1.483 (1.337, 1.644) |
1.572 (1.415, 1.747) |
1.568 (1.411, 1.741) |
0.48 (0.452, 0.507) |
0.51 (0.482, 0.544) |
0.51 (0.48, 0.54) |
| Var (HHs) | 1.071 (0.987-1.162) |
1.003 (0.920-1.094) |
0.977 (0.895-1.068) |
1.579 (1.277, 1.955) |
1.741 (1.415, 2.142) |
1.728 (1.403, 2.128) |
0.14 (0.093, 0.210) |
0.29 (0.231, 0.370) |
0.29 (0.23, 0.37) |
| ICC (district) (%) | 4.621 | 2.67 | 2.38 | 9.17 | 8.42 | 7.77 | 8.56 | 7.67 | 7.16 |
| ICC(PSU) (%) | 13.75 | 11.04 | 10.69 | 30.37 | 30.22 | 29.72 | 19.76 | 19.22 | 18.68 |
| ICC(HHs) (%) | 34.93 | 31.83 | 31.16 | 52.96 | 54.37 | 53.92 | 23.03 | 25.82 | 25.25 |
| Model fit statistics | |||||||||
| Wald test X2 | 3820.63 | 4583.49 | 761.65 | 833.12 | 6778.54 | 6897.73 | |||
| Probability> chi-square | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| LR test vs. logistic regression: p-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).