Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Review of Europe's Circular Economy in the Building Sector

Version 1 : Received: 11 September 2022 / Approved: 13 September 2022 / Online: 13 September 2022 (10:04:31 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Mrad, C.; Frölén Ribeiro, L. A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14211. Mrad, C.; Frölén Ribeiro, L. A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14211.

Abstract

This article evaluates Europe's building sector's circular economy (CE). This industry is respon-sible for 42% of energy consumption, more than 50% of extracted materials, 30% of Europe's wa-ter and waste generation, and 35% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study focuses on peer-reviewed articles from Scopus and Web of Science databases. Of the first 1750 publications, 2.9% were eligible for a full-text reading and analysis. Most of the trending studies, 92%, pro-mote the circular economy concept through construction materials rather than analyzing the im-pact of the construction sector on the environment and finding solutions for better implementa-tion, and 41% promote recycling and reuse as the only options. New Design solutions are in 12% of the studies, six-fold more than Law and Legislation, only 2%. Finding an optimal combination of assessing the life cycle of buildings and components and searching for different ways of man-aging the Construction and Demolition Waste at end-of-life is between 33% and 39%. Ultimately, one evaluated CE proposed frameworks for the building industry based on 10R principles varia-tions. One presents an alternative framework for a circular strategy for the building industry that focuses on Upcycling, replacing the Recover principle.

Keywords

Keywords: Circular economy; building sector; Europe

Subject

Engineering, Civil Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.