Submitted:
05 June 2023
Posted:
05 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- (1)
- Common sensors and their cables in the market fail due to disturbance;
- (2)
- The applicability of monitoring sensor range and precision to engineering structures;
- (3)
- It is difficult to break through the technical barriers between the subsystems of the monitoring system;
- (4)
- (he stability and durability of the monitoring system is doubtful;
- (5)
- The storage, transmission and display of a large number of real-time monitoring data are difficult to be solved in one stop;
- (6)
- How the network becomes the medium of real-time online, remote monitoring and data transmission;
- (7)
- Conflict between monitoring system construction and mechanized construction;
- (8)
- The reliability and effectiveness of signal acquisition of monitoring system need to be verified;
- (9)
- Monitoring system is difficult to use remote client and mobile phone client remote control and monitoring.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1. Study Condition
2.1.1. Aircraft motion state
2.1.2. A1 Contact Channel Overview
2.2. Design principles of monitoring system
2.2.1. Construction and Implementation of Channel Panel State Monitoring and Perception System
2.2.2. Monitoring and Analysis of Strain Behavior of Early-Age Road Face Slab in Construction
2.2.3. Mechanical Behavior Monitoring and Analysis of Underdeck Under Aircraft Taxiing Load
2.2.4. Providing Pre-Research Support for Dynamic Response of Airport Road Structure
2.3. Sensor scheme design
2.3.1. Sensor Layout
2.3.2. Sensor Maintenance
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. System overview
3.2. Subsystem design
3.2.1. Sensor subsystem
3.2.2. Data acquisition subsystem
- (1)
- Vibrating string sensor system
- (2)
- resistive sensing system
3.2.3. Data storage subsystem
- (1)
- Vibrating string monitoring data
- (2)
- resistive monitoring data
3.2.4. Data transmission subsystem
3.2.5. Supporting facilities
4. Discussion
- (1)
- The scale of the current monitoring system varies greatly, and whether the monitoring scale and effect reach the standard is still a mystery. A set of standard standards should be formed for intelligent monitoring of civil engineering industry.
- (2)
- Most monitoring systems are still stand-alone versions, and the compatibility and scalability of data interfaces and formats of each system are poor, so computer technology and electronic technology should be developed in tandem.
- (3)
- The low latency (millisecond delay) of 5G network enables the monitoring system to have richer development space in data transmission, which can be expanded successively in the aspects of threshold warning and automatic alarm, and can even introduce AR (virtual reality) technology for auxiliary observation.
- (4)
- In terms of remote real-time online display, the addition of 5G technology can upgrade "Airport pavement condition monitoring and perception system" into "airport pavement condition monitoring intelligent system". Through the slow live broadcast of 4K video (external visual information), the measured mechanical response state of the track panel (structural microscopic deformation and damage identification), 3D simulation (finite element simulation real-time comparison and verification), to achieve the integration of online and offline.
5. CONCLUSION
- The monitoring system is composed of four subsystems, including the sensor subsystem, data acquisition subsystem, data storage subsystem, and data transmission subsystem. The sensor subsystem is responsible for sensing the mechanical deformation and other related parameters of the airport runway. The data acquisition subsystem is responsible for processing and converting the sensor signals. The data storage subsystem is responsible for storing and filtering the measurement data. The data transmission subsystem is responsible for transmitting the data to the remote monitoring center.
- The monitoring system adopts a modular design approach to improve the scalability, reliability, and efficiency of the system. The system can be easily expanded or upgraded to meet the changing monitoring requirements of the airport runway.
- The monitoring system architecture design includes the selection of vibration and resistance sensors, data acquisition, and transmission modules, as well as server storage and communication protocol design. The entire system architecture design ensures reliable, accurate, and continuous monitoring of the airport runway.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- George Schwandt. Airport Pavement Management System Saves Millions[M]. Public Works, 1996, 127, 53–55.
- Navneet Garg. David Brill. Murphy Flynn. Field Instrumentation and Testing[C].FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference, 2010.
- Navneet Garg. Instrumentation Projects at Airports[C]. FAA Working Group Meeting, 2013.
- Raymond, s. Rollings. Field Instrumentation and Performance Monitoring of Rigid Pavements[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1992, 118, 361–370. [Google Scholar]
- Mingyao Dong, Gordon G.F. and Yingwu Fang. Runway Instrumentation at Denver International Airport Sensor Data Processing[J]. ASCE Aircraft/Pavement Technology In the Midst of Change, 1997.
- Edward, H. Guo. Critical Gear Configuration and Position for Rigid Airport Pavements Observations and Analysis[J]. Pavement Mechanics and Performance. ASCE 2006.
- Lev Khazanovich. Experimental Design For Large-scale Testing of Unbonded PCC Overlays at NAPTF[C]. FAA Airport Technology Transfer Conference, 2004.
- David, R. Brill. FAA Rigid Pavement Instrumentation at Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport[C]. FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference, 2007.
