Submitted:
09 March 2023
Posted:
10 March 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design of Experiment (DOE)
2.2. Specimen Design
2.3. Fatigue Test Setup
3. Results
3.1. Rhombic Dodecahedron
3.2. Octet Truss
3.3. Bccz
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Id Code | σM[MPa] | σm[MPa] | σa[MPa] | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bccz-5-25-1 | 12.6 | 1.26 | 5.67 | 10178091 |
| Bccz-5-25-2 | 12.6 | 1.26 | 5.67 | 12441038 |
| Bccz-5-25-3 | 12.6 | 1.26 | 5.67 | - |
| Bccz-5-25-4 | 9.4 | 0.94 | 4.23 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-25-5 | 9.4 | 0.94 | 4.23 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-25-6 | 9.4 | 0.94 | 4.23 | - |
| Bccz-5-25-7 | 6.3 | 0.63 | 2.84 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-25-8 | 6.3 | 0.63 | 2.84 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-25-9 | 6.3 | 0.63 | 2.84 | - |
| Bccz-5-25-10 | 3.1 | 0.31 | 1.40 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-25-11 | 3.1 | 0.31 | 1.40 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-25-12 | 3.1 | 0.31 | 1.40 | - |
| Bccz-5-30-1 | 20.3 | 2.03 | 9.14 | 654563 |
| Bccz-5-30-2 | 20.3 | 2.03 | 9.14 | 762810 |
| Bccz-5-30-3 | 20.3 | 2.03 | 9.14 | - |
| Bccz-5-30-4 | 15.2 | 1.52 | 6.84 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-30-5 | 15.2 | 1.52 | 6.84 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-30-6 | 15.2 | 1.52 | 6.84 | - |
| Bccz-5-30-7 | 10.2 | 1.02 | 4.59 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-30-8 | 10.2 | 1.02 | 4.59 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-30-9 | 10.2 | 1.02 | 4.59 | - |
| Bccz-5-30-10 | 5.1 | 0.51 | 2.30 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-30-11 | 5.1 | 0.51 | 2.30 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-5-30-12 | 5.1 | 0.51 | 2.30 | - |
| Bccz-7-30-1 | 19.5 | 1.95 | 8.78 | 326837 |
| Bccz-7-30-2 | 19.5 | 1.95 | 8.78 | 440166 |
| Bccz-7-30-3 | 19.5 | 1.95 | 8.78 | 326161 |
| Bccz-7-30-4 | 14.6 | 1.46 | 6.57 | 3362847 |
| Bccz-7-30-5 | 14.6 | 1.46 | 6.57 | 3331678 |
| Bccz-7-30-6 | 14.6 | 1.46 | 6.57 | 2249586 |
| Bccz-7-30-7 | 9.8 | 0.98 | 4.41 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-7-30-8 | 9.8 | 0.98 | 4.41 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-7-30-9 | 9.8 | 0.98 | 4.41 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-7-30-10 | 4.9 | 0.49 | 2.21 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-7-30-11 | 4.9 | 0.49 | 2.21 | 15000000 |
| Bccz-7-30-12 | 4.9 | 0.49 | 2.21 | 15000000 |
| Id Code | σM[MPa] | σm[MPa] | σa[MPa] | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhom-5-25-1 | 12.1 | 1.21 | 5.45 | 9044 |
| Rhom-5-25-2 | 12.1 | 1.21 | 5.45 | 6480 |
| Rhom-5-25-3 | 12.1 | 1.21 | 5.45 | - |
