Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Resolution of the $3n+1$ Problem Using Inequality Relation Between Indices of 2 and 3

Version 1 : Received: 6 April 2023 / Approved: 6 April 2023 / Online: 6 April 2023 (11:21:24 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 7 April 2023 / Approved: 10 April 2023 / Online: 10 April 2023 (08:40:06 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 10 April 2023 / Approved: 11 April 2023 / Online: 11 April 2023 (10:05:24 CEST)
Version 4 : Received: 20 April 2023 / Approved: 21 April 2023 / Online: 21 April 2023 (09:25:33 CEST)
Version 5 : Received: 4 May 2023 / Approved: 5 May 2023 / Online: 5 May 2023 (10:18:23 CEST)
Version 6 : Received: 6 May 2023 / Approved: 9 May 2023 / Online: 9 May 2023 (04:15:37 CEST)

How to cite: Goyal, G. Resolution of the $3n+1$ Problem Using Inequality Relation Between Indices of 2 and 3. Preprints 2023, 2023040093. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0093.v1 Goyal, G. Resolution of the $3n+1$ Problem Using Inequality Relation Between Indices of 2 and 3. Preprints 2023, 2023040093. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0093.v1

Abstract

Collatz conjecture states that an integer $n$ reduces to $1$ when certain simple operations are applied to it. Mathematically, it is written as $2^z = 3^kn + C$, where $z, k, C \geq 1$. Suppose the integer $n$ violates Collatz conjecture by re-appearing, then the equation modifies to $2^z n =3^kn +C$. The article takes an elementary approach to this problem by stating that the inequality $2^z > 3^k$ must hold for $n$ to violate the Collatz conjecture. It leads to the inequality $z > 2k$ that helps obtain the relations $3^k/2^z = 3/4 - p$ and $2^z - 3^k = 2^z/4 + q$, where $p, q$ are some variables. The values of $p, q$ are determined by substitution in the $2^zn = 3^kn + C$, and the solution found is $(n, k, z, p, q) = (1, 1, 2, 0, 0)$

Keywords

Collatz conjecture; 3n+1; inequality relations

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.