Version 1
: Received: 17 October 2022 / Approved: 19 October 2022 / Online: 19 October 2022 (09:55:39 CEST)
How to cite:
Robinson, J.; Breed, A.; Camargo, A.; Redvers, N.; Breed, M. Biodiversity and Human Health: A Scoping Review and Case Studies on Underrepresented Linkages. Preprints2022, 2022100275. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0275.v1
Robinson, J.; Breed, A.; Camargo, A.; Redvers, N.; Breed, M. Biodiversity and Human Health: A Scoping Review and Case Studies on Underrepresented Linkages. Preprints 2022, 2022100275. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0275.v1
Robinson, J.; Breed, A.; Camargo, A.; Redvers, N.; Breed, M. Biodiversity and Human Health: A Scoping Review and Case Studies on Underrepresented Linkages. Preprints2022, 2022100275. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0275.v1
APA Style
Robinson, J., Breed, A., Camargo, A., Redvers, N., & Breed, M. (2022). Biodiversity and Human Health: A Scoping Review and Case Studies on Underrepresented Linkages. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0275.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Robinson, J., Nicole Redvers and Martin Breed. 2022 "Biodiversity and Human Health: A Scoping Review and Case Studies on Underrepresented Linkages" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0275.v1
Abstract
Mounting evidence supports the connections between exposure to environment types––such as green spaces and biodiversity––and human health. However, the mechanistic links that connect biodiversity (the variety of life) and human health, plus the level of supporting evidence, are less clear. Here, we undertook a scoping review to map the links between biodiversity and human health and summarise the levels of associated evidence using an established weight of evidence framework. Distinct from other reviews, we provide additional context regarding the environment-microbiome-health axis, evaluate the environmental buffering pathway (e.g., biodiversity impacts on air pollution), and draw upon expert opinion to provide case studies on three underrepresented linkages. The case studies include (1) biodiversity and Indigenous Peoples’ health, (2) biodiversity and urban social equity, and (3) biodiversity and COVID-19. We observed a moderate level of evidence to support the environmental microbiota-human health pathway and a moderate-high level of evidence to support broader nature pathways (e.g., green space) to various health outcomes, from stress reduction to enhanced wellbeing and improved social cohesion. However, studies of broader nature pathways did not typically include specific biodiversity metrics, indicating clear research gaps. Further research is required to understand the connections and causative pathways between biodiversity (e.g., using metrics such as taxonomy, diversity/richness, structure, and function) and health outcomes. There are well-established frameworks to assess the effects of broad classifications of nature on human health. These can assist future research in linking biodiversity metrics to human health outcomes. Our case studies on underrepresented linkages highlight the roles of biodiversity and its loss on urban lived experiences, infectious diseases, and Indigenous Peoples’ sovereignty and livelihoods. More research and awareness of these socioecological interconnections are needed.
Keywords
biodiversity; human health; green space; urban green space; microbiome; urban microbiome; COVID-19; EcoHealth; planetary health; nature connectedness
Subject
Biology and Life Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.