Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Scale Dependence of Errors in Snow Water Equivalent Simulations using ERA5 Reanalysis over Alpine Basins

Version 1 : Received: 10 May 2023 / Approved: 10 May 2023 / Online: 10 May 2023 (14:31:50 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Shrestha, S.; Zaramella, M.; Callegari, M.; Greifeneder, F.; Borga, M. Scale Dependence of Errors in Snow Water Equivalent Simulations Using ERA5 Reanalysis over Alpine Basins. Climate 2023, 11, 154. Shrestha, S.; Zaramella, M.; Callegari, M.; Greifeneder, F.; Borga, M. Scale Dependence of Errors in Snow Water Equivalent Simulations Using ERA5 Reanalysis over Alpine Basins. Climate 2023, 11, 154.

Abstract

This study evaluated the potential of ERA5 reanalysis as a reference dataset for snow water equivalent (SWE) modeling in 16 Alpine basins of varying catchment sizes using the semi-distributed snow model (TOPMELT) in the Upper Adige river basin in the Eastern Italian Alps. The study aimed to identify errors in ERA5 meteorological variables and assess their impact on SWE computation from 1992 to 2019. The findings revealed that ERA5 precipitation overestimated low-intensity rainfall (drizzle problem) and underestimated high-intensity rainfall, while ERA5 temperature underestimated observations. The overestimation of low-intensity rainfall created fictitious low-intensity snowfall events, which, when combined with colder ERA5 temperature, resulted in delayed snowmelt and increased fictitious snow cover days over the study area. The Quantile Mapping (QM) technique was used to remove errors in ERA5 variables. For precipitation, a monthly correction factor accounting the calibration period (1992-2005) was considered to correct the entire period. Temperature errors were corrected individually for calibration and validation periods. The corrected ERA5 SWE simulation showed improved performance, with a decrease in fictitious snow cover days. The study also highlighted the importance of temperature correction over precipitation correction in SWE simulation, particularly for smaller basins, while considering the monthly moving mean to remove seasonality.

Keywords

TOPMELT; ERA5; SWE; Drizzle; Bias Adjustment

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Water Science and Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.