Submitted:
01 June 2023
Posted:
02 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Characterization
2.1. Starting Materials and Preparation of Specimens
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | K2O | SO3 | TiO2 | Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight percent | 50.16 | 36.25 | 4.46 | 3.85 | 1.84 | 0.54 | 1.18 | 1.76 |
2.2. Preparation of Specimens
2.3. Characterizations
3. Results
3.1. Mechanical Properties
| Sample | Activator composition | Compressive strength (MPa) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na2SiO3·9H2O | Na2CO3 | K2CO3 | NaOH | KOH | 3d | 7d | 28d | |
| S1 | 15wt% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.83 | 20.08 | 20.25 |
| S2 | 0 | 1mol/L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.50 | 1.58 | 1.75 |
| S3 | 0 | 2mol/L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 2.42 | 5.25 |
| S4 | 0 | 0 | 1mol/L | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| S5 | 0 | 0 | 2mol/L | 0 | 0 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| S6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4mol/L | 0 | 4.83 | 5.25 | 6.42 |
| S7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8mol/L | 0 | 21.33 | 23.00 | 15.67 |
| S8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4mol/L | 2.08 | 2.17 | 2.30 |
| S9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8mol/L | 15.92 | 11.83 | 10.80 |
| S10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4mol/L | 4mol/L | 8.75 | 10.83 | 9.58 |
| S11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8mol/L | 4mol/L | 21.83 | 33.25 | 30.92 |
| S12 | 15wt% | 1mol/L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.10 | 31.25 | 32.50 |
| S13 | 15wt% | 2mol/L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.67 | 33.08 | 35.50 |
| S14 | 15wt% | 0 | 1mol/L | 0 | 0 | 33.67 | 34.82 | 39.17 |
| S15 | 15wt% | 0 | 2mol/L | 0 | 0 | 38.08 | 40.25 | 43.08 |
| S16 | 15wt% | 0 | 0 | 4mol/L | 0 | 9.63 | 10.42 | 10.67 |
| S17 | 15wt% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4mol/L | 54.08 | 54.67 | 56.08 |
| S18 | 15wt% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8mol/L | 51.71 | 53.93 | 55.17 |
| S19 | 0 | 1mol/L | 0 | 4mol/L | 0 | 17.50 | 17.92 | 18.25 |
| S20 | 0 | 2mol/L | 0 | 4mol/L | 0 | 20.17 | 21.08 | 21.92 |
| S21 | 0 | 0 | 1mol/L | 0 | 4mol/L | 4.92 | 4.92 | 5.17 |
| S22 | 0 | 0 | 2mol/L | 0 | 4mol/L | 4.25 | 4.50 | 4.68 |
| S23 | 0 | 2mol/L | 2mol/L | 0 | 0 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| S24 | 0 | 2mol/L | 0 | 0 | 4mol/L | 5.25 | 5.42 | 5.50 |

3.2. Morphology and Microstructure


| Specimens | <100nm(%) | 100-200nm(%) | >0.2μm(%) | Median pore diameter (nm) | Porosity(%) | Total intrusion volume(ml/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 0.56 | 14.53 | 84.91 | 239.7 | 23.98 | 0.1961 |
| S15 | 27.87 | 14.18 | 57.95 | 104.8 | 21.36 | 0.1719 |
| S17 | 52.54 | 2.16 | 45.31 | 74.6 | 19.69 | 0.1578 |
| S25 | 53.67 | 6.94 | 39.39 | 67.1 | 19.52 | 0.1523 |
3.3. TG/DTG Analysis

