1. Introduction
Collatz conjecture, or the
problem, is a simple arithmetic function applied to positive integers. If the integer is odd, triple it and add one. It is called the odd step. If the integer is even, it is divided by two and is denoted as the even step. It is conjectured that every integer will eventually reach the number 1. Much work has been done to prove or disprove this conjecture [
1,
2,
3,
4].
The problem is easy to understand, and since it has attracted much attention from the general public and experts alike, the literature is endless. Still, the efforts made to tackle the problem can generally be categorized under the following headings:
Experimental or computational method: This method uses computational optimizations to verify Collatz conjecture by checking numbers for convergence [
5,
6,
7]. Numbers as large as
have shown no divergence from the conjecture.
Arguments based on probability: It is suggested that, on average, the sequence of numbers tends to shrink in size so that divergence do not occur. On average, each odd number is
of the previous odd integer [
8].
Evaluation of stopping times: Many researchers seem to work on the
problem from this approach [
9,
10,
11,
12,
13]. In essence, it is sought to prove that the Collatz conjecture yields a number smaller than the starting number.
Mathematical induction: It is perhaps the most common method to “prove" the Collatz conjecture. The literature involving this particular method seems endless [
14,
15].
The issue is that the Collatz conjecture is a straightforward arithmetic operation, while the methods used are not. The mismatch is created because the problem has attracted the attention of brilliant people in mathematics who are used to dealing with complex issues with equally complex tools. Therefore, an elementary analysis of the problem might be lacking.
This article takes a rudimentary approach to the Collatz conjecture and treats it as a problem of inequality between indices of 2 and 3. The inequality relation will be turned into equality using variables. The values of these variables will be investigated, and it will be shown that the Collatz conjecture does not need complex analysis.
2. Prerequisite
Consider that
n is an odd integer, and the following Collatz function
f is applied to it
A sequence is formed by performing this operation repeatedly, taking the result at each step as the input for the next. Collatz conjecture states that, for all n, for some non-negative integer k, where the function is applied to n exactly k times. Let the sequence of integers obtained be:
1st odd, evens, 2nd odd, evens, ⋯, odd.
After the
odd term, the odd step is applied to obtain an even integer. This even integer is computed in terms of the function
:
where
and
It is noted that .
3. Methodology
One of the significant results of the Collatz conjecture is that “almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values [
9,
10]." In simpler words, suppose the Collatz conjecture is valid up to the integer
. To test if the integer
n complies with the Collatz conjecture, it is enough to show that the Collatz function attains a value smaller than the integer
n.
Secondly, for the integer
n to repeat, an integer of the form
must appear in the sequence where
. Let
in Equation (
1).
Equation (
3) tells that the maximum
n that can repeat depends on two factors: (1) The minimum value of
and (2) The maximum value of
.
Therefore, a basic strategy towards resolving the problem can be outlined as follow:
Establish the conditions that prevent the Collatz sequence from falling below the starting integer and also allows for the starting integer to re-appear.
Obtain an upper bound on .
Obtain a lower bound on .
4. Conditions for an unbounded Collatz orbit & repeating integers
Let the Collatz function fall below the starting integer
n in Equation (
1).
If the above inequality is valid for a bounded Collatz orbit, the opposite must be correct for an unbounded Collatz orbit.
Similarly, the following relation should be true for
n to be a positive integer in Equation (
3):
Therefore, the conditions that allow for an unbounded Collatz orbit and repeating integers are
5. Maximum value of
Equation (
2) is re-written as
Analysis of each term starts with the second inequality in Equation (
4).
The index
is decided in the first even step when the Collatz function looks like
To ensure that the first inequality in Equation (
4) is upheld so that the Collatz orbit remains unbounded until
is obtained, it is imperative that
. Therefore, the maximum value of the second term is obtained by substituting the maximum value of
.
The index
is decided in the second even step when the Collatz function looks like
To ensure that the first inequality in Equation (
4) is upheld so that the Collatz orbit remains unbounded until
is obtained, it is imperative that
, as
. Substitute the maximum value of
to obtain the maximum value of the third term.
General term
It is shown that
and
. When higher order indexes are calculated, values are observed to alternate between 1 and 2. Therefore, the series of terms are replaced by a geometric series with the average common ratio of
. The sequence of terms looks like
The last term is less than 1. Therefore, the maximum value of Equation (
5) is
6. Minimum value of
The second inequality in Equation (
4) gives the necessary condition for an integer of the form
to appear in the Collatz sequence. The minimum value of
for the inequality
to be true is
because
is valid only for .
as is odd.
Substitute
in the RHS where
.
