Preprint Review Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Literature Review: Clinical Data Interoperability Models

Version 1 : Received: 14 April 2023 / Approved: 17 April 2023 / Online: 17 April 2023 (08:02:19 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 4 June 2023 / Approved: 5 June 2023 / Online: 5 June 2023 (08:12:36 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Ait Abdelouahid, R.; Debauche, O.; Mahmoudi, S.; Marzak, A. Literature Review: Clinical Data Interoperability Models. Information 2023, 14, 364. Ait Abdelouahid, R.; Debauche, O.; Mahmoudi, S.; Marzak, A. Literature Review: Clinical Data Interoperability Models. Information 2023, 14, 364.

Abstract

A medical entity (hospital, nursing home, rest home, revalidation center, etc.) usually includes a multitude of information systems that allow for quick decision-making close to the medical sensors. The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is an area of IoT that generates a lot of data of different natures (radio, CT scan, medical reports, medical sensor data). However, these systems need to share and exchange medical information in a seamless, timely, and efficient manner with systems that are either located within the same entity or located in other healthcare entities. The lack of inter and intra entity interoperability causes major problems in the analysis of patient records and leads to additional financial costs (e.g., redone examinations). In order to develop a medical data interoperability architecture model that will allow providers and different actors in the medical community to exchange patient summary information with other caregivers and partners in order to improve the quality of care, the level of data security, and the efficiency of care, we take stock of the state of knowledge.

Keywords

Internet of Medical Things (IoMT); data exchange: healthcare; medical data; interoperability

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Computer Science

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 5 June 2023
Commenter: Olivier Debauche
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Review Round 1
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.