| Rhom-5-25-4 | 9 | 0.9 | 4.05 | 45544 |
| Rhom-5-25-5 | 9 | 0.9 | 4.05 | 45031 |
| Rhom-5-25-6 | 9 | 0.9 | 4.05 | - |
| Rhom-5-25-7 | 6 | 0.6 | 2.70 | 291522 |
| Rhom-5-25-8 | 6 | 0.6 | 2.70 | 274062 |
| Rhom-5-25-9 | 6 | 0.6 | 2.70 | - |
| Rhom-5-25-10 | 3 | 0.3 | 1.35 | 15000000 |
| Rhom-5-25-11 | 3 | 0.3 | 1.35 | 15000000 |
| Rhom-5-25-12 | 3 | 0.3 | 1.35 | - |
| Rhom-5-30-1 | 17.1 | 1.71 | 7.70 | 12100 |
| Rhom-5-30-2 | 17.1 | 1.71 | 7.70 | 10947 |
| Rhom-5-30-3 | 17.1 | 1.71 | 7.70 | - |
| Rhom-5-30-4 | 12.8 | 1.28 | 5.76 | 47132 |
| Rhom-5-30-5 | 12.8 | 1.28 | 5.76 | 26329 |
| Rhom-5-30-6 | 12.8 | 1.28 | 5.76 | - |
| Rhom-5-30-7 | 8.6 | 0.86 | 3.87 | 327084 |
| Rhom-5-30-8 | 8.6 | 0.86 | 3.87 | 307454 |
| Rhom-5-30-9 | 8.6 | 0.86 | 3.87 | - |
| Rhom-5-30-10 | 4.3 | 0.43 | 1.94 | 15000000 |
| Rhom-5-30-11 | 4.3 | 0.43 | 1.94 | 3755825 |
| Rhom-5-30-12 | 4.3 | 0.43 | 1.94 | - |
| Rhom-7-30-1 | 17.7 | 1.77 | 7.97 | 4281 |
| Rhom-7-30-2 | 17.7 | 1.77 | 7.97 | 3281 |
| Rhom-7-30-3 | 17.7 | 1.77 | 7.97 | 3970 |
| Rhom-7-30-4 | 13.3 | 1.33 | 5.99 | 14484 |
| Rhom-7-30-5 | 13.3 | 1.33 | 5.99 | 12010 |
| Rhom-7-30-6 | 13.3 | 1.33 | 5.99 | 10550 |
| Rhom-7-30-7 | 8.9 | 0.89 | 4.01 | 53097 |
| Rhom-7-30-8 | 8.9 | 0.89 | 4.01 | 46449 |
| Rhom-7-30-9 | 8.9 | 0.89 | 4.01 | 46723 |
| Rhom-7-30-10 | 4.4 | 0.44 | 1.98 | 1471143 |
| Rhom-7-30-11 | 4.4 | 0.44 | 1.98 | 2004674 |
| Rhom-7-30-12 | 4.4 | 0.44 | 1.98 | - |
| Id Code | σM[MPa] | σm[MPa] | σa[MPa] | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct-5-25-1 | 18.5 | 1.85 | 8.33 | 18568 |
| Oct-5-25-2 | 18.5 | 1.85 | 8.33 | 36394 |
| Oct-5-25-3 | 18.5 | 1.85 | 8.33 | - |
| Oct-5-25-4 | 13.9 | 1.39 | 6.26 | 128641 |
| Oct-5-25-5 | 13.9 | 1.39 | 6.26 | 151236 |
| Oct-5-25-6 | 13.9 | 1.39 | 6.26 | - |
| Oct-5-25-7 | 9.3 | 0.93 | 4.19 | 971841 |
| Oct-5-25-8 | 9.3 | 0.93 | 4.19 | 1119612 |
| Oct-5-25-9 | 9.3 | 0.93 | 4.19 | - |
| Oct-5-25-10 | 4.6 | 0.46 | 2.07 | 15000000 |
| Oct-5-25-11 | 4.6 | 0.46 | 2.07 | 15000000 |
| Oct-5-25-12 | 4.6 | 0.46 | 2.07 | - |
| Oct-5-30-1 | 22.7 | 2.27 | 10.22 | 64099 |
| Oct-5-30-2 | 22.7 | 2.27 | 10.22 | 52684 |
| Oct-5-30-3 | 22.7 | 2.27 | 10.22 | - |
| Oct-5-30-4 | 17 | 1.7 | 7.65 | 239878 |
| Oct-5-30-5 | 17 | 1.7 | 7.65 | 234151 |
| Oct-5-30-6 | 17 | 1.7 | 7.65 | - |
| Oct-5-30-7 | 11.3 | 1.13 | 5.09 | 880174 |
| Oct-5-30-8 | 11.3 | 1.13 | 5.09 | 645908 |
| Oct-5-30-9 | 11.3 | 1.13 | 5.09 | - |
| Oct-5-30-10 | 5.7 | 0.57 | 2.57 | 15000000 |
| Oct-5-30-11 | 5.7 | 0.57 | 2.57 | 15000000 |
| Oct-5-30-12 | 5.7 | 0.57 | 2.57 | - |
| Oct-7-30-1 | 22.9 | 2.29 | 10.31 | 10607 |
| Oct-7-30-2 | 22.9 | 2.29 | 10.31 | 9009 |
| Oct-7-30-3 | 22.9 | 2.29 | 10.31 | 25343 |
| Oct-7-30-4 | 17.2 | 1.72 | 7.74 | 42201 |