Alternatively, starting from Equation (
7),
7. Resolution to the problem
Substitute Equations (
8), (
9) and (
6) in Equation (
3) and take union to obtain the range of integers that repeat in the Collatz sequence
A few values of
n for
i are given in the
Table 1. The integers that repeat in the Collatz sequence lie in the
range. It is unnecessary to check the Collatz conjecture beyond the integer 7. The Collatz sequence is never violated till 7; therefore, it will not be broken for any integer greater than 7. But it does violate for negative integers.
8. Do all positive integers reach 1?
Let there exist a number chain that does not converge to 1. Since the only closed chain in the series is , this n-chain is an open chain. The n-chain converges to n from infinity and then diverges to infinity.
The n-chain contains all terms of the form where . Further, terms arising from the arithmetic function are also part of this chain. Every even integer x in the n-chain is connected to a precursor even number and a precursor odd number (iff is possible for some m). Similarly, every odd integer is connected to a precursor even number. The branches that arise out of the n-chain are infinite. In short, the n-chain contains every integer greater than n up to infinity.
However, there should exist no linkage between the n-chain and the 1-chain. Because, if there were some linkage, all the integers in the n-chain would converge to 1 using the said linkage.
It is absurd, as shown in
Figure 1, as this means the 1-chain ends abruptly below
n. It implies that there exists no integer
in the
n-chain such that
. Conversely, there exists no
x in the 1-chain such that
.
It is concluded that a n-chain that does not converge to 1 is impossible.
9. A comment on Collatz-like series
9.1. 3n - 1 series
The series is akin to using a negative integer in the series. The range of integers that repeat in the series is . Since negative integers repeat for the series, the integers that repeat for the series will lie in the range .
9.2. 5n + 1 series
This series is defined as follows
The value of
is
It is seen that the common ratio is less than 1 for some terms while it is greater than 1 for other terms. The value of the above sum is uncertain - it can be bounded or unbounded. Thus, the series might have many closed-chain solutions or a tendency to diverge to infinity.
9.3. 7n + 1 series
This series is defined as follows
The value of
is
The common ratio is greater than 1 for every term, and the above sum is unbounded. Therefore, this series will diverge to infinity. No comment can be made on the number of closed-chain solutions.
10. Conclusion
This article re-writes the Collatz sequence in the form , where . Further, conditions for an unbounded Collatz orbit and repeating integers are discovered. It helps in placing bounds on the value of and . Correspondingly, it is possible to place a bound on the value of n that repeats in the sequence. It is found that the methodology adopted in this article helps analyze other related sequences like , , and , which proves the validity of the proposed modus-operandi.
References
- J. C. Lagarias, The ultimate challenge: The 3x+ 1 problem. American Mathematical Soc., 2010.
- J. C. Lagarias, “The 3x+ 1 problem: An annotated bibliography (1963–1999),” The ultimate challenge: the 3x, vol. 1, pp. 267–341, 2003. arXiv:math/0608208.
- J. C. Lagarias, “The 3x+ 1 problem: An annotated bibliography, ii (2000-2009),” arXiv preprint math/0608208, 2006.
- J. C. Lagarias, “The 3x+ 1 problem: An annotated bibliography,” preprint, 2004.
- D. Barina, “Convergence verification of the collatz problem,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 2681–2688, 2021. [CrossRef]
- A. Rahn, E. Sultanow, M. Henkel, S. Ghosh, and I. J. Aberkane, “An algorithm for linearizing the collatz convergence,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 16, p. 1898, 2021. [CrossRef]
- E. Yolcu, S. Aaronson, and M. J. Heule, “An automated approach to the collatz conjecture.,” in CADE, pp. 468–484, 2021. [CrossRef]
- K. Barghout, “On the probabilistic proof of the convergence of the collatz conjecture,” Journal of Probability and Statistics, vol. 2019, 2019. [CrossRef]
- R. Terras, “A stopping time problem on the positive integers,” Acta Arithmetica, vol. 3, no. 30, pp. 241–252, 1976.
- T. Tao, “Almost all orbits of the collatz map attain almost bounded values,” in Forum of Mathematics, Pi, vol. 10, p. e12, Cambridge University Press, 2022. [CrossRef]
- S. G. Jiang, “Collatz total stopping times with neural networks,” World Scientific Research Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 296–301, 2021.
- D. Applegate and J. Lagarias, “Lower bounds for the total stopping time of 3n+1 iterates,” Mathematics of computation, vol. 72, no. 242, pp. 1035–1049, 2003. [CrossRef]
- M. Chamberland, “Averaging structure in the 3x+1 problem,” Journal of Number Theory, vol. 148, pp. 384–397, 2015. [CrossRef]
- W. Ren, “A new approach on proving collatz conjecture,” Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2019, 2019. [CrossRef]
- M. Orús-Lacort and C. Jouis, “Analyzing the collatz conjecture using the mathematical complete induction method,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 1972, 2022. [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).