- Steve Pennington. Instrumentation During APM Construction at Dulles International Airport[C]. Seventh International Symposium on Field Measurements in Geomechanics. ASCE2007.
- Statistical Extreme Value ANC Taxiway Centerline Deviations for 747Aircraft[R]. FAA/Boeing Cooperative Research and Development Agreement 01-CRDA-0164.
- Statistical Extreme Value Analysis of JFK Taxiway Centerline Deviations for 747 Aircraft[R]. FAA Boeing Cooperative Research and Development Agreement 01-CRDA-0164.
- Mazzoli, A. Monosi S. Plescia ES. Evaluation of the Early-age-shrinkage of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (frc) Using Image Analysis Methods[J]. Construction & Building Materials 2015, 101, 596–601. [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz, JM. Rasmussen RO. Chang GK. Dick JC. Nelson PK. Ferragut TR. Computer-based Guidelines for Concrete Pavements Volume I-project Summary[R]. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2005.
- Ruiz, JM. Rasmussen RO. Chang GK. Dick JC. Nelson PK,Schindler AK. Turner DJ. Wilde WJ. Computer-based Guidelines for Concrete Pavements, Volume Iii: Technical Appendices[R]. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2006.
- Hiller, JE. Roesler JR. Determination of Critical Concrete Pavement Fatigue Damage Locations Using Influence Lines[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2005, 131, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- W. Hansen. Y. wei. D. l. smiley. Y. peng. E. a. jensen. Effects of Paving Conditions on Built-in Curling and Pavement Performance[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 2006, 7, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, SK. Ceylan HC. Smoothness Variations in Early-age Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2008, 35, 1388–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceylan, H. Kim S. Gopalakrishnan K. Initial Smoothness of Concrete Pavements Under Environmental Loads[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research 2007, 59, 599–609. [Google Scholar]
- J r roesler. D wang. An analytical approach to computing joint opening in concrete pavements[J]. Pavement cracking : mechanisms, modeling, detection, testing and case histories. 2008, 31-42.
- Andrade, C. Sarra J. Alonso C. Relative humidity in the interior of concrete exposed to natural and artificial weathering [J]. Cement and concrete research, 1999; 29, 1249–1259. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Schindler. A.K. Ruiz. J.M. Rasmussen. R.O. Chang. G.K. Wathne.L.G. Concrete pavement temperature prediction and case studies with the FHWA HIPERPAV models. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2004; 463–471.
- Xu, Yi. Xu, Qing. Chen, Shenghong. Li, Xinxin. Self-restraint thermal stress in early-age concrete samples and its evaluation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.The AASHO Road Test, Report 7. Summary Report[R]. Highway Research Board, Report 61G, 1962.
- Le Houedec, D. Influence of Road Surface Quality on the Dynamical Displacements and Stresses by a Heavy Moving Vehicle[J]. Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering 1983, 7, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darestani, M Y, Thambiratnam D P, Nataatmadja A. Structural response of concrete pavements under moving truck loads[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2007, 133, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramaekers, J. Vandewalle, L. Degée, H. Static and dynamic response of rigid concrete pavements: Parametric study[J]. Functional Pavement Design - Proceedings of the 4th Chinese-European Workshop on Functional Pavement Design, 2016; 1499–1512. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jeong J H, Zollinger D. Development of test methodology and model for evaluation of curing effectiveness in concrete pavement construction[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003 ; 17–25.
- Nam J, H. Early-age behavior of CRCP and its implications for long-term performance[D]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 2005.
















| Monitoring requirements | Using the technology | Application direction |
|---|---|---|
| Early age panel temperature | Chord strain sensor | A series of early age reference characters such as environmental field and strain are monitored to provide reference for load variation and line superposition during service period |
| Early age panel strain | ||
| The base of stress | Soil pressure box | The depth of influence of aircraft load on the foundation was obtained by monitoring the stress and working state of the foundation |
| Stress on top of base | Soil pressure box | Monitor the bottom support state of the panel, evaluate the contact state between the surface layer and the base layer, and timely find the phenomenon of empty |
| Longitudinal strain of panel | Resistance strain gauge | Real-time monitoring of the longitudinal strain of the panel under the taxiing condition |
| Long-term monitoring objectives | Panel health diagnosis under long service status | |
| Monitoring content | Sensor Model | Plane Layout | Section layout | Monitoring quantity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature and transverse strain of concrete panel | TJ-MR01 vibrating string strain sensor | Plate center | Top, middle and bottom of the board | 3 (Early age) |
| Dynamic strain of concrete panels | DH1204 concrete embedded resistance strain gauge | Center, corner, Plate edge |
Top and bottom of the board | 6 (connect) (+2 sleep) (+3 Backup) |
| Supporting state of the top surface of the base and dynamic strain of the track foundation | XHZ-410S resistive earth pressure gauge | Center, corner, Plate edge |
The top surface of the base, the top surface of the foundation and the lower 300mm | 10 (connect) (+1 Backup) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).