| Oct-7-30-5 | 17.2 | 1.72 | 7.74 | 68178 |
| Oct-7-30-6 | 17.2 | 1.72 | 7.74 | 35084 |
| Oct-7-30-7 | 11.5 | 1.15 | 5.18 | 136536 |
| Oct-7-30-8 | 11.5 | 1.15 | 5.18 | 86464 |
| Oct-7-30-9 | 11.5 | 1.15 | 5.18 | 204722 |
| Oct-7-30-10 | 5.7 | 0.57 | 2.57 | 3108586 |
| Oct-7-30-11 | 5.7 | 0.57 | 2.57 | - |
| Oct-7-30-12 | 5.7 | 0.57 | 2.57 | - |
Appendix B



References
- C. Ferro, R. Grassi, C. Seclì, and P. Maggiore, “Additive Manufacturing Offers New Opportunities in UAV Research,” in Procedia CIRP, 2016, vol. 41. [CrossRef]
- C. G. Ferro et al., “Design and characterization of trabecular structures for an anti-icing sandwich panel produced by additive manufacturing,” J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., vol. 22, no. 4, 2020. [CrossRef]
- P. Maggiore, Fabio Vitti, C. G. Ferro, and Varetti Sara, “Thermal anti ice system integrated in the structure and method for its fabrication,” 102016000098196, 2016.
- G. Manogharan, “Analysis of Non-Stochastic Lattice Structure Design for Heat Exchanger,” 2009.
- T. Tancogne-Dejean, A. B. Spierings, and D. Mohr, “Additively-manufactured metallic micro-lattice materials for high specific energy absorption under static and dynamic loading,” Acta Mater., vol. 116, pp. 14–28, 2016. [CrossRef]
- L. Hao, D. Raymont, C. Yan, A. Hussein, and P. Young, “Design and additive manufacturing of cellular lattice structures,” Innov. Dev. Virtual Phys. Prototyp., no. May 2016, pp. 249–254, 2011. [CrossRef]
- A. Zargarian, M. Esfahanian, J. Kadkhodapour, S. Ziaei-Rad, and D. Zamani, “On the fatigue behavior of additive manufactured lattice structures,” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., vol. 100, 2019. [CrossRef]
- M. Benedetti, A. du Plessis, R. O. Ritchie, M. Dallago, S. M. J. Razavi, and F. Berto, “Architected cellular materials: A review on their mechanical properties towards fatigue-tolerant design and fabrication,” Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, vol. 144. 2021. [CrossRef]
- A. Burr et al., “A numerical framework to predict the fatigue life of lattice structures built by additive manufacturing,” Int. J. Fatigue, vol. 139, 2020. [CrossRef]
- N. Agenbag and C. McDuling, “Fatigue Life Testing of Locally Additive Manufactured AlSilOMg Test Specimens,” R&D J., vol. 37, 2021. [CrossRef]
- A. Tommasi et al., “Influence of surface preparation and heat treatment on mechanical behavior of hybrid aluminum parts manufactured by a combination of laser powder bed fusion and conventional manufacturing processes,” Metals (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 3, 2021. [CrossRef]
- P. M. Carlo Giovanni Ferro, Sara Varetti, Fabio Vitti, “Thermal anti ice system integrated in the structure and method for its fabrication,” 102016000098196, 2016.
- C. Yan, L. Hao, A. Hussein, S. L. Bubb, P. Young, and D. Raymont, “Evaluation of light-weight AlSi10Mg periodic cellular lattice structures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 214, no. 4, pp. 856–864, 2014. [CrossRef]
- Matteo Perello, “Numerical simulation and experimental validation of lattice structures for an innovative anti-ice leading edge.,” 2018.
- A. Hussein, L. Hao, C. Yan, R. Everson, and P. Young, “Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 213, no. 7, pp. 1019–1026, 2013. [CrossRef]
- T. Maconachie et al., “SLM lattice structures: Properties, performance, applications and challenges,” Materials and Design, vol. 183. 2019. [CrossRef]
- A. du Plessis et al., “Properties and applications of additively manufactured metallic cellular materials: A review,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 125. 2022. [CrossRef]
- A. Seharing, A. H. Azman, and S. Abdullah, “A review on integration of lightweight gradient lattice structures in additive manufacturing parts,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 6. 2020. [CrossRef]
- D. Mahmoud and M. A. Elbestawi, “Lattice structures and functionally graded materials applications in additive manufacturing of orthopedic implants: A review,” Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, vol. 1, no. 2. 2017. [CrossRef]
- M. Muhammad, P. D. Nezhadfar, S. Thompson, A. Saharan, N. Phan, and N. Shamsaei, “A comparative investigation on the microstructure and mechanical properties of additively manufactured aluminum alloys,” Int. J. Fatigue, vol. 146, 2021. [CrossRef]
- D. M. and F. C. Carlo Giovanni Ferro, Sara Varetti, Fabio Vitti, Paolo Maggiore, Mariangela Lombardi, Sara Biamino, Paolo Fino, “DESIGN AND CHARACTERIZATION OF TRABECULAR STRUCTURES FOR A NEW DE-ICING PANEL USING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING.”.
- C. Zilio and L. Patricelli, “Aircraft anti-ice system: Evaluation of system performance with a new time dependent mathematical model,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 63, no. 1, 2014. [CrossRef]
- D. C. Montgomery, “Design and analysis of experiments.” Jojn Wiley & sons, INC, Arizona, p. 684.
- D. Lambert and M. Adler, “IN718 Additive Manufacturing Properties and Influences,” Addit. Manuf. Consort. Meet., no. June, 2014.
- K. Y. G. McCullough, N. A. Fleck, and M. F. Ashby, “Stress-life fatigue behaviour of aluminum alloy foams,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., vol. 23, no. 3, 2000. [CrossRef]
- S. Zhao, S. J. Li, W. T. Hou, Y. L. Hao, R. Yang, and R. D. K. Misra, “The influence of cell morphology on the compressive fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 59, pp. 251–264, 2016. [CrossRef]
- M. DanZenkert, “Tension, compression and shear fatigue of a closed cell polymer foam,” Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 785–792, 2009.
- Y. Z. H. G. D. A.Lados, “Microstructure, static properties, and fatigue crack growth mechanisms in Ti-6Al-4V fabricated by additive manufacturing: LENS and EBM,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 69, pp. 3–14, 2016.
- Y. Li, M. Pavier, and H. Coules, “Compressive fatigue characteristics of octet-truss lattices in different orientations,” Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 27, pp. 6390–6402, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Y. Li, M. Pavier, and H. Coules, “Experimental study on fatigue crack propagation of octet-truss lattice,” in Procedia Structural Integrity, 2021, vol. 37, no. C. [CrossRef]
- M. F. Ashby, “The properties of foams and lattices,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 364, no. 1838, pp. 15–30, 2006. [CrossRef]










| Cell Type | Cell Size [mm] | Relative Density [%] |
|---|---|---|
| Bccz | 5 | 25 |
| Bccz | 5 | 30 |
| Bccz | 7 | 30 |
| Rhombic Dodecahedron | 5 | 25 |
| Rhombic Dodecahedron | 5 | 30 |
| Rhombic Dodecahedron | 7 | 30 |
| Octet Truss | 5 | 25 |
| Octet Truss | 5 | 30 |
| Octet Truss | 7 | 30 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).