Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Application of Machine Learning Technique for Rainfall-Runoff Modelling of Highly Dynamic Watersheds

Version 1 : Received: 10 June 2022 / Approved: 13 June 2022 / Online: 13 June 2022 (03:29:36 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Singh, A.K.; Kumar, P.; Ali, R.; Al-Ansari, N.; Vishwakarma, D.K.; Kushwaha, K.S.; Panda, K.C.; Sagar, A.; Mirzania, E.; Elbeltagi, A.; Kuriqi, A.; Heddam, S. An Integrated Statistical-Machine Learning Approach for Runoff Prediction. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8209. Singh, A.K.; Kumar, P.; Ali, R.; Al-Ansari, N.; Vishwakarma, D.K.; Kushwaha, K.S.; Panda, K.C.; Sagar, A.; Mirzania, E.; Elbeltagi, A.; Kuriqi, A.; Heddam, S. An Integrated Statistical-Machine Learning Approach for Runoff Prediction. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8209.

Abstract

Nowadays, great attention has been attributed to the study of runoff and its fluctuation over space and time. There is a crucial need for a good soil and water management system to overcome the challenges of water scarcity and other natural adverse events like floods and landslides, among others. Rainfall-runoff modeling is an appropriate approach for runoff prediction, making it possible to take preventive measures to avoid damage caused by natural hazards such as floods. In the present study, several data driven models, namely: Multiple linear regression (MLR), Multiple adaptive regression splines (MARS), Support vector machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), were used for rainfall-runoff prediction of the Gola watershed, located in the south-eastern part of the Uttarakhand. The performance of the models was evaluated based on the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and percent bias (PBAIS) indices. In addition to the numerical comparison, the models were evaluated and their performances were evaluated base on graphical plotting, i.e., line diagram, scatter plot, Violin plot, relative error plot and Taylor diagram (TD). The comparison results revealed that the four heuristic methods gave higher accuracy than the MLR model. Among the machine learning models, the RF (RMSE (m3/s), R2, NSE, and PBIAS (%) = 6.31, 0.96, 0.94, and -0.20 during the training period, respectively, and 5.53, 0.95, 0.92, and -0.20 during the testing period, respectively) surpassed the MARS, SVM, and the MLR models in forecasting daily runoff for all cases studies. Among all four models, the RF model outperformed in the training and testing periods. It can be summarized that the RF model is best-in-class and delivers a strong potential for runoff prediction of the Gola watershed.

Keywords

MARS; SVM; RF; rainfall; runoff; rainfall-runoff modelling

Subject

Engineering, Civil Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.