3.4. XRD Analysis

4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
- Deventer J, Provis J, Duxson P, et al. Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products. Journal of Hazardous Materials A,139 (2007) 506–513. [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A, Criado M. Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: a descriptive model. Cement and Concrete Research, 35 (2005) 1204–1209. [CrossRef]
- Wang S, Liu B, Zhang Q, et al. Application of geopolymers for treatment of industrial solid waste containing heavy metals: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390 (2023) 136053. [CrossRef]
- Peng X, Li H, Hu Y. Preparation of metakaolin-fly ash cenosphere based geopolymer matrices for passive fire protection. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 23 (2023) 604-610. [CrossRef]
- Harmal A, Khouchani O, El-Korchi T, et al. Bioinspired brick-and-mortar geopolymer composites with ultra-high toughness. Cement and Concrete Composites, 137 (2023) 104944. [CrossRef]
- He M, Yang Z, Li N, et al. Strength, microstructure, CO2 emission and economic analyses of low concentration phosphoric acid-activated fly ash geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 374 (2023) 130920.
- Sarıdemir M, Çelikten S. Effects of Ms modulus, Na concentration and fly ash content on properties of vapour-cured geopolymer mortars exposed to high temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 363 (2023) 129868.
- Komljenovic M, Bascarevic Z, Bradic V. Mechanical and microstructural properties of alkali-activated fly ash geopolymers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 181 (2010) 35–42. [CrossRef]
- Cheng T, Chiu J. Fire-resistant geopolymer produced by granulated blast furnace slag. Minerals Engineering, 16 (2003) 205–210. [CrossRef]
- Tchakouté H, Rüscher C, Kong S, et al. Geopolymer binders from metakaolin using sodium water glass from waste glass and rice husk ash as alternative activators: A comparative study. Construction and Building Materials, 114 (2016) 276–289.
- Esaifan M, Khoury H, Aldabsheh I, et al. Hydrated lime/potassium carbonate as alkaline activating mixture to produce kaolinitic clay based inorganic polymer. Applied Clay Science, 126 (2016) 278-286. [CrossRef]
- Wang W, Fan C, Wang B, et al. Workability, rheology, and geopolymerization of fly ash geopolymer: Role of alkali content, modulus, and water–binder ratio. Construction and Building Materials, 367 (2023) 130357. [CrossRef]
- Yan S, Pan D, Dan J, et al. Calcium carbide residue and Glauber’s salt as composite activators for fly ash-based geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites, 140 (2023) 105081. [CrossRef]
- Yang J, Bai H, He X, et al. Performances and microstructure of one-part fly ash geopolymer activated by calcium carbide slag and sodium metasilicate powder. Construction and Building Materials, 367 (2023) 130303. [CrossRef]
- Wang H, Zhao X, Gao H, et al. The effects of salt-loss soda residue and oxalate acid on property and structure of fly ash-based geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 366 (2023) 130214. [CrossRef]
- Yliniemi J, Nugteren H, Illikainen M, et al. Lightweight aggregates produced by granulation of peat-wood fly ash with alkali activator. International Journal of Mineral Processing 149 (2016) 42–49. [CrossRef]
- Görhan G, Kürklü G. The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures. Composites: Part B, 58 (2014) 371–377. [CrossRef]
- Somna K, Jaturapitakkul C, Kajitvichyanukul P, et al. NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Fuel, 90 (2011) 2118–2124.
- Chindaprasirt P, Thaiwitcharoen S, Kaewpirom S, et al. Controlling ettringite formation in FBC fly ash geopolymer concrete. Cement & Concrete Composites, 41 (2013) 24–28. [CrossRef]
- Prudhomme E, Michaud P, Joussein E, et al. Role of alkaline cations and water content on geomaterial foams: Monitoring during formation. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 357 (2011) 1270–1278. [CrossRef]
- Guerrieri M, Sanjayan J. Behavior of combined fly ash/slag-based geopolymers when exposed to high temperatures. Fire Material, 34 (2010)163–175. [CrossRef]
- Kürklü G. The effect of high temperature on the design of blast furnace slag and coarse fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Composites Part B, 92 (2016) 9-18. [CrossRef]
- Vassilev S, Baxter D, Vassileva C. An overview of the behaviour of biomass during combustion: Part I. Phase-mineral transformations of organic and inorganic matter. Fuel, 112 (2013) 391–449. [CrossRef]
- MarieSkofteland B, Ellesad O, Lillerud K. Potassium merlinoite: crystallization, structural and thermal properties. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 43 (2001) 61-71.
- Lee W, Deventer J. Structural reorganisation of class F fly ash in alkaline silicate solutions. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 211 (2002) 49-66. [CrossRef]
- Korina T. Ion exchange in amorphous alkali-activated aluminosilicates: Potassium based geopolymers. Applied Clay Science 87 (2014) 205–211.
- Wang Y, Zhao J. Comparative study on flame retardancy of silica fume-based geopolymer activated by different activators. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 743 (2018) 108-114. [CrossRef]
- Yang J, Zhang Q, He X, et al. Low-carbon wet-ground fly ash geopolymer activated by single calcium carbide slag. Construction and Building Materials, 353 (2022) 129084. [CrossRef]
- Murri A, Medri V, Ruffini A, et al. Study of the chemical activation of hydroxyapatite rich ashes as raw materials for geopolymers. Ceramics International, 41 (2015) 9734–9744. [CrossRef]
- Peng Z, Vance K, Dakhane A, et al. Microstructural and 29Si MAS NMR spectroscopic evaluations of alkali cationic effects on fly ash activation. Cement & Concrete Composites, 57 (2015) 34–43. [CrossRef]
- Cioffi R, Maffucci L, Santoro L. Optimization of geopolymer synthesis by calcination and polycondensation of a kaolinitic residue. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 40 (2003) 27–38. [CrossRef]
- Hwang C, Huynh T. Effect of alkali-activator and rice husk ash content on strength development of fly ash and residual rice husk ash-based geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 101 (2015) 1–9. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).