Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength in Division III Soccer Athletes: An Ecological Study

Version 1 : Received: 24 April 2023 / Approved: 26 April 2023 / Online: 26 April 2023 (12:36:09 CEST)

How to cite: Judd, K.; Morales, C.; White, M.; Wilkie, K.; Faller, J.; Ives, S.J. The Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength in Division III Soccer Athletes: An Ecological Study. Preprints 2023, 2023040987. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0987.v1 Judd, K.; Morales, C.; White, M.; Wilkie, K.; Faller, J.; Ives, S.J. The Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength in Division III Soccer Athletes: An Ecological Study. Preprints 2023, 2023040987. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0987.v1

Abstract

Background: Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) uses occlusion during low-intensity resistance training (<50% of repetition maximum, 1RM) to reduce arterial blood flow and venous return, imposing greater metabolic stress but similar muscular hypertrophy and strength gains as high-intensity resistance training (HIRT). However, no study, to date, has incorporated BFRT in a collegiate strength and conditioning setting to assess ecological validity. We aimed to investigate the effects of adding 6-weeks of accessory BFRT or HIRT to NCAA Division III soccer players prescribed resistance training regimen on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Methods: Male and female (n=17) athletes were randomly assigned to complete biceps curls 2x/week under BFRT or control (HIRT), following the regularly scheduled strength training. Bicep strength (1RM) and circumference (BC) were assessed at weeks 0, 3, and 6. Results: In men, no significant interaction between time and condition was observed for BC (p=0.861), though condition (BFRT vs Control, p=0.025) and time (p=0.024) were significant. For 1RM, there was no significant interaction between time and condition (BFRT vs HIRT, p=0.067) or of condition (p=0.598), but there was a significant effect of time (p=0.004). In women, there was no significant interaction between time and condition (p=0.765) or of condition (p=0.971) on BC, but time was significant (p=0.045). For 1RM, there was no significant interaction between time and condition (p=0.227) or of condition (p=0.741), but time was (p=0.018). Conclusion: BFRT induced similar increases in muscle strength and hypertrophy as HIRT in soccer players, suggesting that BFRT could be incorporated into collegiate athlete training.

Keywords

strength and conditioning, resistance training, weight training, college, football

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.