Preprint Brief Report Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Rich and Easy to Deceive? The Influence of Money Priming on the Ability to Detect Deception

Version 1 : Received: 10 May 2023 / Approved: 12 May 2023 / Online: 12 May 2023 (13:39:40 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 18 January 2024 / Approved: 19 January 2024 / Online: 19 January 2024 (10:01:30 CET)

How to cite: Ende, L.; Reinhard, M. Rich and Easy to Deceive? The Influence of Money Priming on the Ability to Detect Deception. Preprints 2023, 2023050953. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0953.v1 Ende, L.; Reinhard, M. Rich and Easy to Deceive? The Influence of Money Priming on the Ability to Detect Deception. Preprints 2023, 2023050953. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0953.v1

Abstract

Based on recent popular money priming research results, which conclude that money 4 makes self-sufficient (e.g. less interest in other people), we assumed that people are less interested 5 in finding out whether others are lying or telling the truth. In a laboratory experiment, 163 students 6 (85 women, 78 men, MAge = 23.08, ranging from 18 to 36 years) were primed by actively handling 7 money (versus paper sheets). Afterwards, they classified 24 video statements as true or deceptive 8 (senders describing their most/least favorite movie), rated their classification confidence for each 9 decision and then answered control questions. Results revealed no influence of priming condition 10 on judgmental bias, classification accuracy, and classification confidence. Also the level of self-re-11 ported motivation to find out who lied or told the truth did not differ between conditions. Higher 12 motivation was correlated to higher classification confidence. Additionally, and in line with Rein-13 hard (2010) and Reinhard et al. (2011), higher classification accuracy correlated to a higher use of 14 verbal content cues for classification decisions. So, while we were able to replicate these findings, 15 our results contradict the assumption of a money prime influence on lie detection ability. Conclud-16 ing, our results make self-sufficiency in this context questionable and offer next steps for research.

Keywords

Money; Money prime; Credibility judgment; Deception detection; Lie and truth classification

Subject

Social Sciences, Psychology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.