Submitted:
08 February 2023
Posted:
10 February 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
RAD sequencing output
Genetic statistics and AMOVA
Genetic similarity (GS) estimates
Genetic structure reconstruction of the core collection
BLASTn-based RADtag mapping against Cichorium spp. exomes
CAPS assay and myb80-like/RADtag association investigation
Predicting progeny genotypes in planned selfing, full-sibling and pairwise crossing mating strategies
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
Plant Materials
RADseq analysis and data analysis
Data analysis and genetic statistics
BLASTn analysis and RADtag mapping
Cross-strategy planning for breeding purposes
CAPS screening essay for male-sterility identification
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bianchedi, A. I radicchi di Treviso: storia, coltivazione, forzatura e commercio. Ital. Agric. 1961, 98, 37–51. [Google Scholar]
- Pimpini, F.; Chillemi, G.; Lazzarin, R.; Bertolini, P.; Marchetti, C. Il Radicchio Rosso di Chioggia. Aspetti tecnici ed economici di produzione e conservazione; Veneto Agricoltura: Legnaro, Padova, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Lucchin, M.; Varotto, S.; Barcaccia, G.; Parrini, P. Chicory and Endive. In Vegetables I: asteraceae, brassicaceae chenopodi-caceae; Prohens, J., Nuez, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, 2008; Vol. 1, pp. 3–38. [Google Scholar]
- Barcaccia, G.; Ghedina, A.; Lucchin, M. Current Advances in Genomics and Breeding of Leaf Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Agriculture-Basel 2016, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basso, A.; Scariolo, F.; Negrisolo, E.; Lucchin, M.; Barcaccia, G. Molecular Relationships and Genetic Diversity Analysis of Venetian Radicchio (Leaf Chicory, Cichorium intybus subsp. intybus var. sylvestre, 2n = 2x = 18) Biotypes. Diversity 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varotto, S.; Pizzoli, L.; Lucchin, M.; Parrini, P. The incompatibility system in Italian red chicory (Cichorium intybus L). Plant Breed. 1995, 114, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barcaccia, G.; Varotto, S.; Soattin, M.; Lucchin, M.; Parrini, P. Genetic and molecular studies of sporophytic self-incompatibility in Cichorium intybus L. In Proceedings of Eucarpia meeting on Leafy Vegetables Genetics and Breeding; 2003.
- Barcaccia, G.; Pallottini, L.; Soattin, M.; Lazzarin, R.; Parrini, P.; Lucchin, M. Genomic DNA fingerprints as a tool for identifying cultivated types of radicchio (Cichorium intybus L.) from Veneto, Italy. Plant Breed. 2003, 122, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barcaccia, G.; Tiozzo Caenazzo, S. New male sterile Chicorium spp. mutant, parts or derivatives, where male sterility is due to a nuclear recessive mutation linked to a polymorphic genetic marker, useful for producing mutant F1 hybrids of Chicorium spp. WO2012163389-A1, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Barcaccia, G.; Tiozzo Caenazzo, S. New male sterile mutant of leaf chicory, including Radicchio, used to produce chicory plants and seeds with traits such as male-sterility exhibiting cytological phenotype with shapeless, small and shrunken microspores in dehiscent anthers. 2014. US2014157448-A1, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Palumbo, F.; Qi, P.; Pinto, V.B.; Devos, K.M.; Barcaccia, G. Construction of the First SNP-Based Linkage Map Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing and Mapping of the Male-Sterility Gene in Leaf Chicory. Front Plant Sci 2019, 10, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eenink, A.H. Gametic competition after mixed pollinations and double pollinations. In Compatibility and incompatibility in witloof-chicory (Cichorium intybus L.); Euphytica, 1982; Vol. 31, pp. 773–786. [Google Scholar]
- Eenink, A.H. Formation of self-seeds on a self-incompatible and a moderately self-compatible genotype after double and triple pollinations. In Compatibility and incompatibility in witloof chicory (Cichorium intybus L.); Euphytica, 1984; Vol. 33, pp. 161–167. [Google Scholar]
- Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge, G. The progamic phase in Cichorium intybus L. Pollen tube growth in the style, incompatibility reaction and gametophytic competition. Euphytica 1990, 48, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castaño, C.I.; Demeulemeester, M.A.C.; De Proft, M.P. Incompatibility reactions and genotypic identity status of five commercial chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) hybrids. Scientia Horticulturae 1997, 72, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patella, A.; Scariolo, F.; Palumbo, F.; Barcaccia, G. Genetic Structure of Cultivated Varieties of Radicchio (Cichorium intybus L.): A Comparison between F1 Hybrids and Synthetics. Plants (Basel) 2019, 8, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, D.F. Dominance of Linked Factors as a Means of Accounting for Heterosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1917, 3, 310–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cadalen, T.; Morchen, M.; Blassiau, C.; Clabaut, A.; Scheer, I.; Hilbert, J.L.; Hendriks, T.; Quillet, M.C. Development of SSR markers and construction of a consensus genetic map for chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Molecular Breeding 2010, 25, 699–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonthier, L.; Blassiau, C.; Morchen, M.; Cadalen, T.; Poiret, M.; Hendriks, T.; Quillet, M.C. High-density genetic maps for loci involved in nuclear male sterility (NMS1) and sporophytic self-incompatibility (S-locus) in chicory (Cichorium intybus L., Asteraceae). Theor Appl Genet 2013, 126, 2103–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muys, C.; Thienpont, C.N.; Dauchot, N.; Maudoux, O.; Draye, X.; Van Cutsem, P. Integration of AFLPs, SSRs and SNPs markers into a new genetic map of industrial chicory (Cichorium intybus L. var. sativum). Plant Breed. 2014, 133, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galla, G.; Ghedina, A.; Tiozzo, S.C.; Barcaccia, G. Toward a First High-quality Genome Draft for Marker-assisted Breeding in Leaf Chicory, Radicchio (Cichorium intybus L.). In Plant Genomics; Abdurakhmonov, I.Y., Ed.; IntechOpen, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghedina, A.; Galla, G.; Cadalen, T.; Hilbert, J.L.; Caenazzo, S.T.; Barcaccia, G. A method for genotyping elite breeding stocks of leaf chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) by assaying mapped microsatellite marker loci. BMC Res Notes 2015, 8, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simko, I.; Jia, M.Y.; Venkatesh, J.; Kang, B.C.; Weng, Y.Q.; Barcaccia, G.; Lanteri, S.; Bhattarai, G.; Foolad, M.R. Genomics and Marker-Assisted Improvement of Vegetable Crops. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2021, 40, 303–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elshire, R.J.; Glaubitz, J.C.; Sun, Q.; Poland, J.A.; Kawamoto, K.; Buckler, E.S.; Mitchell, S.E. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 2011, 6, e19379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poland, J.A.; Brown, P.J.; Sorrells, M.E.; Jannink, J.L. Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach. PLoS One 2012, 7, e32253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, J.; Zhao, X.; Laroche, A.; Lu, Z.X.; Liu, H.; Li, Z. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), an ultimate marker-assisted selection (MAS) tool to accelerate plant breeding. Front Plant Sci 2014, 5, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, Y.S.; Choi, S.C.; Jun, T.H.; Kim, C. Genotyping-by-Sequencing: a Promising Tool for Plant Genetics Research and Breeding. Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology 2017, 58, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilian, A.; Wenzl, P.; Huttner, E.; Carling, J.; Xia, L.; Blois, H.; Caig, V.; Heller-Uszynska, K.; Jaccoud, D.; Hopper, C.; et al. Diversity Arrays Technology: A Generic Genome Profiling Technology on Open Platforms. In Data Production and Analysis in Population Genomics: Methods and Protocols; Pompanon, F., Bonin, A., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, 2012; pp. 67–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, C.; Guo, H.; Kong, W.; Chandnani, R.; Shuang, L.S.; Paterson, A.H. Application of genotyping by sequencing technology to a variety of crop breeding programs. Plant Sci 2016, 242, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baird, N.A.; Etter, P.D.; Atwood, T.S.; Currey, M.C.; Shiver, A.L.; Lewis, Z.A.; Selker, E.U.; Cresko, W.A.; Johnson, E.A. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 2008, 3, e3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stevanato, P.; Broccanello, C.; Biscarini, F.; Del Corvo, M.; Sablok, G.; Panella, L.; Stella, A.; Concheri, G. High-Throughput RAD-SNP Genotyping for Characterization of Sugar Beet Genotypes. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2014, 32, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Q.; Ling, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Zhao, W.; Xiong, Y.; Dong, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X. RAD-seq as an effective strategy for heterogenous variety identification in plants-a case study in Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). BMC Plant Biol 2022, 22, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fan, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, A.; Jiang, F.; Liu, H.; Zhao, H.; Xu, D.; Zhang, Y. The genomes of chicory, endive, great burdock and yacon provide insights into Asteraceae palaeo-polyploidization history and plant inulin production. Mol Ecol Resour 2022, 22, 3124–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miller, M.R.; Dunham, J.P.; Amores, A.; Cresko, W.A.; Johnson, E.A. Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Res 2007, 17, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sica, P.; Galvao, A.; Scariolo, F.; Maucieri, C.; Nicoletto, C.; Pilon, C.; Sambo, P.; Barcaccia, G.; Borin, M.; Cabrera, M.; et al. Effects of Drought on Yield and Nutraceutical Properties of Beans (Phaseolus spp.) Traditionally Cultivated in Veneto, Italy. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mir, R.R.; Hiremath, P.J.; Riera-Lizarazu, O.; Varshney, R.K. Evolving Molecular Marker Technologies in Plants: From RFLPs to GBS. In Diagnostics in Plant Breeding; Lübberstedt, T., Varshney, R.K., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2013; pp. 229–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rochette, N.C.; Catchen, J.M. Deriving genotypes from RAD-seq short-read data using Stacks. Nat Protoc 2017, 12, 2640–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rohlf, F.J. NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System Version 2.1: Owner manual; Exeter Publishing: Setauket, New York, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 2006, 6, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Earl, D.A.; vonHoldt, B.M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2011, 4, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afgan, E.; Baker, D.; Batut, B.; van den Beek, M.; Bouvier, D.; Cech, M.; Chilton, J.; Clements, D.; Coraor, N.; Gruning, B.A.; et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2018, 46, W537–W544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scariolo, F.; Palumbo, F.; Vannozzi, A.; Sacilotto, G.B.; Gazzola, M.; Barcaccia, G. Genotyping Analysis by RAD-Seq Reads Is Useful to Assess the Genetic Identity and Relationships of Breeding Lines in Lavender Species Aimed at Managing Plant Variety Protection. Genes (Basel) 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heberle, H.; Meirelles, G.V.; da Silva, F.R.; Telles, G.P.; Minghim, R. InteractiVenn: a web-based tool for the analysis of sets through Venn diagrams. BMC Bioinformatics 2015, 16, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voorrips, R.E. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 2002, 93, 77–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.X.; Li, H.Y.; Li, Y.X. Identifying evolutionarily significant units for conservation of the endangered Malus sieversii using genome-wide RADseq data. Nordic Journal of Botany 2018, 36, e01733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, W.Q.; Ao, D.; Wuyun, T.N.; Wang, L.; Bai, Y.E. Development of 85 SNP markers for the endangered plant species Prunus mira (Rosaceae) based on restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2020, 12, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, K.R.; Good, J.M.; Miller, M.R.; Luikart, G.; Hohenlohe, P.A. Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2016, 17, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Du, X.; Yang, H.; Han, F.; Han, Y.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, L.; Peng, S.; Guo, E. A high-density genetic map and QTL analysis of agronomic traits in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.] using RAD-seq. PLoS One 2017, 12, e0179717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basak, M.; Uzun, B.; Yol, E. Genetic diversity and population structure of the Mediterranean sesame core collection with use of genome-wide SNPs developed by double digest RAD-Seq. PLoS One 2019, 14, e0223757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Pop ID | N | na | ne | Ho (%) | He (%) | F | PL (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pop1 | 15.00 | 1.56 | 1.43 | 25.96 | 23.43 | -0.10 | 56.48 |
| Pop2 | 17.00 | 1.36 | 1.27 | 16.33 | 14.02 | -0.14 | 36.23 |
| Pop3 | 37.00 | 1.54 | 1.38 | 17.17 | 20.77 | 0.17 | 54.01 |
| Pop4 | 25.00 | 1.37 | 1.21 | 12.09 | 11.93 | 0.07 | 37.45 |
| Mean | 23.50 | 1.46 | 1.32 | 17.89 | 17.54 | 0.01 | 46.05 |
| Hs | Ht | Fis | Fit | Fst | Nm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.63 |
| SE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Source | df | SS | MS | Est. Var. | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among Pops | 3 | 104,231 | 34,743 | 1,523 | 73.10 |
| Within Pops | 90 | 50,439 | 560 | 560 | 26.90 |
| Total | 93 | 154,671 | 2,083 | 100.00 |
| Obs. Homozygosity (%) | Population ID | Mean Genetic Similarity (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74.04 ± 0.31 | Pop1 | 82.33 ± 0.04 | |||
| 83.67 ± 0.15 | Pop2 | 76.60 ± 0.01 | 90.12 ± 0.01 | ||
| 82.83 ± 0.13 | Pop3 | 56.46 ± 0.00 | 54.13 ± 0.00 | 82.50 ± 0.01 | |
| 87.91 ± 0.13 | Pop4 | 62.59 ± 0.01 | 58.46 ± 0.00 | 54.08 ± 0.00 | 91.05 ± 0.01 |
| Pop1 | Pop2 | Pop3 | Pop4 | ||
| BLASTn results |
RADtags (n) | CDS (n) | Avg. ident (%) |
Avg. ident (n) | Avg. length (bp) | Avg. mis (n) |
Avg. E-value |
Avg. Bs | Avg. score | Ex. Spec. (n) | Ex. Spec. (%) | Shared (n/%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
C. intybus exome |
1,308 | 1,131 | 98.00 | 62.22 | 63.50 | 1.26 | 9.04E-13 | 109.60 | 120.55 | 224 | 15.15 | 1,084 / 73.29% |
|
C. endive exome |
1,255 | 1,071 | 97.23 | 61.91 | 63.70 | 1.74 | 4.24E-13 | 107.73 | 118.43 | 171 | 11.56 |
| P1 genotype* | P2 genotype* | P1×P2 avg. He |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 0/1 | 2 | 0.5 |
| 2 | 0/1 | 0.5 |
| 2 | 2 | 